Search

Background and Purpose: We conducted a prospective phase II multicentric trial to determine if radical radiation therapy to all metastatic sites might improve the progression-free survival (PFS) in oligometastatic breast cancer patients. Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and toxicity., Methods and Materials: Inclusion criteria were the following: oligometastatic breast cancer with ≤5 metastatic sites, FDG-PET/CT staging, no brain metastases, primary tumor controlled. Radiotherapy could be delivered using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) technique or fractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). SBRT consisted of 30-45Gy in 3 fractions, while IMRT was delivered to a total dose of 60Gy in 25 fractions. We hypothesized that radical radiation therapy could increase the PFS from 30% (according to the published literature) to 50% at two years., Results: 54 Patients with 92 metastatic lesions were enrolled. Forty-four were treated with SBRT, and 10 with IMRT. Forty-eight (89%) patients received a form of systemic therapy concomitantly to radiation therapy. Sites of metastatic disease were the following: bones 60 lesions, lymph nodes 23 lesions, lung 4 lesions, liver 5 lesions. After a median follow-up of 30months (range, 6-55months), 1- and 2-year PFS was 75% and 53%, respectively. Two-year LC and OS were 97% and 95%, respectively. Radiation therapy was well tolerated, and no Grade ≥3 toxicity was documented. Grade 2 toxicity were pain and fatigue in 2 cases., Conclusions: Patients with oligometastatic breast cancer treated with radical radiotherapy to all metastatic sites may achieve long-term progression-free survival, without significant treatment-related toxicity. While waiting for data from randomized trials, the use of radical radiation therapy to all metastatic sites in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer should be considered a valuable option, and its recommendation should be individualized., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Substantial progress has been made in the management of breast cancer by targeting HER2 and VEGF pathways. Although the efficacy and safety of target therapy in breast cancer have been established, no specific phase III trial has addressed these issues in the elderly population and the only data available derive from subanalyses or retrospective series. The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence in this special population and to encourage further well designed studies in elderly breast cancer patients., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Life-expectancy and comorbid conditions must be considered in the process of treatment decision-making for elderly patients affected by breast cancer both in the adjuvant and metastatic settings. Moreover, the choice of adjuvant treatment in all age groups is based on two main points: endocrine responsiveness and risk of relapse without setting an upper age limit. The hormonal therapeutic armamentarium of the medical oncologist is now open to different options that may best be tailored to different clinical situations, particularly in elderly women.

Unlabelled: Several drugs have been approved for the treatment of patients affected by advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in progression after first line chemotherapy: Docetaxel, Pemetrexed and Erlotinib. Poor gain of survival has been demonstrated in randomised trials and patient characteristics predicting activity are poorly known yet. We evaluated the activity and toxicity of Pemetrexed, in a post-registration phase, to assess whether clinical benefits justify its employment in a second-line setting in routine clinical practice., Patients and Methods: We collected data on patients with advanced NSCLC treated with Pemetrexed 500mg/m(2) every 21 days, after progression to prior chemotherapy., Results: One hundred and sixty patients from 4 different Italian Institutions, treated with Pemetrexed, mostly as second-line therapy, were analysed. There was a predominance of males versus females, adenocarcinoma versus other histologies; the median age was 63.6 years. The toxicity profile was extremely mild and the response rate (11.2% patients in complete or partial response) was similar to previous reports from the literature. The median overall survival, 12 months, was better than previously reported., Conclusion: Improved efficacy and mild toxicity observed in this clinically relevant patient population confirms Pemetrexed as an interesting choice in second-line treatment of NSCLC. Patient characteristics alone are not able to predict response to Pemetrexed.

There is concern about the potential increase of hematological toxicity in elderly patients treated with chemotherapy. Recently, primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) was proposed for elderly patients receiving moderately toxic chemotherapy. However, evidence for the benefits of this primary prophylaxis for elderly breast cancer patients is currently lacking. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and neutropenic infections in elderly breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy without primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors. In addition, we assessed the direct costs of hospitalization for these complications. Febrile neutropenia or neutropenic infection occurred in 13% of the 46 patients. Further studies are needed to adequately evaluate the risk of neutropenic complications (NC) in elderly patients receiving standard-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer and the potential benefits of primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors.

Idarubicin (IDA) is a structural analogue of daunorubicin with the same mechanism of action. Unlike the other currently available anthracyclines, it has a significant oral bioavailability, which makes it particularly attractive for the treatment of elderly patients. IDA resulted at least as effective as daunorubicin for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia and additional data are in analysis as far as lymphomas and breast cancer are concerned. Adverse effects are mainly hematological, while hair loss, mucositis and cardiotoxicity are less frequently reported with IDA than with other anthracyclines. The pharmacokinetics, activity, adverse effects and new modalities of oral administration are reviewed.

Adjuvant treatment of elderly women affected by breast cancer who have a high risk of recurrence is one of the most questionable issues in clinical oncology. The use of tamoxifen in women with hormone receptor-positive tumors is a relatively simple therapeutic option considering the favourable toxicity profile, whereas the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is more complicated and a variety of aspects need to be considered. The estimated life expectancy, the presence and degree of comorbid conditions, the geriatric assessment and estimated benefit from treatment should be taken into account. Due to the lack of data from clinical trials in women over the age of 70, the approach is still experimental. Clinical trials evaluating the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in high risk patients are currently being developed and hopefully in the near future, more convincing data on the best drugs, regimens and benefits for the treatment of elderly breast cancer patients will become available.