Search

Background and Objective: Diagnosis of egg allergy through basophil activation testing (BAT) has been mainly performed with an egg white extract or individual egg allergens rather than clinically more representative whole-egg extracts. Impact of heating on whole-egg extract allergenicity remains unassessed.Validating BAT with gradually less heated whole-egg extracts in egg allergy diagnosis and as tolerance marker., Methods: CD63-based BAT was performed with five progressively less heated extracts from cake, hard-boiled egg, omelet, soft-boiled, and raw egg in 10 egg allergic (EA), 10 complete egg tolerant (ET) and 12 non-egg-sensitized non-allergic (NEA) children. Cutoffs and diagnostic accuracy measures were established through ROC analysis. Changes in basophil response were assessed in 12 baked egg tolerant children undergoing an 8-month gradual egg reintroduction protocol with BAT and oral food challenges prior to each reintroduction step., Results: Basophil responses to all egg extracts were increased in EA, but not in ET and NEA children. Responses decreased progressively with more heated egg extracts. Compared to ET children, EA children showed higher basophil sensitivity for all egg extracts. Negative BAT responses predicted clinical tolerance with a 90-100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and false positive rate of 2.78%. In comparison, egg sIgE's (<0.35 kUA/L) had a lower specificity of 50-78% with a false positive rate of 40%. Basophil reactivity and sensitivity tended to decrease in baked egg tolerant children undergoing gradual egg reintroduction, concurrent with tolerance development., Conclusion: BAT with progressively less heated egg preparations is a sensitive and highly specific tool to discriminate EA from ET children.