Search

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of a reinforced analgesic protocol (RAP) on pain control in patients undergoing conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Materials and Methods: Eighty-one consecutive patients (57 men, 24 women) with a mean age of 69 ± 10 (standard deviation) years (age range: 49-92 years) underwent 103 cTACEs. Standard antalgic protocol (50 mg hydroxyzine, 10 mg oxycodone, 8 mg ondansetron, and lidocaine for local anesthesia) was prospectively compared to a RAP (standard + 40 mg 2-h infusion nefopam and 50 mg tramadol). The individual pain risk was stratified based on age, the presence of cirrhosis and alcoholic liver disease, and patients were assigned to a low-risk group (standard protocol) or high-risk group (RAP). The primary endpoint was severe periprocedural abdominal pain (SAP), defined as a visual analog scale score ≥30/100. A predefined intermediate analysis was performed to monitor the benefit-risk of the RAP. Based on the intermediate analysis, all patients were treated with the RAP., Results: The intermediate analysis performed after 52 cTACE showed that 2/17 (12%) high-risk patients (i.e., those receiving the RAP) experienced SAP compared to 15/35 (43%) low-risk patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.98; P = 0.03). Analysis of all procedures showed that 12/67 (18%) patients in cTACE receiving the RAP experienced SAP compared to 15/36 (42%) patients who did not receive it (OR = 3.27; 95% CI: 1.32-8.14; P = 0.01). There were no statistical differences in adverse events, particularly for nausea, between groups., Conclusion: Reinforcing the analgesic protocol by combining non-opioid and opioid molecules reduces perioperative pain in patients undergoing cTACE for HCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article., (Copyright © 2022 Société française de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to that of magnetic resonance imaging obtained with extracellular contrast agent (ECA-MRI) for the diagnosis of a tumor capsule in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using histopathologic findings as the standard of reference., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with pathologically-proven resected HCCs with available preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and ECA-MRI examinations. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed contrast-enhanced CT and ECA-MRI examinations to assess the presence of an enhancing capsule. The histopathological analysis of resected specimens was used as reference for the diagnosis of a tumor capsule. The sensitivity and specificity of CT and ECA-MRI for the diagnosis of a tumor capsule were determined, and an intra-individual comparison of imaging modalities was performed using McNemar test. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Kappa test., Results: The study population included 199 patients (157 men, 42 women; mean age: 61.3 ± 13.0 [SD] years) with 210 HCCs (mean size 56.7 ± 43.7 [SD] mm). A tumor capsule was present in 157/210 (74.8%) HCCs at histopathologic analysis. Capsule enhancement was more frequently visualized on ECA-MRI (R1, 68.6%; R2, 71.9%) than on CT (R1, 44.3%, P < 0.001; R2, 47.6%, P < 0.001). The sensitivity of ECA-MRI was better for the diagnosis of histopathological tumor capsule (R1, 76.4%; R2, 79.6%; P < 0.001), while CT had a greater specificity (R1, 84.9%; R2, 83.0%; P < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement was moderate both on CT (kappa = 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.66) and ECA-MRI (kappa = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.45-0.70)., Conclusion: Capsule enhancement was more frequently visualized on ECA-MRI than on CT. The sensitivity of ECA-MRI was greater than that of CT, but the specificity of CT was better than that of ECA-MRI., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We aim to assess the outcomes of percutaneous ablation of locally advanced HCC in a tertiary center, which is usually not indicated. We compared to sorafenib or trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE)., Methods: We included 272 patients with HCC and tumor portal invasion treated by percutaneous ablation (n = 44) assessed retrospectively from one center compared to a control group from the SARAH trial including patients treated with sorafenib (n = 123) or TARE (n = 105). A propensity-score matching was performed in a subgroup of patients with similar baselines characteristics., Results: 84% of patients treated by ablation were male with a unique nodule (median size 50 mm) in 72.7% of the case. Complete tumor ablation was achieved in 75% of the patients with 20% Dindo-Clavien III-V adverse events including 6.8% of 90-days mortality. Sum of tumor size ≥70 mm was associated with incomplete ablation (p = 0.0239) and a higher risk of death (p = 0.0375). Patients in control group had a higher tumor burden, and more Vp3/4 compared to ablation group. Median overall survival was similar in the ablation and in the control group (16.4 and 14.0 months respectively, p = 0.48). The median progression-free survival was 6.6 months in ablation group compared to 4.2 months in the control group (p = 0.12)., Conclusion: Percutaneous ablation for locally advanced HCC was feasible and associated with similar long-term outcomes to sorafenib or TARE., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mostly occurs in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). HCC treatment may have a direct impact on CLD prognosis. HCC management can therefore become complex, involving multiple health care providers, such as oncologists, hepatologists, radiologists, and surgeons. In France, dedicated nurses have been involved in patient care pathways. Their impact is poorly documented., Purpose: To determine the country-wide distribution of HCC nurse coordinators in French health care settings and to describe their roles and responsibilities., Patients and Methods: A survey using a multi-item questionnaire (including center characteristics, nurse coordinator characteristics, and quality indicators such as patient care pathway initiation timeline, scheduled length of hospital stay, diagnostic disclosure process) was conducted. All French liver cancer centers planning to participate in a prospective national cohort study for patients with HCC (CHIEF Cohort) were invited to take part in the survey. Bivariate analysis compared centers with a nurse coordinator to those without., Results: Among the 42 of 72 centers that replied, 14 treated fewer than 75 HCC patients. Treatment mostly took place in hepatology units (34/42). Sixteen nurse coordinators were part of the health care team in 13 of the 42 centers. Among these 13 centers, 11 were university hospitals and 11 followed more than 75 patients per year. The median number of patients followed in these centers was 300 (min-max 44-600) in 2017. All nurse coordinators were involved in providing patient information and counseling. Other roles included treatment monitoring (13/16), care coordination (12/16), psychological support (12/16) and treatment planning (11/16). Thirteen nurse coordinators conducted diagnostic disclosure nurse consultations; seven conducted initial patient contact consultations; and six held outpatient nurse consultations, with wide heterogeneity between centers. The presence of a nurse coordinator was associated with completion of the full diagnostic disclosure process (p = 0.045)., Conclusion: In France, nurse coordinators for HCC patient pathway management are present mainly in university hepatology units with a caseload of more than 75 patients per year. All provide patient information and counseling but their roles in care coordination, patient support and holistic assessment are heterogeneous and not standardized., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) published in March 2019., Method: It is a collaborative work under the auspices of most of the French medical societies involved in the management of HCC. It is based on the previous guidelines published in 2017. Recommendations are graded in 3 categories according to the level of evidence of data found in the literature., Results: The diagnosis and staging of HCC is essentially based on clinical, biological and imaging features. A pathological analysis obtained by a biopsy of tumoral and non-tumoral liver is recommended. HCCs can be divided into 2 groups, taking into account not only the tumor stage, but also liver function. HCCs accessible to curative treatments are tumors that are in Milan criteria or with an AFP score ≤ 2, mainly treated by surgical resection, local ablation or liver transplantation. Intermediate and advanced HCCs with no liver insufficiency, accessible only to palliative treatments, benefit from TACE, SIRT or systemic therapy according to the presence or absence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread., Conclusion: Such recommendations are in permanent optimization and each individual case must be discussed in a multidisciplinary expert board., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune-related hepatitis (IRH) occurs in 1 to 18% of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated patients. Steroids are usually recommended for grade≥3 IRH, but their impact on IRH resolution and patient survival remains unclear., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a prospective cohort of 339 patients treated at Saint-Louis Hospital (Paris, France) with ICIs for advanced melanoma. Cases of grade≥3 IRH were collected and analyzed. Two groups were compared for their biological features and time for IRH resolution and survival: patients who received steroids (steroids group: SG) and patients who did not (nonsteroids group: NSG)., Findings: Grade≥3 IRH was observed in 21 patients. Thirteen were treated with steroids (SG), and 8 were not (NSG). The median time for toxicity resolution was 49 days in SG and 24 days in NSG (P=0.62). All but one patient showed a favorable outcome. Two-year survival was 56% in SG and 54% in NSG (P=0.83). Higher transaminase (P=0.002) and bilirubin (P=0.008) and lower prothrombin (P=0.035) levels were observed in SG than in NSG. For 8 (4 SG/4 NSG) patients, ICI was resumed without any hepatitis relapse., Interpretation: Favorable outcomes may be achieved spontaneously and with no steroids in patients with severe IRH. Steroid initiation should be discussed in cases of high bilirubin levels and decreased prothrombin levels. ICI could be resumed without hepatitis relapse. We propose a management algorithm for grade≥3 IRH that should be validated in larger and prospective cohorts., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stands as a major health problem worldwide. The management of advanced HCC, limited for a longtime by the disappointing results of conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies, has recently changed with the publication of the results of the Sorafenib Hepatocellular Carcinoma Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP) trial, which demonstrated an overall survival benefit over placebo in patients with advanced HCC. This study was further confirmed by the Asian-Pacific trial using sorafenib in Eastern patients. Those trials demonstrated that therapeutic benefits may derive from improving our knowledge of deregulated signaling pathways involved in HCC carcinogenesis. This review summarizes the results of clinical trials in which targeted therapies are currently evaluated aiming to enlarge the therapeutic armamentarium for HCC in a near future., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)