Search

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful, degenerative disease that affects the tissues of the joint spaces, such as the shoulder. Conventional medical treatment options, such as corticosteroid injections and anti-inflammatory medications, are not always sufficient to alleviate the symptoms from this disease. Low dose radiotherapy is a newer treatment option for patients with shoulder osteoarthritis and has shown positive outcomes. However, the problem is that there is a paucity of literature about treatment planning considerations for this new treatment option. The purpose of this case study was to provide an example of treatment planning techniques and considerations for shoulder osteoarthritis. Treatment techniques for shoulder LDRT, such as treatment field borders, prescribed dose, beam arrangements, appropriate beam energy, and special considerations are discussed., (Copyright © 2024 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

According to the World Health Organization, burnout is described as having a negative attitude regarding one's work and being exhausted. Previous studies have shown that occupational burnout exists amongst medical dosimetrists, however, the incidence of medical dosimetrist burnout before and after a pandemic warrant continued research. Medical dosimetrists could be experiencing increased burnout in the workplace postpandemic due to staffing shortages and increased remote planning, which may reduce work performance. The researchers utilized a survey to answer research questions regarding whether staffing shortages or remote planning influenced perceived occupational burnout among medical dosimetrists in a post COVID-19 pandemic environment. The survey was intended to assess levels of emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP) and personal accomplishment (PA). It was distributed electronically to 2591 certified medical dosimetrists in the United States through the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists (AAMD) membership database. A total of 160 responses were recorded, resulting in a response rate of 6% (160/2591). The results of this study indicated that increased staffing shortages have a direct relationship with increased burnout incidence. Increased remote work appears to be inversely related to the incidence of burnout among medical dosimetrists., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a frequently employed and guideline-recommended radiotherapy (RT) modality for extremity soft tissue sarcomas (eSTS). Prior studies have demonstrated that significant tumor volume changes during treatment result in loss of target volume coverage with highly conformal techniques such as VMAT, but few solutions exist to these issues aside from adaptive replanning. Here, we describe a related but novel phenomenon in which relatively minor changes in surface volume contour (whether due to daily setup uncertainty, edema of peritumoral tissue, or progression or pseudo-progression of tumor volume itself) can result in unexpected subcutaneous hotspots. This phenomenon is of significant clinical concern given the known association between skin dose and major wound complications during preoperative RT for eSTS. By evaluating daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) images from thirteen eSTS patients treated with VMAT RT, we identify daily surface contour changes (range: 2 mm-15 mm, median: 8 mm) which are frequently below conventional adaptive replanning thresholds. When applied under experimental conditions, these external contour changes did not have major impacts on target volume coverage (range: 30.2%-91.2%, mean: 72.5%) but did result in unexpected hotspots of 125.8% on average (range: 110.0%-142.2%) in the subcutaneous tissues. To mitigate this issue, we develop a methodology for VMAT treatment planning using flash PTV and virtual bolus (VB) to produce robust treatment plans that are more resistant to target volume changes, surface contour changes, and setup uncertainties than conventional planning methods. With this methodology, robust plans were equivalent to standard plans at baseline, but, after incorporation of surface volume changes, both maintained target volume coverage (p < 0.001) and prevented development of subcutaneous hotspots (p < 0.001) better than standard plans. As such, this treatment planning methodology may facilitate development of robust VMAT treatment plans that minimize development of subcutaneous hotspots and preserve target volume coverage in the context of routine volumetric changes during preoperative RT., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Though dosimetry has a multitude of treatment modalities, software, and workflows to aid in the treatment planning process, treatment planners are still responsible for several tedious and monotonous tasks that could decrease their planning efficiency. The purpose of this study was to determine if scripting could improve treatment planning efficiency for multiple brain lesion stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) volumetric arc therapy cases by reducing planning time commitment. A script was developed for multiple brain lesion SRS cases using Eclipse scripting application programming interface with the intention of improving treatment planning efficiency by creating optimization structures and importing prescription and suggested OS dose metrics to the optimizer. Nine treatment planners were each provided with 3 different multiple brain lesion, single-isocenter SRS cases. Each planner created 2 plans for each case. One of these 2 plans used the SRS script, and the other did not. There were 54 treatment plans developed, totaling 27 plan comparisons. Each of the 54 treatment plans were considered clinically acceptable based on the participating institution's plan quality guidelines. Statistical analyses of planning time commitment with and without the SRS script were performed using RStudio. The mean and median planning times with and without the SRS script were compared using a paired T-test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, respectively, and effect size was evaluated using Cohen's classification. Using the SRS script resulted in statistically significant reduction in total contouring time (11.3 vs 2.8 minutes, p < 0.001), optimizer preparation time (7.7 vs 2.1 minutes, p < 0.001), and overall planning time (105.1 vs 77.9 minutes, p < 0.001). This study concluded that scripts developed using Eclipse scripting application programming interface offer an opportunity to improve treatment planning efficiency by reducing the planning time commitment for treatment planners., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Diversity is a critical component in the advancement of human endeavor in science. Students who complete their education and training at diverse schools can serve patients from a wide range of ethnic backgrounds and promote cross-cultural competence. However, developing a diverse environment of professionals is a long-term effort which often takes generations to complete. Increasing awareness of underrepresented genders and/or minorities helps to establish goals for building a future of improved diversity. Specific to radiation oncology, professions such as medical physicists and radiation oncology physicians have reported underrepresented females and minorities. The problem is that there is a paucity of literature regarding diversity of medical dosimetry professionals. The professional organization does not track diversity data for those members currently working in the profession. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to present aggregate data demonstrating the diversity of medical dosimetry applicants and graduates. The methodology involved quantitative data collection from medical dosimetry program directors which answered the research question, what is the diversity of medical dosimetry applicants and graduates? In comparison to the U.S. population, there were less applicant and accepted students of Hispanic/Latino and African American ethnicities whereas the Asian population was higher. While the U.S. population data reveals 3% more females, there were 35% more female than male applicant and accepted students in this study. However, the results differ significantly from medical physics and radiation oncology physicians with only 30% female clinicians., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The author declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to examine if the use of a bolus helmet when treating the head with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) will maintain organs at risk (OAR) sparing while improving the clinical target volume (CTV) coverage. A bolus helmet is a device that aims to improve on the traditionally used range shifter in proton therapy by improving dose distribution characteristics. Ten patients were retrospectively selected who had 2 separate treatment planning scans performed, a scan with the bolus helmet and a second scan without. Plans were created using both scans. Dose to organs at risk (OAR) including the left optic nerve, right optic nerve, optic chiasm, and normal brain minus CTV (brain-CTV), as well as CTV coverage were compared between the 2 plans. The use of the bolus helmet displayed lower mean OAR doses as well as higher CTV coverage, suggesting that use of the bolus helmet provides benefit when treating the head with IMPT., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 3D dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) are 2 methods proven useful for the clinical implementation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung lesions however, similar comparisons of SBRT liver lesions are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine if the conformity of dose, irradiated volume, and dose to organs at risk (OAR) are equivalent or improved with the use of DCAT as an alternative treatment method when compared to standard VMAT for SBRT delivery of palliative and early-stage liver lesions. Twenty patients with liver lesions sized 2.0 to 5.0 cm were selected for this study. Plans were created with both DCAT and VMAT techniques for each patient. Metrics evaluated included the mean heart, kidney, large bowel, small bowel, esophagus, and stomach doses, the lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V 20 ), the volume of the normal liver receiving 15 Gy (V 15 ), conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), and the irradiated volume or volume receiving 25 Gy (V 25 ). The p-values for the mean dose to kidneys, small bowel, esophagus, and the lung V 20 were greater than 0.05, and no statistical difference could be determined between DCAT and VMAT. The p-values for the mean heart, large bowel, stomach, and liver V 15 were less than 0.05, indicating statistical significance and superiority of VMAT for minimizing dose to these organs, especially V 15 of the liver. The DCAT technique produced CI greater than 1.0 for all patients proving superior coverage, while standard VMAT produced significantly improved V 25 with p-values less than 0.0001, and consequently higher HI., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The author declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has affected medical physics and radiation oncology departments and the delivery of radiation therapy. Among the changes implemented in response to the onset of the pandemic was a shift to remote treatment planning by health care institutions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the overall frequency of errors changed after the implementation of remote radiation therapy treatment planning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reported incidents were obtained from an incident reporting database operated by a multisite cancer care facility in the Northeast. Researchers compared the frequency of reported events in a period prior to the start of the pandemic (March 2019 to February 2020) with a period after the onset of the pandemic (March 2020 to February 2021). No significant increase in reported incidents was detected suggesting the efficiency and safety of remote radiotherapy treatment planning., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although auto-contouring methods were created to reduce the workload for the radiation oncology team, concern lies in whether auto-contouring can improve efficiency regarding generated contours of a treatment plan. Researchers have measured differences between auto-contouring algorithms and manual contour methods specific to the contouring of organs at risk (OAR). The problem lies in the paucity of literature specific to perceptions of auto-contouring and the impact on workflow efficiency. The purpose of this study was to measure medical dosimetrists' perceptions of how auto-contouring software impacts the treatment planning process. To measure perceptions, researchers surveyed medical dosimetrists about their perspectives on consistency and efficiency of auto-contouring during treatment planning. A (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) survey was created based on the 2 research questions in this study. The survey was distributed through email to 2598 full members of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists (AAMD) who were certified by the MDCB; mostly medical dosimetrists but also included a small group of medical physicists. The email open rate was 39% (1024/2598) but the response rate for those who read the email was only 8.4% (86/1024). Of the survey respondents, 67% (59/86) used auto-contouring software; thus, eligible to complete the remainder of the survey. Majority of participants agreed that auto-contouring software decreases time spent contouring per patient; however, most agreed that manual contouring is more efficient. Therefore, it was inferred that a combination of both auto and manual contouring have an impact on workload efficiency., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a potential toxic side effect of thoracic radiotherapy. Optimal planning techniques must maintain tumor coverage while limiting dose to normal lung tissue to reduce the risk of patients developing RP. The addition of a noncoplanar arc may be beneficial by increasing treatment angles and providing an ideal dose distribution for tumor coverage while decreasing dose to organs at risk (OAR). The purpose of this research was to compare the effects on the normal bilateral lung tissue receiving 20 Gy, 10 Gy and 5 Gy (V20, V10, V5) and the mean lung dose (MLD) values when medial lung tumors are treated with 3 partial coplanar arcs vs 2 partial coplanar arcs combined with a partial sagittal arc. Researchers hypothesized that a beam arrangement of 2 partial coplanar arcs and 1 partial sagittal arc would reduce V20, V10, V5, and MLD values when compared to a 3 partial coplanar arc plan. In a retrospective study of 5 patients with bulky, medial right lung lesions without nodal involvement, cases were planned with both a noncoplanar and a coplanar arc geometry. Results were evaluated using a two-tailed t-test to determine the statistical significance (p < 0.05) of changes to total lung volume analyzation metrics when a noncoplanar sagittal arc was incorporated compared to the standard lung treatment using only coplanar arcs. Although some patient cases showed minor improvement in the V 20 , V 10 , V 5 , and MLD metrics, the study results were not statistically significant and showed no advantage with the introduction of an anterior sagittal arc over a coplanar beam arrangement., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patient quality assurance (QA) is a required part of the treatment care path, and plan failure can lead to increased personnel hours or delay of treatment. The recommendation by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine is that gamma analysis be used to evaluate measured volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. Vendors have developed many different measurement geometries for patient QA devices which could yield varying pass rates when used with the recommended tolerances, normalization, and criterion. For this study, clinically treated stereotactic body radiation therapy plans were used to evaluate differences in gamma dose tolerances and sampled dose distribution complexity for centralized or peripheral measurement geometries on a cylindrical phantom. Random errors were then introduced into a subset of these plans, and the differences in pass rates between the geometries were correlated with differences in the observed mathematical differences. Finally, a single clinically relevant target coverage deviation was introduced to another subset of plans to evaluate whether a particular geometry is measurably better at identifying clinically relevant errors. It was found that centralized geometries resulted in more lenient dose tolerances and less complex sampled dose distributions compared to peripheral geometries. Pass rates were uniformly lower in the peripheral measurement geometry, and the difference in pass rates between the geometries correlated strongly with the difference in dose tolerance and weakly with the difference in the chosen complexity metrics. However, neither of the geometries were sufficiently sensitive enough to detect clinically relevant changes to target coverage when using recommended tolerances and criteria, and no statistically significant difference was found between their pass rates. Given these findings, the authors concluded that stereotactic body radiation therapy plans could fail patient QA when measured in the peripheral geometry but pass in the centralized geometry, with possibly neither having correlation to true clinical deviation., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The prone position is frequently used for breast irradiation in an effort to minimize dose to normal tissue and reduce skin toxicities. Immobilization required for prone breast irradiation can cause collision issues with the linear accelerator, disrupting treatment and negatively affecting the patient experience. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if an isocenter location guideline could be developed to prevent collisions with the prone breast immobilization device and gantry head, while still creating a clinically acceptable treatment plan. Clearance isocenter guidelines were established by measuring clearance between the Civco Horizon breast board and Varian linear accelerator. Fourteen patients with known clearance issues at a single institution were selected for this study and re-planned using clearance isocenter guidelines. Collision plans were compared to clearance plans created within the established clearance threshold through the institutions breast treatment guidelines based on arm II of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1005 recommendations. Researchers in this study demonstrated clinical relevance by establishing that a clearance isocenter location guideline can be developed to prevent collisions with the prone breast immobilization and gantry head, while still creating a clinically acceptable treatment plan., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) account for almost 70 million physician office visits per year in the United States and are the most common workplace injuries. These are conditions involving the nerves, tendons, muscles, and supporting structures of the body. Previous studies have concluded that computer users are at high risk of developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs). As computer users, medical dosimetrists are at risk of developing WRMSDs, yet there is a lack of information regarding the incidence of WRMSDs among medical dosimetrists. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of WRMSDs and variables of workstation ergonomics that contribute to the increased risk of WRMSDs in medical dosimetrists. A Qualtrics survey was created to support the 3 research questions guiding this study. The survey was distributed to 2,646 full members of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists (AAMD), which included only certified medical dosimetrists (CMDs), via email. The distribution of email surveys sent through the AAMD email distribution list resulted in 988 emails opened, for a contact rate of 37% (988/2646). One hundred sixty-four responses were recorded yielding a completion rate of 17% (164/988). Fifty-five percent (90/163) of participants responded that they have experienced WRMSDs. Forty-four percent (289/652) of responses indicated WRMSDs have a slight or moderate interference on work. Sixty-two percent (94/152) of participants felt that their workstations were not ergonomically designed; even greater 68% (104/153) did not feel their workstations were designed for their individually needs. Of those respondents 64% (98/152) would like to see further adaptations made to their workspaces., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine if the split x-jaw planning technique could be used with Varian linear accelerators to improve plan conformity and limit dose to organs at risk (OAR) for planning target volumes that require field sizes larger than the 15 cm extent of the multileaf collimator in the x-jaw position. Traditional planning techniques include limited and open x-jaw methods. The study population included 20 randomly selected patients with endometrial carcinoma. Treatment plans for each patient were designed using split, limited, and open x-jaw volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for comparison purposes. Dose statistics including the PTV conformity index and dose to OAR were used to evaluate plan performance. The split x-jaw planning method had the most consistent conformity index (0.98 ± 0.02), followed by the open (01 ± 0.03), and the limited (1.04 ± 0.05) techniques. On average, the split method better spared the OAR. In comparison to the limited and open techniques, the split method reduced the dose to the bowel by 3.8%, rectum by 3.2%, sigmoid by 2.1%, right femoral head by 3.5%, and left femoral head by 3.9%. The split and open techniques showed comparable bladder results and were superior over the limited method. The monitor units were highest with the split method leading to increased treatment times. The split x-jaw planning technique should be used with Varian linear accelerators to produce superior volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy plans for planning target volumes larger than the maximum extent of the multileaf collimator in the x-jaw direction., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Decreasing radiotoxicity to the heart, lungs, and contralateral breast has proven to lower the risk of secondary malignancy and improve overall outcomes when treating chest wall (CW) and regional lymph nodes in postmastectomy breast cancer patients. In this retrospective study, 11 postmastectomy patients were selected and planned with a novel hybrid treatment method and a traditional volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) approach for comparison. This hybrid technique was able to optimize tangential beams to minimize heart dose and the VMAT contribution to improve dose conformity around the planning target volume (PTV). Overall, this hybrid technique produced more homogenous target dose coverage and demonstrated a decrease of integral dose to organs at risk (OAR), while the VMAT technique demonstrated a higher affinity for maintaining dose conformity. Further observation of dose distributions also revealed that the hybrid plans were more effective in sparing low-dose spread to healthy tissue in both right- and left-sided cases. This observation was made evident by the reduction in heart V5 and D mean , decreases in all parameters regarding the contralateral lung, as well as all values other than the V20 of the ipsilateral lung. This unique hybrid planning technique could present an alternative to standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning when treating postmastectomy CW and regional lymph nodes, as it has shown the capacity to decrease cardiac, lung, and contralateral breast toxicity while maintaining quality PTV coverage., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiotherapy to an intact breast was previously determined to have a positive correlation between breast separation measurement and hot spot dose. As breast separation measurement increased, hot spot dose increased. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if this correlation persisted despite current techniques including field-in-field (FiF) blocking and mixed photon energies. Radiation treatment plans on unilateral intact breasts from 90 female, early stage breast cancer patients treated with lumpectomy were analyzed. Plans were created using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) nondivergent opposing tangent beams, FiF technique, and 6 MV with or without higher energy photons. Data collected included breast separation measurement, hot spot point dose and location, number of beams, photon energy, clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and breast volume coverage. Correlations between breast separation measurement and each of these values were determined. The positive correlation between breast separation measurement and hot spot dose persisted despite incorporating FiF and mixed photon energies. Correlations were also found between breast separation and the number of beams as well as breast separation and photon energy. Larger breast separations tended to be treated with additional beams of higher photon energy. There were no correlations found between breast separation and CTV or breast volume coverage. The data in this study suggested the medical dosimetrist should expect hot spots above prescription dose of 106%, 107%, and 108% for small, medium and large breast separation sizes respectively. Additionally, adding a high energy photon bean may be indicated with medium and large breast separations., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There were no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric impact of weight loss in head and neck (H&N) patients and examine the effectiveness of adaptive planning. Data was collected from 22 H&N cancer patients who experienced weight loss during their course of radiotherapy. The robustness of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were compared including the potential need for replanning. The dosimetric impact of weight loss was evaluated by calculating a verification plan for each patient on an assessment CT scan taken during the course of treatment. Using a regression analysis, significance was tested for the dosimetric change in target volumes and 10 specific organs at risk (OAR) using an anatomical separation difference in the H&N at corresponding levels. For both the IMRT and VMAT plans, a significant correlation was found for the dose to 5% of the high risk Planning Target Volume (PTV) (D 5 ), dose to 95% of the intermediate risk PTV and Clinical Target Volume (CTV) (D 95 ), and the percentage of the pharynx receiving 65 Gy. An independent t-test was also performed for each metric in the VMAT and IMRT plans showing the dose to 95% of the intermediate risk PTV as significant. No quantitative method for finding the threshold of anatomical separation difference requiring a replan was established. Based on the increase in dose to organs at risk and increased target coverage due to separation loss, it was concluded that adaptive radiotherapy may not always be necessary when alignment of bony anatomy and remaining soft tissue is within tolerance. Physician judgment and preference is needed in such situations., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The head and neck (H&N) region is frequently replanned during intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), but replanning disrupts clinical workflow and presents additional burden on patients. The purpose of this study was to establish a standard treatment planning approach to minimize H&N replanning by identifying a correlation between dosimetric variables and replan frequency. In a retrospective study of 27 bilateral oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with IMPT at a single institution, cases were evaluated using Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression for a significant relationship between replan frequency and the following variables: beam number, clinical target volume (CTV) coverage, presence of dental fillings, and robustness. The reason and timing for replan initiation, and patient immobilization was also recorded to identify trends. Results suggested that beam number, CTV coverage, presence of dental fillings, and the initial robustness curve on the high-dose CTV did not individually contribute to replanning frequency. Setup variation in the soft tissue of the neck was the most prominent reason for replanning. A lack of correlation between the number of replans and the studied dosimetric variables highlights the necessity of verification CT and adaptive replanning in IMPT of H&N cancer. Departments may therefore benefit from a methodical replan workflow. One development showing potential to enhance clinical replan processes is machine learning-based automatic adaptive replanning., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

All but a small number of formal medical dosimetry programs require radiation therapy certification for admission. The problem is a lingering perception from the radiation oncology community that medical dosimetry students must have a prior radiation therapy certification and/or experience. There is a paucity of evidence in the literature to support the perception that prior radiation therapy certification equates to better job performance as a medical dosimetrist. The purpose of this quantitative comparative study was to investigate outcomes of medical dosimetry graduates with and without prior radiation therapy certification (RTT and non-RTT). The researcher used archival records to examine comparison data of medical dosimetry graduates with and without radiation therapy certification including track of enrollment, admissions cumulative grade point averages (CGPA) and science grade point averages (SGPA), medical dosimetry program GPAs, radiation therapy work experience, Medical Dosimetrist Certification Board (MDCB) exam pass rates, program completion rates, and job placement rates. Surveys were used to collect and analyze data from clinical supervisors at affiliate internship sites and from employers of program graduates. Key findings from the quantitative study revealed that no relevant differences existed between RTT and non-RTT medical dosimetrist graduates with regard to GPA and program effectiveness data. However, for RTT and non-RTT students combined, there were significantly lower GPAs noted for individuals who did not graduate from the program or graduates that did not pass the MDCB exam on first attempt. Thematic findings from the surveys revealed non-RTT medical dosimetrist students/graduates required more initial training and supervision and differences were noticed among the non-RTT medical dosimetrist students/graduates based on their prior degree. Clinical supervisors and employers had no reservations about hiring RTT or non-RTT medical dosimetry graduates from the program., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Applying dual, or mixed photon energies during radiation therapy is a common practice in 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Mixed photon energies are used to provide uniform dose coverage to a planning target volume (PTV) that ranges in depth from the skin surface. Though the application of mixed photon energies in 3D-CRT was once the convention for treating anal cancers with lymph node involvement (AC-LNI), the advantages offered by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prove to be the optimal form of therapy for AC-LNI. Recently, multiple researchers have uncovered benefits in employing multiple photon energies in VMAT planning for prostate cancer. A retrospective study was completed to assess the impact of implementing mixed energy VMAT planning in comparison to conventional single energy VMAT planning for AC-LNI. Data from 20 patients with AC-LNI was collected to analyze the dosimetric effects of mixed energy VMAT treatments in terms of PTV conformity index, PTV homogeneity index, monitor unit usage, and organs at risk sparing. For each patient 3 treatment plans were created: a single energy 6 MV plan, a single energy 10 MV plan, and a mixed 6 MV and 10 MV energy plan. Analysis of the resulting dosimetric outcomes showed statistical significance. The current study concluded that mixed energy VMAT plans have some effect on treating AC-LNI when compared to single energy VMAT plans., (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study is to determine if RapidPlan (RP) can be used as a prediction method to determine which left-sided supine breast cancer patients would benefit from the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique. An RP model database was created with 72 clinically approved 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) treatment plans. This model was validated by introducing 10 new patient data sets, creating RP-generated plans and comparing the clinically approved plan for the corresponding patient. The prediction ability of the model was then tested on the free-breathing (FB) scans of patients with clinically approved DIBH plans totaling 29 patients and results were then compared to the FB clinical plan attempts. A statistical analysis performed on the data indicated a strong correlation for the mean heart dose (R 2  = 0.914; p-value < 0.001) with a standard deviation of 48.6 cGy. After validating the link between physician PTV and mean heart dose, the model was tested clinically on 15 patients by inserting "Test PTV Evals" that were contoured by the researchers as a surrogate for predicting mean heart dose. Statistical analysis showed a strong correlation between the dose to 5% of the heart (D 5 ) and the mean heart dose (R 2 values of 0.913 and 0.881, respectively) with a standard deviation for the mean heart dose of 27.2 cGy. It was concluded that by using a Test PTV Eval, the RP-generated plans were able to predict mean heart doses within ± 30.0 cGy., (Copyright © 2018 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this case study is to develop a method to account for the difference in the daily volumes in the bladder, rectum, and targets in prostate radiotherapy and to compare the predicted dose to the actual dose to these organs. Five patients, both prospectively and retrospectively, were selected from 2 different cancer centers, with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer. The patients' planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were contoured on the computed tomography (CT) dataset using either Eclipse or Monaco treatment planning systems (TPSs). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were collected before each daily treatment and exported to MIM software for analysis. The automatically generated reports evaluated the organ volume changes, the actual dose received during a single fraction, and the projected dose to each organ at the completion of the treatment course via comparative cumulative dose-volume histograms (DVHs). Volume changes in the bladder and rectum can cause notable variations in the prescribed dose vs the actual dose received. MIM software was proven to have utility prospectively by tabulating daily dose and projecting final doses, potentially aiding physicians in decisions about the boost plans, thus making offline adaptive radiation therapy (ART) clinically manageable., (Copyright © 2018 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immobilization devices serve several purposes in radiation oncology including improved positional reproducibility and decreased patient movement. If immobilization device beam attenuation is unaccounted for in the treatment planning process, planning target volume (PTV) coverage can be compromised. A retrospective case study was performed to evaluate beam attenuation from head and neck (HN) immobilization devices in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using the Eclipse treatment planning system and the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm. Three facilities retrospectively evaluated 15 patients with various HN carcinomas. A test plan was created from each patient's existing plan in Eclipse to include immobilization devices in the dose calculation. Plan comparisons were performed using dose-volume histograms, which assessed the maximum dose, percentage of the PTV that received 95% of the prescription dose (V 95 ), and dose covering 100% of the PTV (D 100 ). The test plan normalization values were then adjusted to match the original PTV coverage. The maximum dose difference calculated ranged from 0.3% to 4.1%. The absolute difference in V 95 coverage between the HN and the test plans ranged from 0.4% to 2.3%. The difference in the D 100 was more statistically significant, reporting a range of 1.2% to 71.4%. Finally, to achieve the same PTV coverage as observed in the HN plan, an adjustment to the normalization value was needed, which required a change ranging from 0.1 to 7.7. Attenuation from immobilization devices, when unaccounted for, can cause a misrepresentation of the dose delivered to the PTV. It is not a standardized practice among institutions to include immobilization devices within the body contour for dose calculations. However, with the increasing use of volumetric-modulated arc therapy for treatment of the HN region, precision is of the utmost importance, and inclusion of immobilization devices should be standardized., (Copyright © 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to compare the variations in doses to the ipsilateral lung and heart between the supine whole breast and nodal volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique and the prone 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) technique. In this study, 3 patients who were simulated in the prone and supine positions were planned using supine VMAT and prone 3DCRT techniques to compare planning target volume (PTV) coverage as well as dose to organs at risk (ORs), including the heart and ipsilateral lung. Although all constraints were met, the ideal treatment technique depended on the patient's anatomy and lumpectomy location. Supine VMAT provided excellent coverage to the target structures but encountered difficulty in limiting dose to the ipsilateral lung and heart. When compared with the supine VMAT technique, the prone 3DCRT limited dose to the ipsilateral lung and heart but provided less dose coverage to the target volumes., (Copyright © 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this case study is to communicate a technique on treating the re-irradiation of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of anal canal with proton fields matched with electron fields to spare prostatic urethra. A 76-year old male presented with a secondary radiation-induced malignancy as a result of prostate brachytherapy seeds irradiation 10 years prior. A rectal examination revealed a bulky tumor at the top of the anal canal involving the left superior-most aspect of the anal canal extending superiorly into the rectum. The inferior extent was palpable approximately 3cm from the anal verge and the superior extent of the mass measured greater than 5cm in the superior-inferior dimension. Chemoradiation was suggested since the patient was opposed to abdominoperineal resection (APR) and colostomy. The use of proton therapy matching with electron fields in the re-irradiation setting could help reduce the complications. A 2 lateral proton beams were designed to treat the bulky tumor volume with 2 electron beams treating the nodal volumes. This complication of treatment fields helped spare the prostatic urethra and reduced the risk of urinary obstruction in the future., (Copyright © 2016 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The hippocampus is responsible for memory and cognitive function. An ongoing phase II clinical trial suggests that sparing dose to the hippocampus during whole-brain radiation therapy can help preserve a patient׳s neurocognitive function. Progressive research and advancements in treatment techniques have made treatment planning more sophisticated but beneficial for patients undergoing treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare hippocampal sparing whole-brain (HS-WB) radiation therapy treatment planning techniques using volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). We randomly selected 3 patients to compare different treatment techniques that could be used for reducing dose to the hippocampal region. We created 2 treatment plans, a VMAT and an IMRT, from each patient׳s data set and planned on the Eclipse 11.0 treatment planning system (TPS). A total of 6 plans (3 IMRT and 3 VMAT) were created and evaluated for this case study. The physician contoured the hippocampus as per the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0933 protocol atlas. The organs at risk (OR) were contoured and evaluated for the plan comparison, which included the spinal cord, optic chiasm, the right and left eyes, lenses, and optic nerves. Both treatment plans produced adequate coverage on the planning target volume (PTV) while significantly reducing dose to the hippocampal region. The VMAT treatment plans produced a more homogenous dose distribution throughout the PTV while decreasing the maximum point dose to the target. However, both treatment techniques demonstrated hippocampal sparing when irradiating the whole brain., (Copyright © 2016 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to determine whether contouring thoracic organs at risk was consistent among medical dosimetrists and to identify how trends in dosimetrist׳s education and experience affected contouring accuracy. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to contextualize the raw data that were obtained. A total of 3 different computed tomography (CT) data sets were provided to medical dosimetrists (N = 13) across 5 different institutions. The medical dosimetrists were directed to contour the lungs, heart, spinal cord, and esophagus. The medical dosimetrists were instructed to contour in line with their institutional standards and were allowed to use any contouring tool or technique that they would traditionally use. The contours from each medical dosimetrist were evaluated against "gold standard" contours drawn and validated by 2 radiation oncology physicians. The dosimetrist-derived contours were evaluated against the gold standard using both a Dice coefficient method and a penalty-based metric scoring system. A short survey was also completed by each medical dosimetrist to evaluate their individual contouring experience. There was no significant variation in the contouring consistency of the lungs and spinal cord. Intradosimetrist contouring was consistent for those who contoured the esophagus and heart correctly; however, medical dosimetrists with a poor metric score showed erratic and inconsistent methods of contouring., (Copyright © 2016 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this report is to communicate the use of single-positron emission computed tomography scan in planning radiation treatments for patients with a history of radiation to the thoracic cavity. A patient presented with obstructive esophageal cancer, having previously received chemotherapy and radiation therapy to the mediastinum for non-Hodgkin lymphoma 11 years earlier. Owing to a number of comorbidities, the patient was not a surgical candidate and was referred to the University of Washington Medical Center for radiation therapy. Prior dose to the spinal cord and lung were taken into account before designing the radiation treatment plan., (Copyright © 2014 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The University of Wisconsin-La Crosse offers the first online medical dosimetry program in the nation. There is no data to research a program of this type. This research consisted of the evaluation of other distance education programs including health profession programs in addition to face-to-face medical dosimetry programs. There was a need to collect and analyze student perceptions of online learning in medical dosimetry. This research provided a guide for future implementation by other programs as well as validated the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse program. Methodology used consisted of an electronic survey sent to all previous and currently enrolled students in the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse medical dosimetry program. The survey was both quantitative and qualitative in demonstrating attitudinal perceptions of students in the program. Quantitative data was collected and analyzed using a 5-point Likert scale. Qualitative data was gathered based on the open-ended responses and the identifying themes from the responses. The results demonstrated an overall satisfaction with this program, the instructor, and the online courses. Students felt a sense of belonging to the courses and the program. Considering that a majority of the students had never taken an online course previously, the students felt there were no technology issues. Future research should include an evaluation of board exam statistics for students enrolled in the online and face-to-face medical dosimetry programs., (Copyright © 2011 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)