Search

Pretomanid (PA-824), a novel anti-tuberculosis (TB) nitroimidazoxazine, has been approved for multi-drug-resistant TB treatment for a few years. Pretomanid has been demonstrated to be highly active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis when combined with other anti-TB drugs. This review provides an update of the current knowledge on the modes of action, resistance mechanisms, emergence of drug resistance, and status of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for pretomanid and its relevance for clinical practice. Pretomanid resistance has been reported in in-vitro and animal models but not yet in clinical trials. Pretomanid-resistance-associated mutations have been reported in the fbiA, fbiB, fbiC, fbiD, ddn and fgd1 genes. However, understanding of in-vivo molecular resistance mechanisms remains limited, and complicates the development of accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for pretomanid. As such, no reference method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pretomanid has been established to guide clinical use. Further studies linking specific mutations, in-vitro susceptibility, drug exposure and resistance mechanisms to treatment failure with pretomanid should be prioritized., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is a first-line antituberculosis drug with potent sterilising activity. Variability in drug exposure may translate into suboptimal treatment responses. This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the concentration-effect relationship. In vitro/in vivo studies had to contain information on the infection model, PZA dose and concentration, and microbiological outcome. Human studies had to present information on PZA dose, measures of drug exposure and maximum concentration, and microbiological response parameter or overall treatment outcome. A total of 34 studies were assessed, including in vitro (n = 2), in vivo (n = 3) and clinical studies (n = 29). Intracellular and extracellular models demonstrated a direct correlation between PZA dose of 15-50 mg/kg/day and reduction in bacterial count between 0.50-27.7 log 10 CFU/mL. Consistent with this, higher PZA doses (>150 mg/kg) were associated with a greater reduction in bacterial burden in BALB/c mice models. Human pharmacokinetic studies displayed a linear positive correlation between PZA dose (i.e. 21.4-35.7 mg/kg/day) and drug exposure (AUC range 220.6-514.5 mg·h/L). Additionally, human studies confirmed a dose-effect relationship, with an increased 2-month sputum culture conversion rate at AUC/MIC targets of 8.4-11.3 with higher exposure/susceptibility ratios leading to greater efficacy. A 5-fold variability in AUC was observed at PZA dose of 25 mg/kg. A direct concentration-effect relationship and increased treatment efficacy with higher PZA exposure to susceptibility ratios was observed. Taking into account variability in drug exposure and treatment response, further studies on dose optimisation are justified., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Voriconazole is an antifungal drug used for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Due to highly variable drug exposure, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been recommended. TDM may be helpful to predict exposure accurately, but covariates, such as severe inflammation, that influence the metabolism of voriconazole have not been included in the population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models suitable for routine TDM., Objectives: To investigate whether the effect of inflammation, reflected by C-reactive protein (CRP), could improve a popPK model that can be applied in clinical care., Patients and Methods: Data from two previous studies were included in the popPK modelling. PopPK modelling was performed using Edsim++. Different popPK models were compared using Akaike Information Criterion and goodness-of-fit plots., Results: In total, 1060 voriconazole serum concentrations from 54 patients were included in this study. The final model was a one-compartment model with non-linear elimination. Only CRP was a significant covariate, and was included in the final model and found to affect the maximum rate of enzyme activity (V max ). For the final popPK model, the mean volume of distribution was 145 L [coefficient of variation percentage (CV%)=61%], mean Michaelis-Menten constant was 5.7 mg/L (CV%=119%), mean V max was 86.4 mg/h (CV%=99%) and mean bioavailability was 0.83 (CV%=143%). Internal validation using bootstrapping resulted in median values close to the population parameter estimates., Conclusions: This one-compartment model with non-linear elimination and CRP as a covariate described the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole adequately., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended based on retrospective data and limited prospective studies. This study aimed to investigate whether TDM-guided voriconazole treatment is superior to standard treatment for invasive aspergillosis., Methods: A multicentre (n = 10), prospective, cluster randomised, crossover clinical trial was performed in haematological patients aged ≥18 years treated with voriconazole. All patients received standard voriconazole dose at the start of treatment. Blood/serum/plasma was periodically collected after treatment initiation of voriconazole and repeated during treatment in both groups. The TDM group had measured voriconazole concentrations reported back, with dose adjustments made as appropriate, while the non-TDM group had voriconazole concentrations measured only after study completion. The composite primary endpoint included response to treatment and voriconazole treatment discontinuation due to an adverse drug reaction related to voriconazole within 28 days after treatment initiation., Results: In total, 189 patients were enrolled in the study. For the composite primary endpoint, 74 patients were included in the non-TDM group and 68 patients in the TDM group. Here, no significant difference was found between both groups (P = 0.678). However, more trough concentrations were found within the generally accepted range of 1-6 mg/L for the TDM group (74.0%) compared with the non-TDM group (64.0%) (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: In this trial, TDM-guided dosing of voriconazole did not show improved treatment outcome compared with standard dosing. We believe that these findings should open up the discussion for an approach to voriconazole TDM that includes drug exposure, pathogen susceptibility and host defence., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT00893555., Competing Interests: Competing interests R.J. Bruggeman has received fees for consulting from Gilead, F2G and Amplyx and has received research grants and given lectures for Gilead, Pfizer, Merck and Astellas. All contracts were with Radboudumc and all payments were with Radboudumc. B.J. Biemond has received research support of Sanquin, Global Blood Therapeutics and Novartis. B.J.A. Rijnders reports grants from Gilead Sciences and personal fees from F2G, outside the submitted work. J.J. Swen reports personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. P.E. Verweij reports grants from MSD, Gilead Sciences, F2G and Pfizer and non-financial support from IMMY, outside the submitted work. J.W.C. Alffenaar reports other financial support from Pfizer, MSD and Gilead and grants from MSD, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Linezolid is used increasingly for the treatment of multi-drug-resistant (MDR) and extensively-drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB). However, linezolid can cause severe adverse events, such as peripheral and optical neuropathy or thrombocytopenia related to higher drug exposure. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to predict the area under the concentration curve (AUC) for linezolid using a limited number of blood samples. Data from patients with MDR-/XDR-TB who received linezolid and therapeutic drug monitoring as part of their TB treatment were used. Mw\Pharm 3.82 (Mediware, Zuidhorn, The Netherlands) was used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and limited sampling strategy (LSS) for linezolid. LSS was evaluated over a time span of 6 h. Blood sampling directly before linezolid administration and 2 h after linezolid administration were considered to be the most clinically relevant sampling points. The model and LSS were evaluated by analysing the correlation between AUC 12h,observed and AUC 12h,estimated . In addition, LSS was validated with an external group of patients with MDR-/XDR-TB from Sondalo, Italy. Fifty-two pharmacokinetic profiles were used to develop the model. Thirty-three profiles with a 300 mg dosing regimen and 19 profiles with a 600 mg dosing regimen were obtained. Model validation showed prediction bias of 0.1% and r 2 of 0.99. Evaluation of the most clinically relevant LSS showed prediction bias of 4.8% and r 2 of 0.97. The root mean square error corresponding to the most relevant LSS was 6.07%. The developed LSS could be used to enable concentration-guided dosing of linezolid., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.)

An important element in antimicrobial stewardship programmes is early switch from intravenous (i.v.) to oral antimicrobial treatment, especially for highly bioavailable drugs. The antifungal agent voriconazole is available both in i.v. and oral formulations and bioavailability is estimated to be >90% in healthy volunteers, making this drug a suitable candidate for such a transition. Recently, two studies have shown that the bioavailability of voriconazole is substantially lower in patients. However, for both studies various factors that could influence the voriconazole serum concentration, such as inflammation, concomitant intake of food with oral voriconazole, and gastrointestinal complications, were not included in the evaluation. Therefore, in this study a retrospective chart review was performed in adult patients treated with both oral and i.v. voriconazole at the same dose and within a limited (≤5 days) time interval in order to evaluate the effect of switching the route of administration on voriconazole serum concentrations. A total of 13 patients were included. The mean voriconazole trough concentration was 2.28 mg/L [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-3.26 mg/L] for i.v. voriconazole administration and 2.04 mg/L (95% CI 0.78-3.30 mg/L) for oral administration. No significant difference was found in the mean oral and i.v. trough concentrations of voriconazole (P = 0.390). The mean bioavailability was 83.0% (95% CI 59.0-107.0%). These findings suggest that factors other than bioavailability may cause the observed difference in voriconazole trough concentrations between oral and i.v. administration in the earlier studies and stress the need for an antimicrobial stewardship team to guide voriconazole dosing., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.)