Search

One major adverse effect of prostate radiotherapy is associated with the rectum. The SpaceOAR system has been developed to address this problem, as it enables treatment planning with a reduced dose to the rectum. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the treatment plans between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer using the SpaceOAR system. Thirty-five patients treated with prostate cancer radiation using the SpaceOAR system received a total radiation dose of 60 Gy/20 fractions. The dose constraints and robustness of the plan for VMAT and 3D-CRT were compared. For 3D-CRT, 6-field conformal method and 2-arc conformal method were created and compared in 3 treatment plans together with VMAT. The dose-constraint evaluation was performed using the planning target volume (PTV), rectum (mean dose), bladder (mean dose), and femoral head (mean dose). One issue associated with prostate radiotherapy is the physiological movement of the target prostate gland, which reduces the accuracy of irradiation. The prostate moves several millimeters during irradiation due to physiological movements, and there are reports of a decrease in the PTV index due to this effect. This has a significant impact on the cure rate of prostate cancer. A comparative study of the 3 irradiation methods was conducted to investigate this issue. Each study item was analyzed using the Friedman test to determine the significance of the 3 irradiation methods. Our analysis showed that the dose constraint was statistically significant for VMAT, but 3D-CRT was also sufficient in achieving dose constraints. The hydrogel spacer reduced the rectal dose and improved the dose-constrained fulfillment rate in VMAT and 3D-CRT. In a study of prostate motion during irradiation, 3D-CRT, a robust plan, was superior in the PTV mean evaluation over VMAT, where the multileaf collimator moved in fine increments. VMAT is currently the standard treatment for prostate cancer; however, with the introduction of the SpaceOAR system using hydrogel spacers, 3D-CRT may also be a viable option for prostate cancer treatment., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None., (Copyright © 2025 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a complex process due to the proximity of critical structures. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can improve the therapeutic ratio. However, multiple treatment delivery systems offer VMAT with varying technical specifications. This study compares the dosimetric plan quality of 2 systems, Clinac-iX and Halcyon in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. We utilized contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) simulation and magnetic resonance (MR) image datasets from thirty patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma to contour target volumes and organs at risk (OARs). Two medical physicists independently performed dosimetric planning for Clinac-iX and Halcyon machines, following standard international dosimetric constraints for OARs. We compared plan quality for dosimetric profiles, indices, and plan complexity parameters from both machines. Dosimetric coverage for target volumes and plan quality indices, such as homogeneity, conformity, and coverage, showed no significant differences between Clinac-iX and Halcyon. However, Halcyon demonstrated significantly better OAR sparing, particularly for the spinal cord, optic chiasm, lenses, eyeballs and lower brain volume integral dose (BVID) (p < 0.05). Complexity parameters showed that both systems used a similar number of arcs, but Halcyon had higher monitor units and lower treatment time per fraction owing to higher dose rate. Our study results favor Halcyon for better plan quality regarding critical organ sparing, low brain volume integral dose, and fast treatment delivery. This study can be used as a reference for selecting an optimal treatment delivery system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in centres equipped with multiple linear accelerators., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The author declares no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Oligometastatic breast cancer patients can today could benefit from a multimodal approach, combining systemic therapy with metastasis-directed treatment using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, the possibility to synchronously treat multiple lesions is still challenging, needing the ability to generate complex dose distributions with steep dose gradients outside the lesions and major sparing of surrounding organs at risk and accurately track and reproduce the patient's position before and during radiation therapy. We report the case of an oligometastatic patient from left breast cancer, which occurred after a full course of whole breast radiotherapy, treated using the potential of modern technology including single-isocenter setup, plan automation, breath-hold technique and surface guided tracking and reproducibility of patient's position before and during radiation therapy. A 44-year-old female patient with a history of left breast cancer, specifically a luminal-B-like invasive ductal carcinoma with Her2 overexpression, was admitted to our department. The patient previously underwent a left mastectomy (pT2N0M0), 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy on the chest wall and lymph nodes drainage, and 5 years of hormonal therapy. A chest wall ultrasound and positron emission tomography revealed the presence of new lesions in the area of the surgical scar from the previous mastectomy, internal mammary, axillary and retropectoral levels. The 3 lesions were simultaneously treated with a mono-isocentric VMAT plan using SBRT technique with a total dose of 30 Gy delivered in 5 fractions. Due to the technical challenges, this treatment was supported by the use of planning automation, breath-hold technique and surface-guided radiation therapy to improve the accuracy of the dose delivery. Two different plans were generated and compared to pursue the best dosimetric result, including a summed plan obtained from 3 individual SBRT plans for each lesion with a separate isocenter placed in each of them (MIP), and a single-isocenter SBRT plan able to treat multiple lesions synchronously (SIP). Because of the advantages in terms of dosimetry and dose delivery efficiency, the patient was successfully treated with the SIP plan. The treatment time was reduced to about 4.5 minutes, allowing the comfortably use of breath-hold technique. After treatment, the condition of the patient was normal, and no toxicities have been observed in follow-up. SBRT with mono isocentric VMAT planning represents the recommended approach to simultaneously treat multiple lesions in close proximity in the thoracic district., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In planning the treatment of spinal metastases using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), the optimal blocking of the spinal cord to match the leaf travel can be achieved with a first-arc collimator angle of approximately 90°. We aim to clarify the optimal second-arc collimator angles when the first-arc collimator angle is fixed to 90° in dual-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). For this retrospective study, we considered 37 spinal segments with spinal metastases and created dual-arc VMAT plans. In the plans, 24 Gy in 2 fractions were prescribed, and the first-arc collimator angle was fixed to 90° while varying the second-arc collimator angle in increments of 15° from 0° to 90°. All the plans were normalized such that the planning organ-at-risk volume for the spinal cord D 0.035 cc  = 17 Gy and satisfied other dose constraints. D 95% for the planning target volume (PTV), V 100% for the overlap between the PTV and 10 mm expansion of the spinal cord, modified gradient index, monitor unit, and 3%/1 mm gamma passing rates were compared between different second-arc collimator angles using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Bonferroni correction. PTV D 95% and overlap V 100% were the highest for a second-arc collimator angle of 45° and decreased as the angle approached either 0° or 90°. The maximum mean differences of PTV D 95% and overlap V 100% were -2.66% (90° vs 45°, p < 0.0024) and -5.49% (90° vs 45°, p < 0.0024), respectively. Moreover, the second-arc collimator angle of 45° was the least suitable in terms of the modified gradient index. The required monitor unit increased from the second-arc collimator angle of 15° to 45°, and the 3%/1 mm gamma passing rates reached over 95% for the evaluated second-arc collimator angles of 15°, 30°, and 45°. We found that in the dual-arc VMAT plan for spine SBRT, second-arc collimator angles other than 90° were suitable, and 45° was the optimal angle in terms of target coverage including the area around the spinal cord., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Kei Ito was a member of the advisory board and has received honorariums from Varian Medical Systems K. K. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study provides a concise and structured overview of a dosimetric comparison study conducted to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of 4 advanced radiotherapy techniques in treating brain metastases with hippocampus sparing and simultaneous integrated boost (HS-WBRT+SIB). Eleven patients with brain metastases previously treated with radiotherapy were included in the study. Planning CT scans with 2 mm slice thickness and MR imaging were used for contouring and dose prescription. The bilateral hippocampus and other organs at risk (OARs) were automatically contoured, and hippocampal avoidance regions (HAR) were defined as a 7 mm 3D expansion around the hippocampus. Gross tumor volume for each metastasis (GTV met ) and planning target volume for metastases (PTV met ) were delineated. The whole-brain CTV (CTV WB ) and planning target volume for whole brain (PTV WB ) were defined accordingly. Treatment planning and optimization were conducted using state-of-the-art radiotherapy techniques: Ethos, HyperArc, VMAT, and Tomotherapy. Tomotherapy achieved the highest D98% for PTV met , indicating the best metastasis coverage. HyperArc plans showed the highest D98% for PTV WB , suggesting superior whole-brain coverage. Tomotherapy demonstrated significantly lower D98%, D2%, and D mean values for the hippocampus, indicating its superiority in sparing the hippocampus. VMAT resulted in the lowest D2% values for the eyes, optic nerves, brainstem, and hypophysis, showing the best sparing of these critical structures. Tomotherapy consistently achieved lower D mean values for parotids, oral cavity, and lips compared to the other techniques. The dosimetric comparison revealed distinct strengths and weaknesses for each radiotherapy technique. Tomotherapy excelled in sparing the hippocampus, while VMAT showed promise in sparing OARs. HyperArc plans demonstrated the best overall whole-brain coverage. These findings should guide clinicians in selecting the most suitable technique based on patient characteristics and institutional resources., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Previous plan competitions have largely focused on dose metric assessments. However, whether the submitted plans were realistic and reasonable from a quality assurance (QA) perspective remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between aperture-based plan complexity metrics (PCM) in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) competition plans and clinical treatment plans verified through patient-specific QA (PSQA). In addition, the association of PCMs with plan quality was examined. A head and neck (HN) plan competition was held for Japanese institutions from June 2019 to July 2019, in which 210 competition plans were submitted. Dose distribution quality was quantified based on dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics by calculating the dose distribution plan score (DDPS). Differences in PCMs between the two VMAT treatment plan groups (HN plan competitions held in Japan and clinically accepted HN VMAT plans through PSQA) were investigated. The mean (± standard deviation) DDPS for the 98 HN competition plans was 158.5 ± 20.6 (maximum DDPS: 200). DDPS showed a weak correlation with PCMs with a maximum r of 0.45 for monitor unit (MU); its correlation with some PCMs was "very weak." Significant differences were found in some PCMs between plans with the highest 20% DDPSs and the remaining plans. The clinical VMAT and competition plans revealed similar distributions for some PCMs. Deviations in PCMs for the two groups were comparable, indicating considerable variability among planners regarding planning skills. The plan complexity for HN VMAT competition plans increased for high-quality plans, as shown by the dose distribution. Direct comparison of PCMs between competition plans and clinically accepted plans showed that the submitted HN VMAT competition plans were realistic and reasonable from the QA perspective. This evaluation may provide a set of criteria for evaluating plan quality in plan competitions., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest There are no ethical issues concerning this manuscript. Mr. Akihisa Wakita received a research grant from the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO); Dr. Hiroshi Igaki received a research grant from HekaBio K.K. honoraria for lectures from Itochu corporation and AstraZeneca, and personal fee from Hekabio., (Copyright © 2024 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Whole brain radiation therapy with hippocampal-sparing (HS-WBRT) is a novel treatment of brain metastases, which can relieve symptoms reduce recurrence in the central nervous system, and spare the hippocampus without compromising target coverage. This study aims to find out the superior combination of the treatment planning system and linear accelerator between Eclipse (version 15.6) with TrueBeam and uRT-TPOIS (vision R001.4) with uRT-linac 506c in HS-WBRT. The coplanar and noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for HS-WBRT plans were evaluated and compared on both combinations, respectively. Twenty patients for HS-WBRT were retrospectively selected at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) from 2021 to 2022. The coplanar and noncoplanar HS-WBRT treatment plans were designed by Eclipse and uRT-TPOIS referring to RTOG 0933 dose criteria, and their dosimetry parameters were compared. In addition, the plan complexity, monitor units, and beam-on time were recorded for Eclipse plans delivered on TrueBeam and uRT-TPOIS plans delivered on uRT-linac 506c. The results demonstrated that the dosimetric criteria of 4 types of HS-WBRT plans could meet the requirements of RTOG 0933. In terms of target coverage, dosimetric indexes of Eclipse plans and uRT-TPOIS plans were comparable, and the former is slightly better. As for metrics of organs-at-risk protection, coplanar and noncoplanar plans conducted by uRT-TPOIS were greatly superior to those by Eclipse. For coplanar and noncoplanar plans designed by the same treatment planning system, most of the dosimetric indexes had no significant difference. The monitor units of uRT-TPOIS plans was higher than that of Eclipse plans, but the modulation complexity of them were close, and uRT-TPOIS with uRT-linac 506c significantly reduced beam-on-time consumption by 9% on average for coplanar plans and 26% for noncoplanar plans compared to Eclipse with TrueBeam. This study firstly compared the coplanar and noncoplanar HS-WBRT treatment plans between Eclipse with TrueBeam and uRT-TPOIS with uRT-linac 506c in terms of dosimetry indexes, modulation complexity, and time consumption. It is shown that the radiation treatment solution of uRT-TPOIS with uRT-linac 506c is comparable with Eclipse with TrueBeam in terms of planning design, and significantly reduced the delivery time, which can be applied in clinical practice and promoted as a treatment format., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Kang Zhang is an employee of Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. The company has no role in analyzing and controlling the data. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

This study exposed the implementation of a novel technique (VMAT LSL ) for the planning of moving targets in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This new technique has been compared to static conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and dynamic conformal arc (DCA). The rationale of this study was to lower geometric complexity (54.9% lower than full VMAT) and hence ensure the reproducibility of the treatment delivery by reducing the risk for interplay errors induced by respiratory motion. Dosimetry metrics were studied with a cohort of 30 patients. Our results showed that leaf speed limitation provided conformal number (CN) close to the VMAT (median CN of VMAT LSL is 0.78 vs 0.82 for full VMAT) and was a significant improvement on 3D-CRT and DCA with segment-weight optimized (respectively 0.55 and 0.57). This novel technique is an alternative to VMAT or DCA for lung SBRT treatments, combining independence from the patient's breathing pattern, from the size and amplitude of the lesion, free from interplay effect, and with dosimetry metrics close to the best that could be achieved with full VMAT., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To determine the feasibility and utility of conebeam CT-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for locally recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancer (HNC) patients on the Halcyon, a ring delivery system (RDS). This research aims to quantify plan quality, treatment delivery accuracy, and overall efficacy by comparing against novel clinical TrueBeam HyperArc method. Ten recurrent HNC patients who were treated at our institution on TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) for 30 to 40 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions with noncoplanar HyperArc plans were re-planned on Halcyon (6MV-FFF). These plans were re-planned with the same Acuros-based dose engine. Additionally, we used site-specific full/partial coplanar VMAT arcs. PTV coverage, mean dose to GTV, maximum dose to organs-at-risk (OAR), beam-on time (BOT), and quality assurance (QA) results were investigated and compared. Halcyon provided highly conformal HNC SRT plans with slightly superior mean PTVD99 coverage (96.7% vs 95.5%, p = 0.071), and slightly lower mean GTV dose (37.8 Gy vs 38.2 Gy, p = 0.241) when compared to the HyperArc plans. Differences in plan conformality and maximum dose to OARs were statistically insignificant. Due to Halcyon's coplanar geometry, D2cm was significantly higher (p = 0.001) but Halcyon did result in a reduced normal brain dose by 1 Gy on average and up to 5.2 Gy in some cases. Halcyon provided similar patient-specific QA pass rates with a 2%/2mm gamma criteria (98.2% vs 98.5%) and independent in-house Monte Carlo second check results (97.7% vs 98.2%), suggesting identical treatment delivery accuracy. Halcyon plans resulted in slightly longer beam-on time (3.16 vs 2.30 minutes, p = 0.010), however door-to-door patient time is expected to be <10 minutes. Compared to clinical TrueBeam HyperArc, Halcyon SRT plans provided similar plan quality and treatment delivery accuracy with a potentially faster overall treatment using fully automated patient setup and verification. Rapid delivery of recurrent HNC SRT may reduce intrafraction motion errors while also improving patient compliance and comfort. To provide high-quality of HNC SRT similar to HyperArc, we recommend Halcyon users consider commissioning this novel method. This method will be useful for remote and underserved patient cohorts including Halcyon-only clinics as well., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study aimed to investigate whether the RapidPlan (RP) model configured by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) could be used to assist in the optimization of HT plans and improve their quality. An RP model was trained using 100 clinically accepted VMAT plans of NPC patients. The predicted dose constraints of the VMAT trained RP model were used to reoptimize 25 consecutive clinically accepted HT plans (HT&#95;clinical) and perform new VMAT plans based on the same computed topography (CT). The dosimetric quality of the reoptimized HT plans (HT&#95;reoptimized), HT&#95;clinical, and VMAT group were compared. The minimum dose encompassing 2% target (D 2% ), the minimum dose encompassing 98% target (D 98% ), homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) were similar for most targets between the HT&#95;clinical and HT&#95;reoptimized plans, although certain targets in the HT&#95;reoptimized plans had higher D 2% and HI and lower D 98% . The HT&#95;reoptimized plans outperformed the HT&#95;clinical plans in the Dmax and D1cc of the spinal cord, V 40Gy of the left temporal lobe, Dmean and V 30Gy of the oral cavity, Dmean of the larynx and thyroid, and the differences were statistically significant. HT plans had higher CI and HI than VMAT plans. HT plans outperformed VMAT plans in the Dmax of the spinal cord and lenses, V 30Gy of the oral cavity and parotids, and V 40Gy of the temporal lobes, but underperformed in the Dmax and D1cc of the brainstem, D1cc of the spinal cord and Dmean of the oral cavity. The VMAT-based RP model can be used to assist in the planning of HT plans and improve the dosimetry quality of HT plans., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) can alleviate symptoms in patients with brain metastases. However, WBRT may damage the hippocampus. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can achieve a suitable coverage of the target region and a more conforming dose distribution whereas decreasing the dose to organs-at-risk (OARs). Herein, we aimed to compare the differences between treatment plans utilizing coplanar VMAT and noncoplanar VMAT in hippocampal-sparing WBRT (HS-WBRT). Ten patients were included in this study. For each patient, the Eclipse A10 treatment planning system was used to generate 1 coplanar VMAT (C-VMAT) and 2 noncoplanar VMAT treatment plans with various beam angles (noncoplanar VMAT A [NC-A] and noncoplanar VMAT B [NC-B]) for HS-WBRT. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 12 fractions. Treatment plans were established based on the OAR dose constraints of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0933 (RTOG 0933). Parameters such as the global maximum dose, dose conformity, dose homogeneity of plans, and OAR doses were evaluated. The maximum biologically equivalent doses in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) of OARs in C-VMAT were 9.17 ± 0.61, 42.79 ± 2.00, and 42.84 ± 3.52 Gy in the hippocampus, brain stem, and optic chiasm, respectively, which were the lowest among the 3 treatment plans. There was no significant difference in dose conformity among the 3 treatment plans. However, NC-A had a slightly better conformity than C-VMAT and NC-B. NC-A had the best homogeneity, and NC-B had the worst homogeneity (p = 0.042). NC-A and NC-B had the lowest and highest global dose maximum, respectively. Therefore, NC-A, which had an intermediate performance in terms of OAR doses, had the best quality parameters. We used the quality score table based on the p-value to evaluate the significant difference between each treatment technique from the multiparameter results. In terms of treatment plan parameters, only NC-A received a score of 2; for OAR doses, C-VMAT, NC-A, and NC-B received a score of 6, 3, and 5, respectively. For the overall evaluation, C-VMAT, NC-A, and NC-B received a total score of 6, 5, and 5, respectively. Rather than noncoplanar VMAT, 3 full-arc C-VMATs should be utilized in HS-WBRT. C-VMAT can simultaneously maintain treatment plan quality and decrease patient alignment time and total treatment time., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study aimed to compare dosimetric parameters for targets and organs at risk (OARs) between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and automated VMAT (HyperArc, HA) plans in stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with cervical metastatic spine tumors. VMAT plans were generated for 11 metastases using the simultaneous integrated boost technique to deliver 35 to 40 and 20 to 25 Gy for high dose and elective dose planning target volume (PTVHD and PTVED), respectively. The HA plans were retrospectively generated using 1 coplanar and 2 noncoplanar arcs. Subsequently, the doses to the targets and OARs were compared. The HA plans provided significantly higher (p < 0.05) D min (77.4 ± 13.1%), D 99% (89.3 ± 8.9%), and D 98% (92.5 ± 7.7%) for gross tumor volume (GTV) than those of the VMAT plans (73.4 ± 12.2%, 84.2 ± 9.6 and 87.3 ± 8.8% for D min , D 99% and D 98% , respectively). In addition, D 99% and D 98% for PTVHD were significantly higher in the HA plans, whereas dosimetric parameters were comparable between the HA and VMAT plans for PTVED. The D max values for the brachial plexus, esophagus, and spinal cord were comparable, and no significant difference was observed in the D mean for the larynx, pharyngeal constrictor, thyroid, parotid grand (left and right), and Submandibular gland (left and right). The HA plans provided significantly higher target coverage of GTV and PTVHD, with a comparable dose for OARs with VMAT plans. The results of this study may contribute to the improvement of local control in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Significant improvements in plan quality using automated planning have been previously demonstrated. The aim of this study was to develop an optimal automated class solution for stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) planning of prostate cancer using the new Feasibility module implemented in the pinnacle evolution. Twelve patients were retrospectively enrolled in this planning study. Five plans were designed for each patient. Four plans were automatically generated using the 4 proposed templates for SBRT optimization implemented in the new pinnacle evolution treatment planning systems, differing for different settings of dose-fallout (low, medium, high and veryhigh). Based on the obtained results, the fifth plan (feas) was generated customizing the template with the optimal criteria obtained from the previous step and integrating in the template the "a-priori" knowledge of OARs sparing based on the Feasibility module, able to estimate the best possible dose-volume histograms of OARs before starting optimization. Prescribed dose was 35 Gy to the prostate in 5 fractions. All plans were generated with a full volumetric-modulated arc therapy arc and 6MV flattening filter-free beams, and optimized to ensure the same target coverage (95% of the prescription dose to 98% of the target). Plans were assessed according to dosimetric parameters and planning and delivery efficiency. Differences among the plans were evaluated using a Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance. The requests for more aggressive objectives for dose falloff parameters (from low to veryhigh) translated in a statistically significant improvement of dose conformity, but at the expense of a dose homogeneity. The best automated plans in terms of best trade-off between target coverage and OARs sparing among the 4 plans automatically generated by the SBRT module were the high plans. The veryhigh plans reported a significant increase of high-doses to prostate, rectum, and bladder that was considered dosimetrically and clinically unacceptable. The feas plans were optimized on the basis on high plans, reporting significant reduction of rectum irradiation; Dmean, and V18 decreased by 19% to 23% (p = 0.031) and 4% to 7% (p = 0.059), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in femoral heads and penile bulb irradiation for all dosimetric metrics. feas plans showed a significant increase of MU/Gy (mean: 368; p = 0.004), reflecting an increased level of fluence modulation. Thanks to the new efficient optimization engines implemented in pinnacle evolution (L-BFGS and layered graph), mean planning time was decreased to less than 10 minutes for all plans and all techniques. The integration of dose-volume histograms a-priori knowledge provided by the feasibility module in the automated planning process for SBRT planning has shown to significantly improve plan quality compared to generic protocol values as inputs., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interests The author declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To evaluate the effects of arc geometry on lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plan quality, using collision check software to select safe beam angles. Thirty lung SBRT cases were replanned 10Gy x 5 using 4 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) geometries: coplanar lateral (cpLAT), coplanar oblique (cpOBL), noncoplanar lateral (ncpLAT) and noncoplanar oblique (ncpOBL). Lateral arcs spanned 180° on the affected side whereas the 180° oblique arcs crossed midline to spare healthy tissues. Couch angles were separated by 30° on noncoplanar plans. Clearance was verified with Radformation CollisionCheck software. Optimization objectives were the same across the four plans for each case. Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was set to 95% and then plans were evaluated for dose conformity, healthy tissue doses, and monitor units. Clinically treated plans were used to benchmark the results. The volumes of the 25%, 50% and 75% isodoses were smaller with noncoplanar than coplanar arcs. The volume of the 50% isodose line relative to the PTV (CI50%) was as follows: clinical 3.75±0.72, cpLAT 3.39 ± 0.37, cpOBL 3.36 ± 0.34, ncpLAT 3.02 ± 0.21 and ncpOBL 3.02 ± 0.22. The Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction showed p < 0.005 in all CI50% comparisons except between the cpLat and cpObl arcs and between the ncpLat and ncpObl arcs. The best lung sparing was achieved using ncpObl arcs, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001) compared with the other four plans at V12.5Gy, V13.5Gy and V20Gy. Chest wall V30Gy was significantly better using noncoplanar arcs in comparison to the other plan types (p < 0.001). The best heart sparing at V10Gy from the ncpOBL arcs was significant compared with the clinical and cpLat plans (p < 0.005). Arc geometry has a substantial effect on lung SBRT plan quality. Noncoplanar arcs were superior to coplanar arcs at compacting the dose distribution at the 25%, 50% and 75% isodose levels, thereby reducing the dose to healthy tissues. Further healthy tissue sparing was achieved using oblique arcs that minimize the pathlength through healthy tissues and avoid organs at risk. The dosimetric advantages of the noncoplanar and oblique arcs require careful beam angle selection during treatment planning to avoid collisions during treatment, which may be facilitated by commercial software., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The study aimed to evaluate the planning characteristics of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using mono- and dual-isocentric volumetrically modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques. The dosimetric indices were compared between different beam arrangement techniques for spinal SBRT planning, including spinal cord avoidance, planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage, conformity, homogeneity, and gradient index. A total of 8 PTVs were contoured on RANDO phantom computed tomography (CT) images, with 4 PTVs per section of the spine (thoracic and lumbar). VMAT plans for each PTV were generated using 4 different beam arrangement techniques with a 6-MV FFF photon beam, two of which were mono-isocentric (MI) and 2 of which were dual-isocentric (DI). Dose calculations for all plans were performed using the Acuros XB algorithm. The study found that when non-contiguous spinal lesions are widely spaced, it may be more effective to use 4-Arcs DI to generate a better homogeneity index and gradient index, whereas 2-Arcs MI was beneficial for closely spaced lesions. Furthermore, the use of more arcs with a dual isocenter reduced the volume of partial cord receiving 10 Gy (V 10Gy ), maximum dose to 0.03 cc of partial cord (D 0.03cc ), and monitor units (MUs). The results showed that DI has a higher plan quality than MI for treating non-contiguous spine SBRT, with better homogeneity and a lower dose to the spinal cord, as well as comparable tumor coverage, delivery accuracy, and adequate tumour coverage. 4-Arcs DI had the sharpest dose falloff and achieved the lowest overall spinal cord doses at the expense of twice the treatment time as 2Arcs-MI. These results could help figure out which VMAT beam arrangements are best for treating non-contiguous spinal tumors., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lattice is a 3-dimensional spatially fractionated radiotherapy that uses a distribution of high-doses, similar to spheres at vertices of a 3D network or matrix. These vertices that receive the high-dose are called peaks, while the rest of the target volume that receives a lower dose, is called the valley. This study aims to verify the technical feasibility for Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy treatment using the Lattice technique performed with VMAT at the National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva - INCA, Unit I. Ten patient cases were selected, with gross tumor volumes ranging from 90 to 1734 cc. A literature review was carried out to determine the geometry, the distribution of peaks and the peak to valley dose ratio that will be used in the Lattice technique plans. The dose distributions in the targets and organs at risk of the Lattice plans were clinically compared with the plans without the peaks. A configuration of spheres with diameter of 1.2 cm, separated center-to-center by 3 cm and with a prescription of 14 Gy in a single dose at these peaks was estabilished, while the valley had a prescription of 25 Gy in 5 fractions. Despite the increase in the prescribed equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions from 40 Gy to 79.3 Gy, the median increase in doses to the OARs was 2.7%, with a maximum increase of 14.7%. The quality control of the plans was approved through the gamma analysis of the measurements performed with the Varian EPID. These findings demonstrate the technical feasibility of SFRT using the lattice technique with VMAT, and suggest that it may provide an effective delivery of high radiation therapy doses to tumors while minimizing the damage to surrounding healthy tissues., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

For a cohort of retrospectively treated patients with prostate carcinoma using a Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) technique and with implanted localization fiducials, this study determined whether there were any correlations between theoretical fiducial visibility using intra-fraction megavoltage imaging and intra-fraction motion induced dosimetric effects. Treatment planning data for 20 retrospective patients that used a SBRT prostate technique were investigated in this study. An in-house script was created that split each of the 360-degree volumetric modulated arc therapy arcs into 12 sectors, with each sector being 30 degrees. The script created a total of 24 sectors for each SBRT plan ranging from 180 to 210 degrees to 180 to 150 degrees. Resulting data was assessed to determine whether there was dosimetric impact from intra-fractional prostate motion and if it correlated with the theoretical fiducial visibility. Forty percent of the 4 highest CTV D 98% mean dose differences occurred within the angles of 240 and 270 degrees and 25% occurred between the angles of 90 and 120 degrees. The 4 highest average percentage differences in PTV D 98% coverage during angular sectors of 270 to 240 degrees, 90 to 120 degrees, 240 to 270 degrees and 60 to 90 degrees were -1.19%, -1.14%, -1.10%, and 1.01% respectively. It was also the case for the PTV D 95% in sectors 90 to 120 degrees, 240 to 270 degrees, 270 to 240 degrees and 270 to 300 degrees, which reduced by -0.97%, -0.93%, -0.92%, and -0.82% respectively. From the 4 highest rectal dose differences in V 32Gy and V 18Gy , it was found that 50% of the highest rectum V 32Gy and V 18Gy dose increases occurred between the angles of 90 and 120 degrees and 37.5% occurred between the angles of 240 and 270 degrees. The MU for each sector showed that 240&#95;270, 240&#95;210, 270&#95;240, and 120&#95;90 had the highest average MU with 150.8, 134.6, 129.2, and 124.3 respectively. This study demonstrated that there is a high correlation between dosimetric impact of intra-fractional motion and the theoretical fiducial visibility. As a result, modification to treatment plans to enable fiducial visibility at all angular sectors throughout a treatment may not be required. Further sector analysis tests are required to develop patient specific megavoltage imaging gantry angles for SBRT prostate patients., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Secondary cancer risk is a significant concern for women treated with breast radiation therapy due to improved long-term survival rates. We evaluated the potential of new advanced automated planning algorithms together with hybrid techniques to minimize the excess absolute risk (EAR) for secondary cancer in various organs after radiation treatment for early staged breast cancer. Using CT data set of 25 patients, we generated 4 different radiation treatment plans of different complexity, including 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), field-in-field (FinF), hybrid-IMRT (HMRT) and automated hybrid-VMAT (HVMAT) techniques. The organ-equivalent dose (OED) was calculated from differential dose-volume histograms on the basis of the "linear-exponential," "plateau," and "full mechanistic" dose-response models and was used to evaluate the EAR for secondary cancer in the contralateral breast (CB), contralateral lung (CL), and ipsilateral lung (IL). Statistical comparisons of data were performed by a Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance. The planning objectives were fulfilled with all the planning techniques for both target coverage and organs-at-risk sparing. The differences in EAR for CB, CL and IL secondary tumor induction were not significant among the 4 techniques. For the CB and CL, the mean absolute difference did not reach 1 case of 10000 patient-years. For the IL, the mean absolute difference was up to 5 cases of 10,000 patient-years. In conclusion, the automated HVMAT technique allows an EAR reduction at the level of well-consolidated tangential 3D-CRT or FinF techniques, keeping all the HVMAT dosimetric improvements unchanged. On the basis of this analysis, the adoption of the HVMAT technique poses no increase in EAR and could be considered safe also for younger patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest All authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The hybrid magnetic resonance image (MRI) scanner and radiation therapy linear accelerator (MR-Linac) has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes for anal cancer (AC) patients with improved soft tissue visualization and daily plan adaption but has planning and delivery limitations due to the incorporation of MRI. We aimed to identify if Elekta Unity MR-Linac-based radiation therapy is feasible for anal cancer. Ten prospectively enrolled AC patients treated with radical chemoradiotherapy were replanned for MR-Linac treatment using departmental planning criteria. For comparison, and to reduce interobserver variability, volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy (VMAT) plans were also created for each patient by the same single senior radiation therapist. Plans were compared using departmental dosimetric plan criteria, as well as conformity and homogeneity indices, monitor units (MUs) and measured plan delivery (beam-on) time. Results were deemed clinically acceptable. Target and organ at risk (OAR) doses were comparable between MR-Linac plans and VMAT plans, although PTV45Gy D98% coverage was compromised in 3 of 10 MR-Linac plans due to caudocranial length exceeding the limits of the MR-Linac. MR-Linac plans had lower MUs, median of 689.1 vs 849.65 (p = 0.002), but took over twice as long to deliver, 529.5s vs 224s (p = <0.0001) as VMAT plans. MR-Linac planning and treatment of AC is feasible for a subset of patients. The current physical limitations of the Elekta Unity system mean patients with large caudocranial elective PTV45Gy target volumes may not be covered dosimetrically to the required clinical standard. Longer image verification and treatment delivery times of the MR-Linac also mean patient selection and intrafractional IGRT are likely to be integral to ensuring high quality clinical outcomes in this rare cancer., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest The author declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a frequently employed and guideline-recommended radiotherapy (RT) modality for extremity soft tissue sarcomas (eSTS). Prior studies have demonstrated that significant tumor volume changes during treatment result in loss of target volume coverage with highly conformal techniques such as VMAT, but few solutions exist to these issues aside from adaptive replanning. Here, we describe a related but novel phenomenon in which relatively minor changes in surface volume contour (whether due to daily setup uncertainty, edema of peritumoral tissue, or progression or pseudo-progression of tumor volume itself) can result in unexpected subcutaneous hotspots. This phenomenon is of significant clinical concern given the known association between skin dose and major wound complications during preoperative RT for eSTS. By evaluating daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) images from thirteen eSTS patients treated with VMAT RT, we identify daily surface contour changes (range: 2 mm-15 mm, median: 8 mm) which are frequently below conventional adaptive replanning thresholds. When applied under experimental conditions, these external contour changes did not have major impacts on target volume coverage (range: 30.2%-91.2%, mean: 72.5%) but did result in unexpected hotspots of 125.8% on average (range: 110.0%-142.2%) in the subcutaneous tissues. To mitigate this issue, we develop a methodology for VMAT treatment planning using flash PTV and virtual bolus (VB) to produce robust treatment plans that are more resistant to target volume changes, surface contour changes, and setup uncertainties than conventional planning methods. With this methodology, robust plans were equivalent to standard plans at baseline, but, after incorporation of surface volume changes, both maintained target volume coverage (p < 0.001) and prevented development of subcutaneous hotspots (p < 0.001) better than standard plans. As such, this treatment planning methodology may facilitate development of robust VMAT treatment plans that minimize development of subcutaneous hotspots and preserve target volume coverage in the context of routine volumetric changes during preoperative RT., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 3D dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) are 2 methods proven useful for the clinical implementation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung lesions however, similar comparisons of SBRT liver lesions are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine if the conformity of dose, irradiated volume, and dose to organs at risk (OAR) are equivalent or improved with the use of DCAT as an alternative treatment method when compared to standard VMAT for SBRT delivery of palliative and early-stage liver lesions. Twenty patients with liver lesions sized 2.0 to 5.0 cm were selected for this study. Plans were created with both DCAT and VMAT techniques for each patient. Metrics evaluated included the mean heart, kidney, large bowel, small bowel, esophagus, and stomach doses, the lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V 20 ), the volume of the normal liver receiving 15 Gy (V 15 ), conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), and the irradiated volume or volume receiving 25 Gy (V 25 ). The p-values for the mean dose to kidneys, small bowel, esophagus, and the lung V 20 were greater than 0.05, and no statistical difference could be determined between DCAT and VMAT. The p-values for the mean heart, large bowel, stomach, and liver V 15 were less than 0.05, indicating statistical significance and superiority of VMAT for minimizing dose to these organs, especially V 15 of the liver. The DCAT technique produced CI greater than 1.0 for all patients proving superior coverage, while standard VMAT produced significantly improved V 25 with p-values less than 0.0001, and consequently higher HI., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The author declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To evaluate the dosimetric advantages of incorporating the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique into left breast cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment under Halcyon Linac and to investigate the correlation between mean heart dose (MHD) and distance from the heart to target volumes in left breast cancer VMAT treatment. Fifteen Post-lumpectomy, left-sided breast patients treated between January 2017 and October 2020 were selected. Two plans were generated for each patient using Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) with the prescription of 50.4 Gy to planning target volume (PTV) breast and 58.8 Gy to PTV boost in 28 fractions. For each patient, DIBH and free breathing (FB) VMAT treatment plans under Halcyon Linac were generated. Dosimetric parameters, monitor unit and beam-on time of both DIBH and FB groups were compared. Three-dimensional distances from heart surface to each target volume were measured on computed tomography images using the TPS contouring tool and their correlation with MHD was evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). Comparable target coverage was shown in both groups. Mean dose to heart, left anterior descending artery, and left ventricle in Halcyon-DIBH-VMAT group were significantly reduced by 0.49 Gy, 1.19 Gy, and 0.57 Gy, respectively, compared to Halcyon-FB-VMAT (p < 0.001). A significant lung dose reduction was also achieved in Halcyon-DIBH-VMAT group. There was also a strong negative correlation between MHD and distance from heart surface to PTV boost in both FB and DIBH group (r = -0.741, p < 0.001), but not observed for distance from heart surface to PTV breast. Incorporating DIBH into left breast cancer VMAT treatment under Halcyon Linac demonstrated significant cardiac and lung dose reduction. It was also demonstrated that MHD had a strong negative correlation with distance from heart surface to PTV boost but relatively independent of distance from heart surface to PTV breast. Recognizing the distance from the heart surface to PTV boost as the main factor in affecting MHD could potentially facilitate clinical treatment planning workflow and decision., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest The author declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Compare the robustness of wide tangents (WT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using different skin flash approaches in breast and nodal radiotherapy. Ten patients treated with WT using 2-cm flash were replanned with VMAT using no flash (NF), manual 2-cm flash (MF), and robust optimization (RO). Plan robustness was assessed for target coverage and organs at risk (OAR) by recalculating on 5 deformed CT scans (SOM1-5), daily cone beam (CBCT), and by shifting the isocenter 5 mm. VMAT NF gave poor coverage of CTVp with its smallest change of -3.2% for V 38Gy on CBCT. VMAT RO plans showed the least variations in target coverage loss compared to WT and VMAT MF which dropped as anatomical swelling increased. CTVp D 0.5cc decreased on CBCT and increased most for VMAT MF plans (case max increase +3.3 Gy), whereas VMAT RO plans were relatively stable (case max increase +1.2 Gy). OAR dose changed little with anatomical changes (isocenter shifts more important with medial, posterior, and inferior increasing dose). Nodal coverage was superior for VMAT which led to the WT being less robust for coverage toward both geometric and anatomical uncertainties. All techniques except NF plans gave high levels of coverage under minor uncertainties. VMAT RO was highly robust for target coverage for anatomical changes. Manually editing control points on VMAT plans was time-consuming and less predictable. CBCT anatomical changes were modest resulting in small delivered dose changes. OAR dose changes were small with no significant differences between techniques., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this work was to study the radiobiological effect of using Acuros XB (AXB) vs Analytic Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Seventy SBRT volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for HCC were calculated using AAA and AXB respectively with the same treatment parameters. Published tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models were used to quantify the effect of dosimetric difference between AAA and AXB on TCP, NTCP and uncomplicated tumor control probability (UTCP). There was an average decrease of 2.5% in 6-month TCP. Normal liver has the largest average decrease in NTCP which was 59.7%. Bowels followed with 26.6% average decrease in NTCP. Duodenum, stomach and esophagus had 10.2%, 5.1%, and 4.3% average decrease in NTCP. There was an average decrease of 1.8% and up to 7.2% in 6-month UTCP. There was an overall decrease in TCP, NTCP, and UTCP for HCC SBRT plans calculated using AXB compared to AAA which could be clinically significant., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to evaluate various combinations of Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD) based and Dose Volume based (DV) cost functions in terms of target coverage and organ sparing for Nasopharyngeal CA. Ten patients diagnosed with Nasopharyngeal CA were selected for this retrospective study. Different hybrid VMAT plans, including EUD- and DV-based cost functions, were generated for each patient to determine the optimum combination in terms of organ sparing and target coverage. The generated VMAT plans were evaluated based on physical and biological dose parameters. No statistical difference was observed among all plans in terms of target coverage. The p values were ≥ 0.005 for V95, D mean , and tumor control probability (TCP). The MU efficiency was maximum (67%), and the number of segments (285 segments) was minimum in Hybrid plan. Hybrid plan showed a significant difference compared to others (p = 0.001) in terms of serial organs. Moreover, the combination of serial and parallel complication models provided better reduction of radiation dose in the parotid glands in Plan-3 (p = 0.001). In this study, better protection was obtained when DVH-based cost functions were defined for targets and a combination of EUD- and DVH-based cost functions were used for OARs., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study compare dosimetric parameters and secondary malignancy risk (SMN) using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for the treatment of sinonasal cancer (SC). After IRB-approval, 10 patients previously treated with IMPT for cancers of the ethmoid, sphenoid, maxillary, or frontal sinuses were identified. Dosimetrists blinded to the IMPT plans generated VMAT plans for comparison. Volume coverage and dose to organs at risk (OAR) were recorded and compared. Organ equivalent dose (OED) of tissues outside of the treatment volume was used to define the excess absolute and relative risk of SMNs. In all cases, both VMAT and IMPT provided acceptable target volume coverage and were able to meet OAR constraints. IMPT was superior for brain V10, V30, and mean, brainstem D0.01 ipsilateral cochlea V30, contralateral cochlea mean, contralateral lacrimal gland mean, contralateral parotid mean, spinal cord D0.01 and body outside of the CTV V10, V20, and V30. VMAT was superior for ipsilateral eye mean, ipsilateral lens mean, CTV V100 and maximum hotspot. The relative risk of SMNs with VMAT compared to IMPT is 3.35 (95% CI, 1.92-5.89). For the treatment of SC, IMPT spares OARs that are not immediately adjacent to the treatment volume and reduces the risk of SMNs when compared to VMAT. VMAT spares OARs abutting the target volume better than IMPT and has more homogenous target coverage. Tumors of the ethmoid sinus, benefit more from IMPT, while tumors located elsewhere require application of our findings on a case by case basis., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

We investigated differences in the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dose distribution in prostate cancer patients treated by rectal gas removal and/or adaptive replanning. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed daily for 22 treatments in eight prostate cancer patients with excessive rectal gas, and the CBCT images were analyzed. Rectal gas removal was performed, and irradiation was delivered after prostate matching. We compared dose-volume histograms for the daily CBCT images before and after rectal gas removal. Plan A was the original plan on CBCT images before rectal gas removal. Plan B was a single reoptimized plan on CBCT images before rectal gas removal. Plan C was the original plan on CBCT images after rectal gas removal. Plan D was a single reoptimized plan on CBCT images after rectal gas removal. D 95 of the planning target volume (PTV) minus the rectum of Plan C (94.7% ± 6.6%) was significantly higher than that of Plan A (88.5% ± 10.4%). All dosimetric parameters of Plan C were improved by rectal gas removal compared with Plan A, regardless of the initial rectal gas volume. Dosimetric parameters of PTV minus the rectum of Plan B were significantly improved compared with Plan C. Additionally, the V 78 of the rectal wall of Plan B (0.2% ± 0.5%) was significantly improved compared with Plan C (3.9% ± 6.3%, p = 0.003). The dosimetric parameters of Plan D were not significantly different from Plan B. The dose distribution of prostate VMAT was improved by rectal gas removal and/or adaptive replanning. An adaptive replanning on daily CBCT images might be a better method than rectal gas removal for prostate cancer patients with excessive rectal gas., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To determine which treatment technique and modality would offer better dosimetric results and be preferable for spinal stereotactic body therapy (SBRT) depending on the three different regions of the vertebrae. Linear accelerator (LINAC)- and CyberKnife (CK)-based treatment techniques were compared in terms of their dosimetric quality, treatment efficiency, and delivery accuracy. Thirty previously treated patients were included in this study. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques were used for LINAC-based treatment, whereas CK-based treatment plans were generated for two different collimator systems: fixed and multileaf collimator (MLC). The plans were compared based on spinal cord sparing, dose homogeneity, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), monitor unit (MU), and beam-on time. The percentage volumes of V2Gy, V5Gy (representing volume low of the dose spillage region), V10Gy, and V20Gy (representing the volume of the high-dose spillage region) of the healthy tissue were analyzed. The CI and GI of the VMAT plans were better than those of the IMRT plans. For spinal cord sparing, the VMAT and MLC-based CK (CK-MLC) techniques were superior. The percentage of low-dose spillage regions was the lowest for IMRT and fixed cone-based CK (CK-FIX) plans. The percentage of the high-dose spillage region was the lowest for the VMAT and CK-MLC plans. In terms of treatment efficiency, the VMAT and CK-MLC plans were superior to the IMRT and CK-FIX plans. The VMAT technique lowered the MU and beam-on time values. The plan delivery accuracy of the VMAT and CK-FIX plans was better than that of the IMRT plans. VMAT is the best option for LINAC-based spinal SBRT. For CK-based spinal SBRT, MLC-based plans are preferred. If the clinic has both treatment modalities and the patient can tolerate long treatment times, CK-MLC-based treatment should be chosen because of its superiority in sparing the spinal cord and sharp dose fall-off., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has been shown to improve the overall survival for invasive breast cancer patients. However, it represents a challenging treatment geometry and individualized planning strategies with complex field arrangements are usually adopted to decrease radiotoxicity to heart and lungs. Automated treatment planning has the potential to improve plan quality consistency and planning efficiency. Herein, we describe the application of the Pinnacle 3 Autoplanning engine as a valuable technological resource able to allow the treatment of challenging patients theoretically unfit for radiotherapy for major cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities. Treatment was planned for three left-sided chest wall and regional lymph-nodes postmastectomy breast cancer patients. A deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique was used aiming to reduce the OARs irradiation. Three manually generated plans (hybrid-IMRT (HMRT), hybrid-VMAT (HVMAT) and full VMAT (MP-VMAT) and a fully automated plan created by the Autoplanning engine (AP-VMAT) were optimized in order to ensure a safe radiation therapy to the patients. The plans were evaluated based on planning target volumes (PTVs) coverage, dose homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CN), dose to organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) of pericarditis, long term mortality and pneumonitis. Despite the use of deep moderated breath-hold, all human-driven plans failed to reach the stringent dose objectives for OARs. All plans provided an optimal coverage for chest wall and lymph-nodal area. AP-VMAT delivered the lowest mean dose to the heart (3.4 to 4.9 Gy) and ipsilateral lung (7.5 to 12.5 Gy) reporting the lowest NTCP for pneumonitis (<1%), confirming the only chance to comply the dose objectives. Moreover, AP-VMAT reported a decrease of the integral dose, which was lower by about 4-8% with respect to manual plans. AP-VMAT plan resulted in up to 58% increase of MUs with respect to manual plans, suggesting a more pronounced fluence modulation and plan complexity. A major difference was found for the planning time which was reduced to less than 30 minutes by using the Auto-Planning module. With improved planning quality and efficiency, Auto-planning is an effective tool to enable high-quality plans in challenging postmastectomy breast cancer radiotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There are no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a potential toxic side effect of thoracic radiotherapy. Optimal planning techniques must maintain tumor coverage while limiting dose to normal lung tissue to reduce the risk of patients developing RP. The addition of a noncoplanar arc may be beneficial by increasing treatment angles and providing an ideal dose distribution for tumor coverage while decreasing dose to organs at risk (OAR). The purpose of this research was to compare the effects on the normal bilateral lung tissue receiving 20 Gy, 10 Gy and 5 Gy (V20, V10, V5) and the mean lung dose (MLD) values when medial lung tumors are treated with 3 partial coplanar arcs vs 2 partial coplanar arcs combined with a partial sagittal arc. Researchers hypothesized that a beam arrangement of 2 partial coplanar arcs and 1 partial sagittal arc would reduce V20, V10, V5, and MLD values when compared to a 3 partial coplanar arc plan. In a retrospective study of 5 patients with bulky, medial right lung lesions without nodal involvement, cases were planned with both a noncoplanar and a coplanar arc geometry. Results were evaluated using a two-tailed t-test to determine the statistical significance (p < 0.05) of changes to total lung volume analyzation metrics when a noncoplanar sagittal arc was incorporated compared to the standard lung treatment using only coplanar arcs. Although some patient cases showed minor improvement in the V 20 , V 10 , V 5 , and MLD metrics, the study results were not statistically significant and showed no advantage with the introduction of an anterior sagittal arc over a coplanar beam arrangement., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to investigate prostate radiotherapy techniques for the patients with hip prosthesis in 4 different field setups. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique was used in 4 different cases: (1) using full VMAT arcs (VMAT&#95;F); (2) same arcs as in case 1 but with avoidance sectors (VMAT&#95;ASEC); (3) as case 2 but with the addition of a lateral static field through the prosthesis (VMAT&#95;ASEC+STAT); (4) as in case 1 but with an automated structure avoidance option to avoid irradiation through the prosthesis (VMAT&#95;ASTR). Fifteen previously treated prostate patients were retrospectively selected to this study. Treatment plans were created for all patients using all 4 techniques. The potential prosthesis misalignment in the treatment setup was modeled by moving the prosthesis 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 cm ventrally and dorsally and recalculating the plans in each case. For VMAT&#95;ASEC, the dose parameters for organs at risk were the highest and the dose coverage of the target volume was the poorest when compared to the other techniques. For VMAT&#95;ASEC+STAT, the movement of the prosthesis changed the target dose distribution the most. VMAT&#95;F and VMAT&#95;ASTR fulfilled the planning criteria the best, even when the prosthesis was misaligned. VMAT&#95;F radiated through the prosthesis more than VMAT&#95;ASTR and increased the dose near the prosthesis surface when compared to VMAT&#95;ASTR. VMAT&#95;ASTR and VMAT&#95;F were the most robust techniques for the patients with the hip prosthesis considering plan quality and the effect of positioning errors. The increased prosthesis surface dose with VMAT&#95;F and possible dose calculation uncertainties favors the use of VMAT&#95;ASTR., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) is used in the management of pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT. This work aims to simplify the treatment planning process for TLI via a proposed template using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. Fifteen pediatric patients were planned, prescribed to 8 Gy in 4 fractions. Cost functions included in the template were the ones for the planning target volume (PTV), and conformality cost function (CCF) for the rest of the patient's volume. Conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), conformation number (CN), gradient index (GI), integral dose, and doses to the organs at risk achieved with the template were reported. Cost function influence over various indexes was studied by Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Same 15 patients were planned with 3-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (3D-CRT) technique for comparison. Mean CI and HI were 1.33 and 0.13, respectively, which indicates good dose conformation and homogeneity. Mean CN and GI values were 0.69 and 4.51, respectively. Mean PTV coverage was reached (V 100% > 95%). No correlation between the CCF and indexes values was found (p > 0.05). Doses to organs at risk (OARs) were as low as possible without losing PTV coverage. VMAT plan showed higher levels of conformation and similar homogeneity as 3D-CRT plans. Doses to OARs were inferior with VMAT except for the right kidney. The proposed template simplifies the planning of TLI treatments, and it is able to create acceptable plans with little modification in order to reduce doses to certain organs like the kidneys or the heart. VMAT technique showed higher conformation and lower doses to OAR compared to 3D-CRT., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Treatment of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) with chemoradiation may be associated with high rates of symptomatic cardiac toxicity. Large margins are typically required to ensure coverage of GEJ tumors with free-breathing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with tighter margins enabled by maximum-inhalation breath hold (MIBH)-gated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on an integrated MRI-linear accelerator system (MR-linac) can decrease radiation doses to the heart and cardiac substructures. Ten patients with locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma underwent both free breathing 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and MIBH MRI simulation scans. MR-linac IMRT plans were created with a 3 mm clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) isotropic margin and 4DCT VMAT plans were created with a 11, 13, and 9 mm CTV to PTV anisotropic margins in the left-right, cranial-caudal, and anterior-posterior directions according to GEJ-specific PTV expansion recommendations by Voncken et al. Prescription dose to PTV was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Dosimetry to the heart and cardiac substructures was compared with paired t test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Mean PTV on the MR-linac IMRT plans was significantly smaller compared to the 4DCT VMAT plans (689 cm 3 vs 1275 cm 3 , p < 0.01). Mean dose to the heart and all cardiac substructures was significantly lower in the MR-linac IMRT plans compared to the 4DCT VMAT plans: heart 20.9 Gy vs 27.8 Gy, left atrium 29.6 Gy vs 39.4 Gy, right atrium 20.5 Gy vs 25.6 Gy, left ventricle 21.6 Gy vs 29.6 Gy, and right ventricle 18.7 Gy vs 25.2 Gy (all p values <0.05). MIBH-gated MR-linac IMRT treatment of locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma can significantly decrease doses to the heart and cardiac substructures and this may translate to reduced rates of cardiac toxicity., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. All rights reserved.)

Linac based radiosurgery to multiple metastases is commonly planned with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) as it effectively achieves high conformality to complex target arrangements. However, as the number of targets increases, VMAT can struggle to block between targets, which can lead to highly modulated and/or nonconformal multi-leaf collimator (MLC) trajectories that unnecessarily irradiation of healthy tissue. In this study we introduce, describe, and evaluate a treatment planning technique called Conformal Arc Informed VMAT (CAVMAT), which aims to reduce the dose to healthy tissue while generating highly conformal treatment plans. CAVMAT is a hybrid technique which combines the conformal MLC trajectories of dynamic conformal arcs with the MLC modulation and versatility of inverse optimization. CAVMAT has 3 main steps. First, targets are assigned to subgroups to maximize MLC blocking between targets. Second, arc weights are optimized to achieve the desired target dose, while minimizing MU variation between arcs. Third, the optimized conformal arc plan serves as the starting point for limited inverse optimization to improve dose conformity to each target. Twenty multifocal VMAT cases were replanned with CAVMAT with 20Gy applied to each target. The total volume receiving 2.5 Gy [cm 3 ], 6 Gy [cm 3 ], 12 Gy [cm 3 ], and 16 Gy [cm 3 ], conformity index, treatment delivery time, and the total MU were used to compare the VMAT and CAVMAT plans. In addition, CAVMAT was compared to a broad range of planning strategies from various institutions (108 linear accelerator based plans, 14 plans using other modalities) for a 5-target case utilized in a recent plan challenge. For the linear accelerator-based plans, a plan complexity metric based on aperture opening area and perimeter, total monitor units (MU), and MU for a given aperture opening was utilized in the plan challenge scoring algorithm to compare the submitted plans to CAVMAT. After re-planning the 20 VMAT cases, CAVMAT reduced the average V 2.5Gy [cm 3 ] by 25.25 ± 19.23%, V 6Gy [cm 3 ] by 13.68 ± 18.97%, V 12Gy [cm 3 ] by 11.40 ± 19.44%, and V 16Gy [cm 3 ] by 6.38 ± 19.11%. CAVMAT improved conformity by 3.81 ± 7.57%, while maintaining comparable target dose. MU for the CAVMAT plans increased by 24.35 ± 24.66%, leading to an increased treatment time of 2 minutes. For the plan challenge case, CAVMAT was 1 of 12 linac based plans that met all plan challenge scoring criteria. Compared to the average submitted VMAT plan, CAVMAT increased the V 10% Gy[%] of healthy tissue (Brain-PTV) by roughly 3.42%, but in doing so was able to reduce the V 25% Gy[%] by roughly 3.73%, while also reducing V 50% Gy[%] , V 75% Gy[%], and V 100% Gy[%] . The CAVMAT technique successfully eliminated insufficient MLC blocking between targets prior to the inverse optimization, leading to less complex treatment plans and improved tissue sparing. Tissue sparing, improved conformity, and decreased plan complexity at the cost of slight increase in treatment delivery time indicates CAVMAT to be a promising method to treat brain metastases., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To adopt a transfer learning approach and establish a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for the prediction of rectum and bladder dose-volume histograms (DVH) in prostate patients treated with a VMAT technique. One hundred forty-four VMAT patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer were included in this study. Data were split into two sets: 120 and 24 patients, respectively. The second set was used for final validation. To ensure the accuracy of the training data, we developed a ground-truth analysis for detecting and correcting for all potential outliers. We used transfer learning in combination with a pre-trained VGG-16 network. We dropped the fully connected layers from the VGG-16 and added a new fully connected neural network. The inputs for the CNN were a 2D image of the volumes contoured in the CT, but we only retained the geometrical information of every CT-slice. The outputs were the corresponding rectum and bladder DVH for every slice. We used a confusion matrix to analyze the performance of our model. Our model achieved 100% and 81% of true positive and true negative predictions, respectively. We have an overall accuracy of 87.5%, a misclassification rate of 12.5%, and a precision of 100%. We have successfully developed a model for reliable prediction of rectum and bladder DVH in prostate patients by applying a previously pre-trained CNN. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to apply transfer learning to the prediction of DVHs that accounts for the ground truth problem., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Treating multiple lung lesions synchronously using a single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plan can improve treatment efficiency and patient compliance. However, due to set up uncertainty, aligning multiple lung tumors on a single daily cone beam CT (CBCT) image has shown clinically unacceptable loss of target(s) coverage. Herein, we propose a Restricted Single-Isocenter Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (RESIST), an alternative treatment that mitigates patient setup uncertainties. Twenty-one patients with two lung lesions were treated with single-isocenter VMAT-SBRT using a 6MV-FFF beam to 54 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 7) or 50 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 14) prescribed to 70-80% isodose line. To minimize setup uncertainties, each plan was re-planned using the RESIST method, utilizing a single-isocenter placed at the patient's mediastinum. It allows for an individual plan to be created for each tumor, using the first plan as the base-dose for the second plan, while still allowing both tumors to be treated in the same session. The technique uses novel features in Eclipse, including dynamic conformal arc (DCA)-based dose and aperture shape controller before each VMAT optimization. RESIST plans provided better target dose conformity (p < 0.001) and gradient indices (p < 0.001) and lower dose to adjacent critical organs. Using RESIST to treat synchronous lung lesions with VMAT-SBRT significantly reduces plan complexity as demonstrated by smaller beam modulation factors (p < 0.001), without unreasonably increasing treatment time. RESIST reduces the chance of a geometric miss due by allowing CBCT matching of one tumor at a time. Placement of isocenter at the mediastinum avoids potential patient/gantry collisions, provides greater flexibility of noncoplanar arcs and eliminates the need for multiple couch movements during CBCT imaging. Efficacy of RESIST has been demonstrated for two lesions and can potentially be used for more lesions. Clinical implementation of this technique is ongoing., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Adequate dose homogeneity and full prescription dose delivery to the scalp still remains a dosimetric problem during scalp irradiation due to the anatomical shape of the cranium. Confounding variables such as gravity, the irregular and convex shape of the cranium, air gaps between scalp surface and commercial bolus, and potential inconsistencies in a 3D printed bolus can negatively impact the dose delivered to the scalp surface during scalp irradiation. The purpose of this retrospective case study was to implement the use of a 3D milled rigid bolus technique combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning and evaluate the dosimetric efficacy in delivering dose to the surface of the scalp. The 8-patient retrospective case study consisted of patients with a scalp lesion treated using a 3D milled bolus, VMAT, 6 megavoltage (MV) photon beams, and aligned for treatment using daily conebeam computed tomography (CT) and 6° of freedom couch positioning. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) were used to evaluate maximum dose delivered to the planning target volumes (PTVs) while the dose homogeneity index (DHI) was calculated and compared to that of an ideal value of 1. The researchers evaluated the minimum dose delivered to the individual PTVs after plan normalization. The researchers found that the 3D milled bolus coupled with volumetric modulated arc therapy increased surface dose homogeneity, while also increasing the percentage of planning target volumes receiving full prescription dose. With statistically significant results, patient specific 3D milled rigid bolus offers a viable bolus option for treatment of superficial scalp lesions when combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning. However, a larger sample size used in a scientific research study across multiple institutions would be desirable to validate these case study findings., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Volumetric Modulated Radiotherapy (VMAT) implementation requires additional Quality Assurance (QA) tests to assure stable machine performance especially in terms of dynamic parameters synchronization. The lack of a twin machine for TrueBeam led us to the investigation of backup workflow with Clinacs 2300C/D. These Clinacs were upgraded to make them VMAT-enabled. This study aimed to compare long-term VMAT performance QA on 3 accelerators: TrueBeam (TB) and 2 Clinacs (V4 and V5). All VMAT test plans were provided by Varian. The test set consisted of initial and advanced tests. Initial tests were intended to check the gravity effect on Multileaf Collimator (MLC) and dosimetry system. As the results of these tests were correct and there was visual inspection applied for MLC positioning accuracy analysis, they were not presented in the paper. We focused on 2 advanced tests: dose rate vs gantry speed and dose rate vs MLC speed. The idea of the advanced test was to compare segments irradiated with the same fluence but different dose rate, gantry speed or MLC speed. Test sets were irradiated weekly on average for 12 months. These tests were analysed following Varian procedures and criteria using in-house-developed software. Apart from that we calculated correlation between all segments pairs and performed profile analysis. According to Varian criteria, all tests for TrueBeam were very well within the tolerances. Dose rate vs gantry speed tests for Clinacs were within allowed limits while as many as 28% and 6% of dose rate vs MLC speed tests failed for Clinacs V4 and V5, respectively. The profile analysis revealed tests for which the difference between measured and planned dose was over 3% and still met the criteria. The correlation analysis showed that VMAT plans on TrueBeam were irradiated repeatably because all segments were strongly correlated. There was no correlation between the segment with the highest MLC speed and the other segments on Clinacs in dose rate vs MLC speed test. This segment was irradiated randomly. TrueBeam is more reliable than upgraded Clinacs 2300C/D for VMAT performance. That is why in our centre the one of upgraded Clinac that performed tests better served only as a backup machine for VMAT technique, and the second one was excluded from clinical use for this technique., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the dosimetric characteristics of helical tomotherapy (HT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and tangential field-in-field technique (FIF) for the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC)., Methods and Materials: Ten patients with early-stage unilateral breast cancer were selected for simulating the patients with SBBC in this retrospective analysis. Treatment plans with HT, VMAT, IMRT, and FIF were generated for each patient with a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the target. Plan quality, namely conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), dose-volume statistics of organs at risk (OARs), and beam-on time (BOT), were evaluated., Results: HT plans showed a lower mean heart dose (3.53 ± 0.31Gy) compared with the other plans (VMAT = 5.6 ± 1.36 Gy, IMRT = 3.80 ± 0.76 Gy, and FIF = 4.84 ± 2.13 Gy). Moreover, HT plans showed a significantly lower mean lung dose (p < 0.01) compared with the other plans: mean right lung doses were 6.81 ± 0.67, 10.32 ± 1.04, 9.07 ± 1.21, and 10.03 ± 1.22 Gy and mean left lung doses were 6.33 ± 0.87, 8.82 ± 0.91, 7.84 ± 1.07, and 8.64 ± 0.99 Gy for HT, VMAT, IMRT, and FIF plans, respectively. The mean dose to the left anterior descending artery was significantly lower in HT plans (p < 0.01) than in the other plans: HT = 19.41 ± 0.51 Gy, VMAT = 25.77 ± 7.23 Gy, IMRT = 27.87 ± 6.48 Gy, and FIF = 30.95 ± 10.17 Gy. FIF plans showed a worse CI and HI compared with the other plans. VMAT plans showed shorter BOT (average, 3.9 ± 0.2 minutes) than did HT (average, 11.0 ± 3.0 minutes), IMRT (average, 6.1 ± 0.5 minutes), and FIF (average, 4.6 ± 0.7 minutes) plans., Conclusions: In a dosimetric comparison for SBBC, HT provided the most favorable dose sparing of OARs. However, HT with longer BOT may increase patient discomfort and treatment uncertainty. VMAT enabled shorter BOT with acceptable doses to OARs and had a better CI than did FIF and IMRT., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The continuous delivery of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans is usually approximated by discrete apertures at evenly-spaced gantry angles for dose calculation purposes. This approximation can potentially lead to large dose calculation errors if the gantry angle spacings are large and/or there are large changes in the MLC apertures from one control point (CP) to the next. In this work, we developed a sliding-window (SW) method to improve VMAT dose calculation accuracy. For any 2 adjacent VMAT CPs ni and ni + 1, the dose distribution was approximated by a 2-CP SW IMRT beam with the starting MLC positions at CP ni and ending MLC positions at CP ni + 1, with the gantry angle fixed in the middle of the 2 VMAT CPs. Therefore, a VMAT beam with N CPs was approximated by a SW plan with N-1 SW beams. To validate the method, VMAT plans were generated for 10 patients in Pinnacle using 4° gantry spacing. Each plan was converted to a SW plan and dose was recalculated. Another VMAT plan, with 1° gantry spacing, was created by interpolating the original VMAT beam. The original plans were delivered on an Elekta Versa HD and measured with ArcCHECK. For both the isodose distribution and DVH, there were significant differences between the original VMAT plan and either the SW or the interpolated plan. However, they were indistinguishable between the SW and the interpolated plans. When compared with measurement, the average passing rates of the original VMAT plans were 87.3 ± 2.8% and 93.1 ± 1.0% for the 5 HN and 5 spine SBRT cases, respectively. On the other hand, the passing rates for both the VMAT1 and SW plans were above 95% for all the 10 cases studied. The dose calculation times of the original VMAT plans and the SW plans were very similar. We conclude that the proposed SW approach improves VMAT dose calculation accuracy without increase in dose calculation time., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cervical cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) largely due to limited resources and insufficient staffing. Knowledge-based planning (KBP) could alleviate understaffing issues by streamlining the radiotherapy treatment planning process. Varian's KBP system (RapidPlan) was used to develop a model capable of producing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for cervical cancer patients. Plan data from 46 patients previously treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) were used to create and train the model which was then applied to 32 patients excluded from the training process. Dose volume histogram (DVH) values for the planning target volume (PTV&#95;High), bladder, rectum, and bowel were evaluated for the validation plans and found to have satisfied the required PTV coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose constraints. The average value for PTV&#95;High D 95.0% was 48.0 Gy (sd = 3.0 Gy) for existing clinical plans and 48.4 Gy (sd = 2.6 Gy) for the validation plans. The mean dose for the bladder, rectum, and bowel was 39.8 Gy (sd = 3.9 Gy), 41.6 Gy (sd = 5.2 Gy), and 21.6 Gy (sd = 5.0 Gy) for existing clinical plans and 38.9 Gy (sd = 4.0 Gy), 40.3 Gy (sd = 4.8 Gy), and 21.5 Gy (sd = 4.6 Gy) for validation plans, respectively. A TOST test showed that the p values for the PTV&#95;High D 95.0% (p < 0.001), rectum V 30Gy (p = 0.039), and mean dose to the bladder (p = 0.0014), rectum (p = 0.025), and bowel (p = 0.006) were statistically significant within a 5% equivalence margin of the clinical value thereby providing strong evidence of equivalence. Based on this statistical analysis, it was determined that the model was capable of generating treatable VMAT plans for cervical cancer patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. L. Court has projects that are financially supported by Varian Medical Systems. All other co-authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Decreasing radiotoxicity to the heart, lungs, and contralateral breast has proven to lower the risk of secondary malignancy and improve overall outcomes when treating chest wall (CW) and regional lymph nodes in postmastectomy breast cancer patients. In this retrospective study, 11 postmastectomy patients were selected and planned with a novel hybrid treatment method and a traditional volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) approach for comparison. This hybrid technique was able to optimize tangential beams to minimize heart dose and the VMAT contribution to improve dose conformity around the planning target volume (PTV). Overall, this hybrid technique produced more homogenous target dose coverage and demonstrated a decrease of integral dose to organs at risk (OAR), while the VMAT technique demonstrated a higher affinity for maintaining dose conformity. Further observation of dose distributions also revealed that the hybrid plans were more effective in sparing low-dose spread to healthy tissue in both right- and left-sided cases. This observation was made evident by the reduction in heart V5 and D mean , decreases in all parameters regarding the contralateral lung, as well as all values other than the V20 of the ipsilateral lung. This unique hybrid planning technique could present an alternative to standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning when treating postmastectomy CW and regional lymph nodes, as it has shown the capacity to decrease cardiac, lung, and contralateral breast toxicity while maintaining quality PTV coverage., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Dose-wall histograms (DWHs) have been used as alternatives to dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for hollow organs, with the rationale that the dose delivered to the interior of a hollow organ would be unrelated to the level of radiation damage. The purpose of this study is to conduct a statistical comparison of dose statistics for both walled and solid structure contours for both bladder and rectum in the treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). Ten intermediate risk prostate cases were randomly selected. Rectum and bladder were first contoured as solid structures, and then the corresponding wall structures were generated using either a slice-by-slice cropping (2D method), or with a full 3D cropping tool (3D method). Each case was then inverse planned using a 2-arc VMAT technique. Two plans per case were created, 1 with a hypofractionated treatment and 1 with a standard fractionated treatment. DVHs were calculated for solid structure contours, and DWHs were calculated for the walled structure contours generated using 2D and 3D contouring tools. A nonparametric Spearman statistic correlation test was used to compare a large number of relevant dose histogram points, and to establish the relationship between dose statistics for walled and solid structures. Several notable relationships were observed. Maximum rectal dose was strongly correlated between the solid structure and both the 2D-generated (Spearman's correlation r s  = 0.988, p < 0.01) and 3D-generated (r s  = 0.952 p< 0.01) wall structures. This indicates that the rectal hot spot occurred in or near the wall for all cases, suggesting that both structure types give similar maximum dose information for rectum. Maximum bladder dose was not significantly correlated between solid structures and the 2D (r s  = 0.596, p= 0.069) and 3D-generated (r s  = 0.681, p= 0.03) counterparts. This suggests that the maximum dose is not consistently in or near the bladder wall. This favors the use of bladder wall contours when considering bladder toxicity, with the maximum dose to the wall potentially being more relevant radiobiologically. This analysis was extended to many other relevant points on the rectum and bladder histogram curves. Where correlations are strong, equations of best-fit are presented. This work establishes several statistically-significant relationships between bladder and rectum DVHs and DWHs for VMAT irradiation of intermediate-risk prostate cancer. This information may be used to inform contouring requirements for clinical trial design as well as for standard patient care., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Multicriteria optimization (MCO), a novel commercially available optimization method for IMRT and VMAT has the potential to improve treatment planning techniques and workflows. MCO allows planners and physicians to assess in real time the impact and tradeoffs between all clinical goals and organ constraints. We investigate the feasibility of a universal set of objectives and constraints for VMAT plans in different anatomical sites and the impact of involving the Physician in the navigation of the generated Pareto plans. We randomly selected 20 prostate only, 14 whole pelvis, 10 advanced lung, 15 pancreas, and 7 head and neck plans planned with a VMAT technique. Using the clinically delivered isocenter and beam set-up, we retrospectively generated MCO plans with a universal set of constraints and objectives for each anatomical site. The MCO plan scores were compared with clinical plans or an independent plan generated with DMPO. For prostate only plans the TCP values for the clinical and MCO plans were similar and the rectum NTCP values and overall P+ were slightly better for the MCO plans. For whole pelvis, the resulting MCO plans were comparable in all the dosimetric measures to the clinical plans. For lung, the MCO dosimetric comparison also yielded comparable plans but when evaluating individual patients, there were 5 patients for which MCO plans had a clear advantage in reducing dose to lung and/or esophagus while improving/maintaining target coverage, 4 patients with comparable plans and 1 patient where MCO was worse. Allowing the physician to navigate independently produced a different selection of dosimetric trade-offs. Comparable MCO plans were also obtained for pancreas and head and neck. Based on our experience with many anatomical sites and a large number of patient plans, we have found that VMAT MCO plans are comparable to the clinical plans and can be produced with a universal set of objectives and constraints, even for a wide range of geometries and anatomies., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To evaluate the Varian 'Fast hybrid multi-criteria optimization (MCO) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)' (H-VMAT) tool for both its dosimetric accuracy and calculation time. This is a new function within V15.6 of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system that allows VMAT optimization and dose calculation using the graphical processing unit (GPU). In versions prior to V15.6 VMAT MCO calculations were only possible using central processing unit (CPU) not GPU. We termed this approach as native VMAT (N-VMAT). The study consisted of a cohort of 53 patients representing a range of anatomical treatment sites; bladder (5), brain (6), gynaecological (5), head & neck (5), lung (7), mediastinum (7) prostate (6), oesophagus (7), and rectum (5). Each case was planned to that of a clinical standard (Base) which was compared to a H-VMAT and N-VMAT approach. The study analyzed plan calculation time data, dose to organ at risk (OAR) and target coverage for each approach. Negligible dosimetric differences were found between the H-VMAT and N-VMAT approach for the cohort of patients evaluated. The largest dosimetric changes where observed in the optic chiasm and lacrimal gland where the H-VMAT achieved a max dose of 50.9 ± 7.7 Gy and 8.0 ± 0.5 Gy in comparison to the N-VMAT 53.1 ± 6.3 Gy and 10.2 ± 2.9 Gy, respectively. Several OAR's provided indistinguishable dose outcomes, namely; brainstem, heart, kidney's, lens, parotid, and spinal cord. Large time savings were found using the H-VMAT technique when compared to N-VMAT, being 5 to 40 times faster or up to 75 minutes time saving (average of 25 minutes). Negligible dosimetric change between the 2 techniques and large time savings were observed with the GPU enabled H-VMAT approach. We have shown that the H-VMAT technique has been safely implemented and is ready for clinical use., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to generate a local confidence limit (CL) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques for Clinac IX linear accelerator using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group (TG119) protocol. The results were compared with the published studies to test the capability and quality of the VMAT technique in our clinic. We used TG119 cases to create plans for IMRT and VMAT in Eclipse Treatment Planning System for Clinac IX using 6 MV and 10 MV photons. Two preliminary and 5 clinical test cases were created based on the dose prescriptions and planning objectives provided by TG119. Verification plans were created in a planning slab phantom, 2D matrix dosimetry system (MatriXX) with multicube phantom and a volumetric phantom (Delta 4 ). Radiation absorption doses to high-dose points in the planning target volume region and low-dose points in avoidance structures were measured with a 0.125 cc semiflex thimble ionization chamber (PTW). The measured and planned doses were normalized with respect to their prescription doses and intercompared with each other. The gamma analysis was carried out for MatriXX and Delta 4 adopting the acceptance criteria of 3% dose difference and 3 mm distance to agreement with 10% threshold dose, respectively. The local CLs with the bench mark set by TG119 were obtained for point, composite planar and field-by-field measurements for IMRT and VMAT with different energies. In this study, the CLs for the high-dose regions of IMRT with 6 MV and 10 MV were 0.025 and 0.014, respectively. For VMAT, they were 0.032 and 0.018. The counterpart CL was 0.045 in TG119. And in organs at risk region, the CLs of IMRT with 6 MV and 10 MV beam were 0.022 and 0.019, respectively, with the counterpart CL indicated by TG119 was 0.047. For VMAT with 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams, the CLs were measured 0.030 and 0.027 with Delta 4 , respectively. The CLs of the maximum gamma passing for all values were 2.0 in 6 MV VMAT plan, which however recommended in TG119 was 12.4. The data presented here showed all the CLs in our clinic meet the criteria of TG119 report well. All these local CLs reached the goals mentioned in AAPM TG119, which indicated that the local clinic had commissioned IMRT and VMAT techniques with adequate accuracy. Prior to the clinical application practice, it is essential to verify with the TG119 test cases for IMRT and VMAT, which allows us to better understand the basic capability of VMAT technology., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Since 2011 when it was first described, the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) has always seen the use of large arc lengths for the spine fields ranging from 200° to 360°. This study was aimed to do a dosimetric comparison between the large and shorter spinal arc for CSI. For a cohort of 10 patients, 2 VMAT CSI plans were created for each patient, one using the conventional full 360° arc (VMAT&#95;FA) for the spine and the other using 100° posterior arc (VMAT&#95;PA) for 23.4 Gy and 35 Gy prescriptions. In both the plans, 360° arc fields were employed for treating cranial volume. Spillage dose (D Body-PTV ) to Body-PTV (D Body-PTV : dose to body excluding planning target volume) was compared with VMAT&#95;FA and VMAT&#95;PA plans. In addition to these VMAT plans, a 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plan was also created for all these patients to compare the D Body-PTV and target volume related dose constraints. Mean D95% difference between the two VMAT plans did not exceed 1.3% for cranial and spinal targets for both prescription levels. The conformity index (CI) was averaged over both prescription doses. Average CI shows a similar value for VMAT&#95;FA (0.84 ± 0.04) and VMAT&#95;PA (0.82 ± 0.05) plans. D95%, V110% and CI did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between partial and full-arc VMAT plans. However, the VMAT&#95;PA plan exhibited a lower D Body-PTV compared to VMAT&#95;FA plans (0.007 ≤ p < 0.05) in the 1 to 5 Gy range. Nevertheless, partial arc plans could not offer a statistically significant dose reduction for delineated organs compared to full arc plans, except for bilateral kidneys., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique as an alternative to high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in the treatment of vaginal cuff in postoperative endometrial cancer. CT scans of 8 patients were used in this study. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the 0.5 cm tissue around the applicator (then subtracting the applicator). Total dose was 30Gy delivered in 5 fractions. In HDR-BT, dose was prescribed at a distance of 0.5 cm from the surface applicator. For VMAT irradiation, a planning target volume (PTV) was obtained from CTV by an expansion of 3 mm. Two VMAT plans were generated using a full arc rotation. The first plan was optimized with an anatomy-based optimization module (PO-VMAT) using a 1mm multileaf collimator beam margin to enhance dose heterogeneity and dose fallout outside the target. The second plan was generated with a full-inverse planning module (FI-VMAT). Conformity (CI100, CI50, CI25), gradient (GI) indexes, and integral doses were calculated. To account for various dose heterogeneity distributions we calculated the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) using the Niemerko model. A Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance followed by Dunn's-type multiple comparisons was performed. Dose distributions were more heterogeneous with HDR-BT: Dmean was 144.2% of prescription dose for CTV in HDR-BT and 118.5 and 108.6% for PTV in PO-VMAT and FI-VMAT, respectively. The mean values of EUD for CTV were 136.9%, 130.0 %, and 111.0% of prescription dose in HDR-BT, PO-VMAT, and FI-VMAT plans, respectively. GI indexes were 2.81, 3.41, and 4.14 for HDR-BT, PO-VMAT, and FI-VMAT, respectively. Near-maximal doses (D0.1cc) for rectum and bladder were significantly higher in HDR-BT plans compared to PO-VMAT and FI-VMAT plans (rectum: 131.2% vs112.8% vs 112.0%, respectively; bladder: 129.2% vs 108.7%, and 109.8%, respectively). PO-VMAT plans were able to mimic the HDR-BT dose distribution, showing a successful capability of highly conformal dose distribution, EUD values similar to HDR-BT, and steep dose-gradient outside PTV, then providing a reasonable alternative to brachytherapy., Competing Interests: Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recently implemented photon optimizer (PO) MLC optimization algorithm is mandatory for RapidPlan modeling in Eclipse. This report quantifies and compares the dosimetry and treatment delivery parameters of PO vs its predecessor progressive resolution optimizer (PRO) algorithm for a single-dose of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Clinical SBRT treatment plans for 12 early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving 30 Gy in 1 fraction using PRO-VMAT were re-optimized using the PO-VMAT MLC algorithm with identical planning parameters and objectives. Average planning target volume derived from the 4D CT scans was 13.6 ± 12.0 cc (range: 4.3 to 41.1 cc) Patients were treated with 6 MV flattening filter free beam using Acuros-based calculations and 2.5 mm calculation grid-size (CGS). Both treatment plans were normalized to receive same target coverage and identical CGS to isolate effects of MLC positioning optimizers. Original PRO and re-optimized PO plans were compared via RTOG-0915 protocol compliance criteria for target conformity, gradient indices, dose to organs at risks and delivery efficiency. Additionally, PO-VMAT plans with a 1.25 mm CGS were evaluated. Both plans met RTOG protocol requirements. Conformity indices showed no statistical difference between PO 2.5 mm CGS and PRO 2.5 mm CGS plans. Gradient index (p = 0.03), maximum dose to 2 cm away from planning target volume in any direction (D 2cm ) (p < 0.05), and gradient distance (p < 0.05) presented statistically significant differences for both plans with 2.5 mm CGS. Some organs at risks showed statistically significant differences for both plans calculated with 2.5 mm CGS; however, no clinically significant dose differences were observed between the plans. Beam modulation factor was statistically significant for both PO 1.25 mm CGS (p = 0.001) and PO 2.5 mm CGS (p < 0.001) compared to clinical PRO 2.5 mm CGS plans. PO-VMAT plans provided decreased beam-on time by an average of 0.2 ± 0.1 minutes (up to 1.0 minutes) with PO 2.5 mm and 1.2 ± 0.39 minutes (maximum up to 3.22 minutes) with PO 1.25 mm plans compared to PRO 2.5 mm plans. PO-VMAT single-dose of VMAT lung SBRT plans showed slightly increased intermediate-dose spillage but boasted overall similar plan quality with less beam modulation and hence shorter beam-on time. However, PO 1.25 mm CGS had less intermediate-dose spillage and analogous plan quality compared to clinical PRO-VMAT plans with no additional cost of plan optimization. Further investigation into peripheral targets with PO-MLC algorithm is warranted. This study indicates that PO 1.25 mm CGS plans can be used for RapidPlan modeling for a single dose of lung SBRT patients. PO-MLC 1.25 mm algorithm is recommended for future clinical single-dose lung SBRT plan optimization., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Applying dual, or mixed photon energies during radiation therapy is a common practice in 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Mixed photon energies are used to provide uniform dose coverage to a planning target volume (PTV) that ranges in depth from the skin surface. Though the application of mixed photon energies in 3D-CRT was once the convention for treating anal cancers with lymph node involvement (AC-LNI), the advantages offered by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prove to be the optimal form of therapy for AC-LNI. Recently, multiple researchers have uncovered benefits in employing multiple photon energies in VMAT planning for prostate cancer. A retrospective study was completed to assess the impact of implementing mixed energy VMAT planning in comparison to conventional single energy VMAT planning for AC-LNI. Data from 20 patients with AC-LNI was collected to analyze the dosimetric effects of mixed energy VMAT treatments in terms of PTV conformity index, PTV homogeneity index, monitor unit usage, and organs at risk sparing. For each patient 3 treatment plans were created: a single energy 6 MV plan, a single energy 10 MV plan, and a mixed 6 MV and 10 MV energy plan. Analysis of the resulting dosimetric outcomes showed statistical significance. The current study concluded that mixed energy VMAT plans have some effect on treating AC-LNI when compared to single energy VMAT plans., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)