Search

Background: Both DNA flow cytometry and cytogenetic analysis have been used to study soft tissue tumors. With flow cytometry, the DNA content of a relatively large number of cells can be examined, but cytogenetic analysis gives more detailed information about genomic changes., Experimental Design: In order to compare the advantages and drawbacks of DNA flow cytometry versus chromosomal analysis, 92 primary or recurrent malignant, 16 borderline malignant, and 13 benign soft tissue tumors were karyotyped after short-term culture. DNA ploidy was determined by flow cytometry of suspensions prepared from frozen or paraffin-embedded samples. From 97 patients, 121 samples were analyzed., Results: On the basis of the results, four groups were distinguished: DNA-euploid tumors with normal diploid karyotypes (group a) or with abnormal (group b) karyotypes, and DNA-aneuploid tumors with normal (group c) or abnormal (group d) karyotypes. The findings in group b show that structural chromosomal abnormalities or minor numerical aberrations of chromosomes are not detected by DNA flow cytometry. In group c, the finding of tumors with an aneuploid DNA-profile and cells with normal karyotypes is most likely due to overgrowth of fibroblasts during culture and subsequent karyotyping of normal cells., Conclusions: The findings show that a) DNA flow cytometry has a higher success rate than karyotyping, b) both techniques are complementary, such that DNA flow cytometry gives an "overview", whereas karyotyping gives more detailed information; comparison of both techniques in individual cases leads to a better understanding of the chromosomal events that occurred during oncogenesis, c) histologically low grade tumors are generally DNA-diploid, but may have an abnormal karyotype, and d) histologically high-grade sarcomas tend to have an aneuploid DNA-profile; they are generally more difficult to karyotype.

To study mechanisms involved in evolution of soft tissue sarcomas, we compared DNA ploidy and karyotypes at different stages of their disease in two patients with myxoid liposarcomas (MLS), one with a fibrosarcoma (FS), and two with rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS). None of the MLS samples revealed clearcut histologic changes in later samples as compared to their primaries, and the DNA ploidy in all samples was diploid. In one patient karyotypes at four different times during the 19 yr of his disease all revealed a t(11;12) (p15;q13), but additional clonal chromosomal abnormalities occurred only in later recurrences. In another patient the karyotypes obtained in the 26th and 28th yr of his disease were similar and included the t(12;16) (q13;p11), characteristic of MLS. A comparison with karyotypes of six other MLS patients at different disease stages suggests that the presence of a t(12;16) may correlate with less aggressive clinical behavior. The histology of the FS remained low-grade and the DNA ploidy diploid. The karyotype, however, showed evolution. In both MLS and FS, chromosomal changes thus seem to be a more sensitive marker for tumor progression than histologic changes or DNA ploidy. In one embryonal RMS, karyotypes obtained 7 and 11 yr after the primary diagnosis were different but clearly had a common "progenitor." In one alveolar RMS, the primary and the synchronous lung and lymph node metastases all revealed a t(2;13). The findings in RMS suggest that polyploidization is an early event in tumor evolution, especially in the alveolar subtype, which may be followed by additional chromosomal changes. In addition, DNA ploidy was measured in eight other RMSs. Among the RMSs the embryonal subtype was characterized by DNA aneuploidy, whereas three of the alveolar cases were in the tetraploid range and one was peridiploid. In local recurrences and in metastases changes in DNA index were observed in half the cases.

Snap-frozen samples from 22 primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) primary in the central nervous system were studied with antibodies to synaptophysin, bombesin, somatostatin, substance P, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, all classes of intermediate filaments, and desmoplakins I and II. Frozen sections were immunostained by the avidin-biotin peroxidase complex and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy methods. Selected cases were also studied by double and triple label immunofluorescence microscopy, and by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and immunoblot analysis. We found that all 22 PNETs expressed synaptophysin extensively. Focal expression of 2 or more neuropeptides was noted in 10 samples studied. All PNETs expressed vimentin, 21 of 22 expressed glial filament protein (GFP), 16 of 22 expressed neurofilament proteins (NFP), 4 of 22 expressed desmin, and 3 of 22 expressed cytokeratins. In only one case were focal and questionable reactions with desmoplakin antibodies seen. Immunoblots confirmed the presence of desmin. Double and triple immunofluorescence revealed a number of antigenic coexpressions in individual cells including: synaptophysin with vimentin, GFP, NFP and desmin, vimentin-GFP, vimentin-NFP, vimentin-cytokeratin, vimentin-desmin and desmin-NFP; similarly, combinations of vimentin-GFP-NFP, vimentin-GFP-desmin, and vimentin-GFP-cytokeratin were found. The consistent expression of synaptophysin and 2 or more neuropeptides indicates that central nervous system PNETs have significant phenotypic features in common with neuroendocrine tumors. Their complex and variable intermediate filament complement patterns combined with their consistent expression of specific neuroendocrine differentiation markers, suggest that central nervous system PNETs comprise a distinct, albeit heterogeneous group of neoplasms.

A new method of identifying and locating lymph nodes in lymph node dissection specimens using a radiographic imaging technique is described. The specimen is immersed in 96% ethyl alcohol which possesses a radiographic density similar to fat tissue. Even small immersed lymph nodes contrast well with 96% ethyl alcohol. Thus, a radiograph of a nodal dissection specimen, immersed in 96% ethyl alcohol, does not show the interfering projection of variations in thickness of the specimen. Simultaneously, lymph nodes are clearly imaged. Using this procedure, we could visualize 97% of all lymph nodes present in the fat tissue of lymph node dissection specimens, which were dissected free from large radiodense structures like muscle and submandibular glands. Thus, a simple method was established for radiographic documentation of lymph nodes in lymph node dissection specimens.

Seventeen soft tissue sarcomas were karyotyped and the chromosomal findings were compared with those in the literature. Some cases were easily classified (immuno)histologically, whereas others defied classification. In four cases with unequivocal histology, a "characteristic" chromosomal abnormality was found. In one case a diagnosis that was doubtful on histologic grounds was supported by the chromosomal findings, whereas in three other cases, the chromosomal pattern led to reconsideration of the histologic diagnosis. The remaining cases either showed chromosomal abnormalities with hitherto undescribed breakpoints or breakpoints described in tumors with different histology. The results extend the knowledge of chromosomal abnormalities in soft tissue sarcomas. Most importantly, the present approach demonstrates that close collaboration between the surgical pathologist and the cytogeneticist may improve the classification of soft tissue sarcomas.

Seventy-one tumors of the central nervous system in children were studied immunohistologically. Thirty-seven were classified histologically as PNETs, of which 35 were located in the cerebellum (medulloblastomas), one in the cerebrum, and one in the spinal cord. The 34 non-PNETs included five ependymomas, seven gangliogliomas, 15 astrocytomas, and seven tumors of other histology. We used monoclonal antibodies specific for neurofilament (NF) triplet proteins, for microtubule associated protein 2 and tau protein and for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and myelin basic protein. In addition, a monoclonal antibody to epithelial membrane antigen was applied. The presence or absence of these antigens defined four major groups of PNETs: 1) PNETs not otherwise specified (10 cases), 2) PNETs with neuronal differentiation (eight cases), 3) PNETs with astrocytic differentiation (six cases), and 4) PNETs with both neuronal and astrocytic differentiation (12 cases). One case showed ependymal differentiation. The pattern of expression of NF isoforms in PNETs was reminiscent of that seen during normal mammalian development, such that phosphorylated NF-H was only present in combination with NF-M and NF-L. Among the other central nervous system tumors, all astrocytomas and gangliogliomas were positive for GFAP, and the gangliogliomas also expressed all NF isoforms. Three atypical teratoid tumors and two rhabdoid tumors showed strong positivity for epithelial membrane antigen and also for GFAP. We conclude that the differentiation antigens described here serve to distinguish PNETs from other pediatric central nervous system tumors and to identify subsets of PNETs. Accordingly, PNETs represent a heterogeneous group of pediatric brain tumors capable of neuronal and glial differentiation.