Search

Background: Anal infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes 16 and 18 and anal cancer are overrepresented in men who have sex with men (MSM). This study investigated HPV prevalence in young MSM before and after the implementation of a school-based quadrivalent HPV (genotypes 6, 11, 16, and 18) vaccination programme for boys in Australia in 2013., Methods: In this repeated cross-sectional study, MSM aged 16-20 years were recruited from two successive birth cohorts via sexual health clinics and the community in Melbourne, Australia. The first cohort was before the implementation of gender-neutral vaccination (HYPER1 study, done in 2010-12, NCT01422356), and the second was the post-vaccination cohort (HYPER2 study, done in 2017-18, NCT03000933). Men who self-identified as being same-sex attracted were enrolled, and those recruited via the HYPER2 study had to be resident in Australia since 2013 to ensure eligibility. Study procedures were done in the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre. A clinician-collected anal swab and self-collected penile swab and oral rinse were tested for 28 HPV genotypes, and data on demographics and sexual health practices were collected via questionnaires. Only assessable samples were included in the analyses. We compared anatomical site-specific prevalence of HPV genotypes between cohorts by calculating the prevalence ratio, adjusting for age, circumcision, and sex with women. Herd protection was also assessed, by calculating the adjusted prevalence ratios by vaccination status., Findings: 400 MSM, 200 per cohort, were included in the study. In both cohorts, the median number of lifetime male partners was ten (IQR 5-25). The prevalence of any anal quadrivalent vaccine-preventable HPV genotype was higher in the pre-vaccination cohort (54 [28%] of 193) than in the post-vaccination cohort (14 [7%] of 193; adjusted prevalence ratio [PR] 0·24, 95% CI 0·14-0·42), largely driven by decreases in HPV6, followed by HPV11, 16, and 18. Nevertheless, there was also a significant reduction in anal HPV16 and 18 in the post-vaccination cohort from the pre-vaccination cohort (0·31, 0·14-0·68). The prevalence of any penile quadrivalent vaccine-preventable HPV genotype was also higher in the pre-vaccination cohort (21 [12%] of 177) than in the post-vaccination cohort (11 [6%] of 179; 0·48, 0·24-0·97), driven by decreases in HPV 6 and 11, but not by 16 and 18. The prevalence of any oral quadrivalent vaccine-preventable HPV genotype was higher in the pre-vaccination cohort (seven [4%] of 200) than in the post-vaccination cohort (one [1%] of 199; 0·10, 0·01-0·97); there were no cases of oral HPV6 or 11 detected in HYPER2. Comparing the pre-vaccinated cohort with the 149 confirmed vaccinated men from HYPER2 showed a reduction in any quadrivalent vaccine-preventable HPV genotype for anal (0·09, 0·03-0·25) and penile (0·18, 0·05-0·59) infection but not for oral infection (0·17, 0·03-1·08)., Interpretation: A reduction in anal, penile, and oral quadrivalent vaccine-targeted genotypes occurred in young MSM following the implementation of a school-based gender-neutral HPV vaccination programme. The fall in anal HPV16 and 18 may lead to a reduction in the incidence of anal cancer., Funding: Merck and the Australian Government Department of Health., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EPFC is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant (GNT1172873). CKF and CSB are supported by an Australian NHMRC Leadership Investigator Grant (GNT1172900 and GNT1173361, respectively). EPFC and AMC have received educational grants from Seqirus Australia and bioCSL to assist with education, training, and academic purposes in the area of HPV, outside the submitted work. CKF has received research funding from CSL Biotherapies and owns shares in CSL Biotherapies. SMG has received advisory board fees and lecture fees from Merck for work in private time and through her institution (Royal Women's Hospital) funding for an investigator initiated grant from Merck for a young women's study on HPV, and is a member of the Merck Global Advisory Board for HPV vaccination. DAM reports educational grants from Seqirus to assist with education, training, and academic purposes in the area of HPV, and travel funding and honoraria to her institute from Merck, outside of the submitted work. She is also an investigator on a genital warts surveillance grant funded by Seqirus. She also reports grants from Commonwealth Department of Health during the conduct of the study. AMC reports grants from Australian Government of Health National HPV Monitoring Program during the conduct of the study. CSB reports grants from SpeeDx outside the submitted work. EPFC, MYC, CKF, SNT, SMG, and AMC received the investigator initiated grant to conduct the HYPER2 study from Merck. All other authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Syphilis transmission is increasing, and precisely how Treponema pallidum is transmitted sexually from person to person is unclear. We aimed to determine the frequency of T pallidum shedding from potentially asymptomatic sites and the stage of infection at which shedding is most frequent in men who have sex with men (MSM), who have been disproportionately affected by syphilis., Methods: We did a prospective, cross-sectional study in MSM recruited from Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (Melbourne, VIC, Australia). Men were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, reported sex with men during the past 12 months, and had laboratory confirmed primary, secondary, or early latent syphilis, consistent with Australian definitions. Primary and secondary syphilis lesions were swabbed and non-lesion samples were collected via oral rinse, oral cavity swab, anal canal swab, urine, and semen. Samples were tested for T pallidum using PCR assays targeting polA (lesion and non-lesion samples) and 47 kDa (non-lesion samples only) gene targets. The primary outcome was the proportion of men with T pallidum detected from potentially asymptomatic sites-namely, the mouth, anus, urethra, and semen., Findings: Between Nov 30, 2015, and May 23, 2019, 246 MSM were screened for inclusion, of whom 200 had serologically confirmed early syphilis and were included in the study: 54 (27%) of 200 had primary syphilis, 93 (47%) had secondary syphilis, and 53 (27%) had early latent syphilis. T pallidum DNA was detected in 48 (24%; 95% CI 18·3-30·5) of 200 men by oral rinse or oral lesion swab, or both, of whom 24 had no oral lesions. Oral T pallidum detection was most frequent in those with secondary syphilis compared with those at other stages of disease (41 [44%] of 93 vs seven [7%] of 107; p<0·0001), and in men with rapid plasma reagin titres of 1/64 or higher compared with those with lower titres (37 [32%] of 117 vs 11 [13%] of 83; p=0·0026). T pallidum was detected by anal canal swab or anal lesion swab, or both, in 45 (23·0%; 95% CI 17·3-29·5) of 196 men with available samples, of whom ten had no anal lesion. Furthermore, T pallidum was detected in urine samples of 12 (6·1%, 3·2-10·3) of 198 men and in semen samples from six (12·0%, 4·5-24·3) of 50 men who provided samples. Among the 93 men with secondary syphilis, 69 (74%) had T pallidum detected at any site, and 24 (26%) had detection at two or more separate sites. Among the 54 men with primary syphilis, 49 (91%) had T pallidum detected at any site, and 11 (20%) had detection at two or more separate sites. Among the 53 men with early latent syphilis, four (8%) had T pallidum detected at any site and none had T pallidum detected at two or more separate sites., Interpretation: Unrecognised oral and anal shedding of T pallidum occurs in MSM with early syphilis, most frequently in those with secondary syphilis, suggesting secondary syphilis is the most infectious stage and that earlier detection and treatment of syphilis to prevent progression to the secondary stage might improve syphilis control. Future research is needed to ascertain the contribution of shedding of T pallidum from non-lesion sites to transmission of syphilis., Funding: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: To address the increasing incidence of gonorrhoea and antimicrobial resistance, we compared the efficacy of Listerine and Biotène mouthwashes for preventing gonorrhoea among men who have sex with men (MSM)., Methods: The OMEGA trial was a multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind randomised controlled trial among MSM, done at three urban sexual health clinics and one general practice clinic in Australia. Men were eligible if they were diagnosed with oropharyngeal gonorrhoea by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) in the previous 30 days or were aged 16-24 years. They were randomly assigned to receive Listerine (intervention) or Biotène (control) via a computer-generated sequence (1:1 ratio, block size of four). Participants, clinicians, data collectors, data analysts, and outcome adjudicators were masked to the interventions after assignment. Participants were instructed to rinse and gargle with 20 mL of mouthwash for 60 s at least once daily for 12 weeks. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected by research nurses every 6 weeks, and participants provided saliva samples every 3 weeks, to be tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae with NAAT and quantitative PCR. The primary outcome was proportion of MSM diagnosed with oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae infection at any point over the 12-week period, defined as a positive result for either oropharyngeal swabs or saliva samples by NAAT, and the cumulative incidence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea at the week 12 visit. A modified intention-to-treat analysis for the primary outcome was done that included men who provided at least one follow-up specimen over the 12-week study period. The trial was registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000247471)., Findings: Between March 30, 2016, and Oct 26, 2018, 786 MSM were screened and 256 were excluded. 264 MSM were randomly assigned to the Biotène group and 266 to the Listerine group. The analysis population included 227 (86%) men in the Biotène group and 219 (82%) in the Listerine group. Oropharyngeal gonorrhoea was detected in ten (4%) of 227 of MSM in the Biotène group and in 15 (7%) of 219 in the Listerine group (adjusted risk difference 2·5%, 95% CI -1·8 to 6·8). The cumulative incidence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea at the week 12 visit did not differ between the two mouthwash groups (adjusted risk difference 3·1%, 95% CI -1·4 to 7·7)., Interpretation: Listerine did not reduce the incidence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea compared with Biotène. However, previous research suggests that mouthwash might reduce the infectivity of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea; therefore, further studies of mouthwash examining its inhibitory effect on N gonorrhoeae are warranted to determine if it has a potential role for the prevention of transmission., Funding: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Australia introduced a school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program for females aged 12-13 years in 2007, with a three-year catch-up to age 26; and for boys aged 12-13 from 2013, with a two-year catch-up to age 15. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of penile HPV between teenage heterosexual males in cohorts eligible or non-eligible for the school-based male vaccination program., Methods: Between 2014 and 2017, sexually active heterosexual males aged 17-19 were recruited from sexual health centres and community sources across Australia. Males provided a self-collected penile swab for 37 HPV genotypes using Roche Linear Array and completed a questionnaire. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) of HPV between males in two periods: 2014-2015 (preceding implementation of school-based male vaccination) and 2016-2017 (eligible for school-based male vaccination). Self-reported vaccine doses were confirmed with doses reported to the National HPV Vaccination Program Register., Results: Overall, 152 males were recruited in 2014-2015 and 146 in 2016-2017. Numbers of female sex partners and condom use did not differ between the two periods. The prevalence of quadrivalent vaccine-preventable [4vHPV] genotypes (6/11/16/18) was low in both periods (2.6% [2014-15] versus 0.7% [2016-17]; p = 0.371; aPR 0.28 [95% CI: 0.03-2.62]). Compared with men in 2014-2015, men in 2016-2017 had a lower prevalence of any of the 37 HPV genotypes tested (21.7% versus 11.6%; aPR 0.62 [95% CI: 0.36-1.07]) and any of the 13 high-risk genotypes tested (15.8% versus 7.5%; aPR 0.59 [95% CI: 0.30-1.19]). Prevalence of low-risk HPV genotypes did not differ between the two periods. Of the males recruited in 2016-2017, 55% had received ≥1 vaccine dose., Conclusion: The prevalence of 4vHPV genotypes among teenage heterosexual males in both cohorts was low, presumably due to herd protection from the female-only vaccination program. Further studies are required to determine the impact of universal HPV vaccination on HPV prevalence in males., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)