Search

Background Context: Anterior cervical discectomy with an interbody cage (ACDF) to obtain fusion is a common procedure in cervical spine surgery. Presently, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) with (auto) graft is frequently used for interbody fusion although alternative implant technology like 3-D printing titanium has been introduced recently., Purpose: Reporting the clinical and quantitative radiological outcome of a prospective cohort of 3-D printed porous titanium implants., Study Design/setting: Prospective study of patients with single level ACDF using 3-D printed porous titanium cervical implants. These data were compared with 48 patients from the PEEK with autograft group of the previously performed CAncellous Structured Ceramic Arthrodesis DEvice trial., Patient Sample: Fourty-nine patients were included., Outcome Measures: Neck disability index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS), self-reported perceived recovery, and fusion status., Methods: The clinical outcomes and fusion rates were documented at 3, 6, and 12 months. Dynamic X-rays were analyzed to determine range of motion (ROM) of the operated level. Fusion was defined as rotation ≤4° and ≤1.25 mm translation on flexion-extension films., Results: The mean NDI improved from 41.2 preoperatively to 19.4 at 12 months postoperatively. Both VAS arm and VAS neck improved significantly after surgery and 77.1% of the patients reported complete or nearly complete recovery at 12 months. The mean ROM of the affected disc level decreased from 8.7° (range 2.6-21.4) before surgery to 1.6° (0.0-4.6°) after 12 months. The fusion rate at 3, 6, and 12 months was 84%, 89%, and 91% respectively, compared with 67%, 72%, and 90%, in the PEEK group., Conclusions: 3-D printed porous titanium cervical implants resulted in significant clinical improvement after surgery. The fusion rate of porous titanium compared with PEEK with autograft at 12 months was similar, although porous titanium resulted in faster consolidation. In addition, one level anterior cervical fusion can be successfully achieved without additional plating., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Patients with large annular defects after lumbar discectomy for disc herniation are at high risk of symptomatic recurrence and reoperation., Purpose: The present study aimed to determine whether a bone-anchored annular closure device, in addition to lumbar microdiscectomy, resulted in lower reherniation and reoperation rates plus increased overall success compared with lumbar microdiscectomy alone., Design: This is a multicenter, randomized superiority study., Patient Sample: Patients with symptoms of lumbar disc herniation for at least 6 weeks with a large annular defect (6-10 mm width) after lumbar microdiscectomy were included in the study., Outcome Measures: The co-primary end points determined a priori were recurrent herniation and a composite end point consisting of patient-reported, radiographic, and clinical outcomes. Study success required superiority of annular closure on both end points at 2-year follow-up., Methods: Patients received lumbar microdiscectomy with additional bone-anchored annular closure device (n=276 participants) or lumbar microdiscectomy only (control; n=278 participants). This research was supported by Intrinsic Therapeutics. Two authors received study-specific support morethan $10,000 per year, 8 authors received study-specific support less than $10,000 per year, and 11 authors received no study-specific support., Results: Among 554 randomized participants, 550 (annular closure device: n=272; control: n=278) were included in the modified intent-to-treat efficacy analysis and 550 (annular closure device: n=267; control: n=283) were included in the as-treated safety analysis. Both co-primary end points of the study were met, with recurrent herniation (50% vs. 70%, P<.001) and composite end point success (27% vs. 18%, P=.02) favoring annular closure device. The frequency of symptomatic reherniation was lower with annular closure device (12% vs. 25%, P<.001). There were 29 reoperations in 24 patients in the annular closure device group and 61 reoperations in 45 control patients. The frequency of reoperations to address recurrent herniation was 5% with annular closure device and 13% in controls (P=.001). End plate changes were more prevalent in the annular closure device group (84% vs. 30%, P<.001). Scores for back pain, leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and health-related quality of life at regular visits were comparable between groups over 2-year follow-up., Conclusions: In patients at high risk of herniation recurrence after lumbar microdiscectomy, annular closure with a bone-anchored implant lowers the risk of symptomatic recurrence and reoperation. Additional study to determine outcomes beyond 2 years with a bone-anchored annular closure device is warranted., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)