1. Traditional Chinese medicine for smoking cessation: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Author
-
Chun-Li Lu, Xin-Yan Jin, Qian-Yun Wang, Xiao-Ying Chen, Ruo-Xiang Zheng, Chao-Jie Wang, Jing-Jing Jiang, Shu-Yu Qiao, Si-Hong Yang, Wei-Han Zhang, Si-Yi Chen, Jia-Xuan Li, Xue-Han Liu, Yu-Si Suo, Jian-Hua Wang, Xue Xue, Li-Rong Liang, Robinson, Nicola, and Jian-Ping Liu
- Subjects
- *
DRUG efficacy , *MEDICAL databases , *RELATIVE medical risk , *ONLINE information services , *SMOKING cessation , *META-analysis , *CONFIDENCE intervals , *MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems , *SYSTEMATIC reviews , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *COMPARATIVE studies , *PLACEBOS , *QUALITY assurance , *RESEARCH funding , *DATA analysis software , *MEDLINE , *CHINESE medicine , *PATIENT safety - Abstract
INTRODUCTION Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may have special advantages in facilitating smoking cessation, but consensus on effectiveness is lacking. We aim to comprehensively review, update, and refine current evidence on TCM effectiveness and safety. METHODS Nine databases were searched from their inception up to 28 February 2023. Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analysis of TCM for smoking cessation were identified and retrieved. Additional databases and hand searches of RCTs from included SRs were performed for data pooling. Cochrane ROB tools and AMSTAR-2 were used to evaluate the methodological quality of RCTs and SRs, respectively. RCT data are presented as relative risks (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using RevMan 5.4. RESULTS Thirteen SRs involving 265 studies with 33081 participants were included. Among these 265 studies, 157 were duplicates (58.36%) and 52 were non-RCTs (19.62%). Combined with the remaining 56 RCTs identified through hand searches, 88 RCTs involving 12434 participants were finally included for data synthesis. All the SRs focused on acupoint stimulation, and the majority were of low or very low quality. The methodological quality of RCTs was either unclear or high risk. For continuous abstinence rate, TCM external interventions were better than placebo in 6 months to 1 year (RR=1.60; 95% CI: 1.14-2.25; I²=27%; n=5533 participants). Compared with placebo, TCM external application was effective in reducing nicotine withdrawal symptoms, and the effect was gradually stable and obvious in the fourth week (MD= -4.46; 95% CI: -5.43 -- -3.49; n=165 participants). Twelve RCTs reported adverse events as outcome indicators for safety evaluation, and no serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS Despite the methodological limitations of the original studies, our review suggests that TCM intervention shows potential effectiveness on the continuous abstinence rate. Extending the intervention time can enhance the effect of TCM on nicotine withdrawal symptoms. Referred to adverse events, more data for safety evaluation are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF