Search

Background: To evaluate whether the knee adduction moment (KAM) could be reduced by a short instruction in the Draw-in (DI) maneuver in healthy adults, and whether knee joint function would improve with a longer DI gait intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA)., Method: In Study 1, healthy adults received 10 minutes supervised instruction in DI gait in and then practiced the gait independently for 10 minutes. Three-dimensional motion analysis measurement was performed in each phase. In Study 2, patients with OA performed a 20-minute DI gait intervention daily for 6 weeks. At baseline and after 6 weeks, knee pain, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the MOS 8 item Short-Form Health Survey, thoracic kyphosis angle, knee joint range of motion, knee extension muscle strength, hip abduction muscle strength, and activity level were evaluated., Results: In Study 1, the DI gait to decrease KAM could be learning following only 10 minutes of instruction and 10 minutes of self-practice in healthy adults. In Study 2, knee pain was reduced by 19 % and the thoracic kyphosis angle was reduced by 2.6° after 6 weeks. No significant changes in other parameters were detected, and the implementation rate was 86 ± 14 %., Significance: In healthy adults, DI gait instruction for 10 minutes of instruction and 10 minutes of self-practice reduced the KAM. In patients with knee OA, 20 minutes of DI gait per day for 6 weeks may reduce knee pain and thoracic kyphosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Ota S is co-CEO of M-Support, LLC, and he has a royalty contract with Matsumoto Prosthetic ＆ Orthotics Manufacturing CO．LTD. However, the company had no control over the design, analysis, interpretation, writing, or publication of this study., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: An increase in medial meniscus extrusion during weight-bearing conditions is associated with the progression of medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). Toe-out gait modification has been known to reduce the knee adduction moment (KAM); however, its effect on reducing the increase in medial meniscus extrusion in patients with knee OA remains unclear., Research Question: To (1) evaluate the effect of toe-out gait on the increase in medial meniscus extrusion and the KAM in patients with medial knee OA and (2) investigate the synergetic effect of lateral wedge insoles in combination with toe-out gait in determining the most effective intervention for reducing medial meniscus extrusion during gait., Methods: Twenty-five patients with medial knee OA were enrolled in this study. Participants walked under four conditions: normal gait, toe-out gait, normal gait with lateral wedge insoles, and toe-out gait with lateral wedge insoles. Medial meniscus extrusion and KAM peaks during gait were measured using ultrasound and a three-dimensional motion analysis system in each condition. These parameters were compared among the four conditions using repeated measures analysis of variance., Results: The increase in medial meniscus extrusion and the second KAM peak were significantly lower in all interventions compared with those observed during normal gait. However, there was no significant difference among the interventions., Significance: This study suggested that toe-out gait reduces the increase in medial meniscus extrusion and is associated with the reduction of the second KAM peak. However, no synergistic effect of lateral wedge insoles and toe-out gait was observed., Competing Interests: Declaration of interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The gait modification strategies Trunk Lean and Medial Thrust have been shown to reduce the external knee adduction moment (EKAM) in patients with knee osteoarthritis which could contribute to reduced progression of the disease. Which strategy is most optimal differs between individuals, but the underlying mechanism that causes this remains unknown., Research Question: Which gait parameters determine the optimal gait modification strategy for individual patients with knee osteoarthritis?, Methods: Forty-seven participants with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis underwent 3-dimensional motion analysis during comfortable gait and with two gait modification strategies: Medial Thrust and Trunk Lean. Kinematic and kinetic variables were calculated. Participants were then categorized into one of the two subgroups, based on the modification strategy that reduced the EKAM the most for them. Multiple logistic regression analysis with backward elimination was used to investigate the predictive nature of dynamic parameters obtained during comfortable walking on the optimal modification gait strategy., Results: For 68.1 % of the participants, Trunk Lean was the optimal strategy in reducing the EKAM. Baseline characteristics, kinematics and kinetics did not differ significantly between subgroups during comfortable walking. Changes to frontal trunk and tibia angles correlated significantly with EKAM reduction during the Trunk Lean and Medial Thrust strategies, respectively. Regression analysis showed that MT is likely optimal when the frontal tibia angle range of motion and peak knee flexion angle in early stance during comfortable walking are high (R 2 Nagelkerke = 0.12)., Significance: Our regression model based solely on kinematic parameters from comfortable walking contained characteristics of the frontal tibia angle and knee flexion angle. As the model explains only 12.3 % of variance, clinical application does not seem feasible. Direct assessment of kinetics seems to be the most optimal strategy for selecting the most optimal gait modification strategy for individual patients with knee osteoarthritis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declare no potential conflicts of interest concerning authorship and publication of this article., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Wearing unloader knee orthoses for the long term may have a side effect on knee adduction moment (KAM)., Research Question: This study sought to determine whether equipping an unloader knee orthosis with vibrators improves its effectiveness in pain, stiffness, function, and reducing the KAM., Methods: The authors performed a clinical evaluation with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) questionnaire and instrumented gait analyses on 14 participants with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis in two testing sessions: before wearing the orthosis and after 6 weeks of use., Results and Significance: Wearing both orthoses for 6 weeks significantly improved (p < 0.05) pain, stiffness, and function compared to the baseline assessment. There was a significantly greater reduction in the first peak KAM (p = 0.016) and KAM impulse (p = 0.008) in the vibratory unloader knee orthosis than in the conventional knee orthosis in the second session. Equipping the unloader knee orthosis with vibrators can improve its effectiveness in reducing the KAM and can prevent the side effects of its use. Furthermore, equipping the unloader knee orthosis with the vibrators did not interfere with its effectiveness on pain, stiffness, and function., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Under my ethical obligation as a researcher, I am reporting that we report that two authors (K.B and I.ET) of this manuscript are considered the inventors of the orthosis that is evaluated in this study. However, all measurements of the first and second testing sessions were carried out by an approved expert who was not involved either in the Ph.D. research or in the patent filing., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Gait analysis has been used extensively for computing knee kinematics and kinetics, in particular, in healthy and impaired individuals. One variable assessed is the external knee adduction moment (EKAM). Variations in EKAM values between investigations may be caused by changes in static standing position, especially foot placement angles which may increase or reduce any differences seen., Purpose of the Study: The current study aimed to explore the influence of static trial foot position on knee kinematic and kinetic variables during walking., Methods: Twelve healthy male participants completed three different static standing trials; 1) 20-degrees toe-in, 2) 0° and 3) 20-degrees toe-out before walking at their own pace during a lower limb kinematics and kinetics assessment. First and second peak EKAM was compared between static foot position trials, as well other knee kinematic and kinetic outcomes. Repeated measures ANOVA was used with post hoc pairwise comparison to determine the differences between static foot position trials., Results: The first peak of EKAM was significantly smaller in the 20 o toe-out angle, than the 20 o toe-in angle (p = 0.04-8.16% reduction). Furthermore, significant changes were found in peak knee kinematics and kinetics variables (adduction angle, external rotation angle, knee flexion moment external rotation moment, abduction angle and internal rotation angle) in the different positions., Conclusion: Modification in static foot position between study visits may result in changes especially in the 1st peak EKAM and other kinematics and kinetics variables during walking. Therefore, standardisation of static foot position should be utilised in longitudinal studies to ensure changes in EKAM are not masked or accentuated between assessments., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest All authors have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The frontal plane knee moment (KAM1 and KAM2) derived from non-invasive three-dimensional gait analysis is a surrogate measure for knee joint load and of great interest in clinical and research settings. Many aspects can influence this measure either unintentionally or purposely in order to reduce the knee joint load to relieve symptoms and pain. All these aspects must be known when conducting a study or interpreting gait data for clinical decision-making., Methods: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020187038). Pubmed and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed, original research articles in which unshod three-dimensional gait analysis was undertaken and KAM1 and KAM2 were included as an outcome variable. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, extracted data and performed a methodological quality assessment using Downs and Black checklist., Results: In total, 42 studies were included. Based on the independent variable investigated, these studies were divided into three groups: 1) gait modifications, 2) individual characteristics and 3) idiopathic orthopedic deformities. Among others, fast walking speeds (1) were found to increase KAM1; There were no sex-related differences (2) and genu valgum (3) reduces KAM1 and KAM2., Conclusion: While consistent use of terminology and reporting of KAM is required for meta-analysis, this review indicates that gait modifications (speed, trunk lean, step width), individual characteristics (body weight, age) and idiopathic orthopedic deformities (femoral or tibial torsion, genu valgum/varum) influence KAM magnitudes during walking. These factors should be considered by researchers when designing studies (especially of longitudinal design) or by clinicians when interpreting data for surgical and therapeutic decision-making., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest All authors do not have any financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that inappropriately influence this work., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Knee braces and lateral wedge foot orthoses are two treatment options recommended for medial knee osteoarthritis, but the combination of both of them could further improve their effectiveness., Research Question: The aim was to evaluate whether the combination of lateral wedge foot orthoses with two types of knee brace enhances the biomechanical effects and pain relief during the stance phase of gait while maintaining comfort., Methods: Ten patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were fitted with a standard valgus brace, an unloader brace with valgus and external rotation functions, and 7° lateral wedge foot orthoses. The pain relief, comfort, kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb were measured during walking without orthotics, with the combined and with the isolated treatments., Results: The valgus and external rotation brace significantly reduced the knee adduction moment and allowed more knee flexion both in isolation and in combination to foot orthoses compared to the valgus brace or without treatment. Pain relief was not significant with the different orthotic treatment modalities. The valgus brace and combined treatment with either brace significantly increased the discomfort level, whereas the valgus and external rotation brace or foot orthoses in isolation did not induce significant discomfort., Significance: Amongst the tested orthotic treatment modalities, the valgus and external rotation brace obtained better biomechanical outcomes while maintaining comfort. The combined treatment with foot orthoses enhanced the effectiveness of the valgus brace, however foot orthoses may be unnecessary with the valgus and external rotation brace., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Radiographic factors estimate the state of the static knee joint, and it is questionable how well these parameters reflect the dynamic knee condition. The external knee adduction moment (KAM) during gait is known to be a kinetic variable contributing to osteoarthritis progression. This study aims to investigate the effects of static radiographic parameters on the dynamic KAM during gait., Methods: Overall, 123 patients (mean age, 65.7 years; standard deviation, 8.1 years; 34 men and 89 women) were included. Seven radiographic parameters including the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA), Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and ankle joint line orientation (AJLO) were measured on radiographs, and the maximum KAM and KAM-time integral in the stance phase were obtained using three-dimensional gait analysis. The correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed for identifying significant radiographic measurements associated with the KAM., Results: Most of the radiographic measurements correlated with the maximum KAM and KAM-time integral. As a result of multiple regression analysis, the mTFA (p < 0.001) and AJLO (p = 0.003) were identified as significant factors associated with the KAM-time integral (R 2  = 0.450); the mTFA (p < 0.001) and AJLO (p = 0.003) were identified as a significant factor associated with the maximum KAM (R 2  = 0.352) in multiple regression analysis. The discriminant validity of KAM was highest at varus 5.7 degree of the mTFA and 7.5 degree of the AJLO., Significance: The mTFA and AJLO were significantly associated with the KAM. However, to be used as a surgical indication for corrective osteotomy, a longitudinal study is needed to validate whether the mTFA and AJLO values directly cause osteoarthritis progression as we have suggested., Level of Evidence: III., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that affects millions of individuals each year. Several biomechanical variables during walking have been identified as risk factors for developing knee OA, including the peak external knee adduction moment (KAM) and the knee flexion angle at initial contact. Many interventions have been studied to help mitigate these risk factors, including footwear. However, it is largely unknown how varying shoe cushioning may affect walking biomechanics related to knee OA risk., Research Question: What is the effect of maximally and minimally cushioned shoes on walking biomechanics compared to a traditionally cushioned shoe in older females?, Methods: Walking biomechanics in three shoes (maximal, traditional, minimal) were collected on 16 healthy females ages 50-70 using an 8-camera 3D motion capture system and two embedded force plates. Key biomechanical variables related to knee OA disease risk were compared between shoes using repeated measures ANOVAs., Results: The KAM was significantly larger in the maximal shoe (p = 0.005), while the knee flexion angle at initial contact was significantly larger in both the maximal and minimal shoe compared to the traditional shoe (p = .000). Additionally, the peak knee flexion angle (p = .000) and the loading rates of the vertical ground reaction force were (instantaneous: p = 0.001; average: p = .010) were significantly higher in the minimal shoe., Significance: While these results are specific to the shoes used in this study, clinicians should exercise caution in prescribing maximal or minimal shoes to females in this age group who may be at risk of knee OA given these results. Research is needed on the effect of these shoes in patients with knee OA., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The goal of valgus knee brace treatment is to reduce medial knee joint loading during walking, often indicated by external knee adduction moment (KAM) measures. However, existing healthy-subjects studies have been equivocal in demonstrating KAM reduction with valgus knee bracing., Research Question: What are the immediate effects of valgus bracing at different tension levels on KAM during walking at a controlled speed and does body height modify the brace-KAM associations?, Methods: Data from 32 knee-healthy participants were analysed in this randomized crossover trial. Participants performed walking trials at controlled speed (1.3 ± 0.065 m/s) both with and without an Ossür Unloader One® brace. During the bracing condition, valgus tension was incrementally increased, from zero tension to normal tension and to maximum tolerable tension., Results: Valgus bracing minimally increased knee flexion at heel-strike (P < 0.001) in a dose-dependent manner and minimally reduced gait velocity (∼0.015m/s) across all tension levels. Valgus bracing, overall, did not significantly reduce the various KAM measures. However, brace use at maximal tension was associated with a 0.04Nm/kg (9.2 %) increase in first peak KAM amongst participants with a body height of 1.75 m and a 0.03Nm/kg (7.6 %) decrease in first peak KAM amongst participants with a body height of 1.55 m., Significance: Valgus bracing did not reduce the various KAM measures during walking; however, body height may play a moderating role. Given knee brace sizes vary more in circumference than length, this result may be due to the ratio between effective moment arm length relative to limb length. A deeper understanding of the potential neuro-biomechanical effects of valgus knee bracing and how these effects are potentially modified by body height may be critical to the design of effective knee braces., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous studies have reported good test-retest reliability for peak knee adduction moment (KAM) during walking. However, reliability of other KAM measurements has not been established., Research Question: What is the test-retest reliability of peak KAM, KAM impulse, and KAM loading rate measurements during walking in knee-healthy individuals?, Methods: Data from 32 knee-healthy participants were analysed in this test-retest reliability study. Various KAM measurements were reported for two sessions with kinematic and kinetic data obtained from a motion capture system synchronised with force plates, with a median of 1 week between sessions., Results: For all KAM measures, intra-class correlation coefficients were above 0.90 and their lower bound 95 % confidence limits exceeded 0.81. However, absolute measurement variability differed across measures, with normalized SEM (8 %-15 %), normalized MDC 95 (20 %-40 %), intra-session MAD (10 %-18 %), and inter-session MAD (12 %-22 %) varying over a 2-fold range. Overall and first peak KAM, KAM impulse over 50 % stance, and KAM loading rate (15 frame window) showed ≤10 % and ≤15 % intra- and inter-session MAD, respectively., Significance: This study provided previously undefined test-retest reliability estimates for various KAM measures during walking. Researchers and clinicians should not assume that the various aspects of the KAM curve share similar reliability., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Negotiating stairs is an important activity of daily living that is also associated with large loads on the knee joint. In medial compartment knee osteoarthritis, the knee adduction moment during level walking is considered a marker for disease severity. It could be argued that the discriminative capability of this parameter is even better if tested in a strenuous stair negotiation task., Research Question: What is the relation with knee osteoarthritis on the knee adduction moment during the stance phase of both stair ascent and descent in patients with and without obesity?, Methods: This case control study included 22 lean controls, 16 lean knee osteoarthritis patients, and 14 obese knee osteoarthritis patients. All subjects ascended and descended a two-step staircase at a self-selected, comfortable speed. Three-dimensional motion analysis was performed to evaluate the knee adduction moment during stair negotiation., Results: Obese knee osteoarthritis patients show a prolonged stance time together with a more flattened knee adduction moment curve during stair ascent. Normalized knee adduction moment impulse, as well as the first and second peaks were not different between groups. During stair descent, a similar increase in stance time was found for both osteoarthritis groups., Significance: The absence of a significant effect of groups on the normalized knee adduction moment during stair negotiation may be explained by a lower ambulatory speed in the obese knee osteoarthritis group, that effectively lowers vertical ground reaction force. Decreasing ambulatory speed may be an effective strategy to lower knee adduction moment during stair negotiation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The knee adduction moment (KAM) is a surrogate measure of mediolateral distribution of loads across the knee joint and is correlated with progression and severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Existing biomechanical approaches for unloading the arthritic medial knee compartment vary in their effectiveness in reducing KAM. This study employed a completely wireless, pressure-detecting shoe insole capable of generating auditory feedback via a smartphone., Research Question: To investigate whether auditory cues from a smartphone can prompt subjects to adjust their gait pattern and reduce KAM., Methods: Nineteen healthy subjects underwent gait training inside the lab (Phase 1) and received auditory cues during mid- and terminal stance to medialize their foot COP (center-of-pressure). This initial training period was continued unsupervised while walking around campus (Phase 2)., Results: After Phase 1, subjects reduced their KAM by 20.6% (p =  0. 001), a finding similar to a previous study that used a wired, lab-based insole system. After further unsupervised training outside the lab during Phase 2, subjects were able to execute the newly learned gait pattern without auditory feedback still showing a KAM reduction of 17.2% (p <  0.001). Although, speed at Phase 2 was lower than at baseline (p =  0.013), this reduction had little effect on KAM (r = 0.297, p =  0.216). In addition, the adduction angular impulse was reduced (p =  0.001), despite the slower speed., Significance: Together, these results suggest that the wireless insole is a promising tool for gait retraining to lower the KAM and will be implemented in a home-based clinical trial of gait retraining for subjects with knee OA., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of biomechanical and clinical measurements in relation to the knee adduction moment when wearing a standard shoe and a shoe design for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (Flex-OA)., Methods: Kinematic and kinetic data were collected from thirty-two healthy individuals (64 knees) using a ten camera motion analysis system and four force plates. Subjects performed 5 walking trials under the two conditions and the magnitude of individuals' biomechanical responses where explored in relation to the clinical assessment of the Foot Posture Index, hip rotation range, strength of hip rotators, and active ankle-foot motion, all of which have been described as possible compensation mechanisms in knee osteoarthritis., Results: Significant reductions in the first peak of the knee adduction moment (KAM) during stance phase (9.3%) were recorded (p<0.0001). However, despite this difference, 22 of 64 knees showed either no change or an increased KAM, indicating a non-response or negative-response to the Flex-OA shoe. Significant differences were observed between the responder and non-responder subgroups in the hip rotation range ratio (p=0.044) and the hip rotators strength ratio (p=0.028)., Conclusion: Significant differences were seen in clinical assessments of hip rotation range and hip rotator strength between responders and non-responders using a cut-off of 0.02Nm/kg change in the KAM., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The external knee adduction moment has been identified as a key biomarker in biomechanics research, with associations with this variable and degenerative diseases such as knee osteoarthritis. Heterogeneity in participant characteristics and the protocols used to measure this variable may however complicate its interpretation. Previous reviews have focused on interventions or did not control for potential moderator variables in their analysis. In this meta-regression analysis, we aimed to determine the influence of factors including the cohort type, footwear, and walking speed on the measurement of knee adduction moment. We performed a systematic review of the literature, identifying articles that used the Plug-in-Gait inverse dynamics model to calculate the knee adduction moment during level walking, and used a mixed effect model to determine the effect of the previously described factors on the measurement. Results for 861 individuals were described in 19 articles. Walking speed had the largest influence on knee adduction moment (p<0.001), and participants with medial knee osteoarthritis had an increased knee adduction moment (p=0.008) compared to healthy subjects. Footwear was found to have a significant overall effect (p=0.024). Participants tested barefoot or wearing their own shoes had lower adduction moments than those tested in footwear provided by the researchers. Overall, the moderators accounted for 60% of the heterogeneity in the results. These results support the hypothesis that an increased knee adduction moment is associated with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis, and that footwear choice can influence the results. Gait speed has the largest effect on knee adduction moment measurement and should be carefully controlled for in studies investigating this variable., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We conducted a meta-analysis to analyze how high tibial osteotomy (HTO) changes gait and focused on the following questions: (1) How does HTO change basic gait variables? (2) How does HTO change the gait variables in the knee joint? Twelve articles were included in the final analysis. A total of 383 knees was evaluated. There were 237 open wedge (OW) and 143 closed wedge (CW) HTOs. There were 4 level II studies and 8 level III studies. All studies included gait analysis and compared pre- and postoperative values. One study compared CWHTO and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and another study compared CWHTO and OWHTO. Five studies compared gait variables with those of healthy controls. One study compared operated limb gait variables with those in the non-operated limb. Gait speed, stride length, knee adduction moment, and lateral thrust were major variables assessed in 2 or more studies. Walking speed increased and stride length was increased or similar after HTO compared to the preoperative value in basic gait variables. Knee adduction moment and lateral thrust were decreased after HTO compared to the preoperative knee joint gait variables. Change in co-contraction of the medial side muscle after surgery differed depending on the degree of frontal plane alignment. The relationship between change in knee adduction moment and change in mechanical axis angle was controversial. Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, walking speed and stride length increased after HTO. Knee adduction moment and lateral thrust decreased after HTO compared to the preoperative values of gait variables in the knee joint., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Lateral wedge insoles (LWIs) are prescribed for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis to reduce the external knee adduction moment (KAM). However, the biomechanical effects of LWIs are limited in some patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the biomechanical effects of LWIs depend on individual foot alignment and to examine the relationship between change in KAM and changes in foot and ankle biomechanics when wearing LWIs. Twenty-one patients participated in this study. They were categorized into normal or abnormal foot groups based on the foot posture index (FPI). All patients were requested to perform a normal gait under barefoot and LWI conditions. A three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to record 1st and 2nd KAM, knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI), center of pressure displacement, and knee-ground reaction force lever arm. Furthermore, the foot and ankle frontal plane kinematic parameters were evaluated. The 1st KAM was significantly reduced under the LWI condition compared to that under the barefoot condition in the normal foot group. In contrast, there was no significant difference in 1st KAM between both conditions in the abnormal foot group. Decreased rear foot eversion strongly correlated with reduction in the 1st KAM in the normal foot group. These findings suggested that it is helpful to assess individual foot alignment to ensure adequate insole treatment for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis and that decreased rear foot eversion during the early stance phase is significantly involved in the reduction of 1st KAM when wearing LWIs with normal feet., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Toe-out/-in gait has been prescribed in reducing knee joint load to medial knee osteoarthritis patients. This study focused on the effects of toe-out/-in at different walking speeds on first peak knee adduction moment (fKAM), second peak KAM (sKAM), knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI), net mechanical work by lower limb as well as joint-level contribution to the total limb work during level walking. Gait analysis of 20 healthy young adults was done walking at pre-defined normal (1.18m/s), slow (0.85m/s) and fast (1.43m/s) walking speeds with straight-toe (natural), toe-out (15°>natural) and toe-in (15°

Objective: This study, firstly, investigates the effect of using an anatomical versus a functional axis of rotation (FAR) on knee adduction moment (KAM) in healthy subjects and patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Secondly, this study reports KAM for models with FAR calculated using weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing motion., Design: Three musculoskeletal models were created using OpenSim with different knee axis of rotation (AR): transepicondylar axis (TEA); FAR calculated based on SARA algorithm using a weight-bearing motion (wFAR) and a non-weight-bearing motion (nwFAR). KAM were calculated during gait in fifty-nine subjects (n=20 healthy, n=16 early OA, n=23 established OA) for all models and groups., Results: Significant differences between the three groups in the first peak KAM were found when TEA was used (p=0.038). However, these differences were no longer present when using FAR. In subjects with established OA, KAMs were significantly reduced when using nwFAR compared to TEA models but also compared to wFAR models., Conclusion: The presence of excessive KAM in subjects with established KOA showed to be dependent on the definition of the AR: anatomical versus functional. Therefore, caution should be accounted when comparing KAM in different studies on KOA patients. In patients with end-stage knee OA where increased passive knee laxity is likely to exist, the use of weight-bearing motions should be considered to avoid increased variability in the location and orientation of a FAR obtained from activities with only limited joint loading., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine (1) if Medial Thrust or Trunk Lean reduces the knee adduction moment (EKAM) the most during gait in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis, (2) if the best overall strategy is the most effective for each patient and (3) if these strategies affect ankle and hip kinetics., Design: Thirty patients with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis underwent 3-dimensional gait analysis. Participants received verbal instructions on two gait strategies (Trunk Lean and Medial Thrust) in randomized order after comfortable walking was recorded. The peaks and impulse of the EKAM and strategy-specific kinematic and kinetic variables were calculated for all conditions., Results: Early stance EKAM peak was significantly reduced during Medial Thrust (-29%). During Trunk Lean, early and late stance EKAM peak and EKAM impulse reduced significantly (38%, 21% and -25%, respectively). In 79% of the subjects, the Trunk Lean condition was significantly more effective in reducing EKAM peak than Medial Thrust. Peak ankle dorsi and plantar flexion, knee flexion and hip extension and adduction moments were not significantly increased., Conclusions: Medial Thrust and Trunk Lean reduced the EKAM during gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Individual selection of the most effective gait modification strategy seems vital to optimally reduce dynamic knee loading during gait. No detrimental effects on external ankle and hip moments or knee flexion moments were found for these conditions., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Lateral wedge insoles (LWIs) reduce the peak external knee adduction moment (KAM). However, the efficacy of LWIs is limited in certain individuals for whom they fail to decrease KAM. Possible explanations for a lack of desired LWI response are variations in foot alignments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the immediate biomechanical effects of LWIs depend on individual foot alignments during gait. Fifteen healthy adults participated in this study. Their feet were categorized as normal, pronated, and supinated using the foot posture index. All subjects were subsequently requested to perform a normal gait under barefoot and LWI conditions. A three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to record the kinematic and kinetic data, included peak KAM, KAM impulse (KAAI), center of pressure displacement, and knee-ground reaction force lever arm (KLA). Furthermore, lower limb frontal plane kinematic parameters at the rear foot, ankle, knee, and hip were evaluated. Among all feet, there was no significant difference in the peak KAM and KAAI between the conditions. In contrast, the peak KAM was significantly reduced under the LWI condition relative to the barefoot condition in the normal foot group. Reductions in the peak KAM were correlated with a more lateral center of pressure and reduced KLA. In addition, a reduced KLA was correlated with decreased hip adduction. LWIs significantly reduced the peak KAM in normal feet, indicating that biomechanical effects of LWIs vary between individual foot alignments. Our findings suggest that it is helpful to assess individual foot alignment to ensure adequate insole treatment for patients with knee osteoarthritis., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We explored the tibiofemoral contact forces and the relative contributions of muscles and external loads to those contact forces during various gait tasks. Second, we assessed the relationships between external gait measures and contact forces. A calibrated electromyography-driven neuromusculoskeletal model estimated the tibiofemoral contact forces during walking (1.44±0.22ms(-1)), running (4.38±0.42ms(-1)) and sidestepping (3.58±0.50ms(-1)) in healthy adults (n=60, 27.3±5.4years, 1.75±0.11m, and 69.8±14.0kg). Contact forces increased from walking (∼1-2.8 BW) to running (∼3-8 BW), sidestepping had largest maximum total (8.47±1.57 BW) and lateral contact forces (4.3±1.05 BW), while running had largest maximum medial contact forces (5.1±0.95 BW). Relative muscle contributions increased across gait tasks (up to 80-90% of medial contact forces), and peaked during running for lateral contact forces (∼90%). Knee adduction moment (KAM) had weak relationships with tibiofemoral contact forces (all R(2)<0.36) and the relationships were gait task-specific. Step-wise regression of multiple external gait measures strengthened relationships (0.20

Lateral trunk lean (LTL) is a proposed intervention for knee osteoarthritis but increased muscular demands have not been considered. The objective was to compare lower extremity and trunk muscle activation and joint mechanics between normal and increased LTL gait in healthy adults. Participants (n=20, mean age 22 years) were examined under two gait conditions: normal and increased LTL. A motion capture system and force plates sampled at 100 and 2000Hz respectively were used to determine joint angles and external moments including LTL angle and external knee adduction moment (KAM). Surface electromyography, sampled at 2000Hz, measured activation of six trunk/hip muscles bilaterally. Peak LTL angle, peak KAM, gait speed, and mean values from electromyography waveforms were compared between normal and LTL conditions using paired t-tests or 2-way analysis of variance. There was a significant (p<0.05) increase in peak LTL angle, decrease in first but not second peak KAM, and decrease in gait speed during LTL gait. There were significant (p<0.01) increases in external oblique and iliocostalis muscle activation during LTL gait. There was no change in activation for internal oblique, rectus abdominis, longissimus, and gluteus medius. LTL gait decreased early/mid-stance KAM demonstrating its ability to decrease medial compartment knee loading. Increases in external oblique and iliocostalis activation were present but small to moderate in size and unlikely to lead to short term injury. Longitudinal studies should evaluate the effectiveness of increased LTL for knee osteoarthritis and if the increase in muscular demands leads to negative long term side effects., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Ipsilateral trunk lean toward the affected stance limb has been identified as a compensatory mechanism to unload the hip joint. However, this altered gait pattern increases the lever arm around the knee joint by shifting the ground reaction vector more lateral to the knee joint center, which could be sufficient to deform the lateral compartment of the knee. The purpose of the present study was to show the effect of ipsilateral trunk lean on hip and knee joint moments in the frontal plane in 132 young patients with different orthopedic diagnosis. Linear correlations between ipsilateral trunk lean and the external knee and/or hip adduction moment were detected for patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD), arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, myelomeningocele, and unilateral cerebral palsy (CP). In contrast, children with bilateral CP did not show such a relationship due to an increased internal foot placement. In comparison to the hip joint, the effect of ipsilateral trunk lean in patients with LCPD is obviously more pronounced in the knee joint. The valgus thrust of the knee could initiate degenerative changes by placing altered loads on regions of the articular cartilage that were previously conditioned for different load levels. The results suggest that the ipsilateral trunk lean should not be considered and recommended as unloading mechanism for the hip joint on its own but also as a potential increased joint loading of the lateral knee compartment. Therefore, an acceptable therapy concept for limping patients should aim for an inconspicuous gait pattern with a reduced trunk movement., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Gait retraining programs are prescribed to assist in the rehabilitation process of many clinical conditions. Using lateral trunk lean modification as the model, the aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of kinematic data recorded using a marker-based 3D motion analysis (3DMA) system and a low-cost alternative, the Microsoft Kinect™ (Kinect), during a gait retraining session. Twenty healthy adults were trained to modify their gait to obtain a lateral trunk lean angle of 10°. Real-time biofeedback of the lateral trunk lean angle was provided on a computer screen in front of the subject using data extracted from the Kinect skeletal tracking algorithm. Marker coordinate data were concurrently recorded using the 3DMA system, and the similarity and equivalency of the trunk lean angle data from each system were compared. The lateral trunk lean angle data obtained from the Kinect system without any form of calibration resulted in errors of a high (>2°) magnitude (mean error=3.2±2.2°). Performing global and individualized calibration significantly (P<0.001) improved this error to 1.7±1.5° and 0.8±0.8° respectively. With the addition of a simple calibration the anatomical position coordinates of the Kinect can be used to create a real-time biofeedback system for gait retraining. Given that this system is low-cost, portable and does not require any sensors to be attached to the body, it could provide numerous advantages when compared to laboratory-based gait retraining systems., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)