Search

Introduction: The average hospital length of stay after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is 3 days, with a current trend towards outpatient cases, although no population has been identified. The main objective of the study was to analyze the time to onset of post-operative complications, identify risk factors for significant early complications in order to define a population eligible for outpatient case., Material and Method: The study included 3342 patients with clinically localized renal tumors who underwent RAPN surgery between 2010 and 2021. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of significant complications (SC) (Clavien Dindo>2 [CD]). A CS-free survival analysis was performed. A multivariate logistic regression model was fitted to predict the risk of early significant complications (ESC) after RAPN., Results: The rates of total complications and SC were 14.99% and 3.59% respectively. Median time to SC was significantly longer at 3 days [3.9-5.7] versus 2 days [2.4-3] for total complications (P=0.012). The majority of complications occurred within the first 72h, and the risk factors for early SC (<72h) (ESC) were clamping time (P=0.04) and ASA>2 score (P=0.007). Analysis of survival without ESC showed a significant impact of clamping time (P=0.043) on complication-free survival., Conclusion: Using standard preoperative variables, we were able to determine that the only factor influencing the occurrence of postoperative ESC was ASA score >2 and thus define it as a primary eligibility criterion for an indication of outpatient RAPN subject to a clamp time of less than 20mins., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is the standard treatment for severe stress urinary incontinence in men. While the perineal access is considered the gold standard, some authors have proposed penoscrotal AUS in order to facilitate the procedure. The main objective of our study was to evaluate the duration of survival without revision surgery (SSRC) according to the surgical approach for primary implantation., Material and Methods: Data from 1179 patients implanted in France between 1991 and 2020 with an AMS 800 AUS were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 762 men were implanted perineally (VP) and 417 penoscrotally (VPS)., Results: Median follow-up was 20 vs. 25months respectively. The groups were equivalent overall, apart from the use of anticoagulants (11% VP vs. 6.3% VPS P=0.014). In our population, 54% patients were considered as "dry" in the case of VPS vs. 42% for VP. There was no significant difference in terms of survival time without reoperation, revision, replacement or explantation. In univariate and multivariate analysis, age over 70years was predictive of more reinterventions, whereas the use of a 4.5cm cuff was protective, with hazard ratios of 1.42 (P=0.001) and 0.78 (P=0.04), respectively., Conclusion: The penoscrotal approach does not appear to be associated with more complications, has good functional results and no significant difference in reoperation-free survival. A prospective multicenter non-inferiority study could be of interest to confirm our findings., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)