Search

This experiment evaluated reproductive and productive responses of beef cows receiving self-fed low-moisture blocks (LMB) enriched or not with Ca salts of soybean oil (CSSO) throughout the breeding season. Non-pregnant, suckled multiparous Angus-influenced cows were assigned to a fixed-time artificial insemination (AI) protocol (day -10 to 0) followed by natural service (day 15-70). Cows were managed in 12 groups (46 ± 4 cows/group) maintained in individual pastures, and groups received LMB enriched with 25 % (as-fed basis) of CSSO or ground corn (CON) from day - 10 to 100. Both treatments were designed to yield a daily LMB intake of 0.454 kg/cow (as-fed basis). Cows receiving CSSO had greater (P < 0.01) mean concentrations of ω-6 fatty acids in plasma samples collected on days 0 and 55. Cows receiving CSSO had greater (P = 0.05) pregnancy rate to fixed-time AI (67.2 vs. 59.3 %), whereas final pregnancy rate did not differ (P = 0.92) between treatments. Pregnancy loss was less (P = 0.03) in CSSO cows (4.50 vs. 9.04 %), which also calved earlier during the calving season (treatment × week; P = 0.04). Weaning rate tended to be greater (P = 0.09) in CSSO (84.8 vs. 79.4 %), although calf weaning age and weight did not differ (P ≥ 0.72) between treatments. Kilos of calf weaned/cow exposed was greater (P = 0.04) in CSSO cows (234 vs. 215 kg). Therefore, supplementing CSSO to beef cows via LMB during the breeding season improved their reproductive and overall productivity during a cow-calf cycle., Competing Interests: Declaration of interest Nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Physiological stress responses have been associated with lesser pregnancy rates in beef cattle. Alternative cattle restraint methods have been developed to reduce this negative effect. The objective was to determine if there was a difference in pregnancy rate as a result of fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in Bos taurus females when using a breeding box compared with a squeeze chute for restraining cows when conducting FTAI. There were FTAI treatment regimens imposed on cows and heifers at two separate locations (Virginia Tech University, VT; and R.A. Brown Ranch, RAB) with the FTAI being conducted while animals were restrained in a squeeze chute (n = 169) or a breeding box (n = 162). There was imposing of a 7-day Co-Sync + CIDR pre-breeding treatment regimen. Females were randomly assigned to treatments just prior to breeding. Immediately following breeding, blood was collected using coccygeal venipuncture procedures for assessment of plasma cortisol concentration. Chute and exit scores (1-5) were determined at the time of FTAI. Pregnancy rate, cortisol, chute score, and exit score were analyzed. There was no difference in pregnancy rate between treatments (57 ± 26% and 69 ± 26 %, respectively P = 0.59).There were differences in chute (1.52 ± 0.05 and 1.27 ± 0.05, respectively P < 0.05) and exit (1.26 ± 0.04 and 1.08 ± 0.04, respectively P < 0.05) scores between the two treatment groups. Results from the present study are not conclusive in ascertaining effects of the two types of restraint during FTAI on reproductive efficiency., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)