Search

The activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) is a member of the ATF/cAMP-response element-binding protein family of basic-leucine zipper proteins involved in cellular stress response. The transcription potential of ATF2 is enhanced markedly by NH2-terminal phosphorylation by c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) and mediates stress responses including DNA-damaging events. We have observed that four DNA-damaging agents (cisplatin, actinomycin D, MMS, and etoposide), but not the cisplatin isomer, transplatin, which does not readily damage DNA, strongly activate JNK, p38, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and strongly increase phosphorylation and ATF2-dependent transcriptional activity. Selective inhibition studies with PD98059, SB202190, SP600125, and the dominant negative JNK indicate that activation of JNK but not p38 kinase or ERK kinase is required for the phosphorylation and transcriptional activation of ATF2. Stable expression of ATF2 in human breast carcinoma BT474 cells increases transcriptional activity and confers resistance to the four DNA-damaging agents, but not to transplatin. Conversely, stable expression of a dominant negative ATF2 (dnATF2) quantitatively blocks phosphorylation of endogenous ATF2 leading to a marked decrease in transcriptional activity by endogenous ATF2 and a markedly increased sensitivity to the four agents as judged by decreased cell viability. Similarly, application of SB202190 at 50 micro m or SP600125 inhibited JNK activity, blocked transactivation, and sensitized parental cells to the four DNA-damaging drugs. Moreover, the wild type ATF2-expressing clones exhibited rapid DNA repair after treatment with the four DNA-damaging agents but not transplatin. Conversely, expression of dnATF2 quantitatively blocks DNA repair. These results indicate that JNK-dependent phosphorylation of ATF2 plays an important role in the drug resistance phenotype likely by mediating enhanced DNA repair by a p53-independent mechanism. JNK may be a rational target for sensitizing tumor cells to DNA-damaging chemotherapy agents.

We studied the roles of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K)-Akt-BAD cascade, ERK-BAD cascade, and Akt-Raf-1 cascade in the paclitaxel-resistant SW626 human ovarian cancer cell line, which lacks functional p53. Treatment of SW626 cells with paclitaxel activates Akt and ERK with different time frames. Interference with the Akt cascade either by treatment with PI-3K inhibitor (wortmannin or LY294002) or by exogenous expression of a dominant negative Akt in SW626 cells caused decreased cell viability following treatment with paclitaxel. Interference with the ERK cascade by treatment with an MEK inhibitor, PD98059, in SW626 cells also caused decreased cell viability following treatment with paclitaxel. Treatment of cells with paclitaxel also stimulated the phosphorylation of BAD at both the Ser-112 and Ser-136 sites. The phosphorylation of BAD at Ser-136 was blocked by treatment with wortmannin or cotransfection with the dominant negative Akt. On the other hand, the phosphorylation of BAD at Ser-112 was blocked by PD98059. We further examined the role of BAD in the viability following paclitaxel treatment using BAD mutants. Exogenous expression of doubly substituted BAD2SA in SW626 cells caused decreased viability following treatment with paclitaxel. Moreover, because paclitaxel-induced apoptosis is mediated by activated Raf-1 and the region surrounding Ser-259 in Raf-1 conforms to a consensus sequence for phosphorylation by Akt, the regulation of Raf-1 by Akt was examined. We demonstrated an association between Akt and Raf-1 and showed that the phosphorylation of Raf-1 on Ser-259 induced by paclitaxel was blocked by treatment with wortmannin or LY294002. Furthermore, interference with the Akt cascade induced by paclitaxel up-regulated Raf-1 activity, and expression of constitutively active Akt inhibited Raf-1 activity, suggesting that Akt negatively regulates Raf-1. Our findings suggest that paclitaxel induces the phosphorylation of BAD Ser-112 via the ERK cascade, and the phosphorylation of both BAD Ser-136 and Raf-1 Ser-259 via the PI-3K-Akt cascade, and that inhibition of either of these cascades sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to paclitaxel.

Raloxifene is a tissue-selective estrogen receptor modulator. The effect of estrogen on cardiovascular disease is mainly dependent on direct actions on the vascular wall involving activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) via Akt and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) cascades. Although raloxifene is also known to activate eNOS in the vascular endothelium, the molecular mechanism responsible for this effect remains to be elucidated. In studies of both human umbilical vein endothelial cells and simian virus 40-transformed rat lung vascular endothelial cells (TRLECs), the raloxifene analog LY117018 caused acute phosphorylation of eNOS that was unaffected by actinomycin D and was blocked by the pure estrogen receptor antagonist ICI182,780. Activation of Akt by raloxifene reached a plateau at 15-30 min and declined thereafter, a similar time frame to that of Akt activation by 17beta-estradiol. On the other hand, both activation and phosphorylation of ERK by raloxifene showed a biphasic pattern (peaks at 5 min and 1 h), whereas ERK activation and phosphorylation by 17beta-estradiol reached a plateau at 5 min and declined thereafter. A MEK inhibitor, PD98059, had no effect on the raloxifene-induced Akt activity, suggesting an absence of cross-talk between the ERK and Akt cascades. Either exogenous expression of a dominant-negative Akt or pretreatment of TRLECs with PD98059 decreased the raloxifene-induced eNOS phosphorylation. Moreover, raloxifene stimulated the activation of Akt, ERK, and eNOS in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing estrogen receptor alpha but not Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing estrogen receptor beta. Our findings suggest that raloxifene-induced eNOS phosphorylation is mediated by estrogen receptor alpha via a nongenomic mechanism and is differentially mediated by Akt- and ERK-dependent cascades.

Although estrogen is known to activate endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in the vascular endothelium, the molecular mechanism responsible for this effect remains to be elucidated. In studies of both human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and simian virus 40-transformed rat lung vascular endothelial cells (TRLECs), 17beta-estradiol (E2), but not 17alpha-E2, caused acute activation of eNOS that was unaffected by actinomycin D and was specifically blocked by the pure estrogen receptor antagonist ICI-182,780. Treatment of both TRLECs and HUVECs with 17beta-E2 stimulated the activation of Akt, and the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin blocked the 17beta-E2-induced activation of Akt. 17beta-E2-induced Akt activation was also inhibited by ICI-182,780, but not by actinomycin D. Either treatment with wortmannin or exogenous expression of a dominant negative Akt in TRLECs decreased the 17beta-E2-induced eNOS activation. Moreover, 17beta-E2-induced Akt activation actually enhances the phosphorylation of eNOS. 17beta-E2-induced Akt activation was dependent on both extracellular and intracellular Ca(2+). We further examined the 17beta-E2-induced Akt activity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transiently transfected with cDNAs for estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) or estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta). 17beta-E2 stimulated the activation of Akt in CHO cells expressing ERalpha but not in CHO cells expressing ERbeta. Our findings suggest that 17beta-E2 induced eNOS activation through an Akt-dependent mechanism, which is mediated by ERalpha via a nongenomic mechanism.

Regulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the gonadotrope cell line LbetaT2 was investigated. Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK). Activation of ERK by GnRHa occurred within 5 min, and declined thereafter, whereas activation of JNK by GnRHa occurred with a different time frame, i.e. it was detectable at 5 min, reached a plateau at 30 min, and declined thereafter. GnRHa-induced ERK activation was dependent on protein kinase C or extracellular and intracellular Ca(2+), whereas GnRHa-induced JNK activation was not dependent on protein kinase C or on extracellular or intracellular Ca(2+). To determine whether a mitogen-activated protein kinase family cascade regulates rat luteinizing hormone beta (LHbeta) promoter activity, we transfected the rat LHbeta (-156 to +7)-luciferase construct into LbetaT2 cells. GnRH activated the rat LHbeta promoter activity in a time-dependent manner. Neither treatment with a mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitor, PD98059, nor cotransfection with a catalytically inactive form of a mitogen-activated protein kinase construct inhibited the induction of the rat LHbeta promoter by GnRH. Furthermore, cotransfection with a dominant negative Ets had no effect on the response of the rat LHbeta promoter to GnRH. On the other hand, cotransfection with either dominant negative JNK or dominant negative c-Jun significantly inhibited the induction of the rat LHbeta promoter by GnRH. In addition, GnRH did not induce either the rat LHbeta promoter activity in LbetaT2 cells transfected stably with dominant negative c-Jun. These results suggest that GnRHa differentially activates ERK and JNK, and a JNK cascade is necessary to elicit the rat LHbeta promoter activity in a c-Jun-dependent mechanism in LbetaT2 cells.

Regulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family by prolactin-releasing peptide (PrRP) in both GH3 rat pituitary tumor cells and primary cultures of rat anterior pituitary cells was investigated. PrRP rapidly and transiently activated extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) in both types of cells. Both pertussis toxin, which inactivates G(i)/G(o) proteins, and exogenous expression of a peptide derived from the carboxyl terminus of the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase I, which specifically blocks signaling mediated by the betagamma subunits of G proteins, completely blocked the PrRP-induced ERK activation, suggesting the involvement of G(i)/G(o) proteins in the PrRP-induced ERK activation. Down-regulation of cellular protein kinase C did not significantly inhibit the PrRP-induced ERK activation, suggesting that a protein kinase C-independent pathway is mainly involved. PrRP-induced ERK activation was not dependent on either extracellular Ca(2+) or intracellular Ca(2+). However, the ERK cascade was not the only route by which PrRP communicated with the nucleus. JNK was also shown to be significantly activated in response to PrRP. JNK activation in response to PrRP was slower than ERK activation. Moreover, to determine whether a MAPK family cascade regulates rat prolactin (rPRL) promoter activity, we transfected the intact rPRL promoter ligated to the firefly luciferase reporter gene into GH3 cells. PrRP activated the rPRL promoter activity in a time-dependent manner. Co-transfection with a catalytically inactive form of a MAPK construct or a dominant negative JNK, partially but significantly inhibited the induction of the rPRL promoter by PrRP. Furthermore, co-transfection with a dominant negative Ets completely abolished the response of the rPRL promoter to PrRP. These results suggest that PrRP differentially activates ERK and JNK, and both cascades are necessary to elicit rPRL promoter activity in an Ets-dependent mechanism.

We have studied the roles of c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK) and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) cascade in both the cisplatin-resistant Caov-3 and the cisplatin-sensitive A2780 human ovarian cancer cell lines. Treatment of both cells with cisplatin but not transplatin isomer activates JNK and ERK. Activation of JNK by cisplatin occurred at 30 min, reached a plateau at 3 h, and declined thereafter, whereas activation of ERK by cisplatin showed a biphasic pattern, indicating the different time frame. Activation of JNK by cisplatin was maximal at 1000 microM, whereas activation of ERK was maximal at 100 microM and was less at higher concentrations, indicating the different dose dependence. Cisplatin-induced JNK activation was neither extracellular and intracellular Ca(2+)- nor protein kinase C-dependent, whereas cisplatin-induced ERK activation was extracellular and intracellular Ca(2+)- dependent and protein kinase C-dependent. A mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase inhibitor, PD98059, had no effect on the cisplatin-induced JNK activity, suggesting an absence of cross-talk between the ERK and JNK cascades. We further examined the effect of each cascade on the viability following cisplatin treatment. Either exogenous expression of dominant negative c-Jun or the treatment by PD98059 induced sensitivity to cisplatin in both cells. Our findings suggest that cisplatin-induced DNA damage differentially activates JNK and ERK cascades and that inhibition of either of these cascades sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin.

Previous studies in our laboratories have revealed that juvenile visceral steatosis mice show suppressed transcription of urea cycle enzyme genes during development and are systemically deficient in carnitine. It has not yet been explained, however, how this carnitine deficiency relates to the abnormal gene expression. We investigated the effect of carnitine on abnormal gene expression, growth retardation, and fatty liver. Carnitine administration relieved the suppression of the developmental induction of two urea cycle enzymes examined, carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase and argininosuccinate synthase, and kept the activities of enzymes normal. However, carnitine did not reduce accumulated lipid in the liver to the normal level. These results suggest that carnitine deficiency plays an important role in the abnormal expression of urea cycle enzyme genes and that the abnormal expression of the genes is not directly caused by lipid accumulation in the liver.