Search

Background: Despite differing underlying pathophysiology, type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction share many of the same diagnostic criteria and can be challenging to differentiate in clinical practice. Correctly differentiating type 1 from type 2 myocardial infarction is important because they are managed differently. The aim of this study was to compare the patterns of rise of cardiac troponin (cTn) and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) in type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction., Methods: We analyzed retrospective data on 200 patients with myocardial infarction (97 with type 1, 103 with type 2), excluding patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The percentage rise from trough to peak values and the ratio of the peak to the upper limit of normal (RULN) were calculated for both cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and CK-MB. The ratio of peak cTnT to peak CK-MB was also calculated before and after adjusting for sex, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and infarct size., Results: Type 1 myocardial infarction tended to be larger than type 2 myocardial infarction, with a significantly higher mean percentage rise for both cTnT and CK-MB as well as higher mean RULN (207 vs 86 for cTnT, P = 0.02; 9 vs 4 for CK-MB, P = 0.002). There was a trend toward a higher rise of cTnT than CK-MB in type 2 compared with type 1 myocardial infarction, as demonstrated by the ratio of peak cTnT to peak CK-MB (0.09 in type 2 myocardial infarction vs 0.06 in type 1 myocardial infarction, P = 0.06). This difference persisted after adjusting for sex, GFR, and infarct size (P = 0.05)., Conclusion: Both cTnT and CK-MB rise higher in type 1 than in type 2 myocardial infarction. Meanwhile, cTnT tends to rise out of proportion to CK-MB in type 2 myocardial infarction. These patterns may have considerable implications for the differentiation and subsequent treatment of patients with type 1 versus type 2 myocardial infarction., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent reports indicate that statins are associated with an increased risk for new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) compared with placebo and that this relation is dose dependent. The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the impact of different types and doses of statins on new-onset DM. RCTs comparing different types and doses of statins with placebo were searched for using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. A search of RCTs pertinent to this meta-analysis covering the period from November 1994 to October 2012 was conducted by 2 independent investigators using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Embase databases as well as abstracts and presentations from major cardiovascular meetings. Seventeen RCTs reporting the incidence of new-onset DM during statin treatment and including a total of 113,394 patients were identified. The RCTs compared either a statin versus placebo or high-dose versus moderate-dose statin therapy. Among different statins, pravastatin 40 mg/day was associated with the lowest risk for new-onset DM compared with placebo (odds ratio 1.07, 95% credible interval 0.86 to 1.30). Conversely, rosuvastatin 20 mg/day was numerically associated with 25% increased risk for DM compared with placebo (odds ratio 1.25, 95% credible interval 0.82 to 1.90). The impact on DM appeared to be intermediate with atorvastatin 80 mg/day compared with placebo (odds ratio 1.15, 95% credible interval 0.90 to 1.50). These findings were replicated at moderate doses. In conclusion, different types and doses of statins show different potential to increase the incidence of DM., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)