3 results on '"T. Peikert"'
Search Results
2. Validation of the BRODERS classifier (Benign versus aggRessive nODule Evaluation using Radiomic Stratification), a novel HRCT-based radiomic classifier for indeterminate pulmonary nodules.
- Author
-
Maldonado F, Varghese C, Rajagopalan S, Duan F, Balar AB, Lakhani DA, Antic SL, Massion PP, Johnson TF, Karwoski RA, Robb RA, Bartholmai BJ, and Peikert T
- Subjects
- Area Under Curve, Early Detection of Cancer, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Lung Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Multiple Pulmonary Nodules diagnostic imaging, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Introduction: Implementation of low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screening and the ever-increasing use of cross-sectional imaging are resulting in the identification of many screen- and incidentally detected indeterminate pulmonary nodules. While the management of nodules with low or high pre-test probability of malignancy is relatively straightforward, those with intermediate pre-test probability commonly require advanced imaging or biopsy. Noninvasive risk stratification tools are highly desirable., Methods: We previously developed the BRODERS classifier (Benign versus aggRessive nODule Evaluation using Radiomic Stratification), a conventional predictive radiomic model based on eight imaging features capturing nodule location, shape, size, texture and surface characteristics. Herein we report its external validation using a dataset of incidentally identified lung nodules (Vanderbilt University Lung Nodule Registry) in comparison to the Brock model. Area under the curve (AUC), as well as sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were calculated., Results: For the entire Vanderbilt validation set (n=170, 54% malignant), the AUC was 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.92) for the Brock model and 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94) for the BRODERS model. Using the optimal cut-off determined by Youden's index, the sensitivity was 92.3%, the specificity was 62.0%, the positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 73.7% and 87.5%, respectively. For nodules with intermediate pre-test probability of malignancy, Brock score of 5-65% (n=97), the sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 46%, respectively, the PPV was 78.4% and the NPV was 79.2%., Conclusions: The BRODERS radiomic predictive model performs well on an independent dataset and may facilitate the management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: F. Maldonado reports grants from Department of Defense (Lung Cancer Research Program under award number W81XWH-15-1-0110), during the conduct of the study; and holds intellectual property rights as an inventor of the CANARY software and BRODERS classifier, but does not receive any financial relationships regarding this software. Conflict of interest: C. Varghese has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Rajagopalan reports grants from Department of Defense (Lung Cancer Research Program under award number W81XWH-15-1-0110 to F. Maldonado), during the conduct of the study; CALIPER software is licensed to Imbio, LLC, from whom The Mayo Clinic and B.J. Bartholmai receive royalties related to CALIPER (also known as Imbio Lung Texture Analysis, LTA); and S. Rajagoplan holds intellectual property rights as an inventor of the CANARY software and BRODERS classifier, but does not receive any financial relationships regarding this software. Conflict of interest: F. Duan reports grants from Department of Defense (Lung Cancer Research Program under award number W81XWH-15-1-0110 to F. Maldonado), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: A.B. Balar has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.A. Lakhani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.L. Antic has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.P. Massion has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T.F. Johnson reports grants from Department of Defense, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: R.A. Karwoski reports grants from Department of Defense (Lung Cancer Research Program under award number W81XWH-15-1-0110 to F. Maldonado), during the conduct of the study; CALIPER software is licensed to Imbio, LLC, from whom The Mayo Clinic and B.J. Bartholmai receive royalties related to CALIPER (also known as Imbio Lung Texture Analysis, LTA); and R.A. Karwoski holds intellectual property rights as an inventor of the CANARY software and BRODERS classifier, but does not receive any financial relationships regarding this software. Conflict of interest: R.A. Robb reports grants from Department of Defense (Lung Cancer Research Program under award number W81XWH-15-1-0110 to F. Maldonado), during the conduct of the study; CALIPER software is licensed to Imbio, LLC, from whom The Mayo Clinic and B.J. Bartholmai receive royalties related to CALIPER (also known as Imbio Lung Texture Analysis, LTA); and R.A. Robb holds intellectual property rights as an inventor of the CANARY software and BRODERS classifier, but does not receive any financial relationships regarding this software. Conflict of interest: B.J. Bartholmai reports grants from Department of Defense (Lung Cancer Research Program under award number W81XWH-15-1-0110 to F. Maldonado), during the conduct of the study; personal fees for advisory board work from Promedior, LLC, outside the submitted work; CALIPER software is licensed to Imbio, LLC, from whom The Mayo Clinic and B.J. Bartholmai receive royalties related to CALIPER (also known as Imbio Lung Texture Analysis, LTA); and B.J. Bartholmai holds intellectual property rights as an inventor of the CANARY software and BRODERS classifier, but does not receive any financial relationships regarding this software. Conflict of interest: T. Peikert reports grants from Department of Defense (Lung Cancer Research Program under award number W81XWH-15-1-0110 to F. Maldonado), during the conduct of the study; fees paid to institution for advisory board work from AstraZeneca and Novocure, outside the submitted work; and holds intellectual property rights as an inventor of the CANARY software and BRODERS classifier, but does not receive any financial relationships regarding this software., (Copyright ©ERS 2021.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Longitudinal prediction of outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using automated CT analysis.
- Author
-
Jacob J, Bartholmai BJ, van Moorsel CHM, Rajagopalan S, Devaraj A, van Es HW, Moua T, van Beek FT, Clay R, Veltkamp M, Kokosi M, de Lauretis A, Judge EP, Jacob TM, Peikert T, Karwoski R, Maldonado F, Renzoni E, Maher TM, Altmann A, and Wells AU
- Subjects
- Humans, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis mortality, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis therapy, Linear Models, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Vital Capacity, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis diagnostic imaging, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted methods, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J. Jacob reports personal fees for advisory board work from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: B.J. Bartholmai reports grants (paid to Mayo Clinic) from Royal Brompton Hospital, personal fees from Promedior and Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study; royalties (paid to Mayo Clinic) from Imbio, LLC, outside the submitted work; and has a patent Systems and Methods for Analysing in vivo Tissue Volumes using Medical Imaging Data licensed to Imbio LLC. Conflict of interest: C.H.M. van Moorsel has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Rajagopalan reports grants (paid to Mayo Clinic) from Royal Brompton Hospital, during the conduct of the study; royalties (paid to Mayo Clinic) from Imbio, LLC, outside the submitted work; and has a patent Systems and Methods for Analysing in vivo Tissue Volumes using Medical Imaging Data licensed to Imbio LLC. Conflict of interest: A. Devaraj reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: H.W. van Es has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Moua has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F.T. van Beek has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Clay has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Veltkamp has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Kokosi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. de Lauretis has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.P. Judge has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T.M. Jacob has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Peikert has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Karwoski reports grants (paid to Mayo Clinic) from Royal Brompton Hospital, during the conduct of the study; royalties (paid to Mayo Clinic) from Imbio, LLC, outside the submitted work; and has a patent Systems and Methods for Analysing in vivo Tissue Volumes using Medical Imaging Data licensed to Imbio LLC. Conflict of interest: F. Maldonado has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Renzoni reports personal fees for lectures from Roche and Takeda, personal fees for lectures and advisory board meetings from Boehringher, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: T.M. Maher is an investigator in an ongoing Phase 2b study for Gilead; reports grants and personal fees for advisory board work from GSK, grants from Novartis, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim InterMune, Lanthio, Sanofi Aventis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Cipla, Prometic and Apellis, grants, personal fees and research fees (paid to institution) from UCB, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Altmann has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.U. Wells reports personal fees for lectures and advisory board work from Intermune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Bayer, personal fees for advisory board work from Gilead and MSD, personal fees for lectures from Chiesi, outside the submitted work.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.