Search

Recently, low human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein expression has been proposed as a predictive biomarker for response to the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in metastatic breast cancer. HER2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has never been carefully measured, and little is known about the frequency of cases with unamplified but detectable levels of the protein. Although some HER2-targeted therapies have been studied in NSCLC patients, they have been restricted to those with genomic ERBB2 gene alterations, which only represent relatively rare cases of NSCLC. Still, emerging investigations of T-DXd in NSCLC have shown promise in patients with unamplified HER2. Taken together, we hypothesize that there may be many cases of NSCLC with levels of HER2 protein expression comparable with levels seen in breast cancer that benefit from T-DXd. Here, we used a previously validated, analytic, quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) assay that is more sensitive than legacy clinical HER2 immunohistochemistry assays. We measured HER2 protein levels in NSCLC cases to determine the proportion of cases with detectable HER2 expression. Using cell line calibration microarrays alongside our QIF method enabled us to convert HER2 signal into units of attomoles per mm 2 . We found that over 63% of the 741 analyzed NSCLC cases exhibited HER2 expression above the limit of detection, with more than 17% of them exceeding the lower limit of quantification. Although the threshold for response to T-DXd in breast cancer is still unknown, many cases of NSCLC have expression in a range comparable to breast cancer cases with immunohistochemistry scores of 1+ or 2+. Our assay could potentially select NSCLC cases with a detectable target (ie, HER2) that might benefit from HER2 antibody-drug conjugates, irrespective of ERBB2 genomic alterations., (Copyright © 2024 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The assessment of the expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been controversial since its introduction. The methods of assessment and the range of assays and platforms contribute to confusion. Perhaps the most challenging aspect of PD-L1 IHC is the combined positive score (CPS) method of interpretation of IHC results. Although the CPS method is prescribed for more indications than any other PD-L1 scoring system, its reproducibility has never been rigorously assessed. In this study, we collected a series of 108 gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer cases, stained them using the Food and Drug Administration-approved 22C3 assay, scanned them, and then circulated them to 14 pathologists at 13 institutions for the assessment of interpretative concordance for the CPS system. We found that higher cut points (10 or 20) performed better than a CPS of <1 or >1. We used the Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests algorithm to assess how the CPS system might perform in the real-world setting and found that the cut points of <1 or >1 showed an overall percent agreement of only 30% among the pathologist raters, with a plateau occurring at 8 raters. The raters performed better at higher cut points. However, the best cut point of <20 versus that of >20 was still disappointing, with a plateau at an overall percent agreement of 70% (at 7 raters). Although there is no ground truth for CPS, we compared the score with quantitative messenger RNA measurement and showed no relationship between the score (at any cut point) and messenger RNA amount. In summary, we showed that CPS shows high subjective variability among pathologist readers and is likely to perform poorly in the real-world setting. This system may be the root cause of the poor specificity and relatively low predictive value of IHC companion diagnostic tests for PD-1 axis therapies that use the CPS system., (Copyright © 2023 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The HercepTest was approved 20+ years ago as the companion diagnostic test for trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) or ERBB2 gene-amplified/overexpressing breast cancers. Subsequent HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays followed, including the now most common Ventana 4B5 assay. Although this IHC assay has become the clinical standard, its reliability, reproducibility, and accuracy have largely been approved and accepted on the basis of concordance among small numbers of pathologists without validation in a real-world setting. In this study, we evaluated the concordance and interrater reliability of scoring HER2 IHC in 170 breast cancer biopsies by 18 breast cancer-specialized pathologists from 15 institutions. We used the Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests method to determine the plateau of concordance and the minimum number of pathologists needed to estimate interrater agreement values for large numbers of raters, as seen in the real-world setting. We report substantial discordance within the intermediate categories (<1% agreement for 1+ and 3.6% agreement for 2+) in the 4-category HER2 IHC scoring system. The discordance within the IHC 0 cases is also substantial with an overall percent agreement (OPA) of only 25% and poor interrater reliability metrics (0.49 Fleiss' kappa, 0.55 intraclass correlation coefficient). This discordance can be partially reduced by using a 3-category system (28.8% vs 46.5% OPA for 4-category and 3-category scoring systems, respectively). Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests plots suggest that the OPA for the task of determining a HER2 IHC score 0 from not 0 plateaus statistically around 59.4% at 10 raters. Conversely, at the task of scoring HER2 IHC as 3+ or not 3+ pathologists' concordance was much higher with an OPA that plateaus at 87.1% with 6 raters. This suggests that legacy HER2 IHC remains valuable for finding the patients in whom the ERBB2 gene is amplified but unacceptably discordant in assigning HER2-low or HER2-negative status for the emerging HER2-low therapies., (Copyright © 2022 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The efficacy of the antibody drug conjugate (ADC) Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in HER2 low breast cancer patients suggests that the historical/conventional assays for HER2 may need revision for optimal patient care. Specifically, the conventional assay is designed to distinguish amplified HER2 from unamplified cases but is not sensitive enough to stratify the lower ranges of HER2 expression. Here we determine the optimal dynamic range for unamplified HER2 detection in breast cancer and then redesign an assay to increase the resolution of the assay to stratify HER2 expression in unamplified cases. We used the AQUA™ method of quantitative immunofluorescence to test a range of antibody concentrations to maximize the sensitivity within the lower range of HER2 expression. Then, using a cell line microarray with HER2 protein measured by mass spectrometry we determined the amount of HER2 protein in units of attomols/mm 2 . Then by calculation of the limits of detection, quantification, and linearity of this assay we determined that low HER2 range expression in unamplified cell lines is between 2 and 20 attomol/mm 2 . Finally, application of this assay to a serial collection of 364 breast cancer cases from Yale shows 67% of the population has HER2 expression above the limit of quantification and below the levels seen in HER2 amplified breast cancer. In the future, this assay could be used to determine the levels of HER2 required for response to T-DXd or similar HER2 conjugated ADCs., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology.)