6 results on '"Whitaker, Jennifer A."'
Search Results
2. Comparison of bivalent and monovalent SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccines: the phase 2 randomized open-label COVAIL trial.
- Author
-
Branche, Angela, Rouphael, Nadine, Diemert, David, Falsey, Ann, Losada, Cecilia, Baden, Lindsey, Frey, Sharon, Whitaker, Jennifer, Anderson, Evan, Walter, Emmanuel, Novak, Richard, Rupp, Richard, Jackson, Lisa, Babu, Tara, Kottkamp, Angelica, Luetkemeyer, Anne, Immergluck, Lilly, Presti, Rachel, Bäcker, Martín, Winokur, Patricia, Mahgoub, Siham, Goepfert, Paul, Fusco, Dahlene, Malkin, Elissa, Bethony, Jeffrey, Walsh, Edward, Graciaa, Daniel, Samaha, Hady, Sherman, Amy, Walsh, Stephen, Abate, Getahun, Oikonomopoulou, Zacharoula, El Sahly, Hana, Kamidani, Satoshi, Smith, Michael, Ladner, Benjamin, Porterfield, Laura, Dunstan, Maya, Wald, Anna, Davis, Tamia, Atmar, Robert, Mulligan, Mark, Lyke, Kirsten, Posavad, Christine, Meagher, Megan, Stephens, David, Neuzil, Kathleen, Abebe, Kuleni, Hill, Heather, Albert, Jim, Telu, Kalyani, Mu, Jinjian, Lewis, Teri, Giebeig, Lisa, Eaton, Amanda, Netzl, Antonia, Wilks, Samuel, Türeli, Sina, Makhene, Mamodikoe, Crandon, Sonja, Montefiori, David, Makowski, Mat, Smith, Derek, Nayak, Seema, Roberts, Paul, Beigel, John, Little, Susan, and Martin, Thomas
- Subjects
Humans ,COVID-19 Vaccines ,SARS-CoV-2 ,COVID-19 ,Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies - Abstract
Vaccine protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection wanes over time, requiring updated boosters. In a phase 2, open-label, randomized clinical trial with sequentially enrolled stages at 22 US sites, we assessed safety and immunogenicity of a second boost with monovalent or bivalent variant vaccines from mRNA and protein-based platforms targeting wild-type, Beta, Delta and Omicron BA.1 spike antigens. The primary outcome was pseudovirus neutralization titers at 50% inhibitory dilution (ID50 titers) with 95% confidence intervals against different SARS-CoV-2 strains. The secondary outcome assessed safety by solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs), unsolicited AEs, serious AEs and AEs of special interest. Boosting with prototype/wild-type vaccines produced numerically lower ID50 titers than any variant-containing vaccine against all variants. Conversely, boosting with a variant vaccine excluding prototype was not associated with decreased neutralization against D614G. Omicron BA.1 or Beta monovalent vaccines were nearly equivalent to Omicron BA.1 + prototype or Beta + prototype bivalent vaccines for neutralization of Beta, Omicron BA.1 and Omicron BA.4/5, although they were lower for contemporaneous Omicron subvariants. Safety was similar across arms and stages and comparable to previous reports. Our study shows that updated vaccines targeting Beta or Omicron BA.1 provide broadly crossprotective neutralizing antibody responses against diverse SARS-CoV-2 variants without sacrificing immunity to the ancestral strain. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05289037 .
- Published
- 2023
3. Immunogenicity of the BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Bivalent Boosts: Preliminary Results From the COVAIL Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Author
-
Branche, Angela, Rouphael, Nadine, Losada, Cecilia, Baden, Lindsey, Anderson, Evan, Luetkemeyer, Anne, Diemert, David, Winokur, Patricia, Presti, Rachel, Kottkamp, Angelica, Falsey, Ann, Frey, Sharon, Rupp, Richard, Bäcker, Martín, Novak, Richard, Walter, Emmanuel, Jackson, Lisa, Little, Susan, Immergluck, Lilly, Mahgoub, Siham, Whitaker, Jennifer, Babu, Tara, Goepfert, Paul, Fusco, Dahlene, Atmar, Robert, Posavad, Christine, Netzl, Antonia, Smith, Derek, Telu, Kalyani, Mu, Jinjian, Makowski, Mat, Makhene, Mamodikoe, Crandon, Sonja, Montefiori, David, Roberts, Paul, and Beigel, John
- Subjects
SARS-CoV-2 ,vaccine ,variant ,Humans ,COVID-19 ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Antibodies ,Neutralizing ,Vaccines ,Combined ,Antibodies ,Viral - Abstract
In a randomized clinical trial, we compare early neutralizing antibody responses after boosting with bivalent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines based on either BA.1 or BA.4/BA.5 Omicron spike protein combined with wild-type spike. Responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants exhibited the greatest reduction in titers against currently circulating Omicron subvariants for both bivalent vaccines.
- Published
- 2023
4. Evaluating Demographic Representation in Clinical Trials: Use of the Adaptive Coronavirus Disease 2019 Treatment Trial (ACTT) as a Test Case.
- Author
-
Ortega-Villa, Ana M, Hynes, Noreen A, Levine, Corri B, Yang, Katherine, Wiley, Zanthia, Jilg, Nikolaus, Wang, Jing, Whitaker, Jennifer A, Colombo, Christopher J, Nayak, Seema U, Kim, Hannah Jang, Iovine, Nicole M, Ince, Dilek, Cohen, Stuart H, Langer, Adam J, Wortham, Jonathan M, Atmar, Robert L, El Sahly, Hana M, Jain, Mamta K, Mehta, Aneesh K, Wolfe, Cameron R, Gomez, Carlos A, Beresnev, Tatiana, Mularski, Richard A, Paules, Catharine I, Kalil, Andre C, Branche, Angela R, Luetkemeyer, Annie, Zingman, Barry S, Voell, Jocelyn, Whitaker, Michael, Harkins, Michelle S, Davey, Richard T, Grossberg, Robert, George, Sarah L, Tapson, Victor, Short, William R, Ghazaryan, Varduhi, Benson, Constance A, Dodd, Lori E, Sweeney, Daniel A, and Tomashek, Kay M
- Subjects
ACTT ,COVID-19 clinical trials ,representation evaluation ,Clinical Research ,Infectious Diseases ,Prevention ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Good Health and Well Being - Abstract
BackgroundClinical trials initiated during emerging infectious disease outbreaks must quickly enroll participants to identify treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality. This may be at odds with enrolling a representative study population, especially when the population affected is undefined.MethodsWe evaluated the utility of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET), the COVID-19 Case Surveillance System (CCSS), and 2020 United States (US) Census data to determine demographic representation in the 4 stages of the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT). We compared the cumulative proportion of participants by sex, race, ethnicity, and age enrolled at US ACTT sites, with respective 95% confidence intervals, to the reference data in forest plots.ResultsUS ACTT sites enrolled 3509 adults hospitalized with COVID-19. When compared with COVID-NET, ACTT enrolled a similar or higher proportion of Hispanic/Latino and White participants depending on the stage, and a similar proportion of African American participants in all stages. In contrast, ACTT enrolled a higher proportion of these groups when compared with US Census and CCSS. The proportion of participants aged ≥65 years was either similar or lower than COVID-NET and higher than CCSS and the US Census. The proportion of females enrolled in ACTT was lower than the proportion of females in the reference datasets.ConclusionsAlthough surveillance data of hospitalized cases may not be available early in an outbreak, they are a better comparator than US Census data and surveillance of all cases, which may not reflect the population affected and at higher risk of severe disease.
- Published
- 2023
5. Temporal Improvements in COVID-19 Outcomes for Hospitalized Adults: A Post Hoc Observational Study of Remdesivir Group Participants in the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial
- Author
-
Potter, Gail E, Bonnett, Tyler, Rubenstein, Kevin, Lindholm, David A, Rapaka, Rekha R, Doernberg, Sarah B, Lye, David C, Mularski, Richard A, Hynes, Noreen A, Kline, Susan, Paules, Catharine I, Wolfe, Cameron R, Frank, Maria G, Rouphael, Nadine G, Deye, Gregory A, Sweeney, Daniel A, Colombo, Rhonda E, Davey, Richard T, Mehta, Aneesh K, Whitaker, Jennifer A, Castro, Jose G, Amin, Alpesh N, Colombo, Christopher J, Levine, Corri B, Jain, Mamta K, Maves, Ryan C, Marconi, Vincent C, Grossberg, Robert, Hozayen, Sameh, Burgess, Timothy H, Atmar, Robert L, Ganesan, Anuradha, Gomez, Carlos A, Benson, Constance A, de Castilla, Diego Lopez, Ahuja, Neera, George, Sarah L, Nayak, Seema U, Cohen, Stuart H, Lalani, Tahaniyat, Short, William R, Erdmann, Nathaniel, Tomashek, Kay M, and Tebas, Pablo
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Prevention ,Clinical Research ,Rehabilitation ,Complementary and Integrative Health ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,6.1 Pharmaceuticals ,Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions ,Good Health and Well Being ,Adult ,Humans ,Antiviral Agents ,Clinical Trials ,Phase III as Topic ,Dexamethasone ,Double-Blind Method ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,Treatment Outcome ,COVID-19 Drug Treatment ,Medical and Health Sciences ,General & Internal Medicine ,Clinical sciences - Abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 standard of care (SOC) evolved rapidly during 2020 and 2021, but its cumulative effect over time is unclear.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether recovery and mortality improved as SOC evolved, using data from ACTT (Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial).DesignACTT is a series of phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that evaluated COVID-19 therapeutics from February 2020 through May 2021. ACTT-1 compared remdesivir plus SOC to placebo plus SOC, and in ACTT-2 and ACTT-3, remdesivir plus SOC was the control group. This post hoc analysis compared recovery and mortality between these comparable sequential cohorts of patients who received remdesivir plus SOC, adjusting for baseline characteristics with propensity score weighting. The analysis was repeated for participants in ACTT-3 and ACTT-4 who received remdesivir plus dexamethasone plus SOC. Trends in SOC that could explain outcome improvements were analyzed. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04280705 [ACTT-1], NCT04401579 [ACTT-2], NCT04492475 [ACTT-3], and NCT04640168 [ACTT-4]).Setting94 hospitals in 10 countries (86% U.S. participants).ParticipantsAdults hospitalized with COVID-19.InterventionSOC.Measurements28-day mortality and recovery.ResultsAlthough outcomes were better in ACTT-2 than in ACTT-1, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were close to 1 (HR for recovery, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.17]; HR for mortality, 0.90 [CI, 0.56 to 1.40]). Comparable patients were less likely to be intubated in ACTT-2 than in ACTT-1 (odds ratio, 0.75 [CI, 0.53 to 0.97]), and hydroxychloroquine use decreased. Outcomes improved from ACTT-2 to ACTT-3 (HR for recovery, 1.43 [CI, 1.24 to 1.64]; HR for mortality, 0.45 [CI, 0.21 to 0.97]). Potential explanatory factors (SOC trends, case surges, and variant trends) were similar between ACTT-2 and ACTT-3, except for increased dexamethasone use (11% to 77%). Outcomes were similar in ACTT-3 and ACTT-4. Antibiotic use decreased gradually across all stages.LimitationUnmeasured confounding.ConclusionChanges in patient composition explained improved outcomes from ACTT-1 to ACTT-2 but not from ACTT-2 to ACTT-3, suggesting improved SOC. These results support excluding nonconcurrent controls from analysis of platform trials in rapidly changing therapeutic areas.Primary funding sourceNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
- Published
- 2022
6. Efficacy of interferon beta-1a plus remdesivir compared with remdesivir alone in hospitalised adults with COVID-19: a double-bind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
- Author
-
Kalil, Andre C, Mehta, Aneesh K, Patterson, Thomas F, Erdmann, Nathaniel, Gomez, Carlos A, Jain, Mamta K, Wolfe, Cameron R, Ruiz-Palacios, Guillermo M, Kline, Susan, Pineda, Justino Regalado, Luetkemeyer, Anne F, Harkins, Michelle S, Jackson, Patrick EH, Iovine, Nicole M, Tapson, Victor F, Oh, Myoung-don, Whitaker, Jennifer A, Mularski, Richard A, Paules, Catharine I, Ince, Dilek, Takasaki, Jin, Sweeney, Daniel A, Sandkovsky, Uriel, Wyles, David L, Hohmann, Elizabeth, Grimes, Kevin A, Grossberg, Robert, Laguio-Vila, Maryrose, Lambert, Allison A, de Castilla, Diego Lopez, Kim, EuSuk, Larson, LuAnn, Wan, Claire R, Traenkner, Jessica J, Ponce, Philip O, Patterson, Jan E, Goepfert, Paul A, Sofarelli, Theresa A, Mocherla, Satish, Ko, Emily R, de Leon, Alfredo Ponce, Doernberg, Sarah B, Atmar, Robert L, Maves, Ryan C, Dangond, Fernando, Ferreira, Jennifer, Green, Michelle, Makowski, Mat, Bonnett, Tyler, Beresnev, Tatiana, Ghazaryan, Varduhi, Dempsey, Walla, Nayak, Seema U, Dodd, Lori, Tomashek, Kay M, Beigel, John H, members, ACTT-3 study group, Hewlett, Angela, Taylor, Barbara S, Bowling, Jason E, Serrano, Ruth C, Rouphael, Nadine G, Wiley, Zanthia, Phadke, Varun K, Certain, Laura, Imlay, Hannah N, Engemann, John J, Walter, Emmanuel B, Meisner, Jessica, Rajme, Sandra, Billings, Joanne, Kim, Hyun, Martinez-Orozco, Jose A, Felix, Nora Bautista, Elmor, Sammy T, Bristow, Laurel R, Mertz, Gregory, Sosa, Nestor, Bell, Taison D, West, Miranda J, Elie-Turenne, Marie-Carmelle, Grein, Jonathan, Sutterwala, Fayyaz, Choe, Pyoeng Gyun, Kang, Chang Kyung, Sahly, Hana M El, Rhie, Kevin S, Hussein, Rezhan H, Winokur, Patricia L, Mikami, Ayako, Saito, Sho, Benson, Constance A, McConnell, Kimberly, Berhe, Mezgebe, Dishner, Emma, Frank, Maria G, Sarcone, Ellen, Crouch, Pierre-Cedric B, Jang, Hannah, and Jilg, Nikolaus
- Subjects
Rehabilitation ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Lung ,Clinical Research ,Infectious Diseases ,6.1 Pharmaceuticals ,Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions ,Infection ,Adenosine Monophosphate ,Adult ,Aged ,Alanine ,Antiviral Agents ,Double-Blind Method ,Female ,Humans ,Interferon beta-1a ,Japan ,Male ,Mexico ,Middle Aged ,Oxygen ,Oxygen Saturation ,Republic of Korea ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Singapore ,Treatment Outcome ,United States ,COVID-19 Drug Treatment ,ACTT-3 study group members ,Clinical Sciences ,Public Health and Health Services ,Other Medical and Health Sciences - Abstract
BackgroundFunctional impairment of interferon, a natural antiviral component of the immune system, is associated with the pathogenesis and severity of COVID-19. We aimed to compare the efficacy of interferon beta-1a in combination with remdesivir compared with remdesivir alone in hospitalised patients with COVID-19.MethodsWe did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial at 63 hospitals across five countries (Japan, Mexico, Singapore, South Korea, and the USA). Eligible patients were hospitalised adults (aged ≥18 years) with SARS-CoV-2 infection, as confirmed by a positive RT-PCR test, and who met one of the following criteria suggestive of lower respiratory tract infection: the presence of radiographic infiltrates on imaging, a peripheral oxygen saturation on room air of 94% or less, or requiring supplemental oxygen. Patients were excluded if they had either an alanine aminotransferase or an aspartate aminotransferase concentration more than five times the upper limit of normal; had impaired renal function; were allergic to the study product; were pregnant or breast feeding; were already on mechanical ventilation; or were anticipating discharge from the hospital or transfer to another hospital within 72 h of enrolment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous remdesivir as a 200 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by a 100 mg maintenance dose administered daily for up to 9 days and up to four doses of either 44 μg interferon beta-1a (interferon beta-1a group plus remdesivir group) or placebo (placebo plus remdesivir group) administered subcutaneously every other day. Randomisation was stratified by study site and disease severity at enrolment. Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to interferon beta-1a and placebo treatment; remdesivir treatment was given to all patients without masking. The primary outcome was time to recovery, defined as the first day that a patient attained a category 1, 2, or 3 score on the eight-category ordinal scale within 28 days, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomised patients who were classified according to actual clinical severity. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population, defined as all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04492475.FindingsBetween Aug 5, 2020, and Nov 11, 2020, 969 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the interferon beta-1a plus remdesivir group (n=487) or to the placebo plus remdesivir group (n=482). The mean duration of symptoms before enrolment was 8·7 days (SD 4·4) in the interferon beta-1a plus remdesivir group and 8·5 days (SD 4·3) days in the placebo plus remdesivir group. Patients in both groups had a time to recovery of 5 days (95% CI not estimable) (rate ratio of interferon beta-1a plus remdesivir group vs placebo plus remdesivir 0·99 [95% CI 0·87-1·13]; p=0·88). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of mortality at 28 days was 5% (95% CI 3-7%) in the interferon beta-1a plus remdesivir group and 3% (2-6%) in the placebo plus remdesivir group (hazard ratio 1·33 [95% CI 0·69-2·55]; p=0·39). Patients who did not require high-flow oxygen at baseline were more likely to have at least one related adverse event in the interferon beta-1a plus remdesivir group (33 [7%] of 442 patients) than in the placebo plus remdesivir group (15 [3%] of 435). In patients who required high-flow oxygen at baseline, 24 (69%) of 35 had an adverse event and 21 (60%) had a serious adverse event in the interferon beta-1a plus remdesivir group compared with 13 (39%) of 33 who had an adverse event and eight (24%) who had a serious adverse event in the placebo plus remdesivir group.InterpretationInterferon beta-1a plus remdesivir was not superior to remdesivir alone in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients who required high-flow oxygen at baseline had worse outcomes after treatment with interferon beta-1a compared with those given placebo.FundingThe National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (USA).
- Published
- 2021
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.