Search

Background Context: The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is a valid and reliable patient-reported instrument designed to identify patients whose presenting symptoms may be related to central sensitization (CS). Part A of the CSI measures a full array of 25 somatic and emotional symptoms associated with CS, and Part B asks if patients have previously been diagnosed with one or more specific central sensitivity syndromes (CSSs) and related disorders. The CSI has previously been validated in a group of patients with chronic pain who were screened by a trained psychiatrist for specific CSS diagnoses. It is currently unknown if the CSI can be a useful treatment-outcome assessment tool for patients with chronic spinal pain disorder (CSPD) who are not screened for comorbid CSSs. It is known, however, that previous studies have identified CS-related symptoms, and comorbid CSSs, in subsets of patients with CSPDs. Studies have also shown that CS-related symptoms can be influenced by cognitive and psychosocial factors, including abuse history in both childhood and adulthood, sleep disturbance, catastrophic and fear-avoidant cognitions, and symptoms of depression and anxiety., Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate CSI scores, and their associations with other clinically relevant psychosocial variables, in a cohort of patients with CSPD who entered and completed a functional restoration program., Study Design/setting: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data from a cohort study of patients with CSPD, who completed the CSI at admission to, and discharge from, an interdisciplinary function restoration program (FRP) was carried out., Patient Sample: A cohort of 763 patients with CSPD comprised the study sample., Outcome Measures: Clinical interviews evaluated mood disorders and abuse history. A series of self-reported measures evaluated comorbid psychosocial symptoms, including pain intensity, pain-related anxiety, depressive symptoms, somatization symptoms, perceived disability, and sleep disturbance, at FRP admission and discharge., Methods: Patients were grouped into five severity level groups, from mild to extreme, based on total CSI scores, at FRP admission, and then again at discharge. The FRP included a quantitatively directed and medically supervised exercise process, as well as a multimodal psychosocial disability management component., Results: The CSI severity groups were strongly associated with Major Depressive Disorder and previous abuse history (p<.01), which are known risk factors for CS-related symptoms and diagnoses. The CSI scores were also strongly associated with patient-reported CSS diagnoses on CSI Part B. The percentage of patients who reported a comorbid CSS diagnosis increased in each higher CSI-severity group, from 11% in the Subclinical group, to 56% in the Extreme group. The CSI severity groups were significantly related to other CS-related patient-reported symptoms, including pain intensity, pain-related anxiety, depressive symptoms, somatization symptoms, perceived disability, and sleep disturbance (p's<.001). The CSI scores, along with all other psychosocial measures, decreased at treatment discharge., Conclusions: In the present study, admission CSI scores were highly associated with previous CSS diagnoses, CS-related symptoms, and clinically relevant patient-reported psychosocial variables. All psychosocial variables, as well as scores on the CSI, were significantly improved at FRP discharge. The CSI may have important clinical utility, as a screener and as a treatment outcome measure, for patients with CSPD participating in an interdisciplinary FRP., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Insomnia is frequently experienced by patients suffering from chronic musculoskeletal disorders but is often seen as simply a symptom of pain or depression and not as an independent disorder. Compared with those who experience only chronic pain, patients with both chronic pain and insomnia report higher pain intensity, more depressive symptoms, and greater distress. However, insomnia has not yet been systematically studied in a chronic musculoskeletal pain with disability population., Purposes: This study assessed the prevalence and severity of patient-reported insomnia, as well as the relationship among insomnia, pain intensity, and depressive symptoms, in a chronic musculoskeletal pain with disability population., Study Design/setting: This was a retrospective study of prospectively captured data., Patient Sample: A consecutive cohort of 326 chronic musculoskeletal pain with disability patients (85% with spinal injuries) entered a functional restoration treatment program. All patients signed a consent form to participate in this protocol., Outcome Measures: Insomnia was assessed with the Insomnia Severity Index, a validated patient-report measure of insomnia symptoms. Four patient groups were formed: no clinically significant insomnia (score, 0-7); subthreshold insomnia (score, 8-14); moderate clinical insomnia (score, 15-21); and severe clinical insomnia (score, 22-28). Three patterns of sleep disturbance were also evaluated: early, middle, and late insomnia. Additional validated psychosocial patient-reported data were collected, including the Pain Visual Analog Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Oswestry Disability Index, and the Pain Disability Questionnaire., Methods: Patients completed a standard psychosocial assessment battery on admission to the functional restoration program. The program included a quantitatively directed exercise process in conjunction with a multimodal disability management approach. The four insomnia groups were compared on demographic and psychosocial variables. The shared variances among insomnia, depression, and pain were determined by partial correlational analyses., Results: The presence of no clinically significant insomnia, subthreshold insomnia, moderate clinical insomnia, and severe clinical insomnia was found in 5.5%, 21.2%, 39.6%, and 33.7% of the cohort, respectively. More than 70% of patients reported moderate to severe insomnia symptoms, which is a considerably higher prevalence than that found in most patient cohorts studied previously. A stepwise pattern was found, in which severe clinical insomnia patients reported the highest pain, the most severe depressive symptoms, and the greatest disability. The severe clinical insomnia patients also reported a higher number of sleep disturbance types (early, middle, and late insomnia) than the other three groups. In fact, 62.9% of them reported all three disturbance types. Although correlations were found between insomnia and depressive symptoms and between insomnia and pain, the shared variances were small (12.9% and 3.6%, respectively), indicating that depression and pain are separate constructs from insomnia., Conclusion: This research indicates that insomnia is a significant and pervasive problem in a chronic musculoskeletal pain with disability population. Most importantly, although insomnia has traditionally been assumed to be simply a symptom of pain or depression, the findings of the present study reveal that it is a construct relatively independent from both pain and depression. Specific insomnia assessment and treatment is therefore recommended for this chronic musculoskeletal pain with disability population., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: For chronic pain patients, recovery may be slowed by indecisiveness over optional surgery. These patients may be delayed from participating in interdisciplinary functional restoration (FR), pending resolution of the surgical decision. Uncertainty about surgery or rehabilitation leads to delayed recovery. A surgical option process (SOP) was developed to permit patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders to enter FR, make a final determination halfway through treatment, and return to complete rehabilitation after surgery, if surgery was elected., Purpose: This study assessed the frequency with which an FR program can resolve an uncertain surgical option. It also assessed program completion rate and 1-year post-program outcomes for subgroups that decline surgery, request and receive surgery, or request surgery but are denied by surgeon or insurance carrier., Study Design: Retrospective study of a consecutive cohort., Patient Sample: A cohort of 44 consecutively treated chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorder patients were admitted to an FR program and identified as candidates for a surgical procedure but were either ambivalent about undergoing surgery, had a difference of opinion by two or more surgeons, or were denied a surgical request by an insurance carrier. Patients attended half (10 full day visits) of an FR program before making their own final determination to pursue a request or decline surgery., Outcome Measures: Patients were assessed on surgical requests and whether surgery was ultimately performed, program completion status after the surgical determination, demographic variables, and 1-year outcomes on work status, additional surgery, and other health utilization measures., Methods: Patients became part of the SOP on program entry and were included in the study if they participated in a surgical-decision interview halfway through the program. Those who elected to decline surgery (DS) completed the program without delay, but those requesting surgery were placed on hold from the program while consultation and preauthorization steps took place. Those requesting surgery, but denied (RSD), and those undergoing surgery (US) were given the opportunity to complete FR following postoperative physical therapy or resolution of the surgical re-evaluation process., Results: There were 32 DS patients (73%), indicating that a large majority of patients declined the surgery that was still being considered when offered participation in the SOP. Of the 12 patients wanting a surgery, there were four US patients who received surgery previously denied (9% of cohort), and eight RSD patients (18% of cohort). Patients from the DS group completed the FR program at an 88% rate, as did 75% of US patients. However, despite an opportunity to re-enter and complete rehab, only 50% of RSD patients completed the FR option. Overall, patients who persistently sought surgery, contrary to the recommendations of a surgeon, had poorer outcomes. These 1-year post-FR outcomes included lower return-to-work and work retention rates, with higher rates of treatment seeking from new providers (resulting in higher rates of post-discharge surgery) and higher rates of recurrent injury claims after work return., Conclusions: A SOP tied to participation in an interdisciplinary FR program resolves uncertainty regarding surgical options in a high proportion of cases, resulting in a large majority declining surgery and completing the FR program. Timely surgery is also promoted decisively when needed. Findings suggest that patients who persistently seek surgery, contrary to the recommendations of a surgeon, frequently fail to complete FR and have poorer outcomes overall., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: High prevalence rates of depression have been found in patients with chronic spinal disorder (CSD). The biopsychosocial model has become widely adopted and, with it, the role of psychopathology in the development and/or exacerbation of CSD has become increasingly recognized. Standardized diagnostic criteria, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), have been used to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Many measures of MDD (and depressive symptom inventories) have been developed during the past 50 years, but their comparative utility in CSD populations is still unclear., Purpose: To systemically compare the performance of depression screening questionnaires in detecting MDD among a large sample of patients with CSD., Study Design/setting: Prospective cohort study comparing the screening ability of four popular depression measures for diagnosing MDD against the "gold standard" Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in a CSD population., Patient Sample: A consecutive cohort of 546 patients with CSD admitted to an interdisciplinary functional restoration program., Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, ROC curves, area under the curve (AUC), and optimal cutoff points that are most closely related to the prevalence rates of MDD, with balanced sensitivity and specificity analysis., Methods: Using the SCID-I diagnosis as a "gold standard," the ability of four screening measures in detecting MDD were compared. These included: the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD); 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Module (PHQ-9); and the Short Form-36 (SF-36)., Results: Of 542 CSD patients, 331 (61.1%) were diagnosed with MDD by the SCID-I. Results of the ROC analysis revealed that the BDI (AUC 0.768), HRSD (AUC 0.796), and PHQ-9 (AUC 0.768) have similar abilities to discriminate between depressed and nondepressed patients in this population. These depression measures outperformed the two mental health scales derived from the SF-36 (Mental Component Summary score/5-Item Mental Health Index; AUC 0.679-0.715). The optimal cut-off scores of 15 (for the BDI), 17 (for the HRSD), and 10 (for the PHQ-9) were also determined. Although the greatest overall accuracy (sensitivity of 81.3% and specificity of 65.4%) was obtained with the HRSD, it is the only clinician-administered instrument. Self-report measures of depression (the BDI and PHQ-9) showed comparable abilities to detect depression, only slightly less than the HRSD., Conclusions: Compared to the HRSD, both BDI and PHQ-9 are relatively short and easy to self-administer. The cut-off scores established in this study may be used to reliably determine whether a person should be evaluated more thoroughly for an MDD diagnosis. Using an acknowledged "gold standard," the HRSD, BDI and PHQ-9 showed similar validity to recommend their use for future clinical and research purposes. The SF-36 is less appropriate for diagnosing MDD., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Abnormal pretreatment flexion-relaxation in chronic disabling occupational lumbar spinal disorder patients has been shown to improve with functional restoration rehabilitation. Little is known about the effects of prior lumbar surgeries on flexion-relaxation and its responsiveness to treatment., Purpose: To quantify the effect of prior lumbar surgeries on the flexion-relaxation phenomenon and its responsiveness to rehabilitative treatment., Study Design/setting: A prospective cohort study of chronic disabling occupational lumbar spinal disorder patients, including those with and without prior lumbar spinal surgeries., Patient Sample: A sample of 126 chronic disabling occupational lumbar spinal disorder patients with prior work-related injuries entered an interdisciplinary functional restoration program and agreed to enroll in this study. Fifty-seven patients had undergone surgical decompression or discectomy (n=32) or lumbar fusion (n=25), and the rest had no history of prior injury-related spine surgery (n=69). At post-treatment, 116 patients were reevaluated, including those with prior decompressions or discectomies (n=30), lumbar fusions (n=21), and no surgery (n=65). A comparison group of 30 pain-free control subjects was tested with an identical assessment protocol, and compared with post-rehabilitation outcomes., Outcome Measures: Mean surface electromyography (SEMG) at maximum voluntary flexion; subject achievement of flexion-relaxation (SEMG≤3.5 μV); gross lumbar, true lumbar, and pelvic flexion ROM; and a pain visual analog scale self-report during forward bending task. Identical measures were obtained at pretreatment and post-treatment., Methods: Patients entered an interdisciplinary functional restoration program, including a quantitatively directed, medically supervised exercise process and a multimodal psychosocial disability management component. The functional restoration program was accompanied by a SEMG-assisted stretching training program, designed to teach relaxation of the lumbar musculature during end-range flexion, thereby improving or normalizing flexion-relaxation and increasing lumbar flexion ROM. At 1 year after discharge from the program, a structured interview was used to obtain socioeconomic outcomes., Results: At pre-rehabilitation, the no surgery group patients demonstrated significantly better performance than both surgery groups on absolute SEMG at maximum voluntary flexion and on true lumbar flexion ROM. Both surgery groups were less likely to achieve flexion-relaxation than the no surgery patients. The fusion patients had reduced gross lumbar flexion ROM and greater pain during bending compared with the no surgery patients, and reduced true lumbar flexion ROM compared with the discectomy patients. At post-rehabilitation, all groups improved substantially on all measures. When post-rehabilitation measures were compared with the pain-free control group, with gross and true lumbar ROM corrected by 8° per spinal segment fused, there were no differences between any of the patient groups and the pain-free control subjects on spinal ROM and only small differences in SEMG. The three groups had comparable socioeconomic outcomes at 1 year post-treatment in work retention, health-care utilization, new injury, and new surgery., Conclusions: Despite the fact that the patients with prior surgery demonstrated greater pretreatment SEMG and ROM deficits, functional restoration treatment, combined with SEMG-assisted stretching training, was successful in improving all these measures by post-treatment. After treatment, both groups demonstrated ROM within anticipated limits, and the majority of patients in all three groups successfully achieved flexion-relaxation. In a chronic disabling occupational lumbar spinal disorder cohort, surgery patients were nearly equal to nonoperated patients in responding to interdisciplinary functional restoration rehabilitation on measures investigated in this study, achieving close to normal performance measures associated with pain-free controls. The responsiveness and final scores shown in this study suggests that flexion-relaxation may be a useful, objective diagnostic tool to measure changes in physical capacity for chronic disabling occupational lumbar spinal disorder patients., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Systematic reviews of lumbar fusion outcomes in purely workers' compensation (WC) patient populations have indicated mixed results for efficacy. Recent studies on lumbar fusions in the WC setting have reported return-to-work rates of 26% to 36%, reoperation rates of 22% to 27%, and high rates of persistent opioid use 2 years after surgery. Other types of lumbar surgery in WC populations are also acknowledged to have poorer outcomes than in non-WC. The possibility of improving outcomes by employing a biopsychosocial model with a continuum of care, including postoperative functional restoration in this "at risk" population, has been suggested as a possible solution., Purpose: To compare objective socioeconomic and patient-reported outcomes for WC patients with different lumbar surgeries followed by functional restoration, relative to matched comparison patients without surgery., Study Design/setting: A prospective cohort study of chronic disabling occupational lumbar disorder (CDOLD) patients with WC claims treated in an interdisciplinary functional restoration program., Patient Sample: A consecutive cohort of 564 patients with prerehabilitation surgery completed a functional restoration and was divided into groups based on surgery type: lumbar fusion (F group, N=331) and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery (NF group, N=233). An unoperated comparison group was matched for length of disability (U group, N=349)., Outcome Measures: Validated patient-reported measures of pain, disability, and depression were administered pre- and postrehabilitation. Socioeconomic outcomes were collected via a structured 1-year "after" interview., Methods: All patients completed an intensive, medically supervised functional restoration program combining quantitatively directed exercise progression with a multimodal disability management approach. The writing of this article was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant 1K05-MH-71892; no conflicts of interest are noted among the authors., Results: The F group had a longer length of disability compared with the NF and U groups (M=31.6, 21.7, and 25.9 months, respectively, p<.001). There were relatively few statistically significant differences for any socioeconomically relevant outcome among groups, with virtually identical postrehabilitation return-to-work (F=81%, NF=84%, U=85%, p=.409). The groups differed significantly after surgery on diagnosis of major depressive disorder and opioid dependence disorder as well as patient-reported depressive symptoms and pain intensity prerehabilitation. However, no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes were found postrehabilitation. Prerehabilitation opioid dependence disorder significantly predicted lower rates of work return and work retention as well as higher rates of treatment-seeking behavior. Higher levels of prerehabilitation perceived disability and depressive symptoms were significant risk factors for poorer work return and retention outcomes., Conclusions: Lumbar surgery in the WC system (particularly lumbar fusion) have the potential achieve positive outcomes that are comparable to CDOLD patients treated nonoperatively. This study suggests that surgeons have the opportunity to improve lumbar surgery outcomes in the WC system, even for complex fusion CDOLD patients with multiple prior operations, if they control postoperative opioid dependence and prevent an excessive length of disability. Through early referral of patients (who fail to respond to usual postoperative care) to interdisciplinary rehabilitation, the surgeon determining this continuum of care may accelerate recovery and achieve socioeconomic outcomes of relevance to the patient and WC jurisdiction through the combination of surgery and postoperative rehabilitation., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest change in an outcome that a patient would perceive as meaningful. The Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) group proposed defining the MCID as a 30% improvement in self-reported pain or function. However, this MCID threshold has not been validated against an objective physical measure., Purpose: To test the validity of the IMMPACT-based MCID threshold, using an objective physical measure as an external anchor., Study Design/setting: Prospective study of chronic disabling occupational lumbar disorder (CDOLD) patients completing a functional restoration program., Patient Sample: A consecutive cohort of 743 CDOLD patients., Outcome Measures: Self-report measures of pain-related function were compared with an objective lifting measure, the progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation (PILE), obtained after treatment., Methods: The association between reporting 30% or greater improvement (the IMMPACT's MCID key criterion) and the PILE score after treatment was assessed., Results: A 30% or greater improvement on the self-report measures was significantly associated with improvement in physical function on the PILE task., Conclusions: Despite extensive use of the MCID to evaluate effects of treatment in spinal disorders, this is the first empirical documentation of the validity of the IMMPACT's 30% change criterion compared with an objective physical anchor., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Various methodologies have been used in attempting to elucidate a standard method for calculating minimal clinically important difference (MCID). A consensus-based decision (Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials [IMMPACT] group) suggested a 30% reduction from baseline as a means to define the MCID of self-report back pain measures. Additionally, important psychometric issues need to be addressed regarding use of an independent measure of the same construct as an external criterion, instead of simply using another self-report measure, when using an anchor-based approach to MCID., Purpose: The purpose was to test the validity of recently published guidelines regarding MCID using self-report back pain measures and objective socioeconomic outcomes., Study Design/setting: This is a prospective study assessing change scores on commonly used spinal pain assessment measures in patients with chronic disabling occupational spinal disorders (CDOSDs) treated in a regional referral rehabilitation center performing interdisciplinary functional restoration., Patient Sample: The study consisted of consecutive cohort of patients (N=1,180) with CDOSDs completing a functional restoration program., Outcomes Measures: Self-report measures including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) obtained before and after treatment, were compared with objective socioeconomically relevant outcomes obtained 1 year after treatment (ie, work status and additional health-care utilization), that were the external criteria for evaluating MCID., Methods: Pre- to posttreatment improvement was calculated separately for each measure, and subjects were divided into two groups based on the change in scores relative to baseline: 30% or greater versus less than 30% improvement. One-year posttreatment objective socioeconomic outcomes were used as independent external criteria relevant to the CDOSD population. This population is often studied as the most costly and problematic cohort in spine care., Results: The ODI and SF-36 MCS were not associated with any of the objective 1-year outcomes used as external criteria. Reduced post-rehabilitation health-care utilization (based on the percentage of patients pursuing health care from a new provider) was weakly associated with 30% or greater improvement on the SF-36 PCS, relative to patients whose scores changed by less than 30% relative to baseline (17.0% vs. 21.1%). The same was true for the ODI and return-to-work., Conclusions: When objective and independent criteria are used (socioeconomic outcomes) in a CDOSD cohort, the 30% improvement in the ODI and SF-36 may not be a valid MCID index. This replicates similar conclusions made by an independent research group using a distribution-based approach to MCID. The validity of the MCID concept rests on future research using objective external criteria. Moreover, there remains a question whether the term "important" in MCID can be unequivocally and operationally defined as a reliable construct.

The management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) has proven to be very challenging in North America, as evidenced by its mounting socioeconomic burden. Choosing amongst available nonsurgical therapies can be overwhelming for many stakeholders, including patients, health providers, policy makers, and third-party payers. Although all parties share a common goal and wish to use limited health-care resources to support interventions most likely to result in clinically meaningful improvements, there is often uncertainty about the most appropriate intervention for a particular patient. To help understand and evaluate the various commonly used nonsurgical approaches to CLBP, the North American Spine Society has sponsored this special focus issue of The Spine Journal, titled Evidence-Informed Management of Chronic Low Back Pain Without Surgery. Articles in this special focus issue were contributed by leading spine practitioners and researchers, who were invited to summarize the best available evidence for a particular intervention and encouraged to make this information accessible to nonexperts. Each of the articles contains five sections (description, theory, evidence of efficacy, harms, and summary) with common subheadings to facilitate comparison across the 24 different interventions profiled in this special focus issue, blending narrative and systematic review methodology as deemed appropriate by the authors. It is hoped that articles in this special focus issue will be informative and aid in decision making for the many stakeholders evaluating nonsurgical interventions for CLBP.

Background Context: Studies have revealed smoking to have a negative impact on spinal surgery. It is assumed that this is the result of the negative impact of nicotine on revascularization of damaged tissue. However, there is a paucity of research on the role of smoking with regard to nonsurgical rehabilitation, but there exists a clear bias for believing that smoking is strongly associated with poor socioeconomic and psychosocial outcome., Purpose: This study was designed to examine the relationship between smoking and outcomes in a chronically disabled work-related spinal disorder (CDWRSD) cohort undergoing functional restoration., Study Design: A prospective comparison cohort study investigating the effects of smoking status on functional restoration treatment outcomes., Patient Sample: A cohort of 1,141 consecutive CDWRSD patients were divided into four groups: Group A, patients who did not smoke (n=710); Group B, patients who smoked less than one cigarette pack/day (n=157); Group C, patients who smoked 1.0 to 1.9 packs/day (n=218); Group D, patients who smoked 2.0 or more packs/day (n=56)., Outcome Measures: Before the start of functional restoration, and upon its completion, patients received a standard psychosocial assessment battery and were assessed on a variety of physical factors. A structured clinical interview examining socioeconomic outcomes was conducted 1 year after the program., Methods: Patients underwent an intensive functional restoration chronic pain management rehabilitation program consisting of quantitatively directed exercise progression and a multimodal disability management program for CDWRSD. The program consisted of four phases, the most significant of which involved a 3-week full-day intensive phase after preparatory preprogram phases and before a work transition phase., Results: Analysis revealed that the percent of males increased as the smoking level increased (Group A=51.8% vs Group D=73.2%; p<.001). Also, as smoking increased, the level of education significantly decreased. In addition, as smoking level increased, the percent of patients completing the rehabilitation program decreased (from 86.3% to 75%; p=.03). No significant differences in 1-year posttreatment socioeconomic outcomes of work status, health utilization, recurrent injury or case closure were related to smoking except work retention, which decreased with more smoking (85 to 71%, p<.05). Surprisingly, the physical cumulative score at posttreatment increased as smoking frequency increased (p<.01). This finding indicates that those who smoked more performed at a higher level on physical measures. Those who smoked more frequently before treatment also appeared more depressed (p<.001), but after treatment, these differences disappeared. Self-reported pain intensity differed only after treatment, and posttreatment disability ratings showed a significant linear trend., Conclusions: Contrary to popular belief, CDWRSD patients who smoke do not differ significantly in socioeconomic or psychosocial outcomes relative to those who do not. Although this study does indicate that those who smoke more evidence lower rehabilitation completion rates, those who completed the program had identical 1-year posttreatment outcomes of socioeconomic importance except in retraining work at year end as those who did not smoke. Smokers had slightly higher posttreatment self-reported pain and disability ratings mixed and limited. Overall, there is evidence for the widely held belief that smoking negatively affects tertiary rehabilitation.

Background Context: Clinicians have long hypothesized that gender may be a risk factor in treatment outcomes of patients with chronic disability associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Although the scientific literature shows a higher prevalence of occupational low back injury in men, and a higher rate of repetitive motion and neck injuries in women, few studies have comprehensively investigated the role of gender regarding cost-related outcome variables of significance after work-related injuries., Purpose: This study was designed to examine the relationship between gender and biopsychosocial treatment outcomes in a predominately chronically disabled spinal disorder (CDSD) workers' compensation cohort undergoing a tertiary functional restoration program., Study Design: A prospective comparison cohort study investigating the effect of gender on biopsychosocial treatment outcomes as risk factors for rehabilitation failure., Patient Sample: A cohort of 1,827 consecutively treated patients with CDSD were placed into two gender-based groups: men (n=1,158, average age 40.7+/-10 years) and women (n=669, average age 42.5+/-10 years)., Outcome Measures: Before the start of the program, and again upon completion of the program, all patients received a standard psychosocial assessment and were assessed on a variety of physical factors (leading to a cumulative score, calculated on the basis of the aggregates and averages of these physical measures). A structured clinical interview examining socioeconomic outcomes was conducted at 1 year after program completion, and at least partial information was obtained from this interview on all patients in the present study., Methods: All patients underwent a medically directed functional restoration program combining quantitatively guided exercise progression with a multimodal disability management approach using psychological and case management techniques., Results: Men had a significantly higher rate of lumbar injury than women, whereas women had a significantly higher rate of cervical injury. Men returned to work and retained work at a 40 hours/week job at a higher rate at 1-year follow-up. Women evidenced a higher rate of health care-seeking behaviors from new providers. On physical testing immediately after treatment, men had a significantly higher cumulative physical score (gender normalized), both before and after treatment. On depression and disability questionnaires, men showed fewer pre- and posttreatment depressive symptoms with lower pretreatment disability scores., Conclusions: The present study represents the first large-scale examination of the relationship between gender and treatment outcomes for a population with CDSD after work injuries. There was a pattern of moderately better 1-year posttreatment socioeconomic outcome for men. On psychosocial measures, men showed lower disability and depression scores than women, with higher levels of physical functioning both before and after treatment. Overall, male patients with CDSD appeared to show somewhat better biopsychosocial outcomes. This leaves the question of identifying gender-specific risk factors to explain these differences.

Background Context: Spinal surgery in the workers compensation population shows evidence of less favorable outcomes than in general health cases. Although spine surgery has been alleged to be a cause of poor outcomes, such outcomes may be improved by appropriate postsurgical rehabilitation., Purpose: To compare objective demographic, physical and psychological measurements and socioeconomic outcomes of treatment in work-related disabling cervical pain for the combination of anterior cervical fusion (ACF) plus functional restoration, compared with rehabilitation alone., Study Design/setting: A prospective study of patients undergoing ACF for degenerative disc disease before rehabilitation for work-related musculoskeletal disorders versus neck pain unoperated controls, with data collected in an outpatient tertiary interdisciplinary rehabilitation setting., Patient Sample: A group of 52 patients completed a functional restoration treatment program after undergoing ACF (Group S) at one or two levels for degenerative cervical disc disease. During the study period, 625 patients with work-related neck pain were identified from the same study population, from which a rehabilitation (Group R) comparison group (n=150) was identified who were stratified according to the number and location of other compensable body parts., Outcome Measures: Socioeconomic outcomes relevant to chronic disabling work-related cervical spinal disorders are reported based on 1-year posttreatment interviews. Pre- to posttreatment assessment of pain intensity, disability, depression and cumulative physical capability were assessed prospectively., Methods: All patients were totally or partially disabled before completing an intensive, medically supervised, functional restoration program combining quantitatively directed exercise progression with a multimodal disability management approach. Preprogram preparation included drug detoxification, psychotropic medication management and preparatory aerobic and mobility training. The intensive treatment phase involved strength and endurance training, with counseling geared to goals of work return and fitness maintenance. The 1-year structured clinical interview had a contact rate of 93% to 95%, and partial information acquisition on all patients., Results: Although Group S had lower work return and work retention outcomes, the differences were not significant. Group S patients had significantly more health utilization from a new provider in the year after completion of functional restoration (46% vs 24%; OR=2.7 [1.3, 5.3], p<.004). Group S patients were also more likely to be depressed, both at pre- and postrehabilitation. There were no significant differences in recurrent injury, additional surgery, physical measures or pain/disability self-report between the groups., Conclusions: Workers compensation patients with chronic disabling work-related cervical spinal disorders who undergo a cervical fusion, combined with functional restoration, have socioeconomic outcomes after their surgery statistically similar to those for unoperated controls. Surgery patients had a higher rate of additional health-care-seeking behaviors from new providers and a greater likelihood of being clinically depressed before and after rehabilitation. This study suggests that cervical fusion for degenerative disc disease in workers compensation patients is not contraindicated, as long as interdisciplinary rehabilitation is available for complex cases after the surgical procedure.