Search

The instant blood-mediated inflammatory response (IBMIR) causes islet loss and compromises diabetes outcomes after total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplant (TPIAT). We previously reported a possible benefit of etanercept in maintaining insulin secretion 3 months post-TPIAT. Here, we report 2-year diabetes outcomes and peri-operative inflammatory profiles from a randomized trial of etanercept and alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT) in TPIAT. We randomized 43 TPIAT recipients to A1AT (90 mg/kg IV x6 doses, n = 13), etanercept (50 mg then 25 mg SQ x 5 doses, n = 14), or standard care ( n = 16). Inflammatory cytokines, serum A1AT and unmethylated insulin DNA were drawn multiple times in the perioperative period. Islet function was assessed 2 years after TPIAT with mixed meal tolerance test, intravenous glucose tolerance test and glucose-potentiated arginine induced insulin secretion. Cytokines, especially IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and MCP-1, were elevated during and after TPIAT. However, only TNFα differed significantly between groups, with highest levels in the etanercept group ( p = 0.027). A1AT increased after IAT in all groups ( p < 0.001), suggesting endogenous upregulation. Unmethylated insulin DNA ratios (a marker of islet loss) and 2 years islet function testing were similar in the three groups. To conclude, we found no sustained benefit from administering etanercept or A1AT in the perioperative period., Competing Interests: MB declares research support from Dexcom and Viacyte; consulting/DSMB membership with Vertex, Insulet, and consulting for Emerging Therapy Solutions. BJH holds equity in and serves as a paid executive officer and director of Diabetes Fee, Inc., a company that may commercially benefit from the results of this research. This interest has been reviewed and managed by the University of Minnesota in accordance with its Conflict of Interest policies. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Abdel-Karim, Hodges, Herold, Pruett, Ramanathan, Hering, Dunn, Kirchner, Beilman and Bellin.)

Hepatic steatosis (HS) beyond a certain degree can jeopardize living donor (LD) safety, particularly in right lobe (RL) donors, making it a major obstacle for donor pool expansion in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). From July 2004 to June 2016, 58 LDs donated their RLs despite having moderate HS (30%-50% steatosis) determined by intraoperative biopsy at a single center. We performed greedy matching to compare the outcomes of the donors and recipients of this group with those of LDs with no HS. The mean left lobe (LL) HS value in the 58 cases was 20.9 ± 12.4%, which was significantly lower than the mean RL HS value (38.8 ± 6.7%, P < 0.001). The mean ratio of the remnant LL to the total liver volume was 37.8 ± 2.2. No differences were observed in the postoperative liver function and donor and recipient morbidity and mortality rates. The liver regeneration rates in recipients and donors at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively did not differ significantly. The patient and graft survival rates of the recipients showed no differences. The use of well-selected RL grafts with moderate steatosis does not impair graft function, recipient outcomes, or donor safety., (© 2021 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The Igls criteria assess islet function after islet allotransplant, based on C-peptide, insulin use, hemoglobin A1c, and severe hypoglycemia. However, these criteria as currently defined cannot be applied to total pancreatectomy islet autotransplant (TPIAT) patients. We tested modified criteria for assessing islet function in a large cohort of TPIAT patients (n = 379). Metabolic outcomes were assessed. We assigned Auto-Igls class to each patient as able and evaluated the utility, validity, and perioperative risk factors of Auto-Igls at 1-year post-IAT. We tested the association of Auto-Igls with independent measures of islet graft function, specifically continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data or acute C-peptide response to glucose (ACRglu) from intravenous glucose tolerance tests. An Auto-Igls class was assigned to 264 patients (69%). Among patients who could not be classified, most were missing exact insulin dose. Seventy-three percent of TPIAT recipients were classified as optimal or good at 1 year. The only significant predictor of Auto-Igls class was islet mass transplanted (P < 0.0001). Auto-Igls class was associated with percent time in range (70-140 mg/dl) on CGM (P = 0.02) and ACRglu (P < 0.0001). Modified Igls classification for IAT permits simple, comprehensive assessment of metabolic outcomes after TPIAT and is associated with other islet functional measures., (© 2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Organ donors are screened for the hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) and those with positive tests can be used under extended criteria donation. However, there is still a question of long-term organ viability. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of anti-HCV positive (HCV+) liver grafts. The US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Scientific Registry was reviewed for the period from April 1994 to February 6, 2008 and 56,275 liver transplantations were analyzed. In total, there were 19,496 HCV+ recipients and 934 HCV+ donors. Patient and graft survival were assessed accounting for both donor and recipient anti-HCV status. Multivariable proportional hazards survival models were developed to adjust for factors known to affect post-transplant survival. With anti-HCV negative (HCV-) recipient/HCV- donor as the reference, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was similar for HCV+ recipient/HCV- donor compared with HCV+ recipient/HCV+ donor (1.176 vs. 1.165, P = 0.91). Our results suggest that HCV+ liver donors do not subject the HCV+ recipient to an increased risk for death over the HCV- donor, keeping in mind that careful donor and recipient selection is critical for the proper use of these extended criteria donors., (© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 European Society for Organ Transplantation.)

With the implementation of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system, the number of combined liver-kidney transplants (CLKT) has increased dramatically. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) dataset was analysed for adult recipients with renal failure for the period between February 2002 and April 2006. This group was subdivided into patients on hemodialysis (HD) and to those not on HD prior to transplantation. All recipients in renal failure (serum creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dl) at the time of transplantation were included. A total of 1397 subjects were in renal failure but not on HD (18% received a CLKT, 82% underwent LT alone). Another 1740 subjects were on HD prior to transplantation (41% received a CLKT while 59% received a LT). In dialysis-dependent recipients, Cox regression analysis demonstrated CLKT had an independent protective effect. In subjects on HD, CLKT had improved survival at 1 year (79.4 vs. 73.7%, P = 0.004). In patients in renal failure without HD, CLKT was not protective. CLKT subjects had a nonsignificant difference in survival as compared with patients who had undergone liver transplantation alone, at 1 year (81.0% vs. 78.8%, P > 0.10). In subjects undergoing CLKT, there was improved survival at 1 year as compared with LT-alone patients on hemodialysis; however, in patients with renal failure, but not on hemodialysis, there was no difference in survival when comparing CLKT to LT-alone.

Advanced age has been shown to be a risk factor for survival in primary liver transplantation. We sought to determine the independent influence of recipient age on retransplantation survival. The UNOS dataset was analyzed for adult, nonstatus 1, liver retransplantations since February 27, 2002. The univariate effect of age on 90-day and 1-year survival was analyzed. Multivariate survival models were used to determine 90-day, 1-year, and overall survival. Recipient age, donor age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and hepatitis C status were used to construct multivariable survival models. Some 2141 liver retransplantations were analyzed. Overall, increasing recipient age was independently predictive of increasing mortality after liver retransplantation. In recipients between 18 and 60, there remained a direct relationship between age and mortality. However, in recipients aged over 60, increasing age was not independently associated with 90-day mortality (P = 0.88) and 1-year mortality (P = 0.74), despite adjusting for donor age, MELD score, and viral hepatitis status, suggesting that their original liver condition, their co-morbidities or perioperative condition plays an important role in retransplantation survival. Increasing recipient age up to 60, adversely affects liver retransplantation survival. After 60, there are no additional risks. Advanced age alone should not be an exclusionary factor when considering liver retransplantation; only the overall ability of the patient to tolerate a major surgery should be the determining factor.

Fungi cause severe infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Recently, a shift towards non-Aspergillus filamentous fungal infections (nAFFI) was noticed. In a series of 2878 SOTs (kidney, pancreas, islets, liver, heart, lung, and bowel) performed between January 1995 and December 2006 at the Innsbruck medical university, eleven cases of nAFFI were diagnosed. The encountered species included Zygomyzetes (n = 8), and Alternaria alternate, Pseudallescheria boydii, Trichoderma spp. (one each); there were three liver and three heart, one intestinal, pancreas, lung, bilateral forearm and renal recipient each. Five patients died from nAFFI (zygomycosis: 4, Pseudallerichia boydii: 1); four were diagnosed postmortem. In five cases infection was surgically treated in combination with antifungals. Risk factors for nAFFI were renal failure (73%) and intensified immunosuppression (73%); two cases were associated with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, one with graft versus host disease. An increase in the incidence of nAFFI was observed parallel to introduction of caspofungin and voriconazole (three cases until 12/2003, seven cases thereafter). NAFFI are increasingly found in SOT recipients. If diagnosed in time, the outcome seems acceptable. Intensified immunosuppression and exposure to antifungals not active against zygomycetes may be risk factors. Surgical therapy may play an important role in these infections.

Several laboratories have resorted to flow-cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) in an effort to prevent hyperacute and accelerated renal allograft rejections. The currently employed FCXM has problems with both false-positive and -negative reactions, largely as a result of irrelevant IgG binding to Fc IgG receptors. In 1980, we circumvented this problem by digesting Fc IgG receptors with pronase, and demonstrated that, with immunofluorescence microscopy (IF), detection of IgG anti-HLA antibodies was highly sensitive and specific. In 1995, we introduced the pronase technique to FCXM and showed that this enzyme did not decrease HLA expression. We present herein a prospective study at our institution to determine whether FCXM using pronase-digested (PD) lymphocytes is as sensitive and more specific than FCXM with undigested (UD) lymphocytes when compared with the highly sensitive and specific IF assay. In analyzing the 186 donor-specific pre-renal-transplant crossmatches, we found that PD FCXM was as sensitive and specific as IF and was able to detect weak IgG anti-HLA antibodies that bound to B cells. Fourteen of these patients would have been denied transplants if one were to have relied on UD FCXM. The data clearly indicate that PD FCXM can reliably be used to detect weak IgG anti-HLA antibodies before renal transplantation.