Search

Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens using fludarabine (Flu) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) have been widely used in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. The optimal exposure of these agents remains to be determined. We aimed to delineate the exposure-outcome associations of Flu and Cy separately and then both combined on HCT outcomes. This is a single-center, observational, pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) study of Flu and Cy in HCT recipients age ≥18 years who received Cy (50 mg/kg in a single dose), Flu (150 to 200 mg/m 2 given as 5 daily doses), and total body irradiation (TBI; 200 cGy). We measured trough concentrations of 9-β-D-arabinosyl-2-fluoradenine (F-ara-A), an active metabolite of Flu, on days -5 and -4 (F-ara-A Day-5 and F-ara-A Day-4 , respectively), and measured phosphoramide mustard (PM), the final active metabolite of Cy, and estimated the area under the curve (AUC). The 89 enrolled patients had a nonrelapse mortality (NRM) of 9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3% to 15%) at day +100 and 15% (95% CI, 7% to 22%) at day +180, and an overall survival (OS) of 73% (95% CI, 63% to 81%) at day +180. In multivariate analysis, higher PM area under the curve (AUC) for 0 to 8 hours (PM AUC 0-8 hr ) was an independent predictor of worse NRM (P < .01 at both day +100 and day +180) and worse day +180 OS (P < .01), but no associations were identified for F-ara-A trough levels. We observed lower day +100 NRM in those with both high F-ara-A Day-4 trough levels (≥40 ng/mL; >25th percentile) and low PM AUC 0-8 hr (<34,235 hr ng/mL; <75th percentile), compared with high exposures to both agents (hazard ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.48). No patients with low F-ara-A Day-4 (<40 ng/mL; <25th percentile) had NRM by day +100, regardless of PM AUC. The interpatient PK variability was large in F-ara-A Day-4 trough and PM AUC 0-8 hr (29-fold and 5.0-fold, respectively). Flu exposure alone was not strongly associated with NRM or OS in this reduced Flu dose regimen; however, high exposure to both Flu and Cy was associated with a >16-fold higher NRM. These results warrant further investigation to optimize reduced-intensity regimens based on better PK-PD understanding and possible adaptation to predictable factors influencing drug clearance., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Regimen-related toxicities with high-dose therapy followed by hematopoietic cell rescue leads to considerable patient distress, morbidity, and high readmission rates. Palifermin is a recombinant keratinocyte growth factor that is Food and Drug Administration-approved to decrease severe oral mucositis (OM) associated with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (ASCT) for hematologic malignancies. We added palifermin as a supportive care measure for patients with lymphoma undergoing ASCT with BEAM conditioning. We compared patients receiving palifermin (n = 35) with historical controls (n = 38) for toxicity and readmission outcomes. The cumulative incidence of OM of any grade was 23% in the palifermin-treated patients and 42% in the control group. Patients receiving palifermin were less likely to be readmitted (57% versus 82%; P = .04), had fewer hospital readmission days (median, 4 days versus 7 days; P < .01), and had fewer total days in the hospital through day +30 after ASCT (median, 12 days versus 15 days; P = .05). Fewer patients in the palifermin group had >20 days in the hospital through day +30 (9% in the palifermin group versus 23% of controls). Adverse events associated with palifermin were mild and transient. The addition of palifermin limits severe regimen-related toxicities and decreases readmissions and duration of hospital stay. This and other measures are needed to identify comprehensive and cost-effective approaches, possibly including palifermin, to prevent severe regimen-related toxicities and decrease health care resource utilization., (Copyright © 2020 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The high incidence of human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) reactivation, potentially interfering with engraftment after umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), remains a major challenge. To potentially address this problem, we evaluated the effect of prophylactic foscarnet administered twice daily beginning on day +7 and continuing through engraftment in 25 patients. To determine the impact of foscarnet on HHV-6, engraftment, and other transplantation outcomes, we compared results in 61 identically treated patients with hematologic malignancies. Treatment and control groups underwent reduced-intensity conditioning UCB HCT with a conditioning regimen of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation 200 cGy with or without antithymocyte globulin (ATG), using sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil immune suppression. The treatment and control groups were similar in terms of age, disease risk, use of ATG, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index, and graft CD34 cell dose; however, foscarnet-treated patients were less likely to receive a double UCB graft and to be treated more recently (2016 to 2018). The cumulative incidence of HHV-6 reactivation by day +100 was 63% for all patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 51% to 75%) and was not significantly different between the 2 groups. HHV-6 reactivation occurred at a median of 34 days in the foscarnet group and 25.5 days in the control group. The incidence of neutrophil engraftment at day 42 was higher in the foscarnet group compared with the control group (96%; [95% CI, 83% to 100%] versus 75% [95% CI, 64% to 85%]; P< .01). The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment by 6 months was 92% (95% CI, 69% to 100%) for the foscarnet group versus 75% (95% CI, 60% to 90%) for the control group (P= .08), and multivariate analysis identified the use of foscarnet as an independent predictor of better platelet engraftment. No patients died as a result of graft failure in recipients of foscarnet, whereas 5 patients died from graft failure in the control group. Six-month overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were better in the foscarnet group (96% versus 72% [P= .02] and 4% versus 18% [P= .07], respectively). Even though foscarnet prophylaxis did not prevent HHV-6 viremia, we observed a delay in time to HHV-6 reactivation, a trend toward differences in engraftment, NRM, and OS compared with historical controls., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)