Search

Introduction: Vaccination remains crucial in reducing COVID-19 hospitalizations and mitigating the strain on healthcare systems. We conducted a multicenter study to assess vaccine effectiveness (VE) of primary and booster vaccination against hospitalization and to identify subgroups with reduced VE., Methods: From March to July 2021 and October 2021 to January 2022, a test-negative case-control study was conducted in nine Dutch hospitals. The study included adults eligible for COVID-19 vaccination who were hospitalized with respiratory symptoms. Cases tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within 14 days prior to or 48 h after admission, while controls tested negative. Logistic regression was used to calculate VE, adjusting for calendar week, sex, age, nursing home residency and comorbidity. We explored COVID-19 case characteristics and whether there are subgroups with less effective protection by vaccination against COVID-19 hospitalization., Results: Between October 2021 to January 2022, when the Delta variant was dominant, 335 cases and 277 controls were included. VE of primary and booster vaccination was 78 % (95 % CI: 65-86), and 89 % (95 % CI: 69-96), respectively. Using data from both study periods, including 700 cases and 511 controls, VE of primary vaccination was significantly reduced in those aged 60+ and patients with malignancy, chronic cardiac disease or an immunocompromising condition., Conclusion: Although VE against hospitalization was 78% and increased to 89% after boosting during the Delta-dominant study period, VE was lower in certain high risk groups, for which indirect protection or other protective measures might be of added importance., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: MJM Bonten reports a relationship with Janssen Vaccines and Prevention BV that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. MJM Bonten reports a relationship with Merck Sharp & Dohme UK Ltd that includes: funding grants. MJM Bonten reports a relationship with LimmaTech Biologics AG that includes: funding grants. MJM Bonten reports a relationship with CureVac AG that includes: funding grants. MJM Bonten reports a relationship with Spherecydes that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. MJM Bonten reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: consulting or advisory. MJM Bonten reports a relationship with Pfizer Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. MJM Bonten reports a relationship with Shionogi Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. MJM Bonten reports a relationship with GSK that includes: consulting or advisory. MJM Bonten reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: board membership (DSMB)., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates are essential to identify potential groups at higher risk of break-through infections and to guide policy. We assessed the VE of COVID-19 vaccination against COVID-19 hospitalization, while adjusting and stratifying for patient characteristics., Methods: We performed a test-negative case-control study in six Dutch hospitals. The study population consisted of adults eligible for COVID-19 vaccination hospitalized between May 1 and June 28, 2021 with respiratory symptoms. Cases were defined as patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR during the first 48 h of admission or within 14 days prior to hospital admission. Controls were patients tested negative at admission and did not have a positive test during the 2 weeks prior to hospitalization. VE was calculated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for calendar week, sex, age, comorbidity and nursing home residency. Subgroup analysis was performed for age, sex and different comorbidities. Secondary endpoints were ICU-admission and mortality., Results: 379 cases and 255 controls were included of whom 157 (18%) were vaccinated prior to admission. Five cases (1%) and 40 controls (16%) were fully vaccinated (VE: 93%; 95% CI: 81 - 98), and 40 cases (11%) and 70 controls (27%) were partially vaccinated (VE: 70%; 95% CI: 50-82). A strongly protective effect of vaccination was found in all comorbidity subgroups. No ICU-admission or mortality were reported among fully vaccinated cases. Of unvaccinated cases, mortality was 10% and 19% was admitted at the ICU., Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination provides a strong protective effect against COVID-19 related hospital admission, in patients with and without comorbidity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The long-term impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on pneumonia hospitalizations in all age-groups varies between countries. In the Netherlands, the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) was implemented for newborns in 2006 and replaced by PCV10 in 2011. We assessed the impact of PCVs on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) hospitalization rates in all age-groups., Methods: A time series analysis using Poisson regression was performed on 155,994 CAP hospitalizations. Hospitalization rates were calculated using the total number of hospitalizations as denominator. The time trend in the pre-PCV period (1999-2006) was extrapolated to predict the hospitalization rate in the post-PCV period (2006-2014) if PCV had not been implemented. Rate ratios over time were calculated by comparing observed and predicted time trends., Results: In children <5 years of age, the observed hospitalization rates during the post-PCV period were significantly lower than predicted if PCV had not been implemented (0-6 months: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41-0.96; 6 months - 1 year: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.50-0.90; 2-4 years: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61-0.97). In all other age-groups, rate ratios declined over time but did not reach statistical significance., Conclusions: After introduction of PCV, CAP hospitalizations declined in young children but no clear impact of PCV on CAP hospitalizations was seen in other age-groups., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in males in the Western world and the second leading cause of male cancer death. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) based screening and case finding leads to identification of early stage prostate cancer. It is often difficult to discriminate between patients that need curative treatment and those that can be managed conservatively. Prognostic factors are used to make this clinical decision. Based on the classification proposed by the American College of Pathologists and the World Health Organisation, selected prognostic factors in prostate cancer are described. Clinical applicable factors are stage, grade and serum PSA. Prognostic factors that are not routinely used (for various reasons) are ploidy, histological type and cancer volume in needle biopsies. All other factors (including circulating tumour cells, angiogenesis, growth factors, proliferation rate, apoptosis, nuclear morphometry, neuroendocrine differentiation, loss of chromosomal regions, tumour suppresser genes and adhesion molecules) are promising as prognostic factor although currently their use in clinical decisions is not recommended. The role of these factors in prostate cancer growth and their predictive value are discussed. The rapid developments in molecular techniques allow assessment of structure or function of thousands of genes in a prostate biopsy sample. We expect that molecular characterisation of tumour material will become a clinically important tool to predict prognosis in patients with localised prostate cancer.