Search

The impact of irregular breathing on respiratory gated radiation therapy (RGRT) was evaluated for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments. Measurements in the static mode were performed with different field sizes, depths of the measurements, breathing periods and duty cycles, using the Farmer ion chamber, PinPoint ion chamber, and microDiamond detector. The output constancy (OC) was evaluated between gated and nongated beams. Measurements in the dynamic mode for regular and irregular breathing in phase- and amplitude-gated modes, were performed with the amplitude of target motion from 5 mm to 25 mm, and breathing period from 3 to 6 s, for ion chamber, and film inserts. The dose discrepancy was evaluated for the ion chamber insert. The gamma passing rate was evaluated with film dosimetry. In the static mode, the maximum obtained OC was 0.8% using the Farmer ion chamber, 1% (p < 0.001) using the microDiamond detector, and 1.4% (p < 0.001) using the PinPoint ion chamber. In the dynamic mode, good agreement between planned and measured doses was obtained for regular breathing, 2.08 ± 0.48% (1.57 to 2.74%), which increased to 3.42 ± 1.24% (1.58 to 6.69%) for irregular breathing. The gamma passing rate of 3mm/3%, 3mm/2%, 3mm/1% and 2mm/2% was 99.4% ± 0.3, 98.2 ± 0.8%, 88.2 ± 3.0% and 96.4 ± 1.0% for regular and 97.2% ± 1.6%, 95.1 ± 2.6%, 85.6 ± 3.0% and 92.9 ± 2.9% for irregular breathing patterns (p < 0.01), respectively. For a slightly irregular breathing amplitude, lung SBRT cancer patients can be treated in the phase-gated mode., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to evaluate thoracic surface motion from chest wall expansion during free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) methods, measured with and without 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) simulation, using equipment developed in-house. The respiratory amplitude and chest wall expansion were evaluated at 5 levels of the thorax, (the sterno-clavicular joint (SCJ), the second level, the intermammary line (IML), the fourth level and the caudal end of the xiphoid process (XP)) using radiopaque wires and potentiometers, with a CT scan simultaneously. This study included 25 examinees (10 volunteers performed FB, 10 volunteers performed DIBH and 5 patients performed FB). For low and irregular respiration, coaching was used, and its impact was evaluated for both breathing methods, FB and DIBH. The breathing amplitude performed with FB between volunteers and patients was not detectable at the SCJ; increasing to the abdomen, 3 mm vs 2 mm (p = 0.326) at the second level; 6 mm vs 4 mm (p = 0.042) at the IML; 10 mm vs 8 mm (p < 0.01) at the fourth level; and 23 mm vs 19 mm (p < 0.001) at the XP. Contrary to the DIBH, where breathing amplitude was greater at 2 first levels 18 mm (SCJ) and 20 mm (second level), decreasing to the abdomen, 14 mm (IML); 11 mm (fourth level); and 10 mm (XP). Chest wall expansion was not detected at the SCJ, while at other levels measured from 1 to 7 mm. Coaching was improve breathing amplitude, for both methods, FB (3 mm) and DIBH (5 mm). The location of amplification is different depending on the breathing method and the in-house phantom was useful to check the amplification level., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)