1. Impact of 18 F-FDG PET/MR on therapeutic management in high risk primary breast cancer patients - A prospective evaluation of staging algorithms.
- Author
-
Kirchner J, Martin O, Umutlu L, Herrmann K, Bittner AK, Hoffmann O, Mohrmann S, Gauler T, Theurer S, Antke C, Esposito I, Kinner S, Schaarschmidt BM, Kowall B, Lütke-Brintrup D, Stang A, Becker AS, Antoch G, and Buchbender C
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Breast diagnostic imaging, Breast pathology, Breast Neoplasms therapy, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Multimodal Imaging methods, Neoplasm Staging, Prospective Studies, Risk, Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Positron-Emission Tomography methods, Radiopharmaceuticals
- Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether potential differences in staging between a traditional staging imaging algorithm and
18 F-FDG PET/MR lead to a change in patient management in breast carcinoma and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between the traditional staging algorithm and18 F-FDG PET/MR for the TNM classification., Method: In this prospective cohort study from two university hospitals 56 women with newly diagnosed, therapy-naive breast cancer and increased pre-test probability for distant metastases were included. All patients were examined by a traditional staging imaging algorithm (X-ray mammography, breast ultrasonography, chest plain radiography, bone scintigraphy, and ultrasonography of the liver and axillary fossa) and whole-body18 F-FDG PET/MR including dedicated18 F-FDG PET/MR breast examinations. Each patient was discussed two times in a separate tumor board session to determine a total of three therapy recommendations based on histopathological data of the primary tumor and (1) traditional algorithm only, (2) traditional algorithm and18 F-FDG PET/MR, and (3)18 F-FDG PET/MR only. Major changes in therapy recommendations and differences between the traditional staging algorithm and18 F-FDG PET/MR for the TNM classification were evaluated., Results: Staging by18 F-FDG PET/MR led to a difference in treatment compared the traditional staging algorithm in 8/56 cases (14%). Therapy changes included therapy of the breast, locoregional nodes and systemic therapy. A trend to staging superiority was found for18 F-FDG PET/MRI without statistical significance (p = 0.3827)., Conclusion: In conclusion, for breast cancer patients with elevated pre-test probability for distant metastases a change of the therapy regiment occurs in 14 % of patients when staged by18 F-FDG PET/MR and confirmed by histopathology compared to a traditional staging algorithm. In particular with regard to the amendment of the guideline further assessment of18 F-FDG-PET/MR in this setting is necessary to assess the true value of this modality., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF