Search

BackgroundMental disorders pose a high risk for the occurrence of sexual dysfunctions (SD). This study aimed to investigate prevalence of risk factors and help-seeking behavior for sexual dysfunctions in patients with opioid use disorder compared to patients seeking psychotherapeutic help.MethodsNinety-seven patients at two opioid agonist treatment (OAT) centers and 65 psychotherapeutic patients from a psychiatric practice (PP) in Switzerland were included in the study. Self-report assessments comprised sexual functioning (IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function; FSFI: Female Sexual Function Index), depressive state, psychological distress, alcohol consumption, nicotine use, and a self-designed questionnaire on help-seeking behavior. We used chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests for group comparisons and binary logistic regression models to identify variables predicting the occurrence of sexual dysfunctions.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.140) in the prevalence of SD between OAT (n = 64, 66.0%) and PP sample (n = 35, 53.8%). OAT patients scored significantly higher in scales assessing nicotine use (p

Background and AimsSexual dysfunctions (SDs) show a marked impact on a person’s general wellbeing. Several risk-factors like physical and mental illnesses as well as alcohol and tobacco use have to date been identified to contribute to the occurrence of SDs. The impact of opioid-agonist treatment (OAT) on SDs remains unclear, with some studies demonstrating an improvement after methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) initiation. However, no studies on the prevalence and predictors of SDs in heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) exist to date.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with patients from a MMT center (n = 57) and a center specializing in HAT (n = 47). A control group of patients with mild transient illnesses (n = 67) was recruited from a general practitioner (GP). The International Index of Erectile Function, the Female Sexual Function Index, as well as measurements for psychological distress, depressive state, nicotine dependence, and high-risk alcohol use were employed. Patients also completed a self-designed questionnaire on help-seeking behavior regarding sexual health. Mann-Whitney-U tests and chi-square tests were performed for group comparisons and binary logistic regression models were calculated.ResultsTwenty-five percent of the GP sample (n = 17), 70.2% (n = 40) of the MMT sample, and 57.4% (n = 27) of the HAT sample suffered from SDs at the time of study conduction. OAT patients differed significantly from GP patients in depressive state, high-risk alcohol use, nicotine dependence, and psychological distress. Age, depressive state, and opioid dependence predicted the occurrence of SDs in the total sample. No differences between OAT and GP patients were found regarding help-seeking behavior.DiscussionAge, depressive state, and opioid dependence predicted the occurrence of SDs in the total sample. It remains unclear whether SDs are caused by opioid intake itself or result from other substance-use related lifestyle factors, that were not controlled for in this study. A lack of help-seeking behavior was observed in our sample, underlining the importance of clinicians proactively inquiring about the sexual health of their patients.ConclusionThe high prevalence of SDs observed in MMT does not differ from the prevalence in HAT. Clinicians should actively inquire about their patients’ sexual health in GP and OAT centers alike.

Open doors in psychiatry have been a subject of controversy in recent years. While some studies postulate the clinical necessity of closed doors, others challenge the theoretical advantages of this setting, mention numerous drawbacks of closed wards, and focus on the advantages of open-door settings. With regard to patients diagnosed with substance use disorders (SUD), other standards may apply. Very little research has been done on this topic. Some studies adopted a consumer perspective (i.e. asking involved parties about their experience of the door status). To the authors’ knowledge, no study has so far addressed the ideal setting for the treatment of SUD. With our data from the opening of a specialized SUD ward, we take one step to closing this knowledge gap. Applying a qualitative design, we asked patients and health care professionals (HCP) to report changes following the opening of the ward. The results are mainly in line with the literature on the general psychiatric population. The newly introduced open-door setting was mostly perceived as positive, but some disadvantages were mentioned (e.g. less protection of patients, less control over who enters/leaves the ward, the theoretically increased risk of patients absconding). Moreover, HCP (but not patients) mentioned potentially increased substance use on the ward as an additional disadvantage that could arise. Opening a previously closed ward was generally perceived as a positive and progressive decision. These findings support the trend towards an overall open-door policy in psychiatry.