Search

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and prediabetes are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), when diagnosed by an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) display low concordance with the oGTT in the early phase posttransplant. For this prospective cross-sectional pilot study, 41 KTR from years one to five after transplantation without known preexisting PTDM (defined by HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (NGSP) or 48 mmol/mol (IFCC) at last visit or glucose-lowering therapy) were recruited at the Charité Transplant Outpatient Clinic. For each study participant HbA1c, FPG and an oGTT were followed by CGM. 38 of the 41 patients recruited had sufficient CGM-recordings (≥10 days). PTDM and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), as defined by the gold standard oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT)-derived 2-h plasma glucose (2hPG), were diagnosed in one (3%) and twelve (32%) patients, respectively. HbA1c exhibited good test characteristics regarding IGT (ROC-AUC: 0.87); sensitivity/specificity of HbA1c-threshold 5.7% (NGSP) or 39 mmol/mol (IFCC) were 1.0/0.64, respectively. Best performing CGM-readouts mean sensor glucose and percent of time >140 mg/dL (%TAR (140 mg/dL)) displayed acceptable diagnostic performance (ROC-AUC: 0.78 for both). Thus, HbA1c can aid in timely diagnosis of IGT in the stable phase after kidney transplantation., Competing Interests: GE received travel support from Chiesi. MN received research funding from Berlin Institute of Health; travel support from Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nephrologie; lecture honoraria from Novartis, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nephrologie. BO received travel support from Oncocyte. FH received grants from MSD, Hansa Pharma, Chiesi; consulting fees from Orifarm, Sanofi; honoraria from Hansa Pharma, Thermo Fischer, Aey Congresse; travel support from Hansa Pharma and is part of the advisory board of TolerogenixX TOL-2 Study. MC received grants from DFG, BMBF, EKFS Exzellenzstipendium; honoraria from Alexion, AstraZeneca, Berliner Dialyseseminar, Freunde der Berliner Charité, GSK, Novartis. KB received grants/contracts from Alexion, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, CSL Behring, MSD, Otsuka, Stada, Takeda; consulting fees from Alcuris, Alexion, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Carealytics, CareDx, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Fresenius, Hansa, HiBio, MSD, Natera, Neovii, Paladin, Pfizer, Pirche, Sanofi, Stada, Takeda, Veloxis, Vifor, Xenothera; honoraria from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Fresenius, MSD, Paladin, Sanofi, Takeda; travel support from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, HiBio, MSD, Neovii, Paladin, Stada, Takeda, Veloxis; is part of the advisory board of Alcuris, Alexion, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Carealytics, CareDx, Chiesi, CSL Behring, HiBio, MSD, Natera, Neovii, Paladin, Pfizer, Stada, Takeda, Veloxis, Vifor and has a leader or fiduciary role for Deutsche Transplantationsgesellschaft, Eurotransplant The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Eleftheriadis, Naik, Osmanodja, Liefeldt, Halleck, Choi, Schrezenmeier, Zukunft, Tura and Budde.)

The number of patients returning to dialysis after graft failure increases. Surprisingly, little is known about the clinical and immunological outcomes of this cohort. We retrospectively analyzed 254 patients after kidney allograft loss between 1997 and 2017 and report clinical outcomes such as mortality, relisting, retransplantations, transplant nephrectomies, and immunization status. Of the 254 patients, 49% had died 5 years after graft loss, while 27% were relisted, 14% were on dialysis and not relisted, and only 11% were retransplanted 5 years after graft loss. In the complete observational period, 111/254 (43.7%) patients were relisted. Of these, 72.1% of patients were under 55 years of age at time of graft loss and only 13.5% of patients were ≥65 years. Age at graft loss was associated with relisting in a logistic regression analysis. In the complete observational period, 42 patients (16.5%) were retransplanted. Only 4 of those (9.5%) were ≥65 years at time of graft loss. Nephrectomy had no impact on survival, relisting, or development of dnDSA. Patients after allograft loss have a high overall mortality. Immunization contributes to long waiting times. Only a very limited number of patients are retransplanted especially when ≥65 years at time of graft loss., (© 2021 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT.)

Proteinuria and transplant glomerulopathy (TG) are common in kidney transplantation. To date, there is limited knowledge regarding proteinuria in different types of TG and its relationship to allograft survival. A retrospective cohort analysis of TG patients from indication biopsies was performed to investigate the relationship of proteinuria, histology, and graft survival. One hundred and seven (57.5%) out of 186 TG patients lost their grafts with a median survival of 14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 10-22] months after diagnosis. Proteinuria ≥1 g/24 h at the time of biopsy was detected in 87 patients (46.8%) and the median of proteinuria was 0.89 (range 0.05-6.90) g/24 h. TG patients with proteinuria ≥1 g/24 h had worse 5-year graft survival (29.9% vs. 53.5%, P = 0.001) compared with proteinuria <1 g/24 h. Proteinuria was associated with graft loss in univariable Cox regression [hazard ratio (HR) 1.25, 95% CI, 1.11-1.41, P < 0.001], and in multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.42, P < 0.001) independent of other risk factors including creatinine at biopsy, positive C4d, history of rejection, and Banff lesion score mesangial matrix expansion. In this cohort of TG patients, proteinuria at indication biopsy is common and associated with a higher proportion of graft loss., (© 2020 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT.)

eHealth ("electronic" Health) is a new field in medicine that has the potential to change medical care, increase efficiency, and reduce costs. In this review, we analyzed the current status of eHealth in transplantation by performing a PubMed search over the last 5 years with a focus on clinical studies for post-transplant care. We retrieved 463 manuscripts, of which 52 clinical reports and eight randomized controlled trials were identified. Most studies were on kidney (n = 19), followed by liver (n = 10), solid organ (n = 7), bone-marrow (n = 6), and lung transplantation (n = 6). Eleven articles included adolescents/children. Investigated eHealth features covered the whole spectrum with mobile applications for patients (n = 24) and video consultations (n = 18) being most frequent. Prominent topics for patient apps were self-management (n = 16), adherence (n = 14), symptom-reporting (11), remote monitoring of vital signs (n = 8), educational (n = 7), and drug reminder (n = 7). In this review, we discuss opportunities and strengths of such new eHealth solutions, the implications for successful implementation into the healthcare process, the human factor, data protection, and finally, the need for better evidence from prospective clinical trials in order to confirm the claims on better patient care, potential efficiency gains and cost savings., (© 2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)