Search

Lactose intolerance has a high prevalence worldwide, ranging between 57% and 65%. It is caused by a reduction or loss of the activity of the intestinal enzyme lactase-phlorizin hydrolase, responsible for the digestion of lactose. This alteration determines an increased osmotic load in the small intestine and the fermentation of lactose by the bacterial flora, which leads to a high production of short-chain fatty acids and gas. This is followed by the onset of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence. In addition to these problems, it was found that subjects with lactose intolerance have an increased risk of developing various extra-intestinal diseases, including cancers. The diagnosis is essential to undertake an adequate treatment and, for this purpose, different methods have been tested. These include genetic test, hydrogen breath test (HBT), quick lactase test, and lactose tolerance test. HBT is the most used method because it is non-invasive, inexpensive, and highly sensitive and specific, as well as easy to perform. In clinical practice, the other methods are mainly used as HBT integration tests. There are also many therapeutic options. An appropriate intervention concerns the dietetic style, such as the consumption of lactose-free foods, but with nutritional characteristics comparable to dairy products. Other valid choices are represented by the use of exogenous enzymes, probiotics, prebiotics, the selection of milk containing specific types of beta-caseins. This review is intended to illustrate the diagnostic methods currently available and the possible therapeutic options for lactose intolerance., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Consumption of milk has been declining sharply in recent decades, particularly in developed countries. One of the reasons for this decline is the diagnosis or perception of lactose intolerance. The aim of this study was to investigate average consumption of milk and dairy products in the Campania region of Italy, one of the main producers of dairy products in the country., Methods: Individuals aged 18 to 75 y and living in Campania were invited to answer an online questionnaire regarding their average consumption of milk and dairy products. The questionnaire was posted on the public access hospital site, as well as on several Facebook pages of friends and hospital personnel., Results: The study found that 22.2% (260 of 1173) of responders from Campania do not drink milk, and 18.1% (213 of 1173) drink lactose-free milk, mainly because of gastrointestinal symptoms. The vast majority of the sample population chose to avoid consuming milk without undergoing the breath test for lactose intolerance or consulting a doctor. Women and underweight people drink more lactose-free milk than milk containing lactose. The population sample does not avoid dairy products; rather, they seem to be consumed quite frequently., Conclusion: The data support the need for mandatory implementation of a nutritional campaign to increase understanding regarding, for example, unnecessary avoidance of milk and excessive consumption of cheese., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The postingestive reinforcing and satiating effects of intragastric (i.g.) infusions of 16% galactose, glucose, and fructose were compared in adult female rats. In Experiment 1, food-restricted rats were trained to drink (30 min/day) flavored solutions (the CS+Gal and CS+Glu) paired with intragastric (i.g.) infusions of galactose and glucose; other flavors (the CS-) were paired with IG water infusions. In subsequent choice tests, the rats strongly preferred (91%) the CS+Glu to the CS-, but avoided the CS+Gal (21%) in favor of the CS-. In Experiment 2, the rats were trained with a CS+Fru paired with i.g. fructose infusions and a CS- paired with i.g. water. In the choice test they consumed similar amounts of CS+Fru and CS- (CS+Fru preference = 51%). In other choice tests they preferred the CS+Glu (>80%) to CS+Fru and CS+Gal, and the CS+Fru (81%) to CS+Gal. Satiation tests were performed in Experiment 3 by adapting the rats to drink a 3% sugar + 0.2% saccharin solution paired with i.g. water infusions (30 min/day). On different test days 16% sugar instead of water was infused. IG galactose, glucose, and fructose produced comparable reductions in sugar+saccharin intake in the first test session. These findings demonstrate that, while the three sugars had similar satiating effects, they differed substantially in their postingestive flavor conditioning effects. The glucose and fructose results confirm prior data indicating that only glucose generates potent postingestive reinforcing stimuli. The galactose-induced flavor avoidance indicates that this sugar has a negative postingestive consequence. This may be due to the slow and incomplete hepatic metabolism of this sugar in adult rats. Conceivably, galactose intolerance may contribute to the lactose avoidance in adult animals.