Search

Lifestyle choices and consumption play a large role in contributing to per capita greenhouse gas emissions. Certain activities, like fossil fuel ground transportation, long-haul flights, diets with animal products and residential heating and cooling contribute significantly to per capita emissions. There is uncertainty around whether literacy about these actions encourages individuals to act pro-environmentally to reduce personal carbon footprints or to prioritize the most effective actions. This study investigated the relationship between carbon literacy and pro-environmental actions performed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions among undergraduate engineering students at the University of Toronto. The pro-environmental actions by the participants produced an average carbon footprint of 4.8 tCO 2 (within the subset of actions included in the survey) which was lower than the average for residents each of Toronto, Ontario, and Canada overall but still higher than the global target of ∼2.8 tCO 2 e. The carbon literacy by participants was best for high impact actions like ground transportation and dietary choices but less so for air travel and there was mixed awareness for the moderate and low impact actions. For high impact actions and many moderate and low impact actions, participants who thought the action was high impact (even if incorrect) had lower carbon footprints related to the associated activity than those who thought the action was moderate or low impact. The overall relationship between pro-environmental action and carbon literacy was weak. It showed that for high impact actions, there is a slight negative correlation between carbon literacy and personal carbon footprint whereas for moderate and low impact actions, there is a positive correlation., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Sherry-Ann Ram reports financial support was provided by 10.13039/501100004489Mitacs Research Training Award. Sherry-Ann Ram, I. Daniel Posen, Heather MacLean, Deborah Tihanyi reports a relationship with 10.13039/501100003579University of Toronto Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering that includes: employment and funding grants. As a follow-up to the response provided in Question 2, authors I. Daniel Posen, Heather MacLean, Deborah Tihanyi are professors and Sherry-Ann Ram is a PhD student at the University of Toronto within the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. This is the Faculty in which the survey for the study was administered., (© 2023 The Authors.)