Search

Introduction: Ewing sarcoma (ES), is a rare cancer affecting children, adolescents and adults. After VIDE (vincristine-ifosfamide-doxorobucin-etoposide) induction chemotherapy, Busulfan-Melphalan (BuMel) high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation improved outcomes in unfavourable localized ES, but with more toxicities than conventional chemotherapy (VAI: Vincristine-dactinomycin-Ifosfamide). We evaluated whether the risk of acute toxicity associated with BuMel compared to VAI varied according to age in patients recruited in the R2Loc and R2Pulm randomised trials of the Euro-E.W.I.N.G.99 and Ewing-2008 trials., Methods: We included patients with a localized high-risk disease, or pulmonary or pleural metastasis. We analysed the risk of severe toxicity according to randomised treatment group (VAI versus BuMel) and age group (<12 years, 12-17 years, 18-24 years, ≥25 years). We evaluated the heterogeneity of treatment effects by age group using interaction terms in logistic multivariable models., Results: The analysis included 243 patients treated with VAI and 205 with BuMel. Overall, BuMel was associated with a higher risk of severe acute toxicity than VAI particularly haematological, gastrointestinal, liver, sinusoidal occlusive syndrome, and infections. Severe haematological toxicity and lower general condition were significantly more frequent in younger patients, whatever treatment. We did not observe any significant heterogeneity in terms of the excess risk of severe toxicities associated with BuMel compared to VAI according to age group., Conclusion: The excess of acute toxicity associated with BuMel compared to VAI does not vary significantly with age, suggesting the feasibility of BuMel across all age groups., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The eighth Paediatric Strategy Forum focused on multi-targeted kinase inhibitors (mTKIs) in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. The development of curative, innovative products in these tumours is a high priority and addresses unmet needs in children, adolescents and adults. Despite clinical and investigational use of mTKIs, efficacy in patients with bone tumours has not been definitively demonstrated. Randomised studies, currently being planned or in progress, in front-line and relapse settings will inform the further development of this class of product. It is crucial that these are rapidly initiated to generate robust data to support international collaborative efforts. The experience to date has generally indicated that the safety profile of mTKIs as monotherapy, and in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted therapy, is consistent with that of adults and that toxicity is manageable. Increasing understanding of relevant predictive biomarkers and tumour biology is absolutely critical to further develop this class of products. Biospecimen samples for correlative studies and biomarker development should be shared, and a joint academic-industry consortium created. This would result in an integrated collection of serial tumour tissues and a systematic retrospective and prospective analyses of these samples to ensure robust assessment of biologic effect of mTKIs. To support access for children to benefit from these novel therapies, clinical trials should be designed with sufficient scientific rationale to support regulatory and payer requirements. To achieve this, early dialogue between academia, industry, regulators, and patient advocates is essential. Evaluating feasibility of combination strategies and then undertaking a randomised trial in the same protocol accelerates drug development. Where possible, clinical trials and development should include children, adolescents, and adults less than 40 years. To respond to emerging science, in approximately 12 months, a multi-stakeholder group will meet and review available data to determine future directions and priorities., Competing Interests: Conflcits of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/ personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: FB is an employee and stockholder of Ipsen Pharma. JC is an employee of Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals. MC has served as an advisor for Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Pfizer, and Servier. SGD has received consulting fees from Amgen, Bayer, and Loxo Oncology and has received travel reimbursement from Roche and Salarius. EG is an employee of Oncoheroes Biosciences. AH is an employee of Blueprint Medicines. KJ has received consulting fees from Bayer and Ipsen and honoraria fromTakeda and Foundation Medicine. JK is an employee of Allarity Therapeutics. SK is an employee of HUTCHMED International Corporation. CO is an employee of Eisai GmbH. ADJP has consulted for Lilly, Norgine and Developmental Therapeutics Consortium Limited and been an advisor for Amgen. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of high-dose chemotherapy in relapsing osteosarcomas has not been established. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of high-dose thiotepa (HDTp) after standard chemotherapy (SCT) in patients with relapsed osteosarcoma., Patients and Methods: This randomised open-label phase II study enrolled patients 1-50 years, with local or metastatic relapse of a high-grade osteosarcoma, not progressive after two cycles of SCT, for whom a complete surgery can be achievable following treatment. The trial assigned enrolled patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive two additional courses of SCT + HDTp and autologous transplantation (Arm A), or SCT alone (Arm B). Surgery for complete resection was scheduled as soon as feasible. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety., Results: From September 2009 to November 2016, 44 patients were randomised (A:22; B:22). In total, 54.5% were males, and the median age was 16 years (9-32years). The two-year OS rate was 66.7% (95% CI 42.5-82.5) (SCT + HDTp, Arm A) versus 50.0% (95% CI 28.2-68.4) for SCT alone (Arm B). Median OS was 27.4 and 24.8 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.826, 95% CI 0.393-1.734; p = 0.6123). Median PFS was 15.6 (8.9-24.9) months in Arm A versus 7.2 (4.8-33.3) months in Arm B, p = 0.3845. Among the 22 patients treated with SCT + HDTp, 16 (72.7%) experienced at least one grade ≥3 adverse events versus 18/22 (81.8%) patients treated with SCT. No toxic death occurred., Conclusion: Adjuvant HDTp failed to significantly improve OS and PFS in resectable relapsed osteosarcomas. Despite a trend of prolonged survival and an acceptable toxicity, thiotepa cannot be recommended., Key Message: HDTp and autologous transplantation added to SCT did not improve OS and PFS in patients with resectable relapsed osteosarcomas. Despite a trend of prolonged survival, thiotepa cannot be recommended., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: There are some lines of evidence suggesting a potential role of immunotherapy for treating patients with osteosarcomas., Patients and Methods: This was an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in combination with metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced osteosarcomas. All patients received 50 mg b.i.d. of cyclophosphamide one week on and one week off and 200 mg of intravenous pembrolizumab (every 3 weeks). There was a dual primary end-point, encompassing both the non-progression and objective responses at 6 months per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), version 1.1. An objective response rate of 20% and/or a 6-month non-progression rate of 60% were determined as reasonable objectives for treatment with meaningful effect. Correlative studies of immune biomarkers were planned from the patients' tumour samples., Results: Between October 13 2015 and July 3 2017, 17 patients were included. Fifty were assessable for the efficacy end-point. Four patients experienced tumour shrinkage, resulting in a partial response (PR) in one patient (6.7%). The 6-month non-progression rate was 13.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-40.5). The most frequent adverse events were grade I or II nausea, anaemia, anorexia and fatigue. programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression rate was low, observed in only 2 cases of 14 with available tumour material. The only patient who experienced PR had a PD-L1-negative tumour., Conclusion: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibition has limited activity in osteosarcomas. Further studies investigating PD-1 inhibitor in combination with agents modulating the microenvironment are warranted., Trial Registration: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02406781., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In most countries, reference chemotherapy for osteosarcoma is MAP regimen (M = high-dose methotrexate, AP = doxorubicin-cisplatinum). In France, the standard preoperative chemotherapy for children/adolescents combines M and etoposide-ifosfamide (EI), based on the OS94-trial. We report the safety and efficacy results of patients ≤25 years treated with preoperative M-EI regimen enroled in the French OS2006-study, between 2007 and 2014., Methods: Treatment comprised preoperative chemotherapy with the 7 M-courses and 2 EI-courses, then surgery and postoperative chemotherapy assigned by risk's groups: standard-risk (good histological response without metastases) received 12 M-courses, 3 EI-courses; high-risk (poor histologic response, initial metastases or unresectable primary) received 5 M-courses alternated with 5 AP-courses. 253 patients were randomised to receive (n = 128) or not (n = 125) zoledronate., Results: 409/522 patients enroled in the OS2006 study who received preoperative M-EI were analysed. Median age was 14.3 years (4.7-24.5), with 55 patients aged 18-25 years. Primary tumour location was limb in 383 patients (94%) and 85 (21%) presented metastases. Median chemotherapy duration was 37.4 weeks. 381 (96%) patients underwent surgery, 258 patients (65%) had a good histologic response. 187/324 patients (58%) with localised disease did not receive doxorubicin nor cisplatinum. Toxicity was evaluated in the randomised study: most patients experienced ≥1 severe toxicity (grade IV haematological or grade III/IV extra-haematological). Median follow-up was 4.8 years, and 168 patients had events. Five-year event-free survival was 56% (95% CI, 51-62%) and overall survival 71% (66-76%)., Conclusion: M-EI regimen/strategy was feasible for patient aged ≤25 years with survival rates are comparable to those obtained with MAP regimen., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The most appropriate design of Phase-II trials evaluating new therapies in osteosarcoma remains poorly defined., Objective: To study consistency in phase-II clinical trials evaluating new therapies for osteosarcoma recurrences with respect to eligibility criteria, response assessment, end-points, statistical design and reported results., Methods: Systematic review of clinical trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu and French National Cancer Institute website or referenced in PubMed and American Society of Clinical Oncology websites, between 2003 and 2016, using the following criteria: (osteosarcoma OR bone sarcoma) AND (Phase-II)., Results: Among the 99 trials identified, 80 were Phase-II, 17 I/II and 2 II/III, evaluating mostly targeted therapy (n = 40), and chemotherapy alone (n = 26). Results were fully (n = 28) or partially (abstract, n = 6) published. Twenty-four trials were dedicated to osteosarcoma, 22 had an osteosarcoma stratum. Twenty-eight out of 99 trials refer to the age range observed at recurrence (28%). Overall, 65 trials were run in multicentre settings, including 17 international trials. Only 9 trials were randomised. The primary end-point was tumour response in 71 trials (response rate, n = 40 or best response, n = 31), with various definitions (complete + partial ± minor response and stable disease), mainly evaluated with RECIST criteria (n = 69); it was progression-free survival in 24 trials and OS in 3. In single-arm trials evaluating response rate, the null hypothesis tested (when available, n = 12) varied from 5% to 25%., Conclusion: No robust historical data can currently be derived from past efficacy Phase-II trials. There is an urgent need to develop international randomised Phase-II trials across all age ranges with standardised primary end-point., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in Ewing sarcoma (ES) is unclear. We assessed the impact of PORT on local control in patients with localised ES and good histological response to chemotherapy (<10% cells)., Patients and Methods: All randomised patients in the EE99-R1 trial (comparing two consolidation chemotherapy regimens) undergoing surgery after induction chemotherapy were included. Local relapse (LR) cumulative incidence was estimated using a competing risk approach. Impact of PORT was assessed in multivariable models, adjusted for country, age, tumour site and volume, quality of resection and histological response. We also evaluated the heterogeneity of PORT effect by patient and tumour characteristics., Results: One hundred forty-two (24%) of the 599 patients included from 1999 to 2009 received PORT (median dose: 45 Grays). With median follow-up of 6.2 years, 67 patients had an LR (with concomitant metastases in 28), leading to an 8-year LR-incidence = 11.9% (standard error [se] = 1.4%). Overall survival (OS) = 21% (se = 5%) 3 years after LR (31% in isolated LR). Controlling for possible confounders, we observed a statistically significant reduction of LR in patients treated by surgery + PORT compared to surgery alone (subdistribution-hazard ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.88, p = 0.02). The benefit of PORT was particularly marked for tumours larger than 200 ml at diagnosis and 100% necrosis. We observed a non-significant trend for benefit associated with PORT for disease-free, event-free and OS., Conclusion: Radiotherapy appears to improve local control. We now recommend PORT in case of incomplete removal of the tissues involved by the pre-chemotherapy tumour volume. Further studies are required to assess the balance between benefit and risks., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Based on the randomised Euro-EWING99-R1 trial, vincristine, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (VAC) may be able to replace vincristine, adriamycin, ifosfamide (VAI) in the treatment of standard-risk Ewing sarcoma. However some heterogeneity of treatment effect by gender was observed. The current exploratory study aimed at investigating the influence of gender on treatment efficacy and acute toxicity., Patients and Methods: Impact of gender on event-free survival (EFS), acute toxicity by course, switches between treatment arms and cumulative dose of alkylating agents was evaluated in multivariable models adjusted for age including terms to test for heterogeneity of treatment effect by gender. The analysis of the EFS was performed on the intention-to-treat population., Results: EFS did not significantly differ between the 509 males and 347 females (p=0.33), but an interaction in terms of efficacy was suspected between treatment and gender (p=0.058): VAC was associated with poorer EFS than VAI in males, hazard ratio (HR) (VAC/VAI)=1.37 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98-1.90], contrasting with HR=0.81 [95%CI, 0.53-1.24] in females. Severe toxicity was more frequent in females, whatever the toxicity type. Thirty patients switched from VAI to VAC (9/251 males, 4%, and 21/174 females, 12%) mostly due to renal toxicity, and three from VAC to VAI (2/258 males, 0.8%, and 1/173 females, 0.6%). A reduction of alkylating agent cumulative dose >20% was more frequent in females (15% versus 9%, p=0.005), with no major difference between VAC and VAI (10% versus 13%, p=0.15)., Conclusion: Differences of acute toxicity rate and cumulative doses of alkylating agents could not explain the marginal interaction observed in the Euro-EWING99-R1 trial data. Effects of gender-dependent polymorphism/activity of metabolic enzymes (e.g. known for CYP2B6) of ifosfamide versus cyclophosphamide should be explored. External data are required to further evaluate whether there is heterogeneity of alkylating agent effect by gender., Trial Numbers: NCT00987636 and EudraCT 2008-003658-13., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate both local outcome and sequelae of non-metastatic spinal Ewing tumours (EWT)., Patients and Methods: A French cohort of patients ≤ 50years with localised spinal EWT treated between 1988 and 2009, was analysed in regard to tumour characteristics (e.g. volume, vertebral compartment, spinal cord compression, paraspinal soft tissue invasion), local treatment modalities (surgery (S) and margin quality, radiotherapy (RT) dose), response to treatment (e.g. histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT)), tumour local control (LC) and sequelae., Results: Seventy-five patients treated in successive trials were evaluated for LC: SFOP-EW88 (n=14), SFOP-EW93 (n=17) and EuroEwing99 (n=44). Fifty-seven patients (79%) presented initial neurological compression and 69% had inaugural decompressive S. Local treatment modality was S+RT (n=50), RT alone (n=19) and S alone (n=6). Surgery was mainly intralesional (66%). Local recurrences had occurred in 19 patients (14 local, 5 loco-regional) with a median interval of 25 months (1-50). After a 7 year median follow-up (1-22 years), the 5-year LC, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) reached 78.0% (95%CI: 62.6-84.6), 57.0% (95%CI: 45.2-68.9) and 70.0% (95%CI: 59.1-81.0), respectively. Vertebral compartment involved was the only prognostic factor (5-year LC rate 100% versus 71% for favourable and unfavourable compartment, p<0.03). Among 41 five-year survivors, we observed spinal curvature deformation (35%), growth retardation (28%), spinal reduction mobility (40%), spinal pain (25%) and neurological sequelae (32%) without any significant association with a particular local procedure., Conclusion: RT is the backbone of a successful local treatment of spinal EWT. The place of S remains a pending question. Its actual benefit will likely evolve with new available RT techniques., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim of the Study: To determine whether a risk factor adapted chemotherapy would improve the outcome of non-metastatic bone Ewing's sarcoma., Methods: Standard risk tumours (SR, good histological response to chemotherapy or small unresected tumours) received the previous EW88 chemotherapy. Ifosfamide/etoposide (IE) were introduced after 3 courses of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicine when tumour regression was <50% or during consolidation therapy for the intermediate risk tumours (IR, intermediate histological response 5-30% residual cells or large unresected tumours >100ml). High risk tumours (HR, histological poor response >30% residual cells or clinical poor response <50% for unresectable tumours), received IE prior high dose busulfan/melphalan with stem cell rescue., Results: From 1993 to 1999, 214 patients were enrolled. 5 y-EFS and OS were 60% (95% confidence interval (CI), 53-66) and 69% (95% CI, 63-75), respectively. 116 (54%), 46 (21%), 48 (22%) patients were considered as SR, IR and HR of relapse, respectively. No advantage to IE was observed in the IR group. As compared to previous study, tumour with poor histological response to induction chemotherapy seemed to benefit from the consolidation strategy including busulfan/melphalan: EFS were 45% (95% CI, 30-60) and 20% (95% CI, 7-43) for EW93 and EW88, respectively. Despite a risk-adapted strategy, histological response to chemotherapy remains the main prognostic factor in resected tumours, while initial tumour volume is the main prognostic factor for unresected tumours., Conclusion: These results showing a potential benefit of a consolidation strategy including busulfan/melphalan as compared to conventional chemotherapy needed confirmation by a randomised trial and were one of the bases of the ongoing EuroEwing99., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cancer is the third leading cause of death in adolescents and young adults (AYA). Little is known, however, about how end-of-life unfolds for those who die of progressive disease. In order to better evaluate the specific needs of these patients, we performed this study providing baseline information about end-of-life care patterns for AYA in our department., Patients: A standardised form was used to collect data concerning all 45 patients treated for a malignancy in the Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology Department at the Gustave Roussy Institute, and who had died of progressive disease above 13 years of age, over a two-year period., Results: The main diagnoses were sarcomas and brain tumours. Previous cancer-directed treatment included a median of 3 different chemotherapy regimens, high-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem cell support for 13% and radiotherapy for 40%. One in every four patients had been enrolled in a clinical trial at diagnosis. Median survival was 18 months after the diagnosis and 7 months after the first relapse/progression. During the last week of life, the median number of physical symptoms was 4, mostly pain and dyspnoea. Frequent psychological symptoms were sadness, anxiety, fear and guilt. End-of-life care included transfusions, artificial nutrition, corticosteroids, pain control, sedation but also palliative chemotherapy. The median time spent in hospital during the last month of life was 16 days. Most patients had died in hospital., Conclusions: The terminally ill adolescent displays notable challenges to care providers and requires a holistic approach with the help of a multidisciplinary team., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)