Search

This systematic review aimed to update the perceived needs of individuals with breast cancer (BC). Databases were searched for studies reporting quantitative data collected through validated assessment tools. Needs of adults with BC were reported by survivorship phase. The post-diagnosis and the post-surgery phases revealed the most needs; health system and information needs represented the greatest concern, with average Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form (SCNS-SF34) scores ranging from 62.0 to 75.8 post-diagnosis and from 45.0 to 67.8 post-surgery. Needs then seemed to decrease or remain stable up to within one year from diagnosis, when needs in all domains increased again; health system and information needs remained a priority. Younger age, side effects, type of treatment, and advanced stage were associated with the occurrence of unmet needs. The needs of BC survivors vary over the course of their cancer experience. This knowledge can assist the planning of appropriate assessments., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: To investigate the performance of combined (18)F-FDG-PET/CT as a predictor of the WHO-classification based malignancy grade in thymic epithelial tumors., Methods: From 05/06 to 02/12, the data of 47 patients with thymic epithelial tumors assessed by (18)F-FDG-PET/CT before being surgically treated were collected in 3 centers and retrospectively reviewed for the purposes of this study. The SUVmax and the SUVmax/T index (the ratio tumor-SUVmax to tumor-size) have been matched with specific subgroups of the WHO-classification: low-risk thymomas (types A-AB-B1), high-risk thymomas (types B2-B3) and thymic carcinomas (type C)., Results: There were 22 men and 25 women (age range: 31-84 yrs). Mean tumor size was 44.7 ± 19.0 mm. The WHO-classification was: type-A #2, type-AB #11, type-B1 #9, type-B2 #9, type-B3 #9 and type-C #7. The SUVmax and the SUVmax/T were found to be predictive factors useful to distinguish thymomas from thymic carcinomas (SUVmax: area under ROC-curve: 0.955, p = 0.0045; SUVmax/T-size: area under ROC-curve: 0.927, p = 0.0022). Moreover, both parameters were found to be correlated with the WHO malignancy grade (low-risk thymomas; high-risk thymomas; thymic carcinoma), Spearman correlation coefficients being 0.56 (p < 0.0001) and 0.76 (p < 0.0001), respectively for the SUVmax and for the SUVmax/T index. In addition, the SUVmax is also significantly correlated with Masaoka stage (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.30, p = 0.0436) CONCLUSIONS: A significant relationship was observed between (18)F-FDG-PET/CT findings and histologic WHO-classification for this cohort of thymic epithelial tumors. Thus, on the basis of these evidences, we infer that (18)F-FDG-PET/CT may be useful to predict histology and the WHO classes of risk., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite the high survival rates reported for screening-detected cases, the potential of screening of high-risk subjects for reducing lung cancer mortality is still unproven. We herewith present the baseline results of a randomized trial comparing screening for lung cancer with annual spiral computed tomography (CT) versus a yearly clinical review., Methods: Male subjects, 60-74 years old, and smokers of 20+ pack-years were enrolled. All participants received a baseline medical examination, chest X-rays (CXR) and sputum cytology upon accrual. Subjects randomized in the spiral CT group received a spiral CT scan at baseline, then yearly for the following 4 years. For controls, a yearly clinical examination was scheduled for the following 4 years., Results: 2472 subjects were randomized (1276 spiral CT arm, 1196 controls). Age, smoking exposure and co-morbid conditions were similar in the two groups. In the spiral CT group, 28 lung cancers were detected, 13 of which were visible in the baseline chest X-rays (overall prevalence 2.2%). Sixteen out of 28 tumours (57%) were stage I, and 19 (68%) were resectable. In the control group, eight cases were detected by the baseline chest X-rays (prevalence rate 0.67%), four (50%) were stage I, and six (75%) were resectable., Conclusions: Baseline lung cancer detection rate in the spiral CT arm was higher than in most published studies. The stage I detection rate was increased four-fold by spiral CT versus chest X-rays. However, more tumours in an advanced stage were also detected by CT. The high resection rate of screening-detected patients suggests a possible increase in cure rate. However, longer follow-up is required for definitive conclusions. This trial has been registered at www.Clinicaltrials.gov, registration No. NCT00420862.