Search

Background: In the process of transtibial prosthetic fitting, alignment is the process of positioning the prosthetic foot relative to the residual limb. Changes in frontal plane alignment can impact knee moments during walking, which can either cause or, when aligned properly, prevent injuries. However, clinical evaluation of dynamic knee moments is challenging, limiting prosthetists' insights into dynamic joint loading. Typically, knee joint loading is assessed in static stance using the knee moment arm as a proxy for subsequent dynamic alignment. It remains uncertain if static alignment accurately represents actual dynamics during walking., Research Question: Is the frontal knee moment arm in stance predictive for the knee moment arm and external knee adduction moment during gait in transtibial bone-anchored prosthesis users?, Methods: In this cross-sectional study, twenty-seven unilateral transtibial bone-anchored prosthesis users underwent data acquisition on the M-Gait instrumented treadmill. Static and dynamic measurements were conducted, and knee moment arm and external knee adduction moment were calculated. Pearson's correlation and linear regression analyses were performed to examine relationships between static and dynamic knee moment arms and external knee adduction moments., Results: The static knee moment arm showed significant associations with dynamic knee moment arm at the ground reaction force peaks (First: r=0.60, r 2 =35%, p<0.001; Second: r=0.62, r 2 =38%, p=0.001) and knee adduction moment (First: r=0.42, r 2 =17%, p=0.030; Second: r=0.59, r 2 =35%, p=0.001). A 1 mm between-subject difference in static knee moment arm corresponded, on average, with a 0.9% difference in knee adduction moment at the first peak and a 1.5% difference at the second peak of the ground reaction force., Significance: While static alignment is important to optimize adduction moments during stance it may only partly mitigate excessive moments during gait. The fair correlation and limited percentage of explained variance underscores the importance of dynamic alignment in optimizing the body's dynamic load during walking., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: A transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) is an alternative for the conventional socket-suspended prosthesis (SSP) in persons suffering from socket-related problems. In these persons, it has been demonstrated to reduce oxygen consumption during walking, which could be related to centre of mass (CoM) and trunk dynamics. However, it remains uncertain whether the same comparative findings are found in SSP-users without any socket-related problems., Research Question: Do oxygen consumption, CoM and trunk dynamics during walking differ between satisfied transfemoral SSP- and BAP-users and able-bodied individuals (AB); and are CoM and trunk dynamics and pistoning potential determinants of oxygen consumption?, Methods: Oxygen consumption was measured while participants walked on a treadmill at preferred speed, 30 % slower, and 30 % faster. At preferred speed, we also evaluated CoM deviation, root-mean-square values (RMS) of mediolateral (ML) CoM and trunk excursions, and pistoning. In the prosthetic users, we evaluated whether oxygen consumption, CoM and trunk dynamics, and pistoning were associated., Results: We included BAP-users (n = 10), SSP-users (n = 10), and AB (n = 10). SSP-users demonstrated higher oxygen consumption, CoM and trunk RMS ML in comparison to AB during walking. BAP-users showed intermediate results between SSP-users and AB, yet not significantly different from either group. Greater CoM and trunk excursions were associated with higher oxygen consumption; in the SSP-users a greater degree of pistoning, in turn, was found to associate with larger trunk RMS ML., Significance: Our results indicate that satisfied SSP-users have increased oxygen consumption compared to AB subjects and use compensatory movements during walking. An assessment of CoM and trunk dynamics, and pistoning during walking may be considered for evaluating whether an individual SSP-user could possibly benefit from a BAP, in addition to the currently used functional tests for evaluating eligibility. This might lead to a larger group of persons with a transfemoral SSP benefiting from this technology., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)