1. Sex Differences in a Real-World Registry Examining Coronary Lithotripsy for Calcified Lesions.
- Author
-
van Oort MJH, Oliveri F, Amri IA, Bingen BO, Claessen BEPM, Dimitriu-Leen AC, Vossenberg TN, Kefer J, Girgis H, van der Kley F, Jukema JW, and Montero-Cabezas JM
- Abstract
Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has established as a safe and effective treatment for coronary artery calcification (CAC). This study aimed to evaluate sex-related differences in the treatment with IVL in a real-world, all-comers international registry. Patients undergoing IVL between May 2019 and February 2024 were enrolled from the BENELUX-IVL registry. Patients were divided into men and women groups. Efficacy endpoints included device success (delivery of the IVL-balloon across the target lesion and administration of therapy without related complications), technical success (TIMI 3 flow and residual stenosis <30% by quantitative coronary analysis and/or fluoroscopically) and procedural success (composite of technical success with absence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization). Safety endpoints were IVL-related complications and MACE at one-year follow-up. 454 patients (73±9.0 years) were treated with IVL, comprising 342 (75%) men and 112 (25%) women. More women presented with acute coronary syndrome (41% in men vs 54% in women; p=0.014) and aorto-ostial lesions (17% in men vs. 29% in women; p=0.009), while the Syntax score (23.5±14.2 in men vs. 17.1±1.0 in women; p<0.001) was higher in men. Rates of device success (97% vs. 98%; p=1.000), technical success (90% vs. 91%; p=0.821) procedural success (90% vs. 88%; p=0.749), IVL-related complications (1% vs 2%; p=0.362) and one-year MACE rates (12% vs 17%; p=0.456) were comparable. In conclusion, despite differences in clinical presentation and lesion types, IVL seems to be safe and effective for both sexes across various clinical and anatomical scenarios., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The Department of Cardiology of the Leiden University Medical Center received unrestricted research grants from Abbott Vascular, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, GE Healthcare and Medtronic. B.E.P.M. Claessen reports relations with Sanofi, Philips, Amgen, Boston Scientific Corp, and AbioMed Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. TNE Vossenberg received consultancy fees from Boston Scientific and Cardiac Dimensions. Drs Kefer has served as proctors for Abbott. F. van der Kley received consultancy fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Vascular. JM. Montero received a research grant from Shockwave Medical and speaker fees from Abiomed, Boston Scientific and Penumbra Inc. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF