Search

Abstract Impaired single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) is associated with emphysema. Small airways disease (SAD) may be a precursor lesion to emphysema, but the relationship between SAD and DLCO is undescribed. We hypothesized that in mild COPD, functional SAD (fSAD) defined by computed tomography (CT) and Parametric Response Mapping methodology would correlate with impaired DLCO. Using data from ever-smokers in the COPDGene cohort, we established that fSAD correlated significantly with lower DLCO among both non-obstructed and GOLD 1–2 subjects. The relationship between DLCO with CT-defined emphysema was present in all GOLD stages, but most prominent in severe disease. Trial registration NCT00608764. Registry: COPDGene. Registered 06 February 2008, retrospectively registered.

BackgroundCOPD is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), and coronary artery calcification (CAC) provides additional prognostic information. With increasing use of nongated CT scans in clinical practice, this study hypothesized that the visual Weston CAC score would perform as well as the Agatston score in predicting prevalent and incident coronary artery disease (CAD) and CVD in COPD.MethodsCAC was measured by using Agatston and Weston scores on baseline CT scans in 1,875 current and former smokers enrolled in the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) study. Baseline cardiovascular disease and incident cardiac events on longitudinal follow-up were recorded. Accuracy of the CAC scores was measured by using receiver-operating characteristic analysis, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to estimate the risk of incident cardiac events.ResultsCAD was reported by 133 (7.1%) subjects at baseline. A total of 413 (22.0%) and 241 (12.9%) patients had significant CAC according to the Weston (≥ 7) and Agatston (≥ 400) scores, respectively; the two methods were significantly correlated (r= 0.84; P< .001). Over 5 years of follow-up, 127 patients (6.8%) developed incident CVD. For predicting prevalent CAD, c-indices for the Weston and Agatston scores were 0.78 and 0.74 and for predicting incident CVD, they were 0.62 and 0.61. After adjustment for age, race, sex, smoking pack-years, FEV1, percent emphysema, and CT scanner type, a Weston score≥ 7 was associated with time to first acute coronary event (hazard ratio, 2.16 [95%CI, 1.32 to 3.53]; P= .002), but a Agatston score≥ 400 was not (hazard ratio, 1.75 [95%CI, 0.99-3.09]; P= .053).ConclusionsA simple visual score for CAC performed well in predicting incident CAD in smokers with and without COPD.Trial registryClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00608764; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

In the January/February 2017 issue of Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, in the Guidelines article titled ‘‘2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans a report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of Thoracic Radiology’’ (2017; 11:74–84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2016.11.003), Appendix 1 containing the disclosures was not included. The appendix has been added to the online version of the article.

The Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) and the Society of Thoracic Radiology (STR) have jointly produced this document. Experts in this subject have been selected from both organizations to examine subject-speci&filig;c data and write this guideline in partnership. A formal literature review, weighing the strength of evidence has been performed. When available, information from studies on cost was considered. Computed tomography (CT) acquisition, CAC scoring methodologies and clinical outcomes are the primary basis for the recommendations in this guideline. This guideline is intended to assist healthcare providers in clinical decision making. The recommendations re&fllig;ect a consensus after a thorough review of the best available current scienti&filig;c evidence and practice patterns of experts in the &filig;eld and are intended to improve patient care while acknowledging that situations arise where additional information may be needed to better inform patient care.

© 2015 American College of Radiology. The Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) is a multidisciplinary consortium sponsored by the RSNA to define processes that enable the implementation and advancement of quantitative imaging methods described in a QIBA profile document that outlines the process to reliably and accurately measure imaging features. A QIBA profile includes factors such as technical (product-specific) standards, user activities, and relationship to a clinically meaningful metric, such as with nodule measurement in the course of CT screening for lung cancer. In this report, the authors describe how the QIBA approach is being applied to the measurement of small pulmonary nodules such as those found during low-dose CT-based lung cancer screening. All sources of variance with imaging measurement were defined for this process. Through a process of experimentation, literature review, and assembly of expert opinion, the strongest evidence was used to define how to best implement each step in the imaging acquisition and evaluation process. This systematic approach to implementing a quantitative imaging biomarker with standardized specifications for image acquisition and postprocessing for a specific quantitative measurement of a pulmonary nodule results in consistent performance characteristics of the measurement (eg, bias and variance). Implementation of the QIBA small nodule profile may allow more efficient and effective clinical management of the diagnostic workup of individuals found to have suspicious pulmonary nodules in the course of lung cancer screening evaluation.

© 2015 American College of Radiology. The ACR recognizes that low-dose CT for lung cancer screening has the potential to significantly reduce mortality from lung cancer in the appropriate high-risk population. The ACR supports the recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for screening patients. To be effective, lung cancer screening should be performed at sites providing high-quality low-dose CT examinations overseen and interpreted by qualified physicians using a structured reporting and management system. The ACR has developed a set of tools necessary for radiologists to take the lead on the front lines of lung cancer screening. The ACR Lung Cancer Screening Center designation is built upon the ACR CT accreditation program and requires use of Lung-RADS or a similar structured reporting and management system. This designation provides patients and referring providers with the assurance that they will receive high-quality screening with appropriate follow-up care.

The American College of Radiology, with more than 30,000 members, is the principal organization of radiologists, radiation oncologists,and clinical medical physicists in the United States. The College is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance thescience of radiology, improve radiologic services to the patient, study the socioeconomic aspects of the practice of radiology, and encouragecontinuing education for radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and persons practicing in allied professional fields.The American College of Radiology will periodically define new practice parameters and technical standards for radiologic practice to helpadvance the science of radiology and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing practice parameters andtechnical standards will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated.Each practice parameter and technical standard, representing a policy statement by the College, has undergone a thorough consensusprocess in which it has been subjected to extensive review and approval. The practice parameters and technical standards recognize that the safeand effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document.Reproduction or modification of the published practice parameter and technical standard by those entities not providing these services is notauthorized.?