Search

BackgroundWaldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare and indolent B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with greater incidence in elderly patients where a precise algorithm of initial therapy is still not clear. Immunochemotherapy regimen consisting of dexamethasone, rituximab, and oral cyclophosphamide (DRC) is considered a suitable first-line treatment because of its safety, efficacy, and manageability.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively describe the results of 36 consecutive treatment-naïve patients with WM who were treated from June 2013 until June 2021 with the DRC regimen every 4 weeks instead of 3 weeks, for six cycles. The median age was 69 years (range, 42–85 years), with one-third being older than 75 years. Most patients had features of advanced disease, with nearly 60% being high risk. Median IgM level prior to treatment initiation was 2.9 g/dL.ResultsOverall response rate was 80% after a median time of two cycles, with 67% of patients achieving at least partial response. After a median follow-up of 59 months, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached and the median time to next treatment (TTNT) was 48 months (95% CI 25–87 months). Approximately 70% of the evaluable study population had a 3-year survival without additional treatment, while 75% had a 3-year OS rate. The treatment was well-tolerated with only two patients (6%) recorded to have grade 3 pneumonia and no grade 3 hematological toxicity maybe due to the regular use of growth factors for red and white blood cells. Baseline albumin level and achievement of at least minimal or partial response had a significant impact on TTNT, while baseline hemoglobin and IgA level affected outcome in terms of OS (p < 0.05).ConclusionThis is the first real-life experience describing the use of the DRC regimen in treatment-naive patients with WM with administration of therapy every 4 weeks instead of 3 weeks showing apparent comparable efficacy, along with good tolerability and safety, especially in terms of hematological toxicity, independently from comorbidity burden.

BackgroundThe anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab is approved as a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who received at least three prior lines of therapy, including proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory agent. A retrospective multicentric study was designed to evaluate feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of daratumumab in monotherapy in RRMM.MethodsThis study included 44 consecutive RRMM patients that underwent daratumumab monotherapy after a median number of four prior therapies (range 2–9). Patients were treated in seven Sicilian centers, as part of Sicilian Myeloma Network and three Calabrian centers outside of controlled clinical trials from August 2016 through July 2020.ResultsThe regimen was well tolerated with few grade 3–4 haematological and rare non-haematological adverse events, such as pneumonia. Definitive discontinuation was due to disease progression in 25 (57%) patients. Since three patients did not complete at least one full cycle, a total of 41 patients was evaluated for response. Overall response rate was 37%, and the disease control rate (stable disease or better) was high (73%). The best achieved responses within 6 months were very good partial remission or better (27%), partial remission (10%), minimal response (14%) and stable disease (22%). After a median follow up of 7.8 months, median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months and overall survival (OS) 7.8 months. Univariate analysis showed that patients with PR or better after 6 months of therapy had longer median PFS and OS (respectively 29.5 vs 3.6 months, p=0.0001 and 30.6 vs 3.9 months p=0.0001), confirmed by multivariate analysis. Furthermore, standard cytogenetic risk and biochemical relapse type had prolonged median PFS, but not OS (respectively unreached vs 2.6, p=0.03 and 23.9 vs 6.2, p=0.05) in both univariate and multivariate analysis. Additionally, univariate analysis showed that patients treated with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone prior to daratumumab had significantly shorter PFS compared to pomalidomide-dexamethasone (3.4 months vs 9.3 months, p=0.03), that multivariate analysis failed to confirm.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that daratumumab as single agent is safe and well-tolerated regimen in real-life, associated to prolonged PFS and OS in responding patients. No new safety signals were identified.

In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), successful treatment requires accurate molecular monitoring to evaluate disease response and provide timely interventions for patients failing to achieve the desired outcomes. We wanted to determine whether measuring BCR-ABL1 mRNA doubling-times (DTs) could distinguish inconsequential rises in the oncogene's expression from resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Thus, we retrospectively examined BCR-ABL1 evolution in 305 chronic-phase CML patients receiving imatinib mesylate (IM) as a first line treatment. Patients were subdivided in two groups: those with a confirmed rise in BCR-ABL1 transcripts without MR3.0 loss and those failing IM. We found that the DTs of the former patients were significantly longer than those of patients developing IM resistance (57.80 vs. 41.45 days, p = 0.0114). Interestingly, the DT values of individuals failing second-generation (2G) TKIs after developing IM resistance were considerably shorter than those observed at the time of IM failure (27.20 vs. 41.45 days; p = 0.0035). We next wanted to establish if decreases in BCR-ABL1 transcripts would identify subjects likely to obtain deep molecular responses. We therefore analyzed the BCR-ABL1 halving-times (HTs) of a different cohort comprising 174 individuals receiving IM in first line and observed that, regardless of the time point selected for our analyses (6, 12, or 18 months), HTs were significantly shorter in subjects achieving superior molecular responses (p = 0.002 at 6 months; p < 0.001 at 12 months; p = 0.0099 at 18 months). Moreover, 50 patients receiving 2G TKIs as first line therapy and obtaining an MR3.0 (after 6 months; p = 0.003) or an MR4.0 (after 12 months; p = 0.019) displayed significantly shorter HTs than individuals lacking these molecular responses. Our findings suggest that BCR-ABL1 DTs and HTs are reliable tools to, respectively, identify subjects in MR3.0 that are failing their assigned TKI or to recognize patients likely to achieve deep molecular responses that should be considered for treatment discontinuation.