Search

Background Haplotypes A1 and A3 in the endothelial protein C receptor gene are tagged by the 4678G/C and 4600A/G polymorphisms, respectively, and have been reported to influence the risk of venous thromboembolism. We assessed whether these haplotypes modify the risk of premature myocardial infarction. Design and Methods We genotyped these polymorphisms in 689 patients with premature myocardial infarction and 697 control subjects. Activated protein C and soluble endothelial protein C receptor levels were also measured. Results After adjustment for other cardiovascular risk factors, A1 and A3 haplotypes protected against premature myocardial infarction (odds ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.4–0.8, p =0.044 and 0.5, 0.3–0.6, p

Haplotypes A1 and A3 in the endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) gene are tagged by 4678G/C and 4600A/G respectively. We assessed whether these haplotypes modify the risk of venous thromboembolism in carriers of the prothrombin 20210A allele.We genotyped 4678G/C and 4600A/G in 246 20210A carriers: 84 venous thromboembolism propositi and 162 relatives (13 symptomatic), and in 140 relatives not carrying the 20210A variant. Prothrombin and soluble EPCR (sEPCR) levels were also measured.Among propositi, the mean age at first onset was lower in carriers (35 +/- 8 years) than non-carriers of the 4600G allele (44 +/- 14 years) (p = 0.004). The probability of being free of thrombosis at age 40 was lower in 20210A carriers with the EPCR 4600G allele (p = 0.015). The frequency of the 4600G allele (p=0.002) and the levels of prothrombin antigen (p = 0.002) and sEPCR (p0.001) were higher in the propositi than in their asymptomatic relatives. Multivariate analyses showed that the presence of the 4600G allele (OR = 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.3-5.0), sEPCR147 ng/mL (2.8, 1.5-5.2) and prothrombin129% (3.8, 1.8-8.3) all increased the thrombotic risk. In bivariate analysis, including the 4600G allele and sEPCR147 ng/mL, only the latter remained associated with risk.These results show that in 20210A carriers the venous thromboembolism risk is influenced both by the actual prothrombin levels and by the EPCR A3 haplotype, via its effect on sEPCR levels.

Background Routine analyses for thrombophilia include determination of the presence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210A polymorphisms. However, the usefulness of these determinations is controversial and the clinical benefit remains questioned because of the moderate risk of associated thrombosis in carriers. In the search for clusters of thrombotic risk factors to estimate individual risk better, we studied the effect of AB0 blood group, a highly prevalent factor with mild prothrombotic features, on the risk and severity of venous and arterial thromboses in carriers of these polymorphisms.Design and Methods We genotyped the AB0 blood group in 981 carriers of factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210A polymorphisms. In order to avoid the over-representation of a particular genotype and to suppress confounding factors, we included only non-related heterozygous carriers without additional genetic risk factors. We studied 609 patients with venous thromboembolism (287 with factor V Leiden, and 322 with prothrombin 20210A), 174 patients with myocardial infarction (78 with factor V Leiden, and 96 with prothrombin 20210A), and 198 controls (96 with factor V Leiden, and 102 with prothrombin 20210A).Results Non-OO blood group did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction in carriers of factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210A. However, non-OO blood group contributed significantly to the expression of venous thrombosis associated with both factor V Leiden (OR: 1.76; 95%CI: 1.06–2.91) and prothrombin 20210A (OR: 2.17; 95%CI: 1.33–3.53). Exclusion of A2A2 and A2O from the non-00 blood group (because factor VIII-von Willebrand factor levels are similar in these and the 00 blood group) increased the thrombotic risk. Finally, non-OO blood group was associated with an earlier onset in symptomatic carriers of these polymorphisms.Conclusions Our study suggests that non-OO blood group increases the risk and severity of venous thrombosis in carriers of prothrombotic polymorphisms. Thus, AB0 phenotyping or genotyping analyses may be valuable components in assessing future thrombophilic risk profiles and might have implications for the policy of thrombosis prophylaxis and treatment.