1. An inactivated whole-virion vaccine for Enterovirus D68 adjuvanted with CpG ODN or AddaVax elicits potent protective immunity in mice.
- Author
-
Senpuku K, Kataoka-Nakamura C, Kunishima Y, Hirai T, and Yoshioka Y
- Subjects
- Humans, Child, Animals, Mice, Antibodies, Viral, Vaccines, Inactivated, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Enterovirus D, Human, Enterovirus Infections, Alum Compounds, Polysorbates, Squalene
- Abstract
Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), a pathogen that causes respiratory symptoms, mainly in children, has been implicated in acute flaccid myelitis, which is a poliomyelitis-like paralysis. Currently, there are no licensed vaccines or treatments for EV-D68 infections. Here, we investigated the optimal viral inactivation reagents, vaccine adjuvants, and route of vaccination in mice to optimize an inactivated whole-virion (WV) vaccine against EV-D68. We used formalin, β-propiolactone (BPL), and hydrogen peroxide as viral inactivation reagents and compared their effects on antibody responses. Use of any of these three viral inactivation reagents effectively induced neutralizing antibodies. Moreover, the antibody response induced by the BPL-inactivated WV vaccine was enhanced when adjuvanted with cytosine phosphoguanine oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG ODN) or AddaVax (MF59-like adjuvant), but not with aluminum hydroxide (alum). Consistent with the antibody response results, the protective effect of the inactivated WV vaccine against the EV-D68 challenge was enhanced when adjuvanted with CpG ODN or AddaVax, but not with alum. Further, while the intranasal inactivated WV vaccine induced EV-D68-specific IgA antibodies in the respiratory tract, it was less protective against EV-D68 challenge than the injectable vaccine. Thus, an injectable inactivated EV-D68 WV vaccine prepared with appropriate viral inactivation reagents and an optimal adjuvant is a promising EV-D68 vaccine., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Yasuo Yoshioka reports financial support was provided by The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University. Chikako Kataoka-Nakamura reports financial support was provided by The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University. Yuta Kunishima reports financial support was provided by The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University. Yasuo Yoshioka reports a relationship with The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University that includes: employment. Chikako Kataoka-Nakamura reports a relationship with The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University that includes: employment. Yuta Kunishima reports a relationship with The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University that includes: employment. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF