Search

We report the case of a 58-year-old man referred to our hospital for liver tumor treatment. The patient had a history of neurosurgery for a meningeal hemangiopericytoma 16 years previously. Pre-operative imaging revealed a hypervascular tumor extending from Couinaud segment 4 to segment 8 of the liver, measuring 95 mm in diameter, indicating an atypical hepatocellular carcinoma. Because right trisectionectomy of the liver was considered to be high risk, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was indicated. After transcatheter arterial embolization, LDLT was performed with the use of a left-lobe liver graft from the patient's son. Post-operative histological findings of the liver tumor were identical to those for meningeal hemangiopericytoma, therefore the patient was diagnosed with meningeal hemangiopericytoma that had metastasized to the liver. After LDLT, the patient had a healthy, active life for 2 years; then, a subcutaneous relapse was discovered in the left chest. The patient did not undergo any systemic chemotherapy in response to the relapse. After thoracic and orthopedic surgeries and radiotherapy for multiple metastases, the patient died 5 years and 5 months after LDLT. LDLT could be an effective treatment for localized metastatic hemangiopericytoma in the liver, but it should be indicated only for carefully selected patients., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (Tac-OD) is expected to reduce non-adherence in recipients after liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to determine the optimal initial dose of orally administered Tac-OD after intravenous tacrolimus (Tac-IV) therapy after LT., Patients and Methods: This prospective study included 10 adult recipients who had undergone LT at our institute. The recipients were prescribed tacrolimus by continuous intravenous administration with a steroid as initial immunosuppression therapy. Tacrolimus was converted from intravenous administration to once-daily oral intake when gastrointestinal function returned. We evaluated tacrolimus concentrations in blood 9 times a day and area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) during conversion. The optimal initial dose of Tac-OD was determined based on simple regression analysis between the oral dose of Tac-OD and the total dose of Tac-IV during a 24-hour period., Results: The AUC before and after conversion showed no differences. We found that the optimal initial dose of Tac-OD was 8 times the dose of Tac-IV. There was a relationship between the AUC and the trough level. No recipients experienced acute rejection or adverse effects such as renal failure, neurotoxicity, or cardiac failure during conversion., Conclusions: We successfully converted continuous Tac-IV to oral intake of Tac-OD by adjusting the dose using trough levels without acute rejection or adverse effects. The AUC of Tac-OD correlated with the trough level. The optimal initial dose ratio of Tac-OD after Tac-IV was 8:1., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Donor shortages occasionally necessitate the use of hepatic allografts from hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb+) donors, with an attendant risk of post-transplantation hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate a protocol of active immunization for prevention of post-transplantation de novo HBV infection in patients receiving liver grafts from HBcAb+ donors., Patients and Methods: Ten patients who had received HBcAb+ liver grafts at Shinshu University Hospital between October 1996 and December 2012 were enrolled. All the recipients were negative for HBV serological tests, and HBV-DNA. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) was given routinely in the peritransplantation and post-transplantation periods, without antiviral drugs. Subcutaneous vaccination with recombinant HBV was given at a dosage of 20 μg in adults and 5 μg in children concomitant with HBIG until acquisition of active immunization. The timing to start HBV vaccination was dependent on the condition of the patient., Results: The median follow-up period after liver transplantation was 140 months, and the median period after transplantation until the start of vaccination was 7.0 months. Nine patients (90%) acquired active immunity after a median number of 4 (range, 2-13) vaccinations (hepatitis B surface antibody >300 mIU/mL for 1 year, or >100 mIU/mL thereafter), and did not require HBIG administration thereafter. None had any side effects of HBV vaccination or developed hepatitis B infection during the study period. Four fast responders who achieved antibody high titers by active immunization within 9 months received pretransplantation vaccinations, whereas 5 slow responders did not., Conclusions: Our vaccination protocol provides a new effective strategy for prevention of de novo hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation in recipients with HBcAb+ liver grafts. Pretransplantation HBV vaccination was helpful for the post-transplantation vaccine response., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Noncompliance with immunosuppressant therapy is a serious problem that leads to the possibility of graft rejection, even in the long term after liver transplantation. The objectives of the present study were to review and describe features of patient noncompliance after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT)., Patients and Methods: Among pediatric patients (age <18 years) surviving more than 5 years after LDLT, noncompliant patients were identified, and their clinicopathologic characteristics were studied retrospectively., Results: Of 108 pediatric recipients who survived more than 5 years after LDLT, 6 female patients (5.6%) were noncompliant. Median (range) age at transplantation was 5 (2-15) years, and at noncompliance was 18 (9-21) years. Median time to noncompliance after transplantation was 8 (5-16) years. The 6 noncompliant patients received increased immunosuppression therapy, and liver function test results improved. Noncompliance was improved via intervention with medication, but recurred in 2 patients (33%). Noncompliance did not result in graft or patient loss., Conclusion: The prevalence of noncompliance was not so high in LDLT recipients. Liver dysfunction secondary to noncompliance improved with increased immunosuppression therapy., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Beginning in 2004, dalteparin doses based on activated clotting time (ACT) were administered for hepatic vessel thrombosis prophylaxis in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We verified the feasibility of this new therapy by comparing it with the previous one. From 1993 through 2008, 42 metabolic liver patients who underwent LDLT were divided into two groups. Group A (1993-2003, n = 32) was administered a fixed dalteparin dose and a large amount of fresh frozen plasma (FFP); Group B (2004-2008, n = 10) was administered an appropriate dosage of dalteparin to maintain the ACT levels from 140 to 150 seconds and a small amount of FFP. Group B was administered a lesser amount of FFP and more dalteparin. This resulted in longer activated partial thromboplastin time, lower fibrinogen degradation products D-dimer, and lower aspartate aminotransferase levels compared to group A; all differences were significant. Group B showed neither thrombotic nor hemorrhagic complications. Anticoagulation therapy comprising adjustment of the dalteparin dose based on ACT reduces thrombotic complications without increasing hemorrhagic complications. ACT measurement is a simple, reliable method for bedside monitoring of dalteparin anticoagulant effects for LDLT.

Background: Hepatic arterial reconstruction is one of the critical issues in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Herein we have reported an LDLT case whose celiac arterial trunk tributaries were insufficient as host arteries because of extensive subintimal dissection proceeding to all tributaries of the celiac arterial trunk., Patients and Methods: A 45-year-old woman with fulminant hepatic failure underwent LDLT. After reperfusion of the hepatic and portal veins, subintimal dissection of the recipient right and left hepatic arteries was found to extend to all tributaries of the celiac arterial trunk, preventing an anastomosis using the more proximal part of these arteries. Therefore, a jejunal arterial arcade of Roux-en-Y limb mobilized for biliary reconstruction was anastomosed to the donor left hepatic artery in end-to-end fashion., Results: Arterial blood flow to the grafted liver was established successfully, and the patient's postoperative recovery was excellent. Postoperative computed tomography demonstrated sufficient hepatic arterial blood flow. The patient is doing well 4 years after transplantation., Conclusion: The method of hepatic graft arterialization described herein is an important option for LDLT recipients when tributaries of the celiac arterial trunk are insufficient as host arteries.

Domino liver transplantation (DLT) has been developed as a method to expand the donor pool. In living donors DLT, the prime concern is to avoid any disadvantage to the donor and the first recipient. Seven DLTs were performed among 211 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation. The domino recipients included six with hepatocellular carcinoma and one with citrullinemia. The domino grafts were obtained from patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) including the left liver in three cases and the right liver in four. Among the seven domino recipients, a 64-year-old woman with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma died of lung metastasis. The other six domino recipients are alive without FAP symptoms. In living donor liver transplantation, because the vessels of the graft from the first donor are not long enough for anastomosis, the hepatic vessels must be left as long as possible when removing the liver from the FAP patients in order to ensure sufficient safety for vascular reconstruction. With careful decision making during the procedure, such as where to divide the vessels in the FAP patients, DLT may help address the shortage of liver grafts.

The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus have distinct advantages and drawbacks. Therefore it is important to tailor their use to the patient's tolerance. In some patients, the need to ameliorate the adverse effects of tacrolimus may necessitate a switch to cyclosporine-based therapy. Rescue therapy with a cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral)-based regimen for transplant patients intolerant of tacrolimus has been evaluated to assess the best method of switching and determine the initial and maintenance doses of Neoral in children and adults. Our aims were to evaluate not only these facets, but also the pharmacokinetics of Neoral in stable patients, including target 2-hour postdose blood concentrations (C2) of cyclosporine in liver transplant recipients. Eighteen liver transplant patients switched from tacrolimus to Neoral underwent a program of cyclosporine blood level monitoring. The conversions were conducted safely; the incidence of acute rejection episodes was low (11.1%). Statistical analysis showed that the C2 correlated with the area under the time-blood concentration curve of cyclosporine for 0 to 4 hours after dosing (R=0.970). We determined the maintenance doses of Neoral for pediatric and adult patients as well as the feasibility of C2 quantitated monitoring in liver transplantation.