Search

Background and Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the radiochemical oxygen depletion (ROD) in vivo by directly measuring oxygen levels in various mouse tissues during ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiation at clinically relevant doses and dose rates., Materials and Methods: Mice bearing subcutaneous human glioblastoma (U-87 MG) tumors were used for tumor and normal tissue (skin, muscle, brain) measurements. An oxygen-sensitive phosphorescent probe (Oxyphor PtG4) was injected into the tissues, and oxygen levels were monitored using a fiberoptic phosphorometer during UHDR irradiation with a 6 MeV electron linear accelerator (LINAC). Dose escalation experiments (10-40 Gy) were performed at a dose rate of 1300 Gy/s, and dose rate escalation experiments were conducted at a fixed dose of 40 Gy with dose rates ranging from 2 to 101 Gy/s., Results: Radiation-induced change in tissue oxygenation (ΔpO 2 ) increased linearly with dose and correlated with baseline tissue oxygenation levels in the range of 0 - 30 mmHg. At higher baseline tissue oxygenation levels, such as those observed in muscle and brain, there was no corresponding increase in ΔpO 2 . When we modulated dose rate, ΔpO 2 increased steeply up to ∼ 20 Gy/s and plateaued thereafter. The relationship between ΔpO 2 and dose rate showcases the interplay between ROD and reoxygenation., Conclusion: While UHDR irradiation induces measurable oxygen depletion in tissues, the observed changes in oxygenation levels do not support the hypothesis that ROD-induced radioresistance is responsible for the FLASH tissue-sparing effect at clinically relevant doses and dose rates. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into alternative mechanisms underlying the FLASH effect., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Marie-Catherine Vozenin reports financial support was provided by Swiss National Science Foundation. Marie-Catherine Vozenin reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Mirna El Khatib reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Paola Ballesteros-Zebadua reports financial support was provided by Swiss National Science Foundation. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH) has been shown to mitigate normal tissue toxicities associated with conventional dose rate radiotherapy (CONV) without compromising tumor killing in preclinical models. A prominent challenge in preclinical radiation research, including FLASH, is validating both the physical dosimetry and the biological effects across multiple institutions., Materials and Methods: We previously demonstrated dosimetric reproducibility of two different electron FLASH devices at separate institutions using standardized phantoms and dosimeters. In this study, tumor-free adult female mice were given 10 Gy whole brain FLASH and CONV irradiation at both institutions and evaluated for the reproducibility and temporal evolution of multiple neurobiological endpoints., Results: FLASH sparing of behavioral performance on novel object recognition (4 months post-irradiation) and of electrophysiologic long-term potentiation (LTP, 5 months post-irradiation) was reproduced between institutions. Differences between FLASH and CONV on the endpoints of hippocampal neurogenesis (Sox2, doublecortin), neuroinflammation (microglial activation), and electrophysiology (LTP) were not observed at early times (48 h to 2 weeks), but recovery of immature neurons by 3 weeks was greater with FLASH., Conclusion: In summary, we demonstrated reproducible FLASH sparing effects on the brain between two different beams at two different institutions with validated dosimetry. FLASH sparing effects on the endpoints evaluated manifested at later but not the earliest time points., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Long-term potentiation (LTP) was used to gauge the impact of conventional and FLASH dose rates on synaptic transmission. Data collected from the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex confirmed significant inhibition of LTP after 10 fractions of 3 Gy (30 Gy total) conventional radiotherapy. Remarkably, 10x3Gy FLASH radiotherapy and unirradiated controls were identical and exhibited normal LTP., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The physico-chemical and biological response to conventional and UHDR electron and proton beams was investigated, along with conventional photons. The temporal structure and nature of the beam affected both, with electron beam at ≥1400 Gy/s and proton beam at 0.1 and 1260 Gy/s found to be isoefficient at sparing zebrafish embryos., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [The proton studies were funded by a research grant from Varian, a Healthineers company (Palo Alto, CA, USA) (to MCV, SP and TL).], (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This study is the first proof of concept that the FLASH effect can be triggered by X-rays. Our results show that a 10 Gy whole-brain irradiation delivered at ultra-high dose-rate with synchrotron generated X-rays does not induce memory deficit; it reduces hippocampal cell-division impairment and induces less reactive astrogliosis., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

This study shows for the first time that normal brain tissue toxicities after WBI can be reduced with increased dose rate. Spatial memory is preserved after WBI with mean dose rates above 100Gy/s, whereas 10Gy WBI at a conventional radiotherapy dose rate (0.1Gy/s) totally impairs spatial memory., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aim: Despite extensive study of the contribution of cell death and apoptosis to radiation-induced acute intestinal injury, our knowledge of the signaling mechanisms involved in epithelial barrier dysfunction remains inadequate. Because PrP(c) plays a key role in intestinal homeostasis by renewing epithelia, we sought to study its role in epithelial barrier function after irradiation., Design: Histology, morphometry and plasma FD-4 levels were used to examine ileal architecture, wound healing, and intestinal leakage in PrP(c)-deficient (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice after total-body irradiation. Impairment of the PrP(c) Src pathway after irradiation was explored by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy, with Caco-2/Tc7 cells. Lastly, dasatinib treatment was used to switch off the Src pathway in vitro and in vivo., Results: The decrease in radiation-induced lethality, improved intestinal wound healing, and reduced intestinal leakage promoted by PrP(c) deficiency demonstrate its involvement in acute intestinal damage. Irradiation of Cacao2/Tc7 cells induced PrP(c) to target the nuclei associated with Src activation. Finally, the protective effect triggered by dasatinib confirmed Src involvement in radiation-induced acute intestinal toxicity., Conclusion: Our data are the first to show a role for the PrP(c)-Src pathway in acute intestinal response to radiation injury and offer a novel therapeutic opportunity., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)