Search

Objectives: Epididymovasostomy is commonly performed at the most distal site of the epididymis where whole sperm are present within the lumen, regardless of their motility status. Although more fresh and motile sperm can be found more proximally within the epididymis, it is believed that the outcome of epididymovasostomy is better more distally. Because the current results of epididymovasostomy are far from perfect, it would be ideal to be able to harvest motile sperm for cryopreservation at the time of surgery in case the patient remains azoospermic postoperatively. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the level of epididymal anastomosis and quality of sperm on the outcome of surgery., Methods: An end-to-side epididymovasostomy was performed on 131 azoospermic men with a mean age of 39 years and a mean obstructive interval of 18 years. The etiology of obstruction was vasectomy in 48%, infectious in 19%, congenital in 20%, and unknown in 13%. The average duration of follow-up was 32 months. The overall patency rate was 67% and pregnancy rate was 27%. Subgroups of patients with an anastomosis to the same level of the epididymis on all functional sides were identified as follows: caput (56), corpus (28), and cauda (13). These groups were compared in regard to the presence of motile sperm within the epididymal lumen at the time of surgery, patency rates, postoperative semen quality, and pregnancy rates., Results: Motile sperm were present more often in both the caput (54%) and corpus (61%) than in the cauda epididymis (25%) (P < 0.05). The patency rates for the three subgroups were not significantly different. The postoperative total motile sperm count and pregnancy rate for the corpus epididymis (13 x 10(6) and 45%) was significantly (P < 0.05) better than for the caput (4.4 x 10(6) and 22%) but no different than that of the cauda (10 x 10(6) and 23%). The patency and pregnancy rates for anastomoses performed at levels demonstrating motile sperm were not significantly better than at sites with nonmotile sperm, but the postoperative total motile sperm count was better (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the outcomes of epididymovasostomy to the corpus and cauda epididymis are roughly equivalent and superior to the caput. Therefore, it may be reasonable to move more proximally from the cauda to corpus in the search for motile sperm for cryopreservation during an end-to-side epididymovasostomy. In contrast, moving from the corpus to the caput epididymis has a significant adverse effect upon outcome; it is, therefore, not worthwhile to search for viable sperm for cryopreservation in this clinical setting.

Objectives: Hitherto, patients with testicular dysfunction and azoospermia had to resort to adoption, donor sperm insemination, or child-free living. The realization that a proportion of such men harbor spermatozoa in their testicular parenchyma, combined with the ability of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to effect pregnancy with single sperm, has prompted male infertility clinicians to explore testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in this patient population. We sought to investigate the likelihood of finding spermatozoa during TESE from men presenting with nonobstructive azoospermia and to define if any factors existed that were predictive of eventual sperm presence or absence., Methods: Thirty patients with nonobstructive azoospermia underwent TESE and simultaneous formal testis biopsy, cytologic analysis, and wet preparation analysis. Tissue obtained from TESE was analyzed according to a rigorous protocol, followed by exhaustive searching by trained embryologists., Results: Twenty-one patients (70%) had spermatozoa found on testicular tissue analysis. Neither patient age nor follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level was predictive of the ability to find sperm. With regard to histologic pattern, 50% of men with Sertoli cell-only, 75% of patients with maturation arrest, and 100% of patients with spermatids seen on histologic analysis had sperm retrieved from their testicular tissue during TESE. Absence of sperm on cytologic smear and wet preparation analysis failed to predict the presence of sperm on formal testicular tissue analysis in 40% of patients., Conclusions: Men with nonobstructive azoospermia may have mature spermatozoa present within their testicular parenchyma. Relying on these data, patients should not be excluded from TESE based on serum FSH level, age, prior histopathologic pattern, or cytology/wet preparation results. These figures will allow clinicians to counsel patients with nonobstructive azoospermia informatively regarding TESE and their chances of having testicular sperm retrieved.