Search

Objectives: KRAS mutations, particularly KRAS G12C , are prevalent in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a frontline treatment, but recently developed KRAS G12C -selective inhibitors, such as sotorasib, present new therapeutic options. We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study to gain insights into real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with KRAS G12C -positive advanced NSCLC receiving systemic therapy post-ICI treatment., Methods: From the CAnadian CAncers With Rare Molecular Alterations-Basket Real-world Observational Study (CARMA-BROS), a cohort of 102 patients with KRAS G12C -positive advanced NSCLC across 9 Canadian centers diagnosed between 2015 and 2021 was analyzed. Clinico-demographic and treatment data were obtained from electronic health records. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models., Results: The patients (median age 66 years; 58 % female; 99 % current/former tobacco exposure; 59 % PD-L1 ≥ 50 %), exhibited heterogeneous treatment patterns post-ICI. Most patients received ICIs as a first-line therapy, with varying subsequent lines including chemotherapy and targeted therapy. In patients receiving systemic therapy post-ICI, median overall survival was 12.6 months, and real-world progression-free survival was 4.7 months. KRAS G12C -selective targeted therapy post-ICI (n = 20) showed longer real-world progression-free survival compared to single-agent chemotherapy (aHR = 0.39, p = 0.012)., Conclusion: This study contributes valuable real-world data on KRAS G12C -positive advanced NSCLC post-ICI treatment. The absence of a standard treatment sequencing post-ICI underscores the need for further investigation and consensus-building in the evolving landscape of KRAS G12C -targeted therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The study was supported by Amgen. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Testing for tumor programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression was initially developed with histology specimens in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, cytology specimens are widely used for primary diagnosis and biomarker studies in clinical practice. Limited clinical data exist on the predictiveness of cytology-derived PD-L1 scores for response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy., Methods: We reviewed all NSCLC specimens clinically tested at the University Health Network (UHN) for PD-L1 with 22C3pharmDx, from 01/2013 to 04/2021. Treatment outcomes in patients treated with single agent ICI therapy were reviewed and compared according to cytology- and histology-derived PD-L1 scores., Results: We identified 494 and 1942 unique patients with cytology- and histology-derived tumor proportion scores, respectively, during the study period. Informative testing rates were 95 % vs 98 % for cytology and histology, respectively. Clinical data were available for 152 patients treated with single agent ICI: 61 cytology and 91 histology. Overall response rates (ORR) were similar for cytology and histology (36 % vs 34 %; p = 0.23), as well as median progression free survival (PFS) (4.9 vs 4.2 months; p = 0.99) and overall survival (23.4 vs 19.7 months; p = 0.99). The results remained similar even after adjusting for PD-L1 expression levels and line of ICI treatment (PFS HR 1.15; 95 %CI 0.78-1.70; p = 0.47)., Conclusions: Treatment outcomes to single agent ICI based on cytology-derived PD-L1 scores were comparable to histology controls. Our results support PD-L1 biomarker testing on both cytology and histology specimens., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We evaluated the baseline demographics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with ALK-rearranged early stage (Stage I-III) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of durvalumab consolidation treatment in patients with ALK-rearranged unresectable stage III disease., Methods: Retrospective chart-review analysis of all patients with histologically confirmed stage I-III reflexively tested ALK-rearranged NSCLC managed with curative intent at two Canadian Centers., Results: Of 48 patients, 19 (40%) were stage I, 5 (10%) were stage II and 24 (50%) were stage-III. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 27.6 months overall (95%CI: 20.5-51.4) and 144.4 months in stage-I, 27.6 months in stage-II and 14.9 months in stage III patients. Of 20 patients with unresectable stage-III disease treated with chemoradiation (9 also received durvalumab consolidation), 18/90% have relapsed. Median PFS was 10.9 months (95%CI:5.9-22.5). A non-significant trend toward improved PFS was seen in patients receiving additional durvalumab compared to patients treated with chemoradiation alone (median PFS, 12.5 vs 5.9 months, p = 0.16). Toxicity-related treatment modifications on subsequent first ALK-TKI at time of metastatic disease were needed in three (33%) patients who had received chemoradiation alone and two (29%) patients with consolidation durvalumab; no relevant pulmonary or hepato-toxicity was observed overall., Conclusion: Treatment strategies and PFS of patients with Stage I-III ALK-rearranged NSCLC are similar to patients without molecular driver alterations. Durvalumab consolidation treatment appears generally safe in patients with unresectable stage III ALK-rearranged disease; however, the degree of benefit of such an approach remains unclear., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have excellent systemic activity and are standard first line treatment in EGFR/ALK wild type metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, their role in patients with brain metastases, which affects over 20% of patients and cause significant morbidity, is less clear., Methods: We reviewed patients with EGFR/ALK wild-type mNSCLC with CNS metastases. Serial MRIs were reviewed to determine the time to intracranial progression (iPFS). Multivariate regression was performed to adjust for the disease-specific graded prognostic score (ds-GPA)., Results: We identified 36 ICI- and 33 chemotherapy-treated patients with baseline CNS metastases and available serial MRIs (average frequency:3.5 months). Baseline radiation was given except for 2 chemotherapy-treated patients with asymptomatic solitary metastasis. The CNS burden of disease was higher in the ICI-treated group (ICI:22% vs. chemotherapy:0% had >10 lesions; p = 0.02), but the utilization of WBRT was not (ICI:31% vs. chemotherapy:45%; p = 0.09). At the time of progression, CNS involvement was identified in 30 % of ICI-treated patients compared to 64 % of chemotherapy controls (p = 0.02). ICI-treated patients had superior iPFS (13.5 vs 8.4 months) that remained significant in multivariate analysis (HR 1.9; 95%CI 1.1--3.4). Superior CNS outcomes in ICI-treated patients were driven by the PD-L1 high subgroup where the 12-month cumulative incidence rate of CNS progression was 19% in ICI-treated PD-L1 ≥ 50%, 50% in ICI-treated PD-L1 < 50% and 58% in chemotherapy-treated patients (p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Remarkable CNS disease control is seen with baseline RT plus ICIs in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%. Strategies for delaying WBRT should be investigated in this subgroup of patients., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Organ transplant recipients (OTR) have an increased risk of developing post-transplant malignancies with lung cancer being one of the most common. In this retrospective study, we investigated incidence, use of systemic therapy and outcomes from lung cancer in OTR., Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with lung cancer following a solid organ transplant at the University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CA, from January 1, 1980 to June 30, 2016 were included. Data for the study population, patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes were abstracted from solid OTR databases, our cancer registry and patient charts. Univariate Kaplan-Meier curves estimated median overall survival (OS) by histology, stage and systemic therapy., Results: Amongst 7944 OTR (heart [N = 765], lung [n = 1668], liver [n = 2238], kidney [n = 3273]), 101 (1.3 %) developed lung cancer which were included in our analyses. Of these, 81 % were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 11 % small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 8% neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Median OS (months) was 25 in those that presented with Stage I/II NSCLC (44 %); 25 for Stage III NSCLC (7%); 3 for Stage IV NCLC (31 %); 10 for Limited stage SCLC (6%); 2 for Extensive stage (ES) SCLC (5%). NSCLC patients that received palliative chemotherapy had an OS of 8 months; ES-SCLC patients that received chemotherapy had an OS of 6 months. Of all patients who received platinum doublets (n = 16), 10 (62.5 %) required dose reductions at some point. Five patients experienced febrile neutropenia (31 %); two (12 %) had other toxicities leading to discontinuation., Conclusion: Patients with stage I/II NSCLC and NET had poorer survival compared to historical norms in non-transplant patients. Patients who had stage III NSCLC or received palliative systemic therapy had survivals at or slightly below historic norms, although numbers were small. Chemotherapy can be administered in selected OTR patients though dose reductions and febrile neutropenia were common., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) targeted therapies have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinomas. However, patients inevitably develop resistance to such therapies. To investigate novel mechanisms of resistance to second generation ALK inhibitors, we characterized and modeled ALK inhibitor resistance of ALK-positive patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models established from advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients who have progressed on one or more ALK inhibitors., Methods: Whole exome sequencing was performed to identify resistance mechanisms to ALK inhibitors in PDXs generated from biopsies at the time of relapse. ALK fusion status was confirmed using fluorescent in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, RNA-sequencing, RT-qPCR and western blot. Targeted therapies to overcome acquired resistance were then tested on the PDX models., Results: Three PDX models were successfully established from biopsies of two patients who had progressed on crizotinib and/or alectinib. The PDX models recapitulated the histology and ALK status of their patient tumors, as well as their matched patients' clinical treatment outcome to ALK inhibitors. Whole exome sequencing identified MET amplification and previously unreported BRAF V600E mutation as independent mechanisms of resistance to alectinib. Importantly, PDX treatment of inhibitors specific for these targets combined with ALK inhibitor overcame resistance., Conclusions: Bypass signaling pathway through c-MET and BRAF are independent mechanisms of resistance to alectinib. Individualized intervention against these resistance pathways could be viable therapeutic options in alectinib-refractory lung adenocarcinoma., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Liu is a consultant or has received honoraria for advisory boards and educational sessions from AstraZeneca, Takeda, Roche, Merck, Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb. Research funding to Dr. Liu’s institution from AstraZeneca, Takeda, Roche, and Boehringer Ingelheim. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are useful preclinical models to study cancer biology and mechanisms of drug response/resistance, particularly in molecularly targetable tumors. However, PDX engraftment may not be stochastic. We investigated clinical, histological and molecular features associated with PDX engraftment in a large cohort of EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)., Material and Methods: Samples were collected by different methods from patients at various disease stages and phases of treatment. PDX engraftment was defined as an ability to passage tumors twice in NOD-SCID mice. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression evaluated factors associated with engraftment., Results: Among 138 EGFR-mutated LUAD implanted into NOD-SCID mice, the overall engraftment rate was only 10% (14/138). However, engraftment was significantly higher in specimens from surgical resections or core-needle biopsies collected from metastatic sites (5/5; 100%) or from patients who had progressed on EGFR-inhibitors (7/10; 70%). Engrafted tumors usually showed poor histological differentiation, a solid morphologic pattern, and presence of either EGFR T790 M and/or TP53 mutations., Conclusions: Population level analyses of mutant EGFR-PDX show that these models might not fully recapitulate the inter-patient heterogeneity of EGFR-LUAD. However, mutant EGFR-PDXs may be useful to address key clinical questions, notably development of resistance to EGFR-inhibitors and disease progression to distant metastases., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peripheral blood sampling for detection of EGFR T790M in cell-free circulating tumour (ct) DNA in TKI-resistant EGFR mutant (EGFRm) lung cancer is now standard. The value of more comprehensive sequencing is unknown., Methods: Prospective ctDNA analysis in patients with EGFRm NSCLC was performed using a next generation sequencing (NGS) panel of regions of 11 genes detecting single nucleotide variants and small insertions/deletions at ≥0.1% variant allele frequency (VAF) was performed. Patients were grouped according to treatment phase, including: (A) pre EGFR-TKI, (B) stable or responding to EGFR-TKI, (C) radiographic progression during EGFR-TKI, and (D) during chemotherapy treatment., Results: Seventy-two patients with stage IV EGFRm NSCLC were enrolled and first blood samples were analysed. Primary sensitizing mutations in del19 or L858R were present in 66 (92%) and uncommon EGFRm in 6 (8%). Mutations in ctDNA were found in 53 samples (74%). T790M was detected in 3 of 4 patients with T790M-negative tissue. Other co-occurring EGFRm were found in 10 patients (7%) including K745R during first-line osimertinib. TP53 (n = 10), KRAS (n = 1), PI3KCA (n = 1) and ALK (n = 3) gene mutations also were detected. The presence of an EGFRm (excluding T790M) was associated with untreated or progressive disease, p = 0.04. In TKI-treated patients without radiologic progression, median progression free survival (PFS) was 10 months versus 2.1 months (HR 2.22, 95% CI: 0.89-5.54, p = 0.08) if an EGFRm in ctDNA was detected. If T790M was present in ctDNA, median PFS was 3.0 months versus 9.7 months (HR 4.59, 95% CI: 1.43-14.73, p = 0.005). High % VAF of both EGFRm and T790M correlated with inferior PFS (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03 respectively)., Conclusion: In addition to the emergence of resistance mutations, the presence of the primary or co-occurring EGFRm in patients receiving EGFR-TKIs may associate with shorter PFS and may be useful in longitudinal analyses of ctDNA to direct therapy., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Somatic mutations are becoming increasingly important biomarkers for treatment selection and outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The role of multiple somatic mutations in early-stage NSCLC is unclear., Methods: Tissue from 214 patients with resected NSCLC at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre was analyzed by next-generation sequencing by Mi-SEQ or Sequenom multiplex platforms. Associations between mutation status, baseline patient characteristics and outcomes (disease-free survival (DFS) after surgical resection and overall survival (OS)) were investigated., Results: Somatic mutations were identified in 184 patients with resected stage I-III NSCLC: None (n = 30), single (n = 101) and multiple (≥2, n = 83). Multiple mutations were significantly associated with younger age (p = 0.0006), female sex (p = 0.012), smoking status (p = 0.002) and adenocarcinoma histology (p = 0.0001).TP53, KRAS and EGFR were the most common mutations. TP53 mutation was the most frequent co-mutation occurring in 72% of patients with multiple mutations. In resected stage I-III patients, multiple mutations were significantly associated with worse DFS (HR = 2.56, p = 0.003) but not OS on univariate analysis. Patients with KRAS and EGFR mutations were also associated with shorter DFS (HR = 2.52, p = 0.016 and HR = 4.37, p = 0.001 respectively) but no OS difference. TP53 mutation was associated with both shorter DFS (HR = 2.21, p = 0.02) and OS (HR = 3.08, p = 0.02). In subgroup univariate analysis, poorer DFS was associated with multiple mutations (p = 0.0015), EGFR (HR = 3.14, p = 0.006), and TP53 (HR = 2.46, p = 0.018) in patients with stage I disease., Conclusion: The presence of known somatic mutations is associated with worse DFS in resected NSCLC. The differences are both statistically significant and clinically relevant. The presence of EGFR, KRAS and TP53 mutations was also associated with adverse outcomes. Larger datasets are required to validate whether mutational status is an independent prognostic factor in early stage NSCLC., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A majority of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will experience disease progression after first-line therapy. Patients who have advanced NSCLC that is especially aggressive, which is defined as disease that rapidly progresses on first-line treatment or disease that is refractory to first-line treatment, have a critical unmet medical need. These patients have a poor prognosis in the second-line setting. Several studies have recently shown that treatment with an antiangiogenic therapy may benefit these patients. This review summarizes the approved antiangiogenic therapies for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC in the second-line setting, specifically focusing on the outcomes from subgroups of patients with rapidly progressing or refractory disease. Several antiangiogenic agents, as monotherapy or in combination with other treatments, have been or are currently being studied in patients with advanced NSCLC. Antiangiogenics that are approved for use in patients with advanced NSCLC are limited to bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy (nonsquamous NSCLC), ramucirumab in combination with docetaxel (all histologies), and nintedanib in combination with docetaxel (adenocarcinoma histology). This review focuses on the efficacy, safety, and quality of life outcomes in the subpopulation of patients with rapidly progressing or refractory NSCLC treated with approved antiangiogenic therapies in the second-line setting. We also discuss the impact of newly approved immunotherapy agents on the outcomes of patients with aggressive or refractory disease. Studies in progress and planned future research will determine if combination treatment with antiangiogenics and immunotherapies will benefit patients with aggressive, advanced NSCLC., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: Pelareorep (reolysin), a Dearing strain of reovirus serotype 3, has demonstrated oncolytic activity as single agent and synergy with chemotherapy. We evaluated pelareorep, combined with standard second-line chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Materials and Methods: This randomized phase II trial enrolled patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC after first line chemotherapy. After a safety run-in, patients were randomized 1:1 to chemotherapy (pemetrexed [500 mg/m2, non-squamous], or docetaxel [75 mg/m2], day 1 every 21 days]) +/- pelareorep (4.5 × 1010 TCID50, days 1-3 every 21 days), stratified by EGFR mutation status. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS) of patients randomized to chemotherapy + pelareorep vs. chemotherapy alone. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, objective response rate and exploratory translational analyses., Results: Between October 2012 and August 2015, 166 patients were enrolled (14 to the safety run in). Pelareorep did not improve the PFS vs. single agent chemotherapy (median PFS 3.0 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-4.1) vs. 2.8 months (95% CI 2.5-4.0), hazard ratio (HR) 0.90 (95% CI 0.65-1.25), P = 0.53). Neither KRAS or EGFR mutation was associated with improved PFS, but STK11 mutations did appear to have an association with improved PFS (HR 0.29 [0.12-0.67); as did PIK3CA mutation (HR 0.45 [0.22-0.93]). The combination was tolerable, although associated with increased rates of neutropenic fever., Conclusion: The addition of pelareorep to second-line chemotherapy did not improve the PFS of patients with NSCLC. The three-day pelareorep schedule was tolerable. Further research is needed to evaluate the potential benefit in molecular subtypes of NSCLC., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: The REVEL study demonstrated improved efficacy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with ramucirumab plus docetaxel, independent of histology. This exploratory analysis characterized the treatment effect in REVEL patients who were refractory to prior first-line treatment., Materials and Methods: Refractory patients had a best response of progressive disease to first-line treatment. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QoL), and safety. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed for OS and PFS, and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for response. QoL was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. Sensitivity analyses were performed on subgroups of the intent-to-treat population with limited time on first-line therapy., Results: Of 1253 randomized patients in REVEL, 360 (29%) were refractory to first-line treatment. Baseline characteristics were largely balanced between treatment arms. In the control arm, median OS for refractory patients was 6.3 versus 10.3 months for patients not meeting this criterion, demonstrating the poor prognosis of refractory patients. Median OS (8.3 vs. 6.3 months; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68-1.08), median PFS (4.0 vs. 2.5 months; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88), and ORR (22.5% vs. 12.6%) were improved in refractory patients treated with ramucirumab compared to placebo, without new safety concerns or further deteriorating patient QoL., Conclusions: The effect of ramucirumab in refractory patients is similar to that in the intent-to-treat population. The benefit/risk profile for refractory patients suggests that ramucirumab plus docetaxel is an appropriate treatment option even in this difficult-to-treat population., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: TP53 mutations are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have been reported as prognostic of poor outcome. The impact of TP53 co-mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC is unclear., Materials and Methods: Tissue from 105 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre was analyzed by next-generation or Sanger sequencing to determine TP53 mutational status. Associations between TP53 status and baseline patient and tumor characteristics, treatments and outcomes (relapse-free survival [RFS] after surgical resection, overall survival [OS], overall response rate [ORR] and progression-free survival [PFS] on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs]), were investigated., Results: Dual TP53/EGFR mutations were found in 43/105 patients (41%). Among 76 patients who underwent surgical resection, neither RFS (HR 0.99, CI 0.56-1.75, p=0.96) nor OS (HR 1.39, CI 0.70-2.77; p=0.35) was associated with TP53 status. Sixty patients (24 TP53 MUT; 36 TP53 WT) received first-generation EGFR TKIs for advanced disease. ORR was not significantly different (TP53 MUT 54%, WT 66%, p=0.42). There was a non-significant trend towards shorter PFS on EGFR TKIs with TP53 mutation (HR 1.74, CI 0.98-3.10, p=0.06). When limited to TP53 missense mutations (n=17), PFS was significantly shorter (HR 1.91, CI 1.01-3.60, p=0.04). Among 11 evaluable patients treated with T790M inhibitors, ORR was not significantly different (TP53 MUT 3/3 [100%], WT 7/8 [88%])., Conclusions: Patients with dual TP53/EGFR mutations, especially missense mutations, had marginally lower response rates and shorter PFS when treated with EGFR TKI therapy. Larger datasets are required to validate these observations., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Molecular profiling in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has allowed for the detection of actionable mutations, which has revolutionized the treatment paradigm in this highly fatal disease. Mutations involving the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are most common and the 'classical mutations', exon 19 deletions and the point mutation L858R at exon 21, predict response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The 'uncommon' EGFR mutations account for 10-18% of all EGFR mutations and primarily consist of exon 20 insertions, exon 18 point mutations and complex mutations. Improved detection techniques have broadened the spectrum of reported aberrations within the 'uncommon group' but response to TKIs is variable and not fully elucidated. This review provides an overview of the biology and incidence of uncommon EGFR mutations and summarizes reported outcomes when treated with EGFR-TKIs., (Crown Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Brain metastases in EGFR/ALK-driven NSCLC frequently pose treatment dilemmas. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can control extracranial disease, but radiotherapy is often required for intracranial control. We aimed to evaluate the impact of first-line whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) or TKI alone on outcomes of patients with brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-driven NSCLC., Methods: This single center retrospective review included 184 patients with brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-driven NSCLC, and analyzed effect of treatment choice on time to intracranial progression (TTIP) and overall survival (OS)., Results: First-line treatment for brain metastases consisted of WBRT in 120 patients, SRS in 37 and TKI alone in 27. WBRT-treated patients had more brain metastases, and more baseline symptoms. Median TTIP was longer in the WBRT group at 50.5months than SRS or TKI groups at 12 and 15months (p=0.0038). No significant difference was seen in median OS: 21.6months in the WBRT group, 23.9months in the SRS group and 22.6months in the TKI group (p=0.67). In multivariable analysis, age>65years (HR 2.2, p=0.0014), greater number of brain metastases (HR 2.48, p=0.0002) and greater number of extracranial metastatic sites (2 vs 0-1 HR=2.05, p=0.014 and 3+ vs 0-1 HR=2.95, p=0.0001 were associated with shorter OS. No independent effect was seen from first-line CNS treatment choice., Conclusions: First-line WBRT for brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-driven NSCLC was associated with longer TTIP than SRS or TKI alone, with no difference in OS. These results could support deferral of WBRT until intracranial progression in selected patients who are closely monitored., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Prognostic and predictive ability of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stromal derived factor (SDF)-1α and soluble VEGF receptors (sVEGFR) 2 and 3, were evaluated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients enrolled in NCIC Clinical Trials Group BR. 24 comparing chemotherapy with or without cediranib., Materials and Methods: Biomarker levels were assessed by ELISA in serum from 149/296 enrolled patients at baseline and 146/149 patients after one treatment cycle. Experimental cut-offs for baseline measures determined using a graphic method were:, Vegf-A: < or ≥1 ng/ml, SDF-1α: ≤ or >3.5 ng/ml, sVEGFR2: < or ≥11 ng/ml and sVEGFR3: < or ≥35.5 ng/ml. Changes in markers from baseline to on-treatment were predefined as increased ≥10%, stable within 10% or decreased ≥10%. Cox regression models were used to correlate biomarkers with patient characteristics and outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: No baseline biomarker was prognostic for OS, however, high baseline sVEGFR2 was prognostic for better PFS (p=0.0008) in the chemotherapy alone arm. Low baseline sVEGFR2 or sVEGFR3 were predictive of PFS benefit from cediranib (interaction p=0.06 and p=0.05, respectively). While on treatment, VEGF-A increases were associated with better PFS (p=0.02) and OS (p=0.01) for cediranib treated patients. Decreases in sVEGFR2 (p=0.01) or sVEGFR3 (p=0.02) were also predictive of better OS in cediranib treated patients., Conclusions: Low baseline sVEGFR2 and sVEGFR3 were predictive for PFS benefit from cediranib, whereas increases in VEGF-A and decreases in sVEGFR2 or sVEGFR3 levels from baseline to on-treatment were predictive of an OS benefit from cediranib in chemotherapy treated NSCLC patients. Validation of these results is warranted., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in North America. In addition to tobacco smoking, inherited genetic factors can also influence the development of lung cancer. These genetic factors may lead to biologically distinct subsets of cancers that have different outcomes. We evaluated whether genetic sequence variants (GSVs) associated with lung cancer risk are associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in stage-III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Methods: A total of 20 candidate GSVs in 12 genes previously reported to be associated with lung cancer risk were genotyped in 564 patients with stage-III or IV NSCLC. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential clinical prognostic factors were generated for OS and PFS., Results: After taking into account multiple comparisons, one GSV remained significant: rs4975616 on chromosome 5p15.33, located near the TERT-CLPTM1L gene. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for OS was 0.75 (0.69-0.91), p = 0.002; for PFS aHR was 0.74 (0.62-0.89), p < 0.001 for each protective variant allele. Results were similar in both Stage III (OS: aHR = 0.70; PFS: aHR = 0.71) and Stage IV patients (OS: aHR = 0.81; PFS: aHR = 0.77)., Conclusion: A GSV on 5p15.33 is not only a risk factor for lung cancer but may also be associated with survival in patients with late stage NSCLC. If validated, GSVs may define subsets of patients with different risk and prognosis of NSCLC., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Four randomized phase II/III trials investigated the addition of cetuximab to platinum-based, first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A meta-analysis was performed to examine the benefit/risk ratio for the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy., Materials and Methods: The meta-analysis included individual patient efficacy data from 2018 patients and individual patient safety data from 1970 patients comprising respectively the combined intention-to-treat and safety populations of the four trials. The effect of adding cetuximab to chemotherapy was measured by hazard ratios (HRs) obtained using a Cox proportional hazards model and odds ratios calculated by logistic regression. Survival rates at 1 year were calculated. All applied models were stratified by trial. Tests on heterogeneity of treatment effects across the trials and sensitivity analyses were performed for all endpoints., Results: The meta-analysis demonstrated that the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.88, p=0.009, median 10.3 vs 9.4 months), progression-free survival (HR 0.90, p=0.045, median 4.7 vs 4.5 months) and response (odds ratio 1.46, p<0.001, overall response rate 32.2% vs 24.4%) compared with chemotherapy alone. The safety profile of chemotherapy plus cetuximab in the meta-analysis population was confirmed as manageable. Neither trials nor patient subgroups defined by key baseline characteristics showed significant heterogeneity for any endpoint., Conclusion: The addition of cetuximab to platinum-based, first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC significantly improved outcome for all efficacy endpoints with an acceptable safety profile, indicating a favorable benefit/risk ratio., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background/objective: Non-platinum-based chemotherapy is a potential alternative to platinum doublet therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in selected patients. We determined the cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine/vinorelbine (GEMVIN), versus cisplatin/gemcitabine (PG) or cisplatin/vinorelbine (PV), from a government payer perspective., Methods: Results from a randomized trial of GEMVIN versus PG or PV demonstrated no significant difference in global quality of life (primary endpoint) or overall survival between regimens, but superior progression-free survival for platinum-based regimens. A cost analysis was conducted using direct medical costs of treatment, grade 3 or 4 toxicity management, and investigations for the mean number of cycles per study arm. Costs were calculated using Canadian dollars in 2005, and then in 2013 after drug patent expiry., Results: In 2005, GEMVIN was the most expensive regimen ($6868), and PV the least expensive ($4650), with an incremental cost of GEMVIN over PV of $2218. Diagnostic and administration costs did not differ significantly among regimens; GEMVIN had the lowest toxicity costs. The principal cost driver in 2005 was the cost of chemotherapy. In 2013, toxicity and administration costs emerged as major drivers; GEMVIN was less costly than PV and PG, (cost savings of $413 over PV)., Conclusion: Despite similar outcomes, GEMVIN was more expensive than PV or PG in 2005 because of higher chemotherapy costs. By 2013, after chemotherapy drug patent expiry, GEMVIN became the least costly regimen. Economic considerations in oncology change over time, and should be revisited in policy decisions based on cost., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: CALGB 9633 was a randomized trial of observation versus adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In CALGB 9633, the presence of mucin in the primary tumor was associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.9, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS; HR = 1.9, p = 0.004)., Methods: To validate these results, mucin staining was performed on primary tumor specimens from 780 patients treated on IALT, 351 on JBR.10 and 150 on ANITA. The histochemical technique using mucicarmine was performed. The prognostic value of mucin for DFS and OS was tested in a Cox model stratified by trial and adjusted for clinical and pathological factors. A pooled analysis of all 4 trials was performed for the predictive value of mucin for benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy., Results: The cross-validation group had 48% squamous, 37% adenocarcinoma and 15% other NSCLC compared with 29%, 56%, and 15%, respectively in CALGB. Among 1262 patients with assessable results, mucin was positive in IALT 24%, JBR.10 30%, ANITA 22% compared with 45% in CALGB. Histology was the only significant covariate (p < 0.0001) in multivariate analysis with mucin seen more commonly in adenocarcinoma (56%) compared with squamous (5%) and other NSCLC (15%). Mucin was a borderline negative prognostic factor for DFS (HR = 1.2 [1.0-1.5], p = 0.06) but not significantly so for OS (HR=1.1 [0.9-1.4], p = 0.25). Prognostic value did not vary according to histology: HR = 1.3 [1.0-1.6] in adenocarcinoma vs. 1.6 [1.2-2.2] for DFS in other histology (interaction p = 0.69). Mucin status was not predictive for benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (test of interaction: DFS p = 0.27; OS p = 0.49)., Conclusions: Mucin was less frequent in the cross-validation group due to its higher percentage of squamous cell carcinomas. The negative impact of mucin was confirmed for DFS but not for OS. Mucin expression was not predictive of overall survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We examined how crossover therapy might affect the association between progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: We extracted PFS- and OS-hazard ratios (HRs) in phase III trials of molecular-targeted agents for advanced NSCLC. Their relationship was modeled in a linear function with the coefficient of determination (R-squared) to assess the correlation between PFS and OS., Results: Thirty-four trials with 35 pairs for the investigational and reference arms were identified (24,158 patients). Overall, there was little correlation between PFS- and OS-HRs (R-squared = 0.14), suggesting PFS-HR could account only for 14% of variation in OS-HR. The median proportion of crossover therapy per trial was 20%. If patients seldom crossed over (none or <1%), the association between PFS- and OS-HRs was strong (R-squared = 0.69). When the proportion of crossover was ≥1%, however, R-squared declined considerably (≥1% to <20% crossover, R-squared = 0.27; ≥20% to <40%, R-squared = 0.06; and ≥40%, R-squared = 0.27)., Conclusions: A PFS advantage seldom is associated with an OS advantage any longer. Our analysis suggests this is due to a high level of crossover now that an increasing number of active agents are available for NSCLC., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the patterns of loco-regional (LR) and distant failure in patients with limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma (LS-SCLC) treated with curative intent., Methods: From 1997 to 2008, 253 LS-SCLC patients were treated with curative intent chemo-radiation at our institution. A retrospective review identified sites of failure. The cumulative LR failure (LRF) rate was calculated. Distant failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Volumetric images of LR failures were delineated and registered with the original radiation treatment plans if available. Dosimetric parameters for the delineated failure volumes were calculated from the original treatment information., Results: The median follow-up was 19 months. The site of first failure was LR in 34, distant in 80 and simultaneous LR and distant in 31 patients. The cumulative LRF rate was 29% and 38% at 2 and 5 years. OS was 44% at 2 years. Seventy patients had electronically archived treatment plans of which there were 16 LR failures (7 local and 39 regional failure volumes). Of the local and regional failure volumes 29% and 31% were in-field, respectively., Conclusions: The predominant pattern of LR failure was marginal or out-of-field. LR failures may be preventable with improved radiotherapy target definition., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Department of Medical Imaging at the University Health Network in Toronto is performing a lung cancer screening study, utilizing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) as the modality. Baseline and annual repeat results are reported on the first 3352 participants, enrolled between June 2003 and May 2007., Methods: Enrollment was limited to those aged 50 years or older, with a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years, no previous cancer and general good health. A helical low-dose CT (LDCT) of the chest was performed using 120kVp, 40-60mA, images were reconstructed with 1-1.25mm overlapping slices. The primary objectives were the detection of parenchymal nodules and diagnosis of early stage lung cancer. Baseline LDCTs were termed positive if at least one indeterminate non-calcified nodule 5mm or larger in size, or non-solid nodule 8mm or larger in size was identified. Follow up periods for individuals with a positive baseline LDCT were determined by nodule characteristics., Results: The median age at baseline was 60 years (range 50-83), with a median of 30 pack-years of cigarette smoking (range 10-189). Baseline CT evaluations were positive in 600 (18%) participants. To date, 2686 (80%) of the participants have returned for at least one annual repeat screening LDCT. Biopsies have been recommended for 82 participants since the study began, and 64 have been diagnosed with screen-detected cancer (62 lung, two plasmacytoma of the rib). A total of 65 lung cancers have been diagnosed (62 screen-detected, 3 interim), 57 are NSCLC (82% with known stage are stage I or II) and the rate of surgical resection was 80%. Sensitivity and specificity of the protocol in successfully diagnosing early stage lung cancers were 87.7% and 99.3%, respectively., Conclusions: Data indicate that LDCT can identify small lung cancers in an at-risk population. The diagnostic algorithm results in few false-positive invasive procedures. Most cancers are detected at an early stage, where the cancer is resectable with a greater potential for cure. Long-term follow up of lung cancer cases will be carried out to determine survival., (Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and to evaluate the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer., Methods: Relevant randomized trials and meta-analyses, published as articles or abstracts, were identified through electronic and hand searches by two reviewers., Results: Seven meta-analyses and 26 randomized trials comparing surgery with or without chemotherapy met the pre-defined eligibility criteria for the review. The meta-analyses all showed a survival advantage for platinum- or UFT-based postoperative chemotherapy, although the results did not always achieve statistical significance. The results of individual trials were inconsistent, although recent trials have detected a large survival advantage with postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy. Differences in trial design, patient characteristics, disease stage, use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimen may explain the variation in results., Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy improves survival compared with surgery alone in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. In patients fit for chemotherapy, the survival benefits strongly outweigh the adverse effects of the treatment.

Purpose: Oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are new agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase II studies demonstrate objective tumor responses and symptom improvement, combined with minimal toxicity and the convenience of an oral agent. We evaluated patient utility through willingness-to-pay (WTP) for these agents in the treatment of advanced NSCLC in Canada., Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients and healthy subjects participated in a structured interview and bidding exercise, reviewing current evidence supporting EGFR TKI therapy in advanced NSCLC and patient willingness-to-pay for treatment., Results: Fifty-seven patients and 54 healthy subjects participated. The median amount both groups were willing to pay for a month of oral EGFR TKI therapy was $100 CAD (range $0-5000 per month). A minority of NSCLC patients received employment income, the majority relying on disability, pension income, and social assistance for financial support. Affordability of these agents was a key concern for both advanced NSCLC patients and healthy subjects. Univariate predictors of WTP included marital status, prior chemotherapy treatment, receiving pension income or financial social assistance. In multivariate analysis, only prior chemotherapy remained a significant predictor of WTP (p=0.049)., Conclusion: Both advanced NSCLC patients and healthy subjects feel oral EGFR TKIs are worth paying for in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, but are willing to pay only a fraction of the market price. As many advanced NSCLC patients are financially disadvantaged, the potential for restricted access to newer therapies is of concern.

Resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has 5-years survival rates of 30-70%. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear with poor compliance reported in most trials. The compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for stage IB and II NSCLC was analyzed using data from a North American multi-centre phase III study (accrual 1994-2001) that compared adjuvant chemotherapy to observation. Planned chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (CIS) 50 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and vinorelbine (VIN) 25 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, 22 for four cycles; the VIN dose had been reduced from 30 mg/m2 after an initial cohort of patients experienced unacceptable toxicity. Four hundred and twenty-four patients were randomized after the amendment, 215 to the chemotherapy arm. Median age was 60 years, 64% were male and 84% had stage II disease. Thirty-seven patients completed one cycle, 14 completed two, 20 completed three and 108 patients completed all four cycles. Ten patients received no therapy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in compliance with extent of surgery, gender and age. Patients randomized in Canada were more likely to fail to complete chemotherapy due to refusal of therapy than their American counterparts. Patients who had pneumonectomies were more likely to discontinue therapy due to toxicity than those who had lesser resections. Extent of surgery may play a role in both the compliance and toxicity of ACT. Differences between nations in the perception of the risks and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, both between physicians and patients, should be investigated further.

Purpose: This is a phase II study to assess the role of induction chemotherapy in the management of stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We are now reporting the long-term follow-up of the Toronto phase II trial., Methods: Sixty five patients with mediastinoscopy proven stage IIIA NSCLC received two cycles of preoperative MVP or VLB/P followed by thoracotomy followed by two further courses of chemotherapy., Results: The overall response rate was 67.7% with three complete and 41 partial responders. Forty seven patients went on to thoracotomy with 35 complete resections. Pathologically 4.6% of patients had no tumour remaining. There were three postop deaths as well as five chemotherapy related deaths. Of the 35 patients completely resected 19 have recurred including eight in brain. The median survival for the entire 65 patients is 18.6 months with a 1 year survival of 66%, 5 year survival of 29% and a 10 year survival of 22%., Conclusions: The long-term survival of induction chemotherapy is maintained. The high incidence of brain recurrences warrants assessment of the role of prophylactic cranial radiation. The role of surgery for stage IIIA NSCLC following induction chemotherapy awaits further study.

We previously reported that our cDNA microarray analysis of primary non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) could predict for patients at increased risk of cancer recurrence. From the result of this analysis, we selected 11 genes that were considered candidate prognostic marker genes and used the realtime reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to investigate their expression in the same set of NSCLC cases used in the microarray study. Cluster analysis of the realtime RT-PCR data separated these patients into two groups with significantly different disease-free survivals (log-rank test, P < 0.017). In contrast, cluster analysis failed to confirm the prognostic significance of the realtime RT-PCR results for these 11 genes in a validation series of 92 NSCLC cases. In univariate analysis, hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha, Rho-GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) alpha (RhoGDI) and Citron/rho-interacting serine-threonine kinase 21 (Citron K21) were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival in the entire cohort of 130 NSCLC patients, but none were significant in multivariate analysis. The results demonstrate that the prognostic significance of microarray (SAM) results can be partially validated using realtime RT-PCR, but secondary validation using larger and independent series of tumors is necessary to identify true prognostic marker genes.

Purpose and Methods: Docetaxel second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has previously been shown to improve survival significantly compared with best supportive care (BSC). This multicenter phase III trial prospectively investigated quality of life (QOL) in NSCLC patients treated with either second-line docetaxel or BSC. Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, performance status < or =2, and adequate biochemistry and hematology were eligible if they had received > or =1 platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. Patients were randomized to docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (n=49) or, after protocol amendment, to docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (n=55), or to BSC (n=100), with Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and/or QLQ-C30 (with LC13 module) assessment every 3 weeks., Results: Longitudinal analysis including all available assessments over time showed statistically significant differences in patient-rated pain scores in favor of docetaxel overall (P=0.005) or docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (P=0.003) compared to BSC. Trends in favor of docetaxel were noted on observer-rated scales for fatigue and pain for all docetaxel patients, and for total LCSS score, appetite and fatigue with docetaxel 100 mg/m2. Changes from baseline to the last available assessment (end point) showed significantly (P<0.05) less deterioration in LCSS pain score in patients with docetaxel (75 and 100 mg/m2 combined) than with BSC. An improved mean pain score with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was contrasted with a deterioration in mean pain score with BSC (P<0.01). There was also significantly less deterioration in the global QOL today score with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (P<0.01). Similar trends were recorded with QLQ-C30 assessments., Conclusions: Second-line docetaxel therapy for advanced NSCLC significantly improves survival with a trend towards less deterioration in QOL compared with BSC.

It has now been almost 30 years since Dr J. Folkman first proposed that inhibition of angiogenesis could play a key role in treating cancer; however, it is only recently that anti-angiogenesis agents have entered the clinical setting. The search for novel therapies is particularly important in lung cancer, where the majority of patients succumb to their disease despite aggressive treatments. Several classes of agents now exist that target the different steps involved in angiogenesis. These include drugs inhibiting matrix breakdown, the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors (MMPIs), such as marimastat, prinomastat, BMS275291, BAY12-9566, and neovastat drugs that block endothelial cell signaling via vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) including rhuMAb VEGF, SU5416, SU6668, ZD6474, CP-547,632 and ZD4190. Drugs that are similar to endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis including endostatin, angiostatin and interferons. There has also been renewed interest in thalidomide. Drugs such as squalamine, celecoxib, ZD6126, TNP-470 and those targeting the integrins are also being evaluated in lung cancer. Despite early enthusiasm for many of these agents, Phase III trials have not yet demonstrated significant increases in overall survival and toxicity remains an issue. It is hoped that as our understanding of the complex process of angiogenesis increases, so will our ability to design more effective targeted therapies.

Several classes of agents now exist that target the different steps involved in angiogenesis. These include drugs inhibiting matrix breakdown, the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors (MMPIs), such as marimastat, prinomastat, BMS275291, BAY12-9566, and neovastat. Trials of this class of agents have all been negative to date. Drugs that block endothelial cell signaling via vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) including rhuMAb VEGF, SU5416, SU6668, ZD6474, CP-547,632 and ZD4190 are all in earlier stages of clinical trial. Drugs that are similar to endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis including interferons have also been evaluated without success. Endostatin has been shown to have an acceptable toxicity profile, but clinical evidence of activity has not yet been demonstrated. There has also been renewed interest in thalidomide. Drugs such as squalamine, celecoxib, ZD6126, TNP-470 and those targeting the integrins are also being evaluated in lung cancer. Despite early enthusiasm for many of these agents, Phase III trials have not yet demonstrated significant increases in overall survival and toxicity remains an issue. It is hoped that as our understanding of the complex process of angiogenesis increases, so will our ability to design more effective targeted therapies.

Lung cancer is the leading world-wide cause of cancer death. The care rate remains less than 15% despite improvements in surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The majority of deaths can be attributed to systemic metastases. Chemotherapy prolongs survival but produces few complete responses and survival at 5-years is rare. Molecular advances have provided many new targets for lung cancer therapy. Many new agents have been developed to attack these targets. This article describes current and proposed trials for these new targeted therapies in both small cell and non-small cell lung cancers.

When compared with best supportive care alone, the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel significantly improved the 1-year survival rate (37 vs. 12%) and lengthened time to disease progression (median 12.3 vs. 7.0 weeks) in study TAX 317. Quality of life was superior with docetaxel and the need for tumor-related therapy was reduced. Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) in this setting is safe, and offers clinically meaningful benefit to patients. These findings are supported by data from study TAX 320 in which a heavily pre-treated population of advanced NSCLC patients was randomized to receive docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) or a comparator arm of either vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Treatment with either dose of docetaxel significantly increased the proportion of patients without disease progression at 26 weeks. By intent to treat analysis, 1-year survival was 32% in patients randomized to docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). This was significantly greater than the 19% 1-year survival rate in the comparator arm. Prior exposure to paclitaxel did not lessen the response rate or survival advantage of docetaxel in this second-line setting. Future development is likely to lie in the combination of docetaxel with novel molecular-targeted agents such as EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors., (Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.)