14 results on '"Sarantopoulos, Stefanie"'
Search Results
2. A More MAGICal Alogrithm in Acute GVHD.
- Author
-
Hong S and Sarantopoulos S
- Subjects
- Humans, Thinking, Magic, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. A Phase I Trial of SYK Inhibition with Fostamatinib in the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.
- Author
-
Lin C, DiCioccio RA, Haykal T, McManigle WC, Li Z, Anand SM, Poe JC, Bracken SJ, Jia W, Alyea EP 3rd, Cardones AR, Choi T, Gasparetto C, Grunwald MR, Hennig T, Kang Y, Long GD, Lopez R, Martin M, Minor KK, Quinones VLP, Sung AD, Wiggins K, Chao NJ, Horwitz ME, Rizzieri DA, and Sarantopoulos S
- Subjects
- Humans, Animals, Mice, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local complications, Aminopyridines therapeutic use, Oxazines pharmacology, Oxazines therapeutic use, Pyridines pharmacology, Pyridines therapeutic use, Steroids therapeutic use, Syk Kinase therapeutic use, Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome, Graft vs Host Disease prevention & control
- Abstract
Despite the exciting advancement of novel therapies, chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains the most common cause of non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Frontline treatment of cGVHD involves systemic steroids, which are associated with significant morbidities. We previously found that inhibition of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) with fostamatinib preferentially eradicated aberrantly activated B cells in both ex vivo studies of cGVHD patient B cells, as well as in vivo mouse studies. These and other preclinical studies implicated hyper-reactive B-cell receptor signaling and increased SYK expression in the pathogenesis of cGVHD and compelled this first in-human allogeneic HCT clinical trial. We investigated the safety and efficacy of the oral SYK inhibitor, fostamatinib, for both the prevention and treatment of cGVHD. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of fostamatinib and determine its maximum tolerated dose in the post-HCT setting. Secondary objectives included assessing the efficacy of fostamatinib in preventing and treating cGVHD, as well as examining alterations in B-cell compartments with treatment. This was a single-institution phase I clinical trial that evaluated the use of fostamatinib in allogeneic HCT patients before the development of cGVHD or at the time of steroid-refractory cGVHD (SR-cGVHD). Patients received fostamatinib at one of three dose levels using a continual reassessment algorithm to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Multiparameter flow cytometry was used to evaluate changes in B cell subpopulations over the first year of treatment with fostamatinib. Nineteen patients were enrolled in this phase I trial, with 5 in the prophylaxis arm and 14 in the therapeutic arm. One patient (5%) required discontinuation of therapy for a dose-limiting toxicity. At a median follow-up of over 3 years, no patients had cancer relapse while on fostamatinib treatment, and recurrent malignancy was observed in 1 patient 2 years after the end of therapy. In the prophylaxis arm, 1 of 5 patients (20%) developed cGVHD while on fostamatinib. In the therapeutic arm, the overall response rate was 77%, with a complete response rate of 31%. The median duration of response was 19.3 months and the 12-month failure-free survival was 69% (95% confidence interval, 48-100). Patients were able to reduce their steroid dose by a median of 80%, with 73% remaining on a lower dose at 1 year compared to baseline. There was an early reduction in the proportion of IgD
- CD38hi plasmablast-like cells with fostamatinib treatment, particularly in those SR-cGVHD patients who had an eventual response. B-cell reconstitution was not significantly impacted by fostamatinib therapy after allogeneic HCT. Fostamatinib featured a favorable safety profile in the post-HCT setting. Our data suggests an early efficacy signal that was associated with effects on expected cell targets in both the prophylaxis and treatment of cGVHD, providing rationale for a phase II investigation., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Toward a Better Understanding of the Atypical Features of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Report from the 2020 National Institutes of Health Consensus Project Task Force.
- Author
-
Cuvelier GDE, Schoettler M, Buxbaum NP, Pinal-Fernandez I, Schmalzing M, Distler JHW, Penack O, Santomasso BD, Zeiser R, Angstwurm K, MacDonald KPA, Kimberly WT, Taylor N, Bilic E, Banas B, Buettner-Herold M, Sinha N, Greinix HT, Pidala J, Schultz KR, Williams KM, Inamoto Y, Cutler C, Griffith LM, Lee SJ, Sarantopoulos S, Pavletic SZ, and Wolff D
- Subjects
- Chronic Disease, Consensus, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Prospective Studies, United States, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis
- Abstract
Alloreactive and autoimmune responses after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation can occur in nonclassical chronic graft-versus-host disease (chronic GVHD) tissues and organ systems or manifest in atypical ways in classical organs commonly affected by chronic GVHD. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus projects were developed to improve understanding and classification of the clinical features and diagnostic criteria for chronic GVHD. Although still speculative whether atypical manifestations are entirely due to chronic GVHD, these manifestations remain poorly captured by the current NIH consensus project criteria. Examples include chronic GVHD impacting the hematopoietic system as immune mediated cytopenias, endothelial dysfunction, or as atypical features in the musculoskeletal system, central and peripheral nervous system, kidneys, and serous membranes. These purported chronic GVHD features may contribute significantly to patient morbidity and mortality. Most of the atypical chronic GVHD features have received little study, particularly within multi-institutional and prospective studies, limiting our understanding of their frequency, pathogenesis, and relation to chronic GVHD. This NIH consensus project task force report provides an update on what is known and not known about the atypical manifestations of chronic GVHD while outlining a research framework for future studies to be undertaken within the next 3 to 7 years. We also provide provisional diagnostic criteria for each atypical manifestation, along with practical investigation strategies for clinicians managing patients with atypical chronic GVHD features., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest G.D.E.C. received consultancy fees from Miltenyi Biotech. M.S. received consultancy fees from Chugai/Roche, Hexal/Sandoz, Gilead, AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, Boehringer/Ingelheim, onkowissen.de, EUSA-Pharma, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Medac, and Lilly, travel support from Chugai/Roche, Boehringer/Ingelheim, Celgene, Medac, UCB, Mylan, and honoraria from BMS, Novartis, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Chugai/Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead, Boehringer/Ingelheim. O.P. received honoraria or travel support from Astellas, Gilead, Jazz, MSD, Neovii Biotech, Novartis, Pfizer and Therakos, received research support from Gilead, Incyte, Jazz, Neovii Biotech and Takeda, and is a member of advisory boards to Jazz, Gilead, MSD, Omeros, Priothera, Shionogi and SOBI. BDS has received consultancy fees from Janssen, Legend Biotech, Kite/Gilead, Celgene, BMS, and Incyte, and is a member of advisory board to In8bio. W.T.K. received grant support and consulting fees from Biogen and NControl Therapeutics, Inc. M. B.-H. received speaker fees from Alexion and Sanofi and received a grant for an advanced training course from Norvatis. R.Z. received speaker fees from Novartis, Incyte and Mallinckrodt. K.A. received travel support from Alexion, Bayer, Biogenldec, MerckSerono, Novartis, Teva (until 2014) and received honoraria from Biogenldec. Y.I. served on advisory boards for Novartis, Janssen, and Meiji Seika Pharma. S.J.L. received consultant fees from Mallinckrodt, Equillium, Kadmon; research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Kadmon, Novartis, Pfizer, Syndax, Takeda; drug supply from Janssen; she is on an Incyte Steering Committee. S.P. received research support from the Center for Cancer Research at the National Cancer Institute through the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program, which includes Clinical Research Development Agreements with Celgene, Actelion, Eli Lilly, Pharmacyclics and Kadmon Corporation. D.W. received research grant support from Novartis and honoraria from Novartis, Mallinckrodt, Behring, Takeda, Neovii, Gilead and Pfizer., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Geriatric Assessment Reveals Actionable Impairments in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Candidates Age 18 to 80 Years.
- Author
-
Lew MV, Ren Y, Lowder YP, Siamakpour-Reihani S, Ramalingam S, Romero KM, Thompson JC, Bohannon LM, McIntyre J, Tang H, Van Opstal J, Johnson E, Cohen HJ, Bartlett DB, Pastva AM, Morey M, Hall KS, Smith P, Peters KB, Somers TJ, Kelleher S, Smith SK, Wischmeyer PE, Lin PH, Wood WA, Thorpe G, Minor K, Wiggins K, Hennig T, Helms T, Welch R, Matthews B, Liu J, Burleson J, Aberant T, Engemann AK, Henshall B, Darby M, Proch C, Dellascio M, Pittman A, Suminguit J, Choi T, Gasparetto C, Long GD, Lopez RD, Sarantopoulos S, Horwitz ME, Chao NJ, and Sung AD
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Geriatric Assessment, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Transplantation, Homologous, Young Adult, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Transplantation Conditioning
- Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for both malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases; however, reported rates of treatment-related mortality approach 30%. Outcomes are worse in patients who begin HCT with functional impairments. To detect such impairments, a geriatric assessment (GA) is recommended in adults age ≥65 years. Younger HCT candidates also may be impaired because of chemotherapy regimens pre-HCT. Therefore, we hypothesized that GA can be beneficial for adult patients of all ages and subsequently created a clinical pretransplantation optimization program to assess all HCT candidates using a modified GA. One-hundred fifty-seven patients were evaluated in 4 functional domains- physical, cognitive, nutritional, and psychological-at 2 time points prior to HCT-new patient evaluation (NPE) and sign-off (SO)-between October 2017 and January 2020. At NPE, 80.9% of the patients had at least 1 domain with a functional impairment, and physical (P = .006), cognitive (P = .04), and psychological (P = .04) impairments were associated with an increased likelihood of not proceeding to HCT. In addition, patients age 18 to 39 years were more likely than older patients to have a physical function impairment (P = .001). Between NPE and SO, 51.9% of the patients had resolution of 1 or more impairments, and nutritional impairment at SO was predictive of worse overall survival (P = .01). Our study shows that GA can identify functional impairments in patients of all ages. Early identification of impairments could facilitate referrals to supportive care and resolution of impairments prior to HCT, suggesting that GA could be recommended for HCT candidates of all ages., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Home-Based Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the United States.
- Author
-
Sung AD, Giri VK, Tang H, Nichols KR, Lew MV, Bohannon L, Ren Y, Jung SH, Dalton T, Bush A, Van Opstal J, Artica A, Messina J, Shelby R, Frith J, Lassiter M, Burleson J, Leonard K, Potter AS, Choi T, Gasparetto CJ, Horwitz ME, Long GD, Lopez RD, Sarantopoulos S, and Chao NJ
- Subjects
- Case-Control Studies, Humans, Recurrence, Transplantation, Autologous, United States, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Quality of Life
- Abstract
Patients undergoing allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) require extensive hospitalizations or daily clinic visits for the duration of their transplantation. Home HCT, wherein patients live at home and providers make daily trips to the patient's residence to perform assessments and deliver any necessary interventions, may enhance patient quality of life and improve outcomes. We conducted the first study of home HCT in the United States to evaluate this model in the US healthcare setting and to determine the effect on clinical outcomes and quality of life. This case-control study evaluated patients who received home HCT at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, from November 2012 to March 2018. Each home HCT patient was matched with 2 controls from the same institution who had received standard treatment based on age, disease, and type of transplant for outcomes comparison. Clinical outcomes were abstracted from electronic health records, and quality of life was assessed via Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant. Clinical outcomes were compared with Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test (continuous variables) or chi-square test (categorical variables). Quality of life scores were compared using the Student t-test. All analyses used a significance threshold of 0.05. Twenty-five patients received home HCT, including 8 allos and 17 autos. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the home HCT patients and their matched controls; home HCT patients had decreased incidence of relapse within 1 year of transplantation. Pre-HCT quality of life was well preserved for autologous home HCT patients. This Phase I study demonstrated that home HCT can be successfully implemented in the United States. There was no evidence that home HCT outcomes were inferior to standard-of-care treatment, and patients undergoing autologous home HCT were able to maintain their quality of life. A Phase II randomized trial of home versus standard HCT is currently underway to better compare outcomes and costs., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IV. The 2020 Highly morbid forms report.
- Author
-
Wolff D, Radojcic V, Lafyatis R, Cinar R, Rosenstein RK, Cowen EW, Cheng GS, Sheshadri A, Bergeron A, Williams KM, Todd JL, Teshima T, Cuvelier GDE, Holler E, McCurdy SR, Jenq RR, Hanash AM, Jacobsohn D, Santomasso BD, Jain S, Ogawa Y, Steven P, Luo ZK, Dietrich-Ntoukas T, Saban D, Bilic E, Penack O, Griffith LM, Cowden M, Martin PJ, Greinix HT, Sarantopoulos S, Socie G, Blazar BR, Pidala J, Kitko CL, Couriel DR, Cutler C, Schultz KR, Pavletic SZ, Lee SJ, and Paczesny S
- Subjects
- Chronic Disease, Consensus, Humans, Incidence, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Quality of Life, United States, Graft vs Host Disease
- Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) can be associated with significant morbidity, in part because of nonreversible fibrosis, which impacts physical functioning (eye, skin, lung manifestations) and mortality (lung, gastrointestinal manifestations). Progress in preventing severe morbidity and mortality associated with chronic GVHD is limited by a complex and incompletely understood disease biology and a lack of prognostic biomarkers. Likewise, treatment advances for highly morbid manifestations remain hindered by the absence of effective organ-specific approaches targeting "irreversible" fibrotic sequelae and difficulties in conducting clinical trials in a heterogeneous disease with small patient numbers. The purpose of this document is to identify current gaps, to outline a roadmap of research goals for highly morbid forms of chronic GVHD including advanced skin sclerosis, fasciitis, lung, ocular and gastrointestinal involvement, and to propose strategies for effective trial design. The working group made the following recommendations: (1) Phenotype chronic GVHD clinically and biologically in future cohorts, to describe the incidence, prognostic factors, mechanisms of organ damage, and clinical evolution of highly morbid conditions including long-term effects in children; (2) Conduct longitudinal multicenter studies with common definitions and research sample collections; (3) Develop new approaches for early identification and treatment of highly morbid forms of chronic GVHD, especially biologically targeted treatments, with a special focus on fibrotic changes; and (4) Establish primary endpoints for clinical trials addressing each highly morbid manifestation in relationship to the time point of intervention (early versus late). Alternative endpoints, such as lack of progression and improvement in physical functioning or quality of life, may be suitable for clinical trials in patients with highly morbid manifestations. Finally, new approaches for objective response assessment and exploration of novel trial designs for small populations are required., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: III. The 2020 Treatment of Chronic GVHD Report.
- Author
-
DeFilipp Z, Couriel DR, Lazaryan A, Bhatt VR, Buxbaum NP, Alousi AM, Olivieri A, Pulanic D, Halter JP, Henderson LA, Zeiser R, Gooley TA, MacDonald KPA, Wolff D, Schultz KR, Paczesny S, Inamoto Y, Cutler CS, Kitko CL, Pidala JA, Lee SJ, Socie G, Sarantopoulos S, Pavletic SZ, Martin PJ, Blazar BR, and Greinix HT
- Subjects
- Chronic Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Consensus, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), United States, Graft vs Host Disease therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects
- Abstract
Positive results from recent clinical trials have significantly expanded current therapeutic options for patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, new insights into the associations between clinical characteristics of chronic GVHD, pathophysiologic mechanisms of disease, and the clinical and biological effects of novel therapeutic agents are required to allow for a more individualized approach to treatment. The current report is focused on setting research priorities and direction in the treatment of chronic GVHD. Detailed correlative scientific studies should be conducted in the context of clinical trials to evaluate associations between clinical outcomes and the biological effect of systemic therapeutics. For patients who require systemic therapy but not urgent initiation of glucocorticoids, clinical trials for initial systemic treatment of chronic GVHD should investigate novel agents as monotherapy without concurrently starting glucocorticoids, to avoid confounding biological, pathological, and clinical assessments. Clinical trials for treatment-refractory disease should specifically target patients with incomplete or suboptimal responses to most recent therapy who are early in their disease course. Close collaboration between academic medical centers, medical societies, and industry is needed to support an individualized, biology-based strategic approach to chronic GVHD therapy., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Female Sex Is Associated with Improved Long-Term Survival Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
- Author
-
Islam P, Tang H, Jin H, Cao F, Bohannon LM, Ren Y, Chao NJ, Choi T, Gasparetto C, Horwitz ME, Long GD, Lopez RD, Rizzieri DA, Sarantopoulos S, and Sung AD
- Subjects
- Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Tissue Donors, Transplantation, Homologous, Graft vs Host Disease, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Abstract
Life expectancy for long-term survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), defined as those living ≥5 years post-transplantation, is significantly lower compared with that of the age-matched general population despite a relatively low primary disease relapse rate at >2 years post-transplantation. Among several factors, patient sex is increasingly recognized as a prognostic indicator of long-term survival. We examined the influence of patient sex and donor-recipient sex matching on overall survival (OS) in a landmark analysis of long-term survivors. Using our institutional database supplemented with individual patient record review, we retrospectively investigated the relative influence of recipient sex and donor-recipient sex matching on outcomes of long-term survivors of alloHSCT between 1994 and 2014. Over this 20-year period, 247 met inclusion criteria for analysis; males and females had similar demographic and treatment characteristics. However, significantly more deaths after the 5-year landmark occurred in male recipients. Interestingly, donor sex did not have a significant impact on OS in multivariate analysis, and differences in OS of donor-recipient sex pairs was driven by recipient sex. In addition to recipient sex, only chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) retained significance as a covariate with an impact on OS in multivariate analysis. Men experienced slightly higher, but statistically nonsignificant, rates and increased severity of cGVHD, and had higher cGVHD-related mortality compared with females. In this long-term survival analysis of adult alloHSCT recipients, one of the only to include follow-up to 15 years, our results show that women survive significantly longer than men irrespective of their age at transplantation. This outcome is independent of other common pretransplantation prognostic indicators, such as donor sex or performance status at transplantation. The inferior survival in males is consistent with survival outcomes described in the transplantation literature. Increasing evidence suggests a biological basis for long-term sex-determined outcomes, possibly owing to differing rates or severity of cGVHD or sustained alloimmune tolerance in females. Larger studies are warranted to validate these retrospective clinical results., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IIb. The 2020 Preemptive Therapy Working Group Report.
- Author
-
Pidala J, Kitko C, Lee SJ, Carpenter P, Cuvelier GDE, Holtan S, Flowers ME, Cutler C, Jagasia M, Gooley T, Palmer J, Randolph T, Levine JE, Ayuk F, Dignan F, Schoemans H, Tkaczyk E, Farhadfar N, Lawitschka A, Schultz KR, Martin PJ, Sarantopoulos S, Inamoto Y, Socie G, Wolff D, Blazar B, Greinix H, Paczesny S, Pavletic S, and Hill G
- Subjects
- Chronic Disease, Consensus, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), United States, Graft vs Host Disease prevention & control, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects
- Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) commonly occurs after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) despite standard prophylactic immune suppression. Intensified universal prophylaxis approaches are effective but risk possible overtreatment and may interfere with the graft-versus-malignancy immune response. Here we summarize conceptual and practical considerations regarding preemptive therapy of chronic GVHD, namely interventions applied after HCT based on evidence that the risk of developing chronic GVHD is higher than previously appreciated. This risk may be anticipated by clinical factors or risk assignment biomarkers or may be indicated by early signs and symptoms of chronic GVHD that do not fully meet National Institutes of Health diagnostic criteria. However, truly preemptive, individualized, and targeted chronic GVHD therapies currently do not exist. In this report, we (1) review current knowledge regarding clinical risk factors for chronic GVHD, (2) review what is known about chronic GVHD risk assignment biomarkers, (3) examine how chronic GVHD pathogenesis intersects with available targeted therapeutic agents, and (4) summarize considerations for preemptive therapy for chronic GVHD, emphasizing trial development, including trial design and statistical considerations. We conclude that robust risk assignment models that accurately predict chronic GVHD after HCT and early-phase preemptive therapy trials represent the most urgent priorities for advancing this novel area of research., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Decreased Mortality in 1-Year Survivors of Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant vs. Matched Related or Matched Unrelated Donor Transplant in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.
- Author
-
Bohannon L, Tang H, Page K, Ren Y, Jung SH, Artica A, Britt A, Islam P, Siamakpour-Reihani S, Giri V, Lew M, Kelly M, Choi T, Gasparetto C, Long G, Lopez R, Rizzieri D, Sarantopoulos S, Chao N, Horwitz M, and Sung A
- Subjects
- Adult, Child, Fetal Blood, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Survivors, Transplantation, Homologous, Unrelated Donors, Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Hematologic Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) has the potential to cure hematologic malignancies but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although deaths during the first year after transplantation are often attributable to treatment toxicities and complications, death after the first year may be due to sequelae of accelerated aging caused by cellular senescence. Cytotoxic therapies and radiation used in cancer treatments and conditioning regimens for HCT can induce aging at the molecular level; HCT patients experience time-dependent effects, such as frailty and aging-associated diseases, more rapidly than people who have not been exposed to these treatments. Consistent with this, recipients of younger cells tend to have decreased markers of aging and improved survival, decreased graft-versus-host disease, and lower relapse rates. Given that umbilical cord blood (UCB) is the youngest donor source available, we studied the outcomes after the first year of UCB transplantation versus matched related donor (MRD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies over a 20-year period. In this single-center, retrospective study, we examined the outcomes of all adult patients who underwent their first allogeneic HCT through the Duke Adult Bone Marrow Transplant program from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2015, to allow for at least 3 years of follow-up. Patients were excluded if they died or were lost to follow-up before day 365 after HCT, received an allogeneic HCT for a disease other than a hematologic malignancy, or received cells from a haploidentical or mismatched adult donor. UCB recipients experienced a better unadjusted overall survival than MRD/MUD recipients (log rank P = .03, median overall survival: UCB not reached, MRD/MUD 7.4 years). After adjusting for selected covariates, UCB recipients who survived at least 1 year after HCT had a hazard of death that was 31% lower than that of MRD/MUD recipients (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.99; P = .049). This trend held true in a subset analysis of subjects with acute leukemia. UCB recipients also experienced lower rates of moderate or severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and nonrelapse mortality, and slower time to relapse. UCB and MRD/MUD recipients experienced similar rates of grade 2-4 acute GVHD, chronic GHVD, secondary malignancy, and subsequent allogeneic HCT. UCB is already widely used as a donor source in pediatric HCT; however, adult outcomes and adoption have historically lagged behind in comparison. Recent advancements in UCB transplantation such as the implementation of lower-intensity conditioning regimens, double unit transplants, and ex vivo expansion have improved early mortality, making UCB an increasingly attractive donor source for adults; furthermore, our findings suggest that UCB may actually be a preferred donor source for mitigating late effects of HCT., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: I. The 2020 Etiology and Prevention Working Group Report.
- Author
-
Williams KM, Inamoto Y, Im A, Hamilton B, Koreth J, Arora M, Pusic I, Mays JW, Carpenter PA, Luznik L, Reddy P, Ritz J, Greinix H, Paczesny S, Blazar BR, Pidala J, Cutler C, Wolff D, Schultz KR, Pavletic SZ, Lee SJ, Martin PJ, Socie G, and Sarantopoulos S
- Subjects
- Chronic Disease, Consensus, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Recurrence, United States, Graft vs Host Disease prevention & control
- Abstract
Preventing chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains challenging because the unique cellular and molecular pathways that incite chronic GVHD are poorly understood. One major point of intervention for potential prevention of chronic GVHD occurs at the time of transplantation when acute donor anti-recipient immune responses first set the events in motion that result in chronic GVHD. After transplantation, additional insults causing tissue injury can incite aberrant immune responses and loss of tolerance, further contributing to chronic GVHD. Points of intervention are actively being identified so that chronic GVHD initiation pathways can be targeted without affecting immune function. The major objective in the field is to continue basic studies and to translate what is learned about etiopathology to develop targeted prevention strategies that decrease the risk of morbid chronic GVHD without increasing the risks of cancer relapse or infection. Development of strategies to predict the risk of developing debilitating or deadly chronic GVHD is a high research priority. This working group recommends further interrogation into the mechanisms underpinning chronic GVHD development, and we highlight considerations for future trial design in prevention trials., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing Reduces the Incidence of Bloodstream Infections in Adults Undergoing Inpatient Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
- Author
-
Giri VK, Kegerreis KG, Ren Y, Bohannon LM, Lobaugh-Jin E, Messina JA, Matthews A, Mowery YM, Sito E, Lassiter M, Saullo JL, Jung SH, Ma L, Greenberg M, Andermann TM, van den Brink MRM, Peled JU, Gomes ALC, Choi T, Gasparetto CJ, Horwitz ME, Long GD, Lopez RD, Rizzieri DA, Sarantopoulos S, Chao NJ, Allen DH, and Sung AD
- Subjects
- Adult, Chlorhexidine analogs & derivatives, Humans, Incidence, Inpatients, Prospective Studies, Cross Infection epidemiology, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Sepsis
- Abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) occur in 20% to 45% of inpatient autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. Daily bathing with the antiseptic chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has been shown to reduce the incidence of BSIs in critically ill patients, although very few studies include HCT patients or have evaluated the impact of compliance on effectiveness. We conducted a prospective cohort study with historical controls to assess the impact of CHG bathing on the rate of BSIs and gut microbiota composition among adults undergoing inpatient HCT at the Duke University Medical Center. We present 1 year of data without CHG bathing (2016) and 2 years of data when CHG was used on the HCT unit (2017 and 2018). Because not all patients adhered to CHG, patients were grouped into four categories by rate of daily CHG usage: high (>75%), medium (50% to 75%), low (1% to 49%), and none (0%). Among 192 patients, univariate trend analysis demonstrated that increased CHG usage was associated with decreased incidence of clinically significant BSI, defined as any BSI requiring treatment by the medical team (high, 8% BSI; medium, 15.2%; low, 15.6%; no CHG, 30.3%; P = .003), laboratory-confirmed BSI (LCBI; P = .03), central line-associated BSI (P = .04), and mucosal barrier injury LCBI (MBI-LCBI; P = .002). Multivariate analysis confirmed a significant effect of CHG bathing on clinically significant BSI (P = .023) and MBI-LCBI (P = .007), without consistently impacting gut microbial diversity. Benefits of CHG bathing were most pronounced with >75% daily usage, and there were no adverse effects attributable to CHG. Adherence to daily CHG bathing significantly decreases the rate of bloodstream infection following HCT., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Assessing the Feasibility of a Novel mHealth App in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.
- Author
-
Racioppi A, Dalton T, Ramalingam S, Romero K, Ren Y, Bohannon L, Arellano C, Jonassaint J, Miller H, Barak I, Fish LJ, Choi T, Gasparetto C, Long GD, Lopez RD, Rizzieri DA, Sarantopoulos S, Horwitz ME, Chao NJ, Shah NR, and Sung AD
- Subjects
- Feasibility Studies, Humans, Pilot Projects, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Mobile Applications, Telemedicine
- Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative treatment option for patients with hematologic conditions but presents many complications that must be managed as a complex, chronic condition. Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) may permit tracking of symptoms in HCT. In seeking strategies to manage the complexities of HCT, our team collaborated with Sicklesoft, Inc., to develop an mHealth app specifically for HCT patients to allow for daily evaluation of patient health, Technology Recordings to better Understand Bone Marrow Transplantation (TRU-BMT). The primary value of this application is that of potentially enhancing the monitoring of symptoms and general health of patients undergoing HCT, with the ultimate goal of allowing earlier detection of adverse events, earlier intervention, and improving outcomes. To first evaluate patient interest in mHealth apps, we designed and administered an interest survey to patients at the 2017 BMT-InfoNet reunion. As a follow-up to the positive feedback received, we began testing the TRU-BMT app in a Phase 1 pilot study. Thirty patients were enrolled in this single-arm study and were given the TRU-BMT mHealth app on a smartphone device in addition to a wearable activity tracker. Patients were followed for up to 180 days, all the while receiving daily app monitoring. Adherence to TRU-BMT was approximately 30% daily and 44% weekly, and greater adherence was associated with increased meal completion, decreased heart rate, and shorter hospital stay. TRU-BMT assessments of symptom severity were significantly associated with duration of hospital stay and development of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Our findings suggest that using TRU-BMT throughout HCT is feasible for patients and established a proof-of-concept for a future randomized control trial of the TRU-BMT application in HCT. © 2021 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved., (Copyright © 2020 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.