Search

Objective: To describe and illustrate a novel technique of uretero-ileal anastomosis for use in urinary diversion - the Pull-through Anastomosis of Ureter To Enteric Conduit (PAUTEC). A second objective was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the PAUTEC anastomosis., Materials and Methods: Our novel anastomotic technique was described step-by-step and visually depicted with illustrations and the accompanying narrated video. Additionally, to evaluate safety and efficacy, a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Patients who underwent radical cystectomy alone or during pelvic exenteration, with ileal conduit diversion incorporating PAUTEC, 2016-2020 with ≥6 months follow-up were included. Surgical outcomes and renal function were analysed., Results: PAUTEC anastomosis was performed on 43 ureters in 23 patients. Mean age was 66 years [50-80] and 21 of 23 patients were male. One patient had a conservatively-managed small urine leak. No ureteric strictures have been identified to date. Mean serum creatinine was 1.15 mg/dL [0.69-2.08] (102umol/L, range 61-184 umol/L) preoperatively, and 1.09 mg/dL [0.61-2.59] (96.3 umol/L, range 54-229 umol/L) at follow-up, demonstrating no significant change (P= .26, paired t-test). Mean follow-up was 15 months [6-44]., Conclusion: A PAUTEC technique of uretero-ileal anastomosis is feasible and technically straightforward, with satisfactory outcomes observed to date., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic penile reconstruction using standardized questionnaires. Whilst organ-preserving penile cancer surgery has evolved, aiming to preserve genital function, reduce psychological morbidity of radical penectomy, and maximise patient quality of life, few studies have evaluated patients' final perceptions., Methods: Following ethical approval, patients post partial/radical glansectomy with reconstruction 2016-2019, under a single surgeon, were identified. Patients were posted a modified Index of Male Genital Image, the IIEF-5, a customised questionnaire exploring outcomes of urinary and sensory function and the EORTC QLQ-C30 to complete and return. Questionnaires were nonidentifiable, however study ID linked responses to the procedure performed., Results: A total of 130 questionnaires were received from 35 patients post penile reconstruction, giving a response rate of 71.4% (35/49). Mean time from surgery was 22 months (4-51), and mean age 61 years (31-79). The majority (82.4%, n = 28) were satisfied or felt neutral about the appearance of their genitalia. High satisfaction with postprocedure urinary function was reported; 85.3% (29/34) could void from a standing position and 79.4% (27/34) reported little or no spraying of urine. Nineteen patients (55.89%) were sexually active, with mean IIEF-5 scores of 14.9 (5-25) (partial glansectomy) and 15.8 (5-25) (radical glansectomy). Mean QoL over past week on 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 scale was 5.88 (3-7)., Conclusion: We report good aesthetic and functional outcomes in a unique study exploring penile cancer surgery patient-reported outcome measures. These results strongly support phallus-preserving phallic-preserving strategies as the standard of care in eligible patients undergoing penile cancer surgery., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)