Search

Your search keyword '"Henneman, Wouter"' showing total 2 results
Start Over Author "Henneman, Wouter" Publisher escholarship, university of california
2 results on '"Henneman, Wouter"'

1. Delphi definition of the EADC‐ADNI Harmonized Protocol for hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance

Author

Boccardi, Marina, Bocchetta, Martina, Apostolova, Liana G, Barnes, Josephine, Bartzokis, George, Corbetta, Gabriele, DeCarli, Charles, deToledo‐Morrell, Leyla, Firbank, Michael, Ganzola, Rossana, Gerritsen, Lotte, Henneman, Wouter, Killiany, Ronald J, Malykhin, Nikolai, Pasqualetti, Patrizio, Pruessner, Jens C, Redolfi, Alberto, Robitaille, Nicolas, Soininen, Hilkka, Tolomeo, Daniele, Wang, Lei, Watson, Craig, Wolf, Henrike, Duvernoy, Henri, Duchesne, Simon, Jack, Clifford R, Frisoni, Giovanni B, and Segmentation, EADC‐ADNI Working Group on the Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal

Subjects
Neurosciences, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Consensus, Delphi Technique, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Internationality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuroimaging, Volumetry, Manual segmentation, Harmonization, Anatomical landmarks, Delphi procedure, Alzheimer's disease, Medial temporal Jobe, Hippocampal atrophy, Magnetic.resonance, Standard operational procedures, Enrichment, MCI, Reliability, EADC-ADNI Working Group on the Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation, Magnetic resonance, Medial temporal lobe, Clinical Sciences, Geriatrics
Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to have international experts converge on a harmonized definition of whole hippocampus boundaries and segmentation procedures, to define standard operating procedures for magnetic resonance (MR)-based manual hippocampal segmentation.MethodsThe panel received a questionnaire regarding whole hippocampus boundaries and segmentation procedures. Quantitative information was supplied to allow evidence-based answers. A recursive and anonymous Delphi procedure was used to achieve convergence. Significance of agreement among panelists was assessed by exact probability on Fisher's and binomial tests.ResultsAgreement was significant on the inclusion of alveus/fimbria (P = .021), whole hippocampal tail (P = .013), medial border of the body according to visible morphology (P = .0006), and on this combined set of features (P = .001). This definition captures 100% of hippocampal tissue, 100% of Alzheimer's disease-related atrophy, and demonstrated good reliability on preliminary intrarater (0.98) and inter-rater (0.94) estimates.DiscussionConsensus was achieved among international experts with respect to hippocampal segmentation using MR resulting in a harmonized segmentation protocol.

Published
2015

2. The EADC‐ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: Evidence of validity

Author

Frisoni, Giovanni B, Jack, Clifford R, Bocchetta, Martina, Bauer, Corinna, Frederiksen, Kristian S, Liu, Yawu, Preboske, Gregory, Swihart, Tim, Blair, Melanie, Cavedo, Enrica, Grothe, Michel J, Lanfredi, Mariangela, Martinez, Oliver, Nishikawa, Masami, Portegies, Marileen, Stoub, Travis, Ward, Chadwich, Apostolova, Liana G, Ganzola, Rossana, Wolf, Dominik, Barkhof, Frederik, Bartzokis, George, DeCarli, Charles, Csernansky, John G, deToledo‐Morrell, Leyla, Geerlings, Mirjam I, Kaye, Jeffrey, Killiany, Ronald J, Lehéricy, Stephane, Matsuda, Hiroshi, O'Brien, John, Silbert, Lisa C, Scheltens, Philip, Soininen, Hilkka, Teipel, Stefan, Waldemar, Gunhild, Fellgiebel, Andreas, Barnes, Josephine, Firbank, Michael, Gerritsen, Lotte, Henneman, Wouter, Malykhin, Nikolai, Pruessner, Jens C, Wang, Lei, Watson, Craig, Wolf, Henrike, deLeon, Mony, Pantel, Johannes, Ferrari, Clarissa, Bosco, Paolo, Pasqualetti, Patrizio, Duchesne, Simon, Duvernoy, Henri, Boccardi, Marina, Initiative, EADC‐ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Volumetry and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Albert, Marilyn S, Bennet, David, Camicioli, Richard, Collins, D Louis, Dubois, Bruno, Hampel, Harald, denHeijer, Tom, Hock, Christofer, Jagust, William, Launer, Leonore, Maller, Jerome J, Mueller, Susan, Sachdev, Perminder, Simmons, Andy, Thompson, Paul M, Visser, Peter‐Jelle, Wahlund, Lars‐Olof, Weiner, Michael W, and Winblad, Bengt

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences, Clinical Sciences, Brain Disorders, Biomedical Imaging, Clinical Research, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Female, Functional Laterality, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Internet, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuroimaging, Organ Size, Reproducibility of Results, Hippocampal volumetry, Magnetic resonance, Alzheimer's disease, Biomarkers, Diagnostic criteria, Enrichment, Clinical trials, Validation, Harmonized protocol, Standard operating procedures, Manual segmentation, EADC-ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Volumetry and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Geriatrics, Clinical sciences, Biological psychology
Abstract

BackgroundAn international Delphi panel has defined a harmonized protocol (HarP) for the manual segmentation of the hippocampus on MR. The aim of this study is to study the concurrent validity of the HarP toward local protocols, and its major sources of variance.MethodsFourteen tracers segmented 10 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cases scanned at 1.5 T and 3T following local protocols, qualified for segmentation based on the HarP through a standard web-platform and resegmented following the HarP. The five most accurate tracers followed the HarP to segment 15 ADNI cases acquired at three time points on both 1.5 T and 3T.ResultsThe agreement among tracers was relatively low with the local protocols (absolute left/right ICC 0.44/0.43) and much higher with the HarP (absolute left/right ICC 0.88/0.89). On the larger set of 15 cases, the HarP agreement within (left/right ICC range: 0.94/0.95 to 0.99/0.99) and among tracers (left/right ICC range: 0.89/0.90) was very high. The volume variance due to different tracers was 0.9% of the total, comparing favorably to variance due to scanner manufacturer (1.2), atrophy rates (3.5), hemispheric asymmetry (3.7), field strength (4.4), and significantly smaller than the variance due to atrophy (33.5%, P < .001), and physiological variability (49.2%, P < .001).ConclusionsThe HarP has high measurement stability compared with local segmentation protocols, and good reproducibility within and among human tracers. Hippocampi segmented with the HarP can be used as a reference for the qualification of human tracers and automated segmentation algorithms.

Published
2015

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results