Search

Introduction: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have been classified according to the finding of ST-segment elevation on the presenting electrocardiogram, with different treatment strategies and practice guidelines. However, a comparative description of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention during index admission has not been published so far., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the Elderly ACS-2 multicenter randomized trial. Main outcome measures were crude cumulative incidence and cause-specific hazard ratio (cHR) of cardiovascular death, noncardiovascular death, reinfarction, and stroke., Results: Of 1443 ACS patients aged >75 years (median age 80 years, interquartile range 77-84), 41% were classified as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 59% had non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTEACS) (48% NSTEMI and 11% unstable angina). As compared with those with NSTEACS, STEMI patients had more favorable baseline risk factors, fewer prior cardiovascular events, and less severe coronary disease, but lower ejection fraction (45% vs 50%, P < .001). At a median follow-up of 12 months, 51 (8.6%) STEMI patients had died, vs 39 (4.6%) NSTEACS patients. After adjusting for sex, age, and previous myocardial infarction, the hazard among the STEMI group was significantly higher for cardiovascular death (cHR 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-3.36), noncardiovascular death (cHR 2.10; 95% CI, 1.01-4.38), and stroke (cHR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.7-13.7)., Conclusions: Despite more favorable baseline characteristics, elderly STEMI patients have worse survival and a higher risk of stroke compared with NSTEACS patients after percutaneous coronary intervention., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Defining short-term prognosis in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is challenging in clinical practice. Although left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) is a key prognostic marker in NICM there are few parameters able to predict it. We investigated whether a complete structural and functional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) evaluation was incremental to the classic clinical-echocardiographic approach in predicting LVRR in a large cohort of NICM patients receiving evidence-based treatment. Patients with a recent diagnosis of NICM (<3 months) who underwent complete clinical, echocardiographic and cMRI assessment were consecutively enrolled from 2008 to 2016. LVRR was defined as an increase in ≥10 points or normalization of left ventricular ejection fraction, associated with a ≥10% reduction or normalization of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter at midterm (median time 20 months) echocardiographic follow-up. Among 80 NICM patients included in the study, LVRR was observed in 43 (54%). At multivariate analysis, the clinical-echocardiographic evaluation failed to identify independent predictors of LVRR. However, absence of late gadolinium enhancement (odds ratio [OR] 9.07; confidence interval [CI] 2.7 to 13.1; p value 0.0003), left ventricular mass (OR 1.018; CI 1.001 to 1.036; p value 0.045) and peak circumferential strain (OR 1.213; CI 1.011 to 1.470; p value 0.049) assessed by cMRI were independently associated with LVRR. A model for LVRR prediction based on cMRI and clinical-echocardiographic parameters performed significantly better than the clinical-echocardiographic model alone (area under curve 0.84 vs 0.72; p value 0.023). In conclusion, an integrated imaging approach with the addition of a structural and functional cMRI study to the standard-of-care evaluation improves the prediction of LVRR in a large cohort of patients with recently diagnosed NICM receiving evidence-based treatment., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The prognostic relevance of direct contrast toxicity in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention remains unclear, owing to the confounding hemodynamic effect of acute left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) impairment on kidney function estimation. In the present study, 644 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled. Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) was defined as an increase in serum creatinine >25% or a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <25% from baseline in the first 72 hours. The primary end point of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year (composite of death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and bleeding). Among the global population, the interaction between the LVEF and eGFR at admission to define CIN was statistically significant (p <0.001). When only the 385 patients without acute LVEF impairment (i.e., those with LVEF ≥40%) were considered, 27 (7%) developed postprocedural CIN that was associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular events rate at 1 year of clinical follow-up (38% vs 9%; p <0.001). On adjusted Cox multivariate analysis, CIN was an independent predictor of worse outcomes, both when defined according to creatinine (hazard ratio 3.81, 95% confidence interval 1.71 to 8.48, p = 0.001) or eGFR (hazard ratio 3.77, 95% confidence interval 1.53 to 9.28, p = 0.004) variations. In conclusion, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, LVEF has a significant interaction with eGFR. When only patients without acute LVEF impairment were considered, CIN confirmed its negative prognostic effect on the 1-year clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Some patients diagnosed with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) are eventually found to have cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Accurate differentiation between these 2 conditions has implications for immunosuppressive therapy and familial screening. We sought to determine whether cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be used to identify the characteristic findings to accurately differentiate between CS and ARVC. Consecutive patients with a diagnostic MRI scan indicating CS and/or ARVC constituted the cohort. All patients diagnosed with CS had histologic confirmation of sarcoidosis, and all patients with ARVC met the diagnostic task force criteria. The cardiac MRI data were retrospectively analyzed to identify possible differentiating characteristics. Of the patients, 40 had CS and 21 had ARVC. Those with CS were older and had more left ventricular scar. The presence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy or left ventricular septal involvement was seen exclusively in the patients with CS (p <0.001). A family history of sudden cardiac death was seen only in the ARVC group (p = 0.012). The right ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular volumes were also significantly different between the 2 groups. In conclusion, patients with CS have significantly different cardiac MRI characteristics than patients with ARVC. The cardiac volume, in addition to the degree and location of cardiac involvement, can be used to distinguish between these 2 disease entities. The presence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and left ventricular septal scar favors a diagnosis of CS and not ARVC. Consideration of CS should be given if these MRI findings are observed during the evaluation for possible ARVC., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Sixty in-stent restenotic lesions were treated with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation and retrospectively compared with a group of matched lesions treated with cutting balloon angioplasty. The results indicate a good safety profile of the procedure and a 57% reduction in the incidence of recurrent restenosis in comparison with cutting balloon angioplasty.

The impact of the use of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in the treatment of in-stent restenosis in previously irradiated sites has not been adequately evaluated. Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions using SESs in lesion sites previously intervened with intracoronary radiation therapy were identified. All stents were implanted successfully, and there were no major in-hospital complications. At 30-day follow-up, there was 1 case of subacute thrombosis that led to target lesion revascularization (TLR). At 6 months, 2 patients underwent TLR because of recurrent angina with angiographic restenosis, and 1 patient underwent target vessel revascularization distally to the SES site; no other major adverse cardiac events occurred at long-term follow-up (mean 17 +/- 8 months).