Search

Introduction: Parenteral nutrition, usually indicated for preterm infants with a birthweight<1500 g and sick newborns, enables the supply with critical nutrients. As a high degree of therapy safety is required, a European guideline provides recommendations for safe therapy procedures. The present project aimed to evaluate the implementation of the European guideline in German perinatal centers and to identify possible barriers that impede its implementation. A further goal was to develop solution approaches to overcome possible barriers., Methods and Results: A multidisciplinary cooperation conducted an online survey questioning the current implementation procedures of the European guideline among pediatricians and hospital pharmacists. Results show barriers in the provisioning process of parenteral nutrition that hinder a guideline-compliant implementation in practice. Based on results of this survey, an expert network developed an interactive toolkit with simplified guideline recommendations, guideline-compliant advice for practice, best-practice examples, forms, and handouts. It seeks to encourage critical reflection of routine processes and provides concrete solutions to overcome barriers in practice., Conclusion: The current procedures related to parenteral nutrition deviate from guideline recommendations. The developed toolkit provides practice-oriented support aiming to enhance the guideline-compliant implementation of parenteral nutrition in perinatal centers., Competing Interests: EFCNI erhielt einen Educational Grant von Baxter zur Projektdurchführung. Es bestehen keine weiteren Interessenskonflikte., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: The extensive use of antibiotics is reflected by an increasing prevalence of infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria, including third-generation cephalosporin-resistant bacteria (3GCRB). For neonatal intensive care units screening and enhanced barrier precautions are recommended to control the spread of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, while evidence for efficacy of barrier precautions remains scarce in a non-outbreak setting., Objective: To determine the impact of a screening program for maternal 3GCRB colonization and the effects of contact precautions and cohort nursing, concerning the risk of neonatal late-onset sepsis (LOS) and antibiotic use rates (AURs)., Study Design: In a retrospective matched-pair cohort study, data of neonates exposed to maternal 3GCRB colonization were compared with findings in non-exposed neonates., Results: Of 3,144 neonates admitted, 184 neonates born to 3GCRB-positive mothers were eligible. Among them, 37 (20%) became 3GCRB positive during hospital stay. 3GCRB-exposed infants had a lower rate of LOS (6.5 vs. 14.1%, p=0.03) and lower AURs in that time period compared to controls (mean 0.009 vs. 0.025, p=0.006). When started within the first 72h after birth, days of therapy with meropenem were significantly lower in non-exposed vs. 3GCRB-exposed infants (mean 0.13 vs. 0.42; p=0.002). No invasive infections with 3GCRB occurred., Conclusions: Neonates of 3GCRB-positive mothers do not have an increased a priori risk for invasive 3GCRB infection and may benefit from enhanced contact precautions measures., Hintergrund: Der zunehmende Einsatz von Antibiotika führt zu einem Anstieg von Infektionen mit multiresistenten Erregern wie z. B. Drittgeneration Cephalosporin-resistenten Bakterien (3GCRB). Empfehlungen zu Screening- und Kohortierungsmaßnahmen auf neonatologischen Intensivstationen zielen auf die Prävention von horizontaler Transmission und invasiven Infektionen ab. Für Nicht-Ausbruchssituationen ist die Evidenz für Hygienemaßnahmen und Screeningprogrammen unzureichend. ZIEL: Evaluation eines Screening für mütterliche 3GCRB-Besiedlung mit nachfolgender Isolation bzw. Kohortenpflege des Neugeborenen (NG) unter Bezug auf das Risiko einer Late-Onset-Sepsis (LOS) und die Anzahl der Antibiotika-Tage (AUR)., Studiendesign: In einer retrospektiven Fall-Kontroll-Kohortenstudie wurden Daten von NG mit maternaler 3GCRB-Besiedelung im Vergleich zu einer Kontrollgruppe mit unauffälligem Screening analysiert., Ergebnisse: In einer Kohorte von 3144 NG fanden sich 184 NG von 3GCRB-besiedelten Müttern. Bei 37 (20%) wurde im Verlauf eine Besiedelung mit 3GCRB nachgewiesen. In der Gruppe der 3GCRB-exponierten NG kam es seltener zu einer LOS (6,5 vs. 14,1%, p=0,03). Zwischen dem 4. Lebenstag und der Entlassung hatten 3GCRB-exponierte NG eine niedrigere AUR (Mittelwert 0,009 vs. 0,025, p=0,006) als die Kontrollgruppe. Die Behandlungstage mit Meropenem (Start in den ersten 3 Lebenstagen), war in der Kontrollgruppe signifikant geringer als in der 3GCRB-exponierten Gruppe (Mittelwert 0,13 vs. 0,43 Tage; p=0,002). In beiden Gruppen trat keine invasive Infektion mit 3GCRB auf., Schlussfolgerung: Neugeborene, deren Mütter 3GCRB besiedelt sind, haben kein erhöhtes a priori Risiko für eine invasive Infektion mit 3GCRB Erregern und profitieren wahrscheinlich von erweiterten Kohortierungs- und Isolationsmaßnahmen., Competing Interests: C. Dame is member of the Neonatology Group of the Commission for Hospital Hygiene, Infection Prevention and Control (KRINKO) of the Federal Robert-Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin, Germany. All other authors report no conflict of interest relevant to this article., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Infants with very low birthweight (< 1 500 g, VLBW) are at increased risk for nosocomial infections (NI). In 2 000, we implemented a surveillance system for VLBW infants in Germany: NEO-KISS. In 2005, a joint committee of healthcare providers and insurance companies required German neonatology departments to participate. As a result, NEO-KISS is now a nationwide surveillance system for NI in VLBW infants., Patients and Methods: We present NEO-KISS data collected between 2007 and 2011 by 228 neonatology departments. Rates of sepsis, pneumonia and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) were calculated. In order to evaluate the department-specific infection rate we introduced a new indicator: the Standardised Infection Rate (SIR). The SIR considers the department-specific patient distribution (based on the patients' birthweight) and describes the ratio of observed and expected infections (calculated from the reference data for this individual patient distribution). The data presented comprise 33 048 VLBW infants.The incidence density of CVC-associated sepsis 8.6 per 1 000 CVC-days., Results and Conclusion: The incidence of pneumonia among mechanically ventilated patients was 2.7/1 000 ventilator days. The incidence of NEC was 0.8. The SIR showed strong variation among the participating departments. It is an excellent tool for identifying outliers in nosocomial infection rates and for stimulating activities to decrease the risk of nosocomial infections., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: NEO-KISS is a national surveillance system generating reference data for nosocomial infections among very low birth weight infants (VLBW) and was established 2000 as a voluntary based system. Since 2006 exist an official decision that participation in NEO-KISS is a prerequisite for the care of VLBW at level III NICUs in Germany., Method: Comparing the reference data before and after the resolution and analysing the structure and the infection rates between the departments participating since 2006 (new-departments) and the neonatology departments participating voluntary before 2006 (old-departments)., Results: Since 2006 the number of participating departments increased clarion. The characteristic of the 110 new-departments differs from the 46 old-departments in many ways. The old-departments treated more VLBW per month, have more beds and are located at larger hospitals. The distribution of the treated VLBW shows a trend to lower birth-weights in the old-departments. However, the comparison of the reference data 2005, generated only from data from old-departments, shows no systematic changes to the reference data 2006 (including data from numerous new-departments). Also the comparison of the infection rates from for an identical time period separated for new and old-departments shows only minor differences., Conclusion: The inclusion of many new departments in NEO-KISS shows no influence to the reference data. And also the comparison of infection rates between new and old-departments shows no systematic discrepancy. It follows the unnecessary of separating the data from old-departments and new-departments and the appropriateness of the entire databank to generate the national reference data.