Search

Introduction: Decisions about treatment prescriptions depend on many factors. For example, the choice of once-daily or multiple administration of an analgesic, an aspect that is not determined by guidelines, depends essentially on medical practice habits, patient preferences, or both. We analyzed this treatment decision for acute back pain in a case-control study., Patients and Methods: A case-control study was conducted in metropolitan France between October and December 2005 among outpatients seeing general practitioners and specialists for acute back pain (cervical, thoracic, lumbar and low back pain). We compared the group treated by a once-daily analgesic (tramadol) with those treated by analgesics (WHO analgesic ladder steps 1 and 2) administered twice daily or more. Patients and physicians were questioned about the different supposed determinants of the treatment choice for acute back pain., Results: Patients for whom physicians prescribed a once-daily analgesic had a history of back pain and previous prescriptions for other analgesics more frequently than the other patients, experienced significantly greater pain and more marked disability. The time to recovery estimated by the physicians was shorter for these patients, as was the time to return to work, estimated by patients. Treatment choice was also guided by the patient's choices: the once-daily analgesic was reserved for patients who prefer to take drugs to prevent pain and prefer a single dose daily., Conclusion: The choice of type of analgesic treatment for acute back pain depends not only on clinical condition (pain and disability), but also on clinical history, the future as envisioned by the physician and the patient's desires. Action to improve treatment choices must integrate these factors, especially as part of an overall education in therapeutics.

Objectives: The aim of this observational study in patients with chronic hepatitis C and treated with interferon alpha-2a was to assess 1) monitoring in everyday practice, 2) the acceptability of treatment and 3) the intensity of fatigue., Methods: Three hundred and fifty four patients were enrolled by physicians in both teaching and general hospitals, or private practice. Before treatment, clinical, epidemiological, and virological data were collected as well as a self-evaluation of fatigue using a visual analogic scale. Clinical follow-up was assessed every 3 months during treatment and 6 months after the end of treatment and included an evaluation of fatigue and the number of workdays missed due to sickness., Results: Two hundred and nineteen men and 135 women, mean age 45 +/- 13, were included. The epidemiological, histological and virological features of this group were similar to those patients usually treated for chronic hepatitis C. Before treatment, the mean measurement of fatigue was 41 on a scale from 0 (perfect form) to 100 (exhausted). Fatigue was unrelated to age, source of infection, biological activity, or histological score. It worsened in patients who stopped interferon after 3 or 6 months, but was stable in patients who continued treatment for 12 months. Fatigue decreased after the end of treatment and was unrelated to treatment response. The need to stop work was strongly related to the intensity of fatigue and the number of workdays missed due to sickness represented nearly two months out of three in 25% of active patients during the first quarter and in 15% of patients thereafter. 61% of patients self-injected interferon (mainly previous drug users) whereas 30% of patients used nurse care throughout treatment., Conclusion: This study not only provides a realistic evaluation of fatigue in patients with chronic hepatitis C, before, during and after treatment, but also highlights its social and economic consequences. It shows the need for further cost-effectiveness studies on new therapeutic strategies using combined treatments.