Search

Purpose: To compare patient discomfort and immobilisation performance of open-face and closed immobilization masks in cranial radiotherapy., Material and Methods: This was a single-center randomized self-controlled clinical trial. At CT simulation, an open-face and closed mask was made for each patient and treatment plans with identical dose prescription were generated for each mask. Patients were randomised to start treatment with an open-face or closed mask. Masks were switched halfway through the treatment course; every patient was their own control. Patients self-reported discomfort, anxiety and pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Inter- and intrafraction set-up variability was measured with planar kV imaging and a surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for the open-face masks., Results: 30 patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors were randomized - 29 completed radiotherapy to a median total dose of 54 Gy (range 30-60 Gy). Mean discomfort VAS score was significantly lower with open-face masks (0.5, standard deviation 1.0) vs. closed masks (3.3, standard deviation 2.9), P < 0.0001. Anxiety and pain VAS scores were significantly lower with open-face masks (P < 0.0001). Closed masks caused more discomfort in infraorbital (P < 0.001) and maxillary (P = 0.02) areas. Two patients and 27 patients preferred closed or open-face masks, respectively. Interfraction longitudinal shifts and roll and yaw rotations were significantly smaller and lateral shifts were significantly larger with closed masks in combination with the laser system (P < 0.05) compared to open masks in combination with a SGRT system. Intrafraction variability did not differ between the masks., Conclusions: Open-face masks are associated with decreased patient discomfort without compromising patient positioning and immobilisation accuracy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Antalgic radiotherapy for bone metastases might be improved by implementing biological information in the radiotherapy planning using (18)F-FDG-PET-CT based dose painting by numbers (DPBN)., Materials and Methods: Patients with uncomplicated painful bone metastases were randomized (1:1:1) and blinded to receive either 8Gy in a single fraction with conventionally planned radiotherapy (arm A) or 8Gy in a single fraction with DPBN (dose range between 610Gy and 10Gy) (arm B) or 16Gy in a single fraction with DPBN (dose range between 1410Gy and 18Gy) (arm C). The primary endpoint was overall pain response at 1month. The phase II trial was designed to select the experimental arm with sufficient promise of efficacy to continue to a phase III trial., Results: Forty-five patients were randomized. Eight (53%), 12 (80%) and 9 patients (60%) had an overall response to treatment in arm A, B and C, respectively. The estimated odds ratio of overall response for arm B vs. A is 3.5 (95% CI: 0.44-17.71, p=0.12). The estimated odds ratio of arm C vs. A is 1.31 (95% CI: 0.31-5.58, p=0.71)., Conclusion: A single fraction of 8Gy with DPBN will be further evaluated in a phase III-trial., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate disease control, survival and severe late toxicity after high-dose fractionated reirradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for recurrent head-and-neck cancer., Materials and Methods: Sixty consecutive patients were reirradiated with IMRT between 1997 and 2011. The median prescribed dose was 70 Gy in 35 daily fractions until 2004 and 69.12 Gy in 32 daily fractions thereafter. The median cumulative dose was 132 Gy. Sixty-seven percent of patients had non-metastatic stage IV disease. Surgery prior to reirradiation and concomitant systemic therapy was performed in 13 (22%) and 20 (33%) patients, respectively., Results: Median follow-up in living patients was 18.5 months. Actuarial 1-, 2- and 5-year locoregional control was 64%, 48% and 32%, respectively. Median overall (OS) and disease-free survival was 9.6 and 6.7 months, respectively. Actuarial 1-, 2- and 5-year OS was 44%, 32% and 22%, respectively. Seventeen (27%) and 2 (3%) patients had grade 3 and 4 acute toxicity, respectively. Cumulative incidence of late grade≥3 toxicity was 23%, 27% and 66% at 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively. In 4 patients, death was attributed to toxicity: fatal bleeding (n=2), aspiration pneumonia (n=1) and skin necrosis (n=1)., Conclusions: High-dose fractionated reirradiation with IMRT offers 5-year disease control and OS in recurrent head-and-neck cancer for 1/3 and 1/4 patients, respectively. Severe late toxicity after 1-2 and 5 years occurs in 1/4 and 2/3 patients, respectively., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The anatomical changes, which occur during the radiotherapy treatment for head-and-neck cancer, may compromise the effectiveness of the treatment. This study compares dosimetrical effects of adaptive (ART) and non-adaptive (RT) dose-painted radiotherapy., Materials and Methods: For 10 patients, three treatment phases were preceded by a planning PET/CT scan. In ART, phases II and III were planned using PET/CT2 and PET/CT3, respectively. In RT, phases II and III were planned on PET/CT1 and recalculated on PET/CT2 and PET/CT3. Deformable image co-registration was used to sum the dose distributions and to propagate regions-of-interest (ROIs) drawn on PET/CT1 to PET/CT2, PET/CT3 and a last-treatment-day CT-scan., Results: Re-adjusted dose-painting ART provided higher minimum and lower maximum doses in target ROIs in comparison to RT. On average, ART reduced the parotids' median dose and swallowing structures mean dose by 4.6-7.1% (p>0.05) and 3% (p=0.06), respectively. Dose differences for targets were from -1.6% to 6.6% and for organs-at-risk from -7.1% to 7.1%. Analysis of individual patient data showed large improvements of ROI dose/volume metrics by ART, reaching a 24.4% minimum-dose increase in the elective neck planning target volume and 21.1% median-dose decrease in swallowing structures., Conclusion: Compared to RT, ART readjusts dose-painting, increases minimum and decreases maximum doses in target volumes and improves dose/volume metrics of organs-at-risk. The results favored the adaptive strategy, but also revealed considerable heterogeneity in patient-specific benefit. Reporting population-average effects underestimates the patient-specific benefits of ART., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: A randomized trial was initiated to investigate whether a reduction of the dose to the elective nodal sites and the swallowing apparatus delivered by IMRT would result in a reduction of acute and late side effects without compromising tumor control. The aim of this paper is to report on dosimetrical analysis and acute toxicity., Materials & Methods: Two-hundred patients were randomized. In the standard arm, elective nodal volumes (PTVelect) were irradiated up to an equivalent dose of 50Gy. In the experimental arm an equivalent dose of 40Gy was prescribed to the PTVelect. The dose to the swallowing apparatus was kept as low as possible without compromising therapeutic PTV (PTVther) coverage., Results: No significant difference was seen between both arms concerning PTVther coverage. The median D95 of the PTVelect was significantly lower in the experimental arm (39.5 vs 49.8Gy; p<0.001). Concerning the organs at risk, the dose to swallowing structures and spinal cord was significantly reduced. There was no significant difference in acute toxicity. Three months after radiotherapy there was significantly less grade ⩾3 dysphagia in the experimental arm (2% vs 11%; p=0.03). With a median follow-up of 6months no significant differences were observed in locoregional control, disease free survival or overall survival., Conclusions: Using IMRT we were able to significantly reduce the dose to the PTVelect and several organs at risk without compromising PTVther coverage. This resulted in a significant reduction of severe dysphagia 3months after radiotherapy. Further follow-up is necessary to investigate whether these observations translate into a benefit on late treatment related dysphagia without affecting treatment outcome., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate feasibility of using deformable image co-registration in three-phase adaptive dose-painting-by-numbers (DPBN) for head-and-neck cancer and to report dosimetrical data and preliminary clinical results., Material and Methods: Between November 2010 and October 2011, 10 patients with non-metastatic head-and-neck cancer enrolled in this phase I clinical trial where treatment was adapted every ten fractions. Each patient was treated with three DPBN plans based on: a pretreatment 18[F]-FDG-PET scan (phase I: fractions 1-10), a per-treatment 18[F]-FDG-PET/CT scan acquired after 8 fractions (phase II: fractions 11-20) and a per-treatment 18[F]-FDG-PET/CT scan acquired after 18 fractions (phase III: fractions 21-30). A median prescription dose to the dose-painted target was 70.2 Gy (fractions 1-30) and to elective neck was 40 Gy (fractions 1-20). Deformable image co-registration was used for automatic region-of-interest propagation and dose summation of the three treatment plans., Results: All patients (all men, median age 68, range 48-74 years) completed treatment without any break or acute G≥4 toxicity. Target volume reductions (mean (range)) between pre-treatment CT and CT on the last day of treatment were 72.3% (57.9-98.4) and 46.3% (11.0-73.1) for GTV and PTV(high&#95;dose), respectively. Acute G3 toxicity was limited to dysphagia in 3/10 patients and mucositis in 2/10 patients; none of the patients lost ≥20% weight. At median follow-up of 13, range 7-22 months, 9 patients did not have evidence of disease., Conclusions: Three-phase adaptive 18[F]-FDG-PET-guided dose painting by numbers using currently available tools is feasible. Irradiation of smaller target volumes might have contributed to mild acute toxicity with no measurable decrease in tumor response., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Design a model for prediction of acute dysphagia following intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer. Illustrate the use of the EMLasso technique for model selection., Material and Methods: Radiation-induced dysphagia was scored using CTCAE v.3.0 in 189 head and neck cancer patients. Clinical data (gender, age, nicotine and alcohol use, diabetes, tumor location), treatment parameters (chemotherapy, surgery involving the primary tumor, lymph node dissection, overall treatment time), dosimetric parameters (doses delivered to pharyngeal constrictor (PC) muscles and esophagus) and 19 genetic polymorphisms were used in model building. The predicting model was achieved by EMLasso, i.e. an EM algorithm to account for missing values, applied to penalized logistic regression, which allows for variable selection by tuning the penalization parameter through crossvalidation on AUC, thus avoiding overfitting., Results: Fifty-three patients (28%) developed acute ≥ grade 3 dysphagia. The final model has an AUC of 0.71 and contains concurrent chemotherapy, D2 to the superior PC and the rs3213245 (XRCC1) polymorphism. The model's false negative rate and false positive rate in the optimal operation point on the ROC curve are 21% and 49%, respectively., Conclusions: This study demonstrated the utility of the EMLasso technique for model selection in predictive radiogenetics., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in a phase I trial on adaptive dose-painting-by-numbers (DPBN) for non-metastatic head and neck cancer., Materials and Methods: Adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy was based on voxel intensity of pre-treatment and per-treatment [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) scans. Dose was escalated to a median total dose of 80.9 Gy in the high-dose clinical target volume (dose level I) and 85.9 Gy in the gross tumor volume (dose level II). The MTD would be reached, if ≥ 33% of patients developed any grade ≥ 4 toxicity (DLT) up to 3 months follow-up., Results: Between February 2007 and August 2009, seven patients at dose level I and 14 at dose level II were treated. All patients completed treatment without interruption. At a median follow-up for surviving patients of 38 (dose level I) and 22 months (dose level II) there was no grade ≥ 4 toxicity during treatment and follow-up but six cases of mucosal ulcers at latency of 4-10 months, of which five (36%) were observed at dose level II. Mucosal ulcers healed spontaneously in four patients., Conclusions: Considering late mucosal ulcers as DLT, the MTD of a median dose of 80.9 Gy has been reached in our trial., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate re-irradiation using IMRT for recurrent and second primary head and neck cancer in previously irradiated territory., Materials and Methods: Between 1997 and 2008, 84 patients with recurrent and second primary head and neck cancer were treated with IMRT to a median dose of 69 Gy. Median time interval between initial radiotherapy and re-irradiation was 49.5 (5.2-298.3) months. Salvage surgery preceded re-irradiation in 19 patients; 17 patients received concurrent chemotherapy., Results: Median follow-up of living patients was 19.8 (1.9-76.1) months. Five-year locoregional control and overall survival were 40% and 20%, respectively. Five-year disease-specific survival and disease-free survival were 29% and 15%, respectively. Stage T4 (p=0.015), time interval between initial treatment and re-irradiation (p=0.011) and hypopharyngeal cancer (p=0.013) were independent prognostic factors for worse overall survival in multivariate analysis. Twenty-six and 11 patients developed Grade 3 acute and late toxicity, respectively. No Grade 5 acute toxicity was encountered. There were 2 fatal vascular ruptures during follow-up., Conclusions: High-dose IMRT for recurrent and second primary head and neck cancer in previously irradiated territory leads to approximately 20% long-term survival in a non-selected patient population. Identification of patients who would benefit most of curative IMRT is warranted.

Background and Purpose: To compare 6 MV and 18 MV photon intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for non-small cell lung cancer., Materials and Methods: Doses for a cohort of 10 patients, typical for our department, were computed with a commercially available convolution/superposition (CS) algorithm. Final dose computation was also performed with a dedicated IMRT Monte Carlo dose engine (MCDE)., Results: CS plans showed higher D(95%) (Gy) for the GTV (68.13 vs 67.36, p=0.004) and CTV (67.23 vs 66.87, p=0.028) with 18 than with 6 MV photons. MCDE computations demonstrated higher doses with 6 MV than 18 MV in D(95%) for the PTV (64.62 vs 63.64, p=0.009), PTV(optim) (65.48 vs 64.83, p=0.014) and CTV (66.22 vs 65.64, p=0.027). Dose inhomogeneity was lower with 18 than with 6 MV photons for GTV (0.08 vs 0.09, p=0.007) and CTV (0.10 vs 0.11, p=0.045) in CS but not MCDE plans. 6 MV photons significantly (D(33%); p=0.045) spared the esophagus in MCDE plans. Observed dose differences between lower and higher energy IMRT plans were dependent on the individual patient., Conclusions: Selection of photon energy depends on priority ranking of endpoints and individual patients. In the absence of highly accurate dose computation algorithms such as CS and MCDE, 6 MV photons may be the prudent choice.