Search

Background: In cholinergic urticaria (CholU), itchy wheal and flare-type skin reactions are triggered by sweat-inducing activities. The CholU activity score (CholUAS) is used to assess disease activity but has not yet been validated. The aim of the study was to validate the CholUAS, develop an English version, and provide instructions for scoring., Methods: Cognitive debriefing of CholUAS was performed. Patients with CholU (n = 75) used the CholUAS on 7 consecutive days, underwent provocation testing, completed additional anchor instrument questionnaires including global evaluation tools, and established quality of life instruments. A scoring protocol for the calculation of the weekly CholUAS, the CholUAS7, was developed. The CholUAS7 was tested for validity, reliability, and influencing factors. An English version of the CholUAS was developed., Results: The final CholUAS contains 3 questions that are used for scoring as well as 1 global question. The weekly CholUAS, CholUAS7, showed excellent test-retest reliability and good correlations with anchor instruments. Statistical analysis showed no significant influence of age or duration of disease on CholUAS7 results., Conclusion: The validated CholUAS is ready for use in clinical trials and routine clinical practice., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The traditional healthcare model is focused on diseases (medicine and natural science) and does not acknowledge patients' resources and abilities to be experts in their own lives based on their lived experiences. Improving healthcare safety, quality, and coordination, as well as quality of life, is an important aim in the care of patients with chronic conditions. Person-centered care needs to ensure that people's values and preferences guide clinical decisions. This paper reviews current knowledge to develop (1) digital care pathways for rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity and (2) digitally enabled, person-centered care. 1 It combines all relevant research evidence, including the so-called real-world evidence, with the ultimate goal to develop digitally enabled, patient-centered care. The paper includes (1) Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA), a 2-decade journey, (2) Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), the evidence-based model of guidelines in airway diseases, (3) mHealth impact on airway diseases, (4) From guidelines to digital care pathways, (5) Embedding Planetary Health, (6) Novel classification of rhinitis and asthma, (7) Embedding real-life data with population-based studies, (8) The ARIA-EAACI (European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology) strategy for the management of airway diseases using digital biomarkers, (9) Artificial intelligence, (10) The development of digitally enabled, ARIA person-centered care, and (11) The political agenda. The ultimate goal is to propose ARIA 2024 guidelines centered around the patient to make them more applicable and sustainable., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The presence of angioedema, or deep skin swelling, in addition to hives (wheals) in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can complicate disease management. There is evidence that omalizumab is effective for patients with CSU with angioedema, but the time to a clinically meaningful response has not been assessed. This post hoc analysis examined data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind ASTERIA I and ASTERIA II studies: patients with CSU with hives were grouped by presence (n = 216) or absence of angioedema (n = 265) at baseline. The time to minimally important difference (MID, change from baseline of ≥11 points) in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Median time to MID for omalizumab 300 mg was similar in patients with and without angioedema. Median time to MID for omalizumab 150 mg was similar to 300 mg for patients without angioedema, and was longer for patients with angioedema. Therefore, the response to omalizumab for patients with CSU with angioedema was dose dependent. We recommend that the best approach for clinicians, in line with guidelines, would be initial administration of omalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks for all patients., Clinical Trials Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01287117 (registered 27 January 2011) and NCT01292473 (registered 7 February 2011)., Competing Interests: Thomas Casale is a consultant and speaker bureau member for Genentech, Inc.; consultant for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Benjamin Trzaskoma and Michael Holden are employees of Genentech, Inc.; stockholders in Roche. Jonathan Bernstein is a consultant and PI for Genentech, Inc., Novartis, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi-Regeneron, AstraZeneca, Celldex, Allakos, Escient, Teva, Takeda/Shire, CSL Behring, Biocryst, Kalvista, Ionis, Biomarin, Pharming, Jasper. Marcus Maurer is a speaker and/or advisor for and/or has received research funding from Allakos, Alexion, Almirall, Alvotech, Amgen, Aquestive, Arcensus, argenX, AstraZeneca, Astria, BioCryst, Blueprint, Celldex, Celltrion, Clinuvel, Cogent, CSL Behring, Escient, Evommune, Excellergy, Genentech, GSK, Incyte, Jasper, Kashiv, Kalvista, Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Menarini, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Moxie, Noucor, Novartis, Orion Biotechnology, Pharvaris, Resonance Medicine, Sanofi/Regeneron, Santa Ana Bio, Septerna, Servier, Takeda, Teva, Third HarmonicBio, Valenza Bio, Vitalli Bio, Yuhan Corporation, Zurabio., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: The impact of recurrent angioedema can be severely debilitating and remains difficult to quantify. Several standardized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Angioedema Activity Score (AAS), Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL) questionnaire, and Angioedema Control Test (AECT), have been developed and translated into different languages. However, these PROMs have yet to be validated in Chinese individuals, and their correlations in the Chinese population remain unknown., Objective: Our aim was to validate the Chinese versions of the AAS, AE-QoL questionnaire, and AECT and assess their intercorrelations., Methods: A prospective cohort of 118 Chinese patients with recurrent angioedema at the Angioedema and Urticaria Centre of Reference and Excellence in Hong Kong completed the traditional Chinese versions of the AAS, AE-QoL questionnaire, and AECT. We analyzed the reliability and validity of these PROMs and their correlations with each other as well as with generic PROMs., Results: The Chinese AAS, AE-QoL questionnaire, and AECT demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.920, 0.976, and 0.832, respectively; McDonald ω = 0.972, 0.977, and 0.901, respectively). Confirmatory factor analysis for the AE-QoL questionnaire showed an acceptable fit with the 4-dimensional model (comparative fit index = 0.869; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.842). The AECT showed significant correlations with both the AAS and AE-QoL questionnaire (ρ = -0.750 and -0.456 respectively [both P  < .05]). The AE-QoL questionnaire was moderately correlated with certain domains of generic PROMs such as the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health, version 2.0, and the Short Form 12-Item Health Survey, version 2 (all ρ < 0.60)., Conclusion: The Chinese AE-QoL questionnaire, AAS, and AECT are valid and reliable tools for use with Chinese patients. More validated tools should be made available to improve patient care and research for all patients with angioedema globally., Competing Interests: Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. Maurer reports serving as a speaker and/or advisor for and/or having received research funding from Allakos, Amgen, 10.13039/100004325AstraZeneca, Astria, 10.13039/100004326Bayer, 10.13039/100014935BioCryst, Celldex, Celltrion, CSL Behring, Evommune, GSK, Ipsen, Kalvista, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Menarini, 10.13039/501100012351Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Moxie, Noucor, Novartis, Pharvaris, Sanofi/Regeneron, Septerna, Takeda, Teva, Third HarmonicBio, ValenzaBio, 10.13039/100019265Yuhan Corporation, and Zurabio outside the present work. K. Weller reports being a speaker and/or advisor for and/or having received research funding from Biocryst, 10.13039/100008322CSL Behring, MOXIE, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, 10.13039/100004339Sanofi, Takeda, and Uriach outside the present work. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can present with non-skin related symptoms (NSRS), including recurrent unexplained fever, joint, bone, or muscle pain (JBMP), and malaise, which also occur in other conditions that manifest with wheals (eg, urticarial vasculitis or autoinflammatory disorders) or without wheals (eg, infection)., Objective: We sought to determine the rate of patients with CSU affected by fever, JBMP, and malaise, their trigger factors, links with clinical and laboratory characteristics, and their impact on everyday life and treatment responses., Methods: We analyzed baseline data from the Chronic Urticaria Registry of 2,521 patients with CSU who were aged 16 years or older., Results: One third of CSU patients (31.2%; 786 of 2,521) had one or more NSRS, including recurrent fever (5.3%), JBMP (19.1%), and/or malaise (18.6%). In a multivariable analysis, having one or more of these NSRS correlated with food and infection as trigger factors of urticaria (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.7 and 1.5), wheals of 24 hours or greater duration (aOR = 2.5), sleep disturbance (aOR = 2.4), anxiety (aOR = 2.8), comorbid atopic dermatitis (aOR = 2.1), gastrointestinal disease (aOR = 1.8), elevated leukocytes (aOR = 1.7) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (aOR = 1.5). In a bivariate analysis, these NSRS were additionally associated with higher disease activity (weekly Urticaria Activity Score, median: 21 vs 14; P = .009), longer disease duration (years, median: 2 vs 1; P = .001), the presence of angioedema (74.6% vs 58.7%; P < .001), worse quality of life (Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire, median: 42 vs 29; P < .001) and more frequent poor control of CSU (78% vs 69%; P < .001)., Conclusions: The presence of NSRS in a subpopulation of patients with CSU points to the need for better control of the disease, exclusion of comorbid conditions, and/or exclusion of urticarial vasculitis and urticarial autoinflammatory diseases., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The pathophysiology of mast cell (MC)-driven disorders is diverse, ranging from localized reactions to systemic disorders caused by abnormal accumulation and activation in multiorgan systems. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is critically important, both for informing treatment and objective assessment of treatment outcomes. As new therapeutics are being developed to deplete MCs or silence them (eg, by engaging inhibitory receptors that block activation), new biomarkers are needed that can distinguish between MC activation versus burden. Serum tryptase is the gold standard for assessing both MC burden and activation; however, commercial tryptase assays have limitations related to timing of release, lack of discernment between inactive (α) and active (β) forms of tryptase, and interpatient variability of baseline levels. Alternative approaches to measuring MC activation include urinary MC mediators, flow cytometry-based assays or gene expression profiling. Additional markers of MC activation are needed for use in clinical diagnostics, to help selection of treatment of MC diseases, and for assessing outcomes of therapy. We review the spectrum of disorders with known or suspected MC contribution, describe the utility and limitations of current MC markers and assays, and discuss the need for new markers that can differentiate between MC activation and burden., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Uncontrolled chronic urticaria (CU) can severely affect physical and psychosocial health as well as quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures are crucial for measuring disease control. The Urticaria Control Test (UCT) is recommended by guidelines to monitor CU and guide clinical management. However, the traditional Chinese version of the UCT has not yet been validated., Objective: We sought to validate the traditional Chinese UCT among Chinese CU patients in Hong Kong., Methods: Patients with CU were enrolled at a Urticaria Centre of Reference and Excellence (aka UCARE) in Hong Kong and completed the traditional Chinese UCT. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, known-group validity, and sensitivity to change of the traditional Chinese UCT were evaluated., Results: We recruited 162 CU patients (80.9% female; age 50 ± 14 years) with a mean (median) ± standard deviation baseline UCT score of 8.8 (8) ± 4.7. Overall, Chinese UCT showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α and McDonald ω = 0.948), as well as test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.916 [95% confidence interval = 0.866-0.953]). Exploratory factor analysis revealed a unidimensional structure and confirmed its construct validity. Strong correlation between UCT and the 7-day urticaria activity score (UAS7) attested to its convergent validity (ρ = -0.699, P  < .001). Its known-group validity was supported by significantly different UCT scores among patient subgroups with different disease activity. The Chinese UCT also demonstrated good sensitivity to change, as reflected by the significant correlation between changes in UCT and UAS7 scores (ρ = 0.491, P  < .001)., Conclusion: The traditional Chinese UCT is a valid, reliable, and sensitive-to-change instrument among Hong Kong Chinese with CU., Competing Interests: Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. Maurer has, outside the present report, been speaker and/or advisor for and/or has received research funding from Allakos, 10.13039/100002429Amgen, Aralez, ArgenX, 10.13039/100004325AstraZeneca, Blueprint, 10.13039/100012431Celldex, Centogene, CSL Behring, FAES, 10.13039/100004328Genentech, GIInnovation, Innate Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Menarini, Moxie, Novartis, 10.13039/100004337Roche, 10.13039/100004339Sanofi/10.13039/100009857Regeneron, Third HarmonicBio, UCB, and Uriach. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are validated and standardized tools that complement physician evaluations and guide treatment decisions. They are crucial for monitoring atopic dermatitis (AD) and chronic urticaria (CU) in clinical practice, but there are unmet needs and knowledge gaps regarding their use in clinical practice., Objecctive: We investigated the global real-world use of AD and CU PROMs in allergology and dermatology clinics as well as their associated local and regional networks., Methods: Across 72 specialized allergy and dermatology centers and their local and regional networks, 2,534 physicians in 73 countries completed a 53-item questionnaire on the use of PROMs for AD and CU., Results: Of 2,534 physicians, 1,308 were aware of PROMs. Of these, 14% and 15% used PROMs for AD and CU, respectively. Half of physicians who use PROMs do so only rarely or sometimes. Use of AD and CU PROM is associated with being female, younger, and a dermatologist. The Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index and Urticaria Activity Score were the most common PROMs for AD and CU, respectively. Monitoring disease control and activity are the main drivers of the use of PROMs. Time constraints were the primary obstacle to using PROMs, followed by the impression that patients dislike PROMs. Users of AD and CU PROM would like training in selecting the proper PROM., Conclusions: Although PROMs offer several benefits, their use in routine practice is suboptimal, and physicians perceive barriers to their use. It is essential to attain higher levels of PROM implementation in accordance with national and international standards., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinical trials investigating drugs for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks have assessed many different outcomes. This heterogeneity limits the comparability of trial results and may lead to selective outcome reporting bias and a high burden on trial participants., Objective: To achieve consensus on a core outcome set composed of key outcomes that ideally should be used in all clinical efficacy trials involving the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks., Methods: We conducted a Delphi consensus study involving all relevant parties: patients with hereditary angioedema, hereditary angioedema expert clinicians and clinical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory bodies. Two Internet-based survey rounds were conducted. In round 1, panelists indicated the importance of individual outcomes used in clinical trials on a 9-point Likert scale. Based on these results, a core outcome set was developed and voted on by panelists in round 2., Results: A total of 58 worldwide panelists completed both rounds. The first round demonstrated high importance scores and substantial agreement among the panelists. In the second round, a consensus of 90% or greater was achieved on a core outcome set consisting of five key outcomes: change in overall symptom severity at one predetermined time point between 15 minutes and 4 hours after treatment, time to end of progression of all symptoms, the need for rescue medication during the entire attack, impairment of daily activities, and treatment satisfaction., Conclusions: This international study obtained a high level of consensus on a core outcome set for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks, consisting of five key outcomes., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Green roof gardens are important for planetary health by mitigating the effects of urbanization. Because of the nature of green roof gardens, only particular plants can be used. The allergologic impact of these plants remains ill-characterized and guidance on building allergy-friendly green roof gardens is missing. To address this gap, we investigated the plant spectrum of several German green roof companies and categorized plants based on their primary pollination mechanism. Except for grasses, most plants were insect-pollinated and of low allergenicity. In addition, we conducted a review on the allergologic impact of plants used for green roof gardens. Our aim was to provide landscape architects with guidance on how to develop allergy-friendly green roof gardens. We highlight the need for universally accepted standards for assessing the allergenicity of roof top plants. Also, we recommend the joint development, by green roof producers and allergists, of criteria for allergy-friendly roof gardens. Their implementation may help to reduce the risk of allergen sensitization and allergy exacerbation, such as by avoiding the use of wind-pollinated plants of proven allergenicity including grasses. Green infrastructure, such as green roofs, should benefit planetary health without increasing the prevalence and burden of allergies., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can have comorbid inducible urticaria (CIndU). How comorbid CIndU affects patients and their CSU is largely unclear., Objective: To compare patients with CSU with and without comorbid CIndUs for differences in demographic features, clinical characteristics, and laboratory markers., Methods: We analyzed 708 patients with CSU of our Urticaria Center of Reference and Excellence enrolled in CURE, the chronic urticaria registry. CURE data collected until October 2022 were used to compare patients with and without comorbid CIndU for their demographic characteristics, disease onset, activity, impact, and control, as well as concomitant allergic and autoimmune diseases and laboratory parameters associated with autoimmune CSU., Results: Of 708 patients with CSU, 247 (35%) had comorbid CIndU. Compared with patients with standalone CSU, patients with CSU with comorbid CIndU were significantly younger, had earlier disease onset, longer disease duration, higher impact on quality of life, and a higher rate of concomitant allergic diseases. Moreover, patients with CSU with comorbid CIndU less often had features linked to autoimmune CSU such as angioedema, concomitant autoimmune diseases, eosinopenia, low levels of total IgE, and low total IgE combined with elevated anti-thyroid peroxidase IgG., Conclusions: Autoimmune CSU may be less common in patients with comorbid CIndU than without, and comorbid CIndU may point to autoallergic CSU., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common condition treated by allergist/immunologists, but the only FDA-approved biologic medication, omalizumab, may be underutilized globally., Objective: This study was performed to determine the global prescription of omalizumab for treatment of CSU by allergists/immunologists., Methods: Anonymous questionnaire surveys were distributed online to World Allergy Organization (WAO) members worldwide. Categorical data were analyzed for descriptive analysis using one-way frequency tabulation in SAS 9.4., Results: There were 348 respondents (43 missing data); Average age 51 (range 28-90); M/F 48%/52%. 58% had > 15 years of clinical experience and 10% < 5; 42% worked in private clinics, 36% public hospitals, 24% academia, 18% private hospitals, and 4% in community practice. Eighty-two percent (82%) prescribed omalizumab for CSU patients and use of omalizumab was highest among young practitioners. The most significant barriers were cost (63%) and restricted formulary (24%). Drug safety (63%) and chances of adverse events (47%) were the most significant factors deciding treatment. Twenty-two percent (22%) reported 80-100% of CSU patients were complete responders to omalizumab; 34% preferred increasing frequency (q 2-weeks), and 18% preferred increasing dose (600 mg q 4-weeks) for partial or non-responders. UAS7, UCT, and CU-QoL were used to assess CSU by 55%, 29%, and 25% of respondents, respectively. Autoimmune thyroid disease (62%), thyroid abnormality (43%) and allergic rhinitis (35%) were the most frequent comorbidities reported., Conclusions: Most clinicians favored omalizumab over other potential treatments due to safety. Although younger clinicians were more likely to prescribe omalizumab, cost and formulary access were major barriers. Only 22% of respondents reported 80% or greater of their patients had complete response to omalizumab, indicating the need for novel CSU therapies., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: Symptoms of hereditary angioedema (HAE) often first occur during childhood, and HAE attacks in children can be severe and substantially affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, there are no approved long-term prophylaxis treatments for children aged less than 6 years., Objective: The SPRING Study (NCT04070326) evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of lanadelumab and HRQoL in patients aged 2 to less than 12 years., Methods: Over 52 weeks of treatment, patients aged 2 to less than 6 years received lanadelumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and patients aged 6 to less than 12 years received 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) but could switch to Q4W if they were attack-free for 26 weeks., Results: We enrolled 21 patients (aged 2 to less than 6 years: n = 4; aged 6 to less than 12 years: n = 17), 20 of whom completed the study. There were no reported serious treatment-emergent adverse events or discontinuations resulting from such events. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 17 patients (81.0%). The most common TEAE was injection site pain. Overall systemic exposure was comparable for both age groups. The mean (SD) attack rate during treatment decreased by 94.8% from baseline (1.84 [1.53] to 0.08 [0.17] attacks/mo), and 16 (76.2%) patients were attack-free. The attack rate reduction in both age groups was similar during the first 26-week fixed-dosing treatment. Seven patients switched from Q2W to Q4W and remained attack-free. A large, clinically meaningful increase in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scale Total Score and a large increase in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scale-Family Impact Module Total Score from baseline to end of study (better HRQoL) were observed., Conclusions: Findings support safety, efficacy, and improved HRQoL with lanadelumab 150 mg Q2W and Q4W regimens for the prevention of HAE attacks in patients aged 2 to less than 12 years., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Mastocytosis is a complex disorder affecting various organs. The diagnostic workup can be challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach including the use of uncommon tests. To assess mastocytosis management around the globe, we conducted the first worldwide online survey for physicians., Methods: A 21-item questionnaire was sent out to the members of the World Allergy Organization (WAO), the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA 2 LEN), the Urticaria (UCARE) and Angioedema (ACARE) Centers of Reference and Excellence, the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), and the European Mast Cell and Basophil Research Network (EMBRN) in April-June 2021., Results: Across 628 respondents from 79 countries 87.7% and 9.7% of physicians were allergists/clinical immunologists and/or dermatologists. Participating physicians were from all regions of the world (Europe, EU: 41.6%; North America, NA: 24.8%; Latin America, LA: 14.5%; Asia-Pacific, AP: 12.6%; and Africa/Middle East, AME: 6.5%). Only 2.2% of respondents worked at Specialized Mastocytosis Centers (SMCs) in North America or European Union. Physicians reported caring for 4 patients with mastocytosis per year, with higher numbers in European Union and Asia Pacific (5/year) compared to Latin America (2/year). Dermatologists and physicians who work at SMCs reported higher patient numbers (15/year and 80/year, respectively). Suspicion of mastocytosis in the allergology and dermatology community is commonly driven by anaphylaxis (82.9%), mastocytosis skin lesions (82.1%), or elevated tryptase levels (76.6%). Osteoporosis and gastrointestinal symptoms less often prompted suspicion of mastocytosis (21.4% and 49.9%, respectively). World Health Organisation (WHO)-diagnostic criteria and classification, regardless of the region, are only used by about 50% of physicians, with higher rates for SMCs (83.3%). Serum tryptase, bone marrow biopsy, and KIT D816V mutation analysis are included in the diagnostic workup by 90.9%, 61.5%, and 58.4% of physicians, respectively. The biggest challenges for the management of mastocytosis are the lack of more effective treatment options (51.1%), missing multidisciplinary networks (47.1%), and the lack of experience of specialists from other disciplines (39.0%)., Conclusions: The diagnostic workup for mastocytosis differs from consensus recommendations and varies between regions. This may be improved by establishing active multidisciplinary networks, increasing access to diagnostic procedures, consistently applying WHO criteria, and developing new Mastocytosis Centers of Reference and Excellence., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious viral disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It has various effects on asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and urticaria and may change the course of the disease depending on the severity of the infection and control status of the disease. Conversely, these diseases may also impact the course of COVID-19. Patients with chronic urticaria and atopic dermatitis may have COVID-19-induced disease exacerbations and biological treatments reduce the risk of exacerbations. Poor asthma control is linked to severe COVID-19 while allergic asthma is associated with lower risk of death and a lower rate of hospitalization due to COVID-19 compared with nonallergic asthma. The use of intranasal corticosteroids is associated with lower rates of hospitalization due to COVID-19 in patients with allergic rhinitis, whereas the effect of inhaled corticosteroids is confounded by asthma severity. These observations reinforce the importance of keeping allergic diseases under control during pandemics. The use of biologicals during COVID-19 is generally regarded as safe, but more evidence is needed. The pandemic substantially changed the management of allergic disorders such as home implementation of various biologicals, allergen immunotherapy, food introduction, and increased use of telemedicine and even home management of anaphylaxis to reduce emergency department burden and reduce risk of infection. Physicians need to be aware of the potential impact of COVID-19 on allergic diseases and educate their patients on the importance of continuing prescribed medications and adhering to their treatment plans to maintain optimal control of their disease., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) have spontaneous wheals (W), angioedema (AE), or both, for longer than 6 weeks. Clinical differences between patients with standalone W, standalone AE, and W and AE (W+AE) remain incompletely understood., Objective: To compare W, AE, and W+AE CSU patients regarding demographics, disease characteristics, comorbidities, disease burden, and treatment response., Methods: Baseline data from 3,698 CSU patients in the ongoing, prospective, international, multicenter, observational Chronic Urticaria REgistry (CURE) were analyzed (data cut: September 2022)., Results: Across all CSU patients, 59%, 36%, and 5% had W+AE, W, and AE, respectively. The W+AE patients, compared with W and AE patients, showed the lowest male-to-female ratio (0.33), higher rates of concomitant psychiatric disease (17% vs 11% vs 6%, respectively), autoimmune disease (13% vs 7% vs 9%, respectively), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity (9% vs 5% vs 2%, respectively) and the highest disease impact. The W patients, compared with W+AE and AE patients, showed the lowest rates of concomitant hypertension (15% vs 21% vs 40%, respectively) and obesity (11% vs 16% vs 17%, respectively), the highest rate of concomitant inducible urticaria (24% vs 22% vs 6%, respectively), and shorter W duration. The AE patients, compared with W+AE and W patients, were older at disease onset, showed longer AE duration, and the best response to increased doses of H 1 -antihistamines (58% vs 24% vs 31%, respectively) and omalizumab (92% vs 67% vs 60%, respectively)., Conclusions: Our findings provide a better understanding of CSU phenotypes and may guide patient care and research efforts that aim to link them to pathogenic drivers., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Blue wheals and blue angioedema, the adverse reactions to blue dye injections with or without anaphylaxis, are poorly defined., Objective: The objective is to review the characteristics (ie, sex and age at onset, interval between blue dye injection and symptom onset, clinical manifestations, duration of blue wheals or angioedema), natural courses, and treatments of blue dye adverse reactions., Methods: A review of the articles published through July 2021 was performed per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations., Results: Across 523 patients (175 studies) with any adverse reactions to blue dye injections, wheals, angioedema, or both occurred in 193 patients (36.9%). Of these 193 patients, 68 patients (35.2%) developed blue wheals or angioedema, 118 (61.1%) had ordinary wheals or angioedema (nonbluish), and 7 had both (3.6%). We reviewed 169 patients with available data (99 with ordinary lesions and 70 with blue lesions). Patent blue violet had the highest rate of inducing blue wheals or angioedema (odds ratio 4.9). Almost half of the patients with blue wheals or angioedema developed systemic symptoms; and of those with systemic symptoms, all except 1 progressed to anaphylaxis. On-demand treatments with antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrine were commonly used and effective., Conclusions: Using blue dyes can lead to blue wheals or angioedema and systemic reactions. In patients with a history of a severe allergic reaction to a blue dye, repeat administration of a blue dye should be used only after carefully weighing all the risks and benefits., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and urticarial vasculitis (UV) share several clinical features including the occurrence of wheals. As of yet, the criteria for differentiating the 2 disorders are not clearly defined., Objective: Here, we aimed to identify differences, similarities, and the likelihood for specific clinical features in patients with UV versus those with CSU., Methods: Across 10 Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence, 106 patients with skin biopsy-confirmed UV and 126 patients with CSU were prospectively recruited to complete a questionnaire on the clinical features, course, and response to treatment of their disease., Results: As compared with CSU, patients with UV more often experienced postinflammatory skin hyperpigmentation, wheals of ≥24-hour duration, eye inflammation, and fever (6.9, 4.0, 3.6, and 2.4 times, respectively). Clinical features that increased the risk for UV diagnosis when present at the onset of disease included wheals of ≥24-hour duration (7.3-fold), pain of the skin (7.0-fold), postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (4.1-fold), and fatigue (3.1-fold). The diagnostic delay was markedly longer for normocomplementemic UV as compared with hypocomplementemic UV and CSU (21 vs 5 vs 6 months, respectively). Oral corticosteroids and omalizumab were the most effective treatments in patients with UV and CSU, respectively. Patients with UV showed a higher need for immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory therapies than patients with CSU., Conclusions: Long wheal duration, skin pain and hyperpigmentation, and systemic symptoms point to UV rather than CSU as the underlying disease and should prompt further diagnostic workup including a skin biopsy., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Two endotypes of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) associated with mast cell-activating autoantibodies are described, namely autoallergic chronic spontaneous urticaria (aaCSU; with immunoglobulin E [IgE]-anti-autoallergens) and autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (aiCSU; with IgG-anti-high-affinity receptor for the Fc region of immunoglobulin E [FcεRI]/IgE)., Objective: To investigate the rates of CSU patients with aaCSU and aiCSU., Methods: We analyzed 111 CSU patients for aaCSU (ie, IgE to thyroid peroxidase, interleukin 24) and for aiCSU (ie, a positive autologous serum skin and Basophil Activation Test plus immunoglobulin G [IgG]-anti-FcεRI/IgE). Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared in patients with aaCSU, aiCSU, and both., Results: Across 111 patients with CSU, 64 (58%) had aaCSU and 9 (8%) had aiCSU. Eight of the 9 aiCSU patients had aaCSU, but only 8 of 64 patients with aaCSU had aiCSU. In total, 7% (8 of 111) of patients had both aiCSU and aaCSU, 41% (46 of 111) had neither, and 16% (18 of 111) tested negative for all markers of aaCSU and aiCSU assessed. Patients with aaCSU or aiCSU are different from those without: patients with stand-alone aaCSU tend to be younger than non-aaCSU patients, aiCSU, and aaCSU/aiCSU overlapping subpopulations. In contrast, patients with aiCSU, with or without aaCSU coexistence, are more often female, have higher levels of thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies (both IgG and IgE), and show more severe quality of life impairment., Conclusions: Our novel finding that aiCSU coexisting with aaCSU needs to be confirmed in bigger cohorts and multicenter studies. Autoimmunity driven by autoreactive IgE and/or IgG in CSU needs further investigation for better understanding of the pathophysiology., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is believed to be Autoimmune (aiCSU) (type IIb CSU) in at least 8% of patients, associated with mast cell-activating IgG autoantibodies. Basophil tests such as the basophil activation test (BAT) and basophil histamine release assay (BHRA) are considered the best single tests for an aiCSU diagnosis. To date, the strength of associations among a positive BAT and/or BHRA (BAT/BHRA + ) and CSU features, patient demographics, and response to treatment remains poorly characterized., Objective: To evaluate the strength of current evidence on basophil tests as parameters for CSU characteristics., Methods: We performed a systematic literature search and review to assess the relationship between BAT/BHRA + and clinical and laboratory parameters of CSU. Of 1,058 records found in the search, 94 studies were reviewed by experts in urticaria and 42 were included in the analysis., Results: In CSU patients, BAT/BHRA + showed a strong level of evidence for an association with high disease activity and low levels of total IgE. A weak level of evidence was shown for the association of BAT/BHRA + and the presence of angioedema, and basopenia., Conclusions: Our results suggest that aiCSU defined by BAT/BHRA + is more active or severe and is linked to other aiCSU markers such as low total IgE/basopenia. Basophil tests should be standardized and implemented in routine clinical care to improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients with aiCSU., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a frequent and often severely disabling disease. A large number of studies were performed during the last 2 decades to clarify its pathogenesis. These studies shed light on the underlying autoimmune mechanisms of CSU pathogenesis and have led us to understand that different mechanisms may exist and, sometimes, coexist behind the same clinical presentation. The present article reviews the meaning of the terms autoreactivity, autoimmunity, and autoallergy, which have been variably used over the years to define different endotypes of the disease. Furthermore, we discuss the methods potentially able to lead us to the correct classification of CSU patients., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Food-dependent exercise-induced allergic reactions can manifest with wheals, angioedema, and anaphylaxis, alone or in combination., Objective: To systematically review the clinical manifestation, culprit foods and exercise, augmenting factors, comorbidities, and treatment options of each phenotype., Methods: Using predefined search terms, we assessed and analyzed the relevant literature until June 2021. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations were applied to this systematic review., Results: A total of 231 studies with 722 patients were included. The most common phenotype was anaphylaxis with wheals, angioedema, or both, reported in 80% of patients. This was associated with a higher number of anaphylactic episodes, augmenting factors, and use of on-demand antihistamine compared with the least common phenotype, anaphylaxis without wheals or angioedema, reported in 4% of patients. Anaphylaxis with wheals/angioedema was also associated with distinct characteristics compared with stand-alone wheals, angioedema, or both, in 17% of patients. Patients with anaphylaxis were older at the time of disease onset, less often had a history of atopy, showed more positive results in response to food and exercise provocation tests, had a more restricted spectrum of culprit foods, and more often used on-demand epinephrine., Conclusions: The three phenotypes of allergic reactions to food and exercise differ in clinical characteristics, triggers, and response to treatment. Knowledge of these differences may help with patient education and counseling as well as disease management., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disease with significant morbidity and mortality for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. Many Asia Pacific (AP) countries still lack access to diagnostic tests and evidence-based therapies. Epidemiologic data from the AP is needed to formulate regional guidelines to improve standards of care for HAE., Objective: To investigate the estimated minimal prevalence, needs, and potential interventions for the diagnosis and management of HAE in the AP., Methods: A structured questionnaire was distributed to representative experts from member societies of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. Patient profiles and the presence of diagnostic facilities or tests, regional and national HAE guidelines, and patient support groups were reported and compared., Results: Completed questionnaires were received from 14 representatives of 12 member countries and territories, representing 46% of the world population. Overall minimal prevalence of HAE in the AP region was 0.02/100,000 population, with significant heterogeneity across different centers. Only one-half and one-third had registered on-demand and prophylactic medications, respectively. Few had patient support groups (58%) or regional guidelines (33%), and their existence was associated with the availability of HAE-specific medications. Availability of C1-inhibitor level testing was associated with a lower age at HAE diagnosis (P = .017)., Conclusions: Hereditary angioedema in the AP differs from that in Western countries. Hereditary angioedema-specific medications were registered in only a minority of countries and territories, but those with patient support groups or regional guidelines were more likely to have better access. Asia Pacific-specific consensus and guidelines are lacking and urgently needed., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Eating can increase disease activity in patients with symptomatic dermographism , the most common subtype of chronic inducible urticaria, but it is unclear how common this is. The effects of exercising on symptomatic dermographism disease activity have also not yet been determined., Objective: To assess the impact of exercise and nonspecific carbohydrate-rich food intake on the severity and intensity of symptomatic dermographism after exercise and nonspecific carbohydrate-rich food intake., Methods: We assessed disease activity by FricTest provocation testing in 75 symptomatic dermographism patients before and after eating, exercising, or both. We determined the rates of food-dependent (FD) symptomatic dermographism and food-exacerbated (FE) symptomatic dermographism. By comparing post- and pre-exercise FricTest scores, we identified complete responders: that is, patients with a negative FricTest response after exercising and partial responders. Finally, we evaluated whether exercise protects patients with FD-symptomatic dermographism or FE-symptomatic dermographism from eating-induced worsening of symptomatic dermographism., Results: Of 64 symptomatic dermographism patients, eight had FD-symptomatic dermographism (13%), 42 had FE-symptomatic dermographism (66%), and 14 patients showed no negative impact of eating on disease activity (21%). Physical exercise reduced FricTest skin provocation test responses in 83% of 58 patients. Exercising protected patients with FD/FE-symptomatic dermographism from worsening of symptomatic dermographism owing to eating in half of cases, with higher rates for exercise after eating (67%) compared with exercise before eating (35%)., Conclusions: Our study shows that eating often worsen symptomatic dermographism symptoms, and exercise often improves it. Our findings might aid patients in controlling symptoms better., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a distressing disease. We report real-world data from the global Chronic Urticaria Registry (CURE) about associations between various CSU states and sleep impairment, plus important health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes and compared different methods to assess CSU states., Methods: CURE data were collected at baseline and 6-monthly follow-ups (FU). Assessments included CSU states using the Urticaria Control Test (UCT), weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), and Physician Global Assessment (PhyGA) of treatment response. Complete response to treatment (CR, UAS7 = 0), complete control of disease (CC, UCT = 16), and PhyGA = CR were assessed, plus the Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Chronic Urticaria Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CU-Q 2 oL) sleep domain., Results: Overall, 2078 patients were included. At baseline, 9.8%, 17.9%, and 42.3% of patients had UCT = 16, UAS7 = 0, or PhyGA = CR, respectively, which increased at FU1 and FU2. Patients with higher UCT scores had better sleep and HRQoL. The presence of angioedema without wheals, episodic disease, omalizumab treatment, and male sex were associated with CC (P < .05). Among 469 patients who achieved CC or CR, 16.4% (n = 77) showed CC or CR with all 3 instruments. Agreement between UCT = 16 and UAS7 = 0 measurements was moderate (κ = 0.581), but poor between UCT = 16 and PhyGA = CR (κ = 0.208)., Conclusions: Few patients had CR/CC of their CSU at baseline entry. Disease control strongly related to good sleep and better HRQoL; therefore, it is important to aim for CR in CSU treatment. Patient-reported UCT and UAS7 assessments demonstrated a more accurate measurement of CSU state versus physician assessments., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is primarily a T2-dominant disease with a complex genetic background. Skin mast cell activation can be induced not only via the IgE-FcεRI axis but also from several other distinct mechanisms, molecules, and receptors involved in CSU onset, persistence, and exacerbation. These include autoallergy, autoimmunity, central or peripheral neuroimmune dysregulation, activation of both extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation pathways, and microbial infections. Besides mast cells, recent reports suggest the active and direct involvement of basophils and eosinophils. Several biological characteristics or biomarkers have been linked with CSU's known endotypes and may help forecast therapeutic responses. The introduction of biologic therapy for CSU has been a major advance in the last 10 years. The cornerstone of angioedema (AE) pathogenesis is increased vascular permeability and plasma leakage into the deeper dermis and subcutis, either mediated by histamine or bradykinin (BK). C1-inhibitor deficiency, hereditary or acquired, is the primary cause of BK-mediated AE due to increased plasma BK concentration. Other complex conditions have been identified, with some likely involving contact system dysregulation and other putative mechanisms related to vascular endothelial dysfunction. The approval of multiple hereditary-AE-specific therapies for both prevention and acute attacks has revolutionized treatment of this disease. Any new knowledge of the pathogenesis of CSU and AE offers the opportunity to improve patient information, physician-patient communication, prediction of therapeutic responses, selection of precise tailor-made treatment for each patient, and exploration of novel treatment options for those who do not achieve disease control with current medications., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE), a potentially life-threatening genetic disorder due to C1 inhibitor deficiency in most cases, is characterized by sudden and/or recurrent attacks of angioedema (subcutaneous/submucosal swellings). The global World Allergy Organization (WAO)/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) International guideline for HAE management is comprehensive, but the implementation of this guideline may require regional adaptation considering the diversity in disease awareness, type of medical care systems, and access to diagnostics and treatment. The aim of this Delphi initiative was to build on the global guideline and provide regional adaptation to address the concerns and specific needs in the Middle East., Methods: The Consensus panel comprised 13 experts from the Middle East (3 from the United Arab Emirates, 3 from Saudi Arabia, 2 from Lebanon, 2 from Kuwait, 2 from Oman and 1 from Qatar) who have more than 2 decades of experience in allergy and immunology and are actively involved in managing HAE patients. The process that was carried out to reach the consensus recommendation included: 1.) A systematic literature review for articles related to HAE management using Ovid MEDLINE. 2.) The development of a questionnaire by an internationally acclaimed expert, with 10 questions specific to HAE management in the Middle East. 3.) Experts received the questionnaire via email individually and their answers were recorded (email/interview). 4.) A virtual consensus meeting was organized to discuss the questionnaire, make amends if needed, vote, and achieve consensus., Results: The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, each with 2 or more statements/recommendations on which the regional experts voted. A consensus was reached based on a 70% agreement between the participants. The key highlights include: 1) HAE experts in the Middle East emphasized the importance of a positive family history for arriving at a diagnosis of HAE. 2) The number of episodes per month or per 6-month period and severity should be used, together with other markers, to determine the need for prophylaxis. 3) Disease status should be monitored by periodic visits and the use of patient-reported outcome measures such as the angioedema activity score and the angioedema control test. 4) Attenuated androgens and tranexamic acid may be considered for long-term prophylaxis, if lanadelumab, C1-Inhibitor or berotralstat are not available., Conclusion: This consensus recommendation may help to educate healthcare practitioners in the Middle East and unify their approach to the diagnosis and management of HAE., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Disease burden is particularly high in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) patients with angioedema, and patients whose signs and symptoms are inadequately controlled by H 1 -antihistamines need new treatment options. Here we report an exploratory analysis, from the ligelizumab Phase 2b study, investigating angioedema occurrence in patients with CSU and describe the changes in angioedema following treatment with ligelizumab, omalizumab, or placebo., Methods: Data from the ligelizumab Phase 2b core (ligelizumab 72 mg, 240 mg, omalizumab 300 mg and placebo) and extension study (ligelizumab 240 mg) were used. Changes in Weekly Angioedema Activity Score (AAS7), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) among each time point were analyzed for each treatment arm., Results: From a total of 297 patients analyzed, 165 (55.6%) reported angioedema occurrence at baseline, with mean AAS7 ranging 30.6-42.2 across treatment arms. At Week 12 of the core study 87.5%, 84.6%, 75.0%, and 61.0% of patients were angioedema free for ligelizumab 72 mg, 240 mg, omalizumab 300 mg, and placebo arms, respectively. In CSU patients with angioedema at baseline, the largest change from baseline in AAS7 score was observed with ligelizumab 72 mg (-31.9) at week 16 in the core study. Patients with angioedema had a higher mean DLQI at baseline (14.9-16.1) vs. patients without angioedema (10.6-12.0). In patients with angioedema, low AAS7 was significantly associated with complete response on UAS7 (UAS7 = 0) and complete normalization of DLQI (DLQI 0-1)., Conclusion: In the Phase 2b study, ligelizumab effectively reduced angioedema and urticaria symptoms, and improve health related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe CSU., Clinicaltrailsgov Nct Number: NCT02477332; NCT02649218., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare and difficult-to-treat chronic skin disease defined by long-lasting urticarial lesions and the histopathologic finding of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. As of yet, little is known about UV patients' perspective on the disease., Objective: To assess UV patients' perspective on the clinical course, treatment response, greatest challenges, and quality-of-life (QOL) impairment., Methods: A web-based questionnaire was disseminated in a Facebook group of patients with UV. Patients with UV confirmed by skin biopsy were included., Results: Patients with UV had a mean age of 47.3 ± 12.3 years and were mostly female (94.3%; n = 82 of 87). The median delay in diagnosis was 8.1 months (interquartile range, 2.0-46.3). Normocomplementemia and hypocomplementemia were present in 54.0% (n = 27) and 46.0% (n = 23) of 50 patients, respectively. Most patients with UV (51.8%; n = 43 of 83) reported severely decreased QOL due to their disease. Low QOL was also the most frequently reported greatest challenge for patients with UV (40.7%), followed by the long-standing course of UV with frequent relapses (14.8%). Low QOL correlated with long disease duration (r = 0.298; P = .02) and high numbers of clinical symptoms (r = 0.294; P = .007). Patients with UV with allergies, lung diseases, and chronic infections reported lower QOL. Patients with UV with low QOL were treated with analgesics, dapsone, montelukast, omalizumab, and colchicine more often than patients with UV with higher QOL (P < .05 for all)., Conclusions: Our results show a considerable impairment in QOL in patients with UV associated with long disease duration, high symptom burden, and a high need for therapy. Improvement of the management of UV by further research is necessary., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Food-dependent exercise-induced wheals, angioedema, and anaphylaxis remain insufficiently characterized., Objective: We systematically reviewed the literature on clinical manifestations, laboratory investigations, culprit foods, triggering exercise, comorbidities, and treatment outcomes., Methods: Using predefined search terms and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) recommendations, we searched 3 electronic databases to identify relevant literature published before July 2021., Results: Of 722 patients (median age 25 years; 55.4% male) from 231 studies (43 cohort studies, 15 cases series, and 173 case reports), 79.6% and 3.7% had anaphylaxis with and without wheals and/or angioedema, respectively. The remaining 16.6% had wheals and/or angioedema without anaphylaxis. The duration from eating to exercising and from exercising to symptom onset ranged from 5 minutes to 6 hours (median 1 hour) and from 5 minutes to 5 hours (median 30 minutes), respectively, and virtually all patients exercised within 4 hours after eating and developed symptoms within 1 hour after exercising. Wheat was the most common culprit food. Running was the most common trigger exercise. Most patients were atopic, and 1 in 3 had a history of urticaria. Aspirin and wheat-based products were the most frequent augmenting factors. On-demand antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrine were commonly used and reported to be effective. Patients who stopped eating culprit foods before exercise no longer developed food-dependent exercise-induced allergic reactions., Conclusions: Food-dependent exercise-induced allergic reactions are heterogeneous in their clinical manifestations, triggers, and response to treatment. Patients benefit from avoidance of culprit foods before exercise, which highlights the need for allergological diagnostic workup and guidance., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) has a favorable prognosis and normal life expectancy. However, many patients suffer from mast cell (MC) mediator-related symptoms, which significantly affect quality of life (QoL). Cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and neurological complaints, musculoskeletal pain, and the presence of skin lesions, anaphylaxis, and osteoporosis are the main symptoms and signs in ISM and must be assessed in all patients before and during treatment. Validated mastocytosis-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) should be used for this purpose. Serum tryptase and KIT D816V allele burden are recommended as secondary outcome parameters, noting that they do not reflect the severity of signs, symptoms, and related QoL impairment, but indirectly express MC burden. Changes from baseline of 90%, 60%, and 30% indicate complete response >90%, major response 60% to 90%, partial response 30% to 60%, and no response <30% to treatment. To conclude, we recommend the use of PROMs as primary outcome parameters to define treatment response in patients with ISM in clinical trials and in everyday clinical practice., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Aquagenic urticaria (AquaU) is a rare variant of chronic inducible urticaria where wheals occur after skin contact with water. Information on clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes is limited, which makes the management of AquaU challenging., Objective: To systematically review disease features and relevant triggers of AquaU and patients' response to treatment., Methods: Related articles were searched by use of the terms "aquagenic urticaria" and "aquagenic angioedema" until June 2021 and reviewed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations., Results: A total of 77 patients with AquaU were investigated in 59 studies including 47 case reports and 12 case series. AquaU predominantly presented in women (47 patients, 61%), and the mean age of onset of the disease was 19.6 ± 10.8 years (range: 0-54 years). Wheals commonly occurred in localized areas and regardless of the water temperature. Based on the reviewed evidence, AquaU can be classified as familial AquaU (FAquaU, 18.2%) and acquired AquaU (AAquaU, 81.8%). Although many treatments were used in both subtypes of AquaU, the use of second-generation H 1 antihistamines (2 nd AH 1 ) was reported most often to achieve marked improvement in both subtypes. The use of topical therapies in AquaU, which most commonly use hydrophobic vehicles, is poorly documented and of controversial efficiency., Conclusions: AquaU is proposed to be classified into 2 subtypes, FAquaU and the more common AAquaU. Treatment with a 2 nd AH 1 is recommended as the first-line treatment for both types of AquaU. Further studies are required to fill knowledge gaps., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To explore and compare the efficacy of standard (300 mg every 2 weeks) and extended (300 mg every 4 weeks) dosing regimens of lanadelumab for long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE)., Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients with HAE on lanadelumab, which identified a total of 9 patients: 5 females and 4 males. The median age of patients was 31 years (IQR 20.7). The mean number of attacks per month before starting lanadelumab was 5.9 (SD 6.3). Patients were started on 300 mg of lanadelumab subcutaneously, every 2 weeks (standard group, n = 5) or every 4 weeks (extended group, n = 4)., Results: We observed a statistically significant improvement in the number of angioedema attacks per month in all 9 patients ( p  = 0.007). Five out of 9 patients (56%) achieved complete remission from attacks after starting lanadelumab. The effect of lanadelumab on number of angioedema attacks was significant in both groups; extended group ( p  = 0.03) and standard group ( p  = 0.01)., Conclusion: Lanadelumab is a safe and effective agent for long-term prophylaxis of HAE. An extended dosing regimen was equally effective as prophylaxis compared to a standard regimen. Further studies are needed to compare the 2 regimens in a larger patient group., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. This revision and update of the global WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE provides up-to-date guidance for the management of HAE. For this update and revision of the guideline, an international panel of experts reviewed the existing evidence, developed 28 recommendations, and established consensus by an online DELPHI process. The goal of these recommendations and guideline is to help physicians and their patients in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1-inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1-inhibitor (type 2), by providing guidance on common and important clinical issues, such as: 1) How should HAE be diagnosed? 2) When should HAE patients receive prophylactic on top of on-demand treatment and what treatments should be used? 3) What are the goals of treatment? 4) Should HAE management be different for special HAE patient groups such as children or pregnant/breast feeding women? 5) How should HAE patients monitor their disease activity, impact, and control? It is also the intention of this guideline to help establish global standards for the management of HAE and to encourage and facilitate the use of recommended diagnostics and therapies for all patients., Competing Interests: Dr. Maurer reports personal fees from Alnylam, grants and personal fees from BioCryst, grants from Centogene, grants and personal fees from CSL Behring, grants from Dyax, grants and personal fees from Kalvista, grants from Pharming, personal fees from Pharvaris, grants and personal fees from Shire/Takeda, outside the submitted work. Dr. Magerl reports personal fees and non-financial support from Shire/Takeda, personal fees and non-financial support from CSL Behring, personal fees from Pharming, personal fees and non-financial support from Biocryst, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and non-financial support from Shire/Takeda, personal fees and non-financial support from CSL Behring, personal fees from Pharming, personal fees and non-financial support from Biocryst, personal fees from Kalvista, personal fees from Octapharma, personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Betschel has received fees for advisory boards, presentations and research from CSL and Takeda. Advisor fees from Biocryst and Kalvista, Octapharma, Pharming, outside of the submitted work. Dr. Aberer has nothing to disclose. Dr. Ansotegui has nothing to disclose. Dr. Aygören-Pürsün reports personal fees from Biocryst, personal fees from Biomarin, personal fees from Centogene, grants and personal fees from CSL Behring, personal fees from Kalvista, personal fees from Pharming, personal fees from Pharvaris, grants and personal fees from Shire/Takeda, outside the submitted work. Dr. Banerji reports grants from Takeda, Biocryst, other from Takeda, Biocryst, Pharming, CSL, Kalvista, Pharvaris, outside the submitted work. Dr. Bara reports personal fees from commercial sponsor, outside the submitted work. Dr. Boccon-gibod reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Takeda, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Biocryst Pharmaceutical, non-financial support from Pharming, outside the submitted work. Dr. Bork reports grants and personal fees from CSL Behring, personal fees from Shire/Takeda, personal fees from Pharvaris, outside the submitted work. Dr. Bouillet reports grants and personal fees from Takeda, Biocryst, Novartis, and GSK. H. B. Boysen has nothing to disclose. Dr. Brodski has nothing relevant to disclose. Dr. Busse reports grants and personal fees from CSL Behring, BioCryst, Takeda; personal fees from Medscape, CVS Health, Novartis, Regeneron Dr. Bygum reports grants and personal fees from CSL Behring, grants from BioCryst, personal fees from Takeda/Shire outside the submitted work. Dr. Caballero reports grants, personal fees and other from CSL-BEHRING, grants, personal fees and other from TAKEDA, personal fees and other from PHARMING NV, personal fees from OCTAPHARMA, personal fees and other from BIOCRYST, personal fees and other from NOVARTIS, outside the submitted work. Dr. Cancian reports and has received grant research support and/or speaker/consultancy fees from BioCryst, CSL Behring, Kalvista, Pharming, Shire (a Takeda company) and SOBI; has received funding to attend conferences/educational events from CSL Behring, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pharming and Shire; is/has been a clinical trial/registry investigator for BioCryst, CSL Behring, Kalvista, Novartis, Pharming, Shire and UCB. Dr. Castaldo has nothing to disclose. Dr. Cohn reports personal fees from CSL Behring, personal fees from Shire/Takeda, personal fees from Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, personal fees from KalVista, personal fees from BioCryst, personal fees from Pharming, personal fees from Pharvaris, personal fees from Sanofi/Genzyme Europe, outside the submitted work. Dr. Csuka has nothing to disclose. Dr. Farkas reports grants and personal fees from CSL Behring, grants and personal fees from Shire/Takeda, grants and personal fees from Pharming Group NV, personal fees from Biocryst Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Kalvista, personal fees from ONO Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Dr. Gompels reports fee for CSL and conference attendance support, member of the immunology clinical reference group, clinical trial work for Novartis, BioCryst. Dr. Gower reports Industry funded research/investigator: BioCryst, Kalvista, Pharming, Pharvaris, Takeda/Shire/Dyax Consultant: BioCryst, CSL Behring, Fresenius Kabi, Pharming, Takeda/Shire/Dyax Speakers Bureau, Faculty, Peer Reviewer: BioCryst, Pharming, Takeda/Shire/Dyax Advisory Committee/Board: BioCryst, CSL Behring, Fresenius Kabi, Pharming, Takeda/Shire/Dyax. Dr Grumach reports grants from Shire/Takeda and personal fees from CSL Behring, Takeda, and Catalyst for educative programs and consulting. Dr. Guidos-Fogelbach has nothing to disclose. Dr Hide reports personal fees from BioCryst, CSL Behring, Takeda and Torii. Dr. Kang has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kaplan has nothing to disclose. Dr Katelaris reports grants from CSL Behring, personal fees from CSL Behring, personal fees from Takeda, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Kiani-Alikhan reports personal fees from BioCryst, personal fees from CSL Behring, personal fees from Takeda, outside the submitted work. Dr. Lei has nothing to disclose. Dr. Lockey has nothing to disclose. Dr. Longhurst has consulted for, acted as speaker for or collaborated in research with the following: Adverum, BioCryst, CSL Behring, GSK, Intellia, Ionis, Kalivista, Pharming, Pharvaris, and Takeda. Dr. Lumry has consulted for, acted as speaker for or collaborated in research with the following: Adverum, Astra Zeneca, BioCryst, Biomarin, CSL Behring, Fresenius Kabi, GSK, Intellia, Ionis, Kalivista, Pharming, Pharvaris, Sanofi Regeneron, Takeda and Teva. Dr. MacGinnitie reports personal fees from Biocryst, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Malbran has nothing to disclose. Inmaculada Martinez Saguer has received research grant support and/or speaker/consultancy fees from BioCryst, CSL Behring, KalVista, Pharming, and Takeda. Dr. Matta has nothing to disclose. Dr. Nast has no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript. Dr. Nguyen has nothing to disclose. Dr. Nieto-Martinez has nothing to disclose. Dr. Pawankar declares no conflicts of interest in relation to this manuscript. Dr. Peter has nothing to disclose. Dr. Porebski is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for CSL Behring, Takeda, Pharming, and has served as an investigator for clinical trials sponsored by BioCryst Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Prior reports receipt of research grant support and/or speaker/consultancy fees from CSL Behring, Pharming, and Shire (currently Takeda). Dr. Reshef Received research grants, speakers and consulting honoraria from CSL Behring, Stallergens, Teva, Pharming, BioCryst, Pharvaris, Takeda (Shire) - not related to the article. Dr. Marc Riedl has received research grants from BioCryst, CSL Behring, Ionis, Kalvista, Pharvaris, and Takeda outside the submitted work; consultancy fees from Astria, BioCryst, Biomarin, CSL Behring, Cycle Pharma, Fresenius-Kabi, Ipsen, Kalvista, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Pharming, Pharvaris, RegenexBio, and Takeda outside the submitted work. Dr. Bruce Ritchie has received Research grants from CSL-Behring, and has participated in clinical trials with Biocrist, CSL-Behring, Ionis, Kalvista, Pharvaris, and Takeda. The University of Alberta has received donations in lieu of consultancy fees to Dr. Ritchie from CSL Behring, Takeda. Dr. Sheikh reports other from Takeda, grants from CSL Behring, outside the submitted work. Dr. Smith reports other from BioCryst, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Takeda/Shire, personal fees from CSL Behring, outside the submitted work. Dr. Späth reports other from CSL Ltd, outside the submitted work; and Expert in an ongoing litigation. Dr. Stobiecki reports other from Takeda, Biocryst, Pharming, Kalvista, fees from CSL Behring, Takeda, Biocryst, outside the submitted work. Dr. Toubi has no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript. Dr. Varga has no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript. Dr. Weller reports personal fees from Biocryst, CSL Behring, MOXIE and Pharvaris as well as grants and personal fees from Shire/Takeda, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Zanichelli has no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript. Dr. Zhi has nothing to disclose. Dr. Zuraw has been a paid consultant for Biomarin, CSL Behring, Cycle Pharma, Fresenius-Kabi, and Takeda. He serves on adjudication boards for Novartis and Genentech. Dr. Craig does research for CSL Behring, Ionis, Takeda, Kalvista, Pharvaris, BioMarin, and Biocryst. He speaks for CSL Behring, Takeda and Grifols. He has a grant to support education from Takeda. He consults with Spark, CSL Behring, Takeda, BioMarin, Pharming and Biocryst., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Background: Monitoring the effects of treatment on disease activity, impact, and control in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is essential. We do not have enough information on how these features of CSU and its response to treatment are linked. Also, there is no information on how recurrent angioedema or coexisting chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) affect their relation. The aim of this study was to analyse the link between disease activity, impact, and control in CSU patients and possible effects of recurrent angioedema and comorbid CIndU., Methods: To perform these analyses, we validated the Polish version of the Urticaria Control Test (UCT) in 106 chronic urticaria patients. The relationship between CSU activity, impact, and control was assessed in regard to recurrent angioedema and coexisting CIndU., Results: The Polish UCT showed high levels of validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. Disease activity, impact, and control as well as their changes, assessed by the UAS, the CU-Q 2 oL, and the UCT, respectively, were strongly correlated. Recurrent angioedema or comorbid CIndU did not significantly affect the link of CSU activity, impact, and control or the relation of their changes., Conclusions: In CSU, there is a strong, albeit not perfect correlation of disease activity, impact, and control, which underlines the need to assess all 3 features of the disease in routine clinical practice. Recurrent angioedema and comorbid CIndU, which are both common and relevant in CSU, do not affect how disease activity, impact and control in patients with CSU are related to each other., Competing Interests: Authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a debilitating skin disease that lasts for more than 6 weeks with wheals and/or angioedema, including chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU). In China, the prevalence of this disease is high, more than 1%, and on the rise. CU has a major impact on the quality of life (QoL) of patients who frequently experience sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety. Nearly one-third of patients with CSU, in China, are resistant to second-generation H 1 -antihistamines (sgAHs), even at a fourfold dose (second line; off-label). Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of CSU treatment in Europe and shows remarkable efficacy and safety. In China, regulatory approval for the use of omalizumab is pending, and its use in clinical practice varies widely. Consensus on omalizumab CU treatment in China is urgently needed. The aim of this article is to propose a practical omalizumab treatment algorithm for the management of antihistamine-resistant CSU and CIndU in adults and special population including children and adolescents, and pregnant or breast feeding women, to guide daily clinical practice in China. In the development of this consensus, an expert group including mainly dermatologists, allergists, but also pulmonologists, ENTs, immunologists, and pediatricians in Allergic Disease Prevention and Control Committee, Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, reviewed the existing evidence and developed consensus on the use of omalizumab in CU patients from China. The goal of this consensus is to assist clinicians in making rational decisions in the management of refractory CU with omalizumab. The key clinical questions covered by the treatment algorithm are: 1) Omalizumab treatment routine strategy in both CSU and CIndU patients; 2) Recommended dose and treatment duration for different age stratification; 3) Treatment duration for CU patients with other allergic comorbidities; 4) Recommendation on omalizumab stopping strategy., Competing Interests: ZT Zhao has participated as Principal Investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Novartis, Pfizer. He has received consultancy/speaker honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas, Galderma, Janssen, GSK, BAYER, LEO, MEDA Pharma (a Mylan Company), and has acted as scientific Advisory Board member for Pfizer, Novartis, Astellas, LEO, MEDA Pharma (a Mylan Company). XH Gao has received consultancy/speaker honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas, Galderma, Janssen, Sinofi, GSK, LEO, Lilly, MEDA Pharma (a Mylan Company), and has acted as scientific Advisory Board member for Novartis, Lilly, Sinofi, MEDA Pharma (a Mylan Company). YS Guo has received consultancy/speaker honoraria from Novartis, Janssen, BAYER, AstraZeneca, Sanofi/Regeneron, ALK-Abello, Allergopharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, MSD and Thermo Fisher Scientific. H Long has received consultancy or speaker honoraria from Novartis, AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Astellas, GSK, BAYER, LEO, Menarini, Sanofi, BrightFuture, and CMS. MM is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for and/or has received research funding from Allakos, Amgen, Aralez, ArgenX, AstraZeneca, Celldex, Centogene, CSL Behring, FAES, Genentech, GIInnovation, Gilead, Innate Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Menarini, Moxie, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Regeneron, Third HarmonicBio, UCB, and Uriach. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Background: Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (aiCSU) comes with high disease activity and poor response to treatment. Recently, elevated levels of IgG anti-thyroid peroxidase (aTPO) and low levels of total IgE were reported to be common in aiCSU., Objective: To investigate how high aTPO and low IgE individually and combined are linked to features of aiCSU, including treatment responses., Methods: We analyzed records of patients with CSU from 2 independent cohorts (n = 1120) for demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters and treatment responses. Total IgE and aTPO were measured, and 4 markers of aiCSU were analyzed: autologous serum skin test, basophil activation test (BAT), and blood eosinophil and basophil counts. Cutoff values were greater than or equal to 34 kU/L (high aTPO) and less than 40 IU/mL (low total IgE)., Results: One of 10 patients with CSU had both high aTPO and low IgE (aTPO↑IgE↓, 11%, n = 123). aTPO↑IgE↓ was linked to higher age at CSU onset, being female, angioedema, and shorter CSU duration. aTPO↑IgE↓ was associated with markers of aiCSU, that is, BAT and autologous serum skin test positivity, basopenia, and eosinopenia (P < .01 for all). Almost half the patients with aTPO↑IgE↓ (44%, 19 of 43) had a positive BAT result, the best single marker for aiCSU, versus 12% (43 of 344) of patients without aTPO↑IgE↓ (P < .001). Relative risk of showing BAT positivity for a patient with aTPO↑IgE↓ is 3.636 (95% CI, 2.382-5.551). Patients with aTPO↑IgE↓ showed low response rates to antihistamine treatment as compared with patients without aTPO↑IgE↓ (30% vs 47%; P = .01)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that aTPO↑IgE↓ is a useful diagnostic marker for aiCSU in everyday clinical practice., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lanadelumab has been available in Germany for the prophylactic treatment of hereditary angioedema since February 2019., Objective: To investigate real-life treatment outcome of lanadelumab and gain practical experience in adapting the therapy to individual patients., Methods: The study included 34 patients. In 24 patients with hereditary angioedema and 4 patients with angioedema due to acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency, the previous treatment was switched to lanadelumab. In 6 patients with hereditary angioedema, lanadelumab from the open-label Hereditary Angioedema Long-term Prophylaxis study was continued in regular care. During the transition, patients were monitored using the angioedema control test and the angioedema quality of life questionnaire. At the time at which patients became symptom-free, the dosage interval was increased gradually (+3 days)., Results: On average, the angioedema control test values improved from 7.5 (poorly controlled disease) to 14.9 (well-controlled disease), and all patients showed adequate disease control. All treated patients, except 1 outlier, scored angioedema quality of life questionnaire values representing only a slight reduction in quality of life (mean, 14 points). At the time point of data collection, 9 patients used an average fixed injection interval of 30 days. Twenty-two patients were symptom-free from the beginning of the treatment phase and intended to extend their injection interval from 30 to 32.5 days (median). We recommended reducing the initial dosing interval from 24 to 21 days (median) to 3 patients because of intermediately occurring symptoms., Conclusions: Gradual extension of injection intervals of lanadelumab presented in this study can minimize the burden of therapy without losing efficacy., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Few studies have explored the association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and chronic urticaria (CU). Our study aims to fill this gap by determining the frequency of the risk categories for OSA and how they might correlate with the specific CU patient reported outcome measures urticaria activity score (UAS7), urticaria control test (UCT) and CU quality of life questionnaire (CU-Q2oL)., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving a cohort of 171 Latin American CU patients. Descriptive statistics were used to determine frequency and proportions for demographic and clinical variables, while a chi-squared test for association between STOP-Bang OSA questionnaire categories and both UAS7 and UCT categories was performed to analyze how such variables interact. To further assess the strength of the correlation a Cramer's V coefficient was reported. Finally, a Kendall-Tau b correlation coefficient was performed to measure the correlation between the STOP-Bang score and other independent continuous variables., Results: The average STOP-Bang score was 2.5, with 24% and 21% of patients falling into the intermediate and high-risk category for moderate-to-severe OSA, respectively. There was a strong statistically significant association (Cramer's V = 0.263; p = .000) between UAS-7 categories and STOP-Bang risk categories . A similar pattern of strong significant association (Cramer's V = .269; p = .002) was observed between UCT categories and STOP-Bang risk categories. A weak positive correlation between the STOP-Bang score and the CU-Q2oL average score (τ b  = 0.188, p = .001) was identified. Overall, 72.5% patients reported limitations with respect to sleep in a varied degree according to the CU-Q2oL., Conclusions: Our results suggest that a considerable proportion of patients with CU are at intermediate to high risk for OSA. Higher disease activity, poor CU control, and worse quality of life were all found to be associated with an increased risk. Additional studies are needed to determine the exact link between these conditions, and to determine whether screening and treatment for OSA might benefit patients with CU., Competing Interests: Authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this work., (© 2021 The Author(s).)

Objective: Recurrent Angioedema (RAE) is characterized by sudden swelling of mucosal surfaces or deep dermis and is either mast cell-(MMAE) or bradykinin-mediated (BMAE). How patients with BMAE and MMAE differ in terms of disease activity and impact remains largely unknown. Here, we determined validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of Turkish versions of angioedema activity score (AAS) and quality of life questionnaire (AE-QoL) and used both instruments to investigate and compare patients with BMAE and MMAE., Methods: Turkish versions of AAS28 and AE-QoL were applied to 94 patients with RAE (18-72 years). Patients' global self-assessment of QoL (PGA-QoL), disease activity (PGA-DA-VRS, PatGA-DA-VAS), and 12-Item-Short Form Survey were used at week 4 (visit 2), and week 8 (visit 3). Demographic characteristics, clinical features, and AAS28 and AE-QoL values were compared between 31 patients with BMAE and 63 patients with MMAE., Results: Turkish AAS28 and AE-QoL showed excellent internal consistency, high reproducibility and known-groups validity. Compared to patients with MMAE, BMAE patients were younger (34.6 ± 10.7 vs. 40.7 ± 13.3 years), had longer disease duration (236 ± 178 vs. 51 ± 78 months), high prevalence of family history (63% vs 14%), longer duration of attacks (65 ± 20 vs. 40 ± 25 h), and they were more commonly affected by upper airway angioedema (70% vs 23%). Disease activity (AAS28) was lower (29.3 ± 24.6 vs 55.2 ± 52.9), but AE-QoL was higher (44.2 ± 16.1 vs 34.5 ± 22.5) in BMAE patients as compared to MMAE patients., Conclusions: Patients with BMAE and MMAE have distinct disease characteristics. Recurrent bradykinin-mediated angioedema impacts quality of life more than mast cell-mediated angioedema. The discriminating characteristics of patients with BMAE and MMAE may help to improve the diagnosis and management of patients with RAE., Competing Interests: Emek Kocaturk reports advisory board fees from 10.13039/100004336Novartis, and has served as a medical advisor for 10.13039/100004326Bayer, Menarini and 10.13039/100004339Sanofi. Marcus Maurer is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for and/or has received research funding from Allakos, 10.13039/100002429Amgen, Aralez, ArgenX, Astra Zeneca, 10.13039/100012431Celldex, Centogene, 10.13039/100008322CSL Behring, 10.13039/100016525FAES, 10.13039/100004328Genentech, GIInnovation, Innate Pharma, 10.13039/100016348Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, 10.13039/100004312Lilly, Menarini, Moxie, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, 10.13039/100004337Roche, 10.13039/100004339Sanofi/10.13039/100009857Regeneron, Third HarmonicBio, 10.13039/100011110UCB, and Uriach. Karsten Weller is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for and/or has received research funding from Biocryst, 10.13039/100008322CSL Behring, Moxie, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, Shire/10.13039/100007723Takeda, and Uriach. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Background: Patients with chronic urticaria (CU) are increasingly using information and communication technologies (ICTs) to manage their health. What CU patients expect from ICTs and which ICTs they prefer remains unknown. We assessed why CU patients use ICTs, which ones they prefer, and what drives their expectations and choices., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 1841 patients across 17 countries were recruited at UCAREs (Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence). Patients with CU who were >12 years old completed a 23-item questionnaire., Results: Most patients were interested in receiving disease information (87.3%), asking physicians about CU (84.1%), and communicating with other patients through ICTs (65.6%). For receiving disease information, patients preferred one-to-one and one-to-many ICTs, especially web browsers. One-to-one ICTs were also the ICTs of choice for asking physicians about urticaria and for communicating with other patients, and e-mail and WhatsApp were the preferred ICTs, respectively. Many-to-many ICTs such as Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Twitter were least preferred for all 3 purposes. Living in rural areas and higher education were linked to higher odds of being interested in receiving disease information, asking physicians, and communicating with patients through ICTs., Conclusions: Most patients and especially patients with higher education who live in rural areas are interested in using ICTs for their healthcare, but prefer different ICTs for different purposes, ie, web browsers for obtaining information, e-mail for asking physicians, and WhatsApp for communicating with other patients. Our findings may help to improve ICTs for CU., Competing Interests: I Cherrez-Ojeda has no conflicts of interest. E Vanegas has no conflicts of interest. A Cherrez has no conflicts of interest. M Felix has no conflicts of interest. K Weller is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from: Biocryst, CSL Behring, Dr. Pfleger, FAES, Moxie, Novartis, Shire/Takeda, and Uriach. M Magerl is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from Biocryst, CSL Behring, Kalvista Pharmaceuticals, Moxie, Novartis, Pharming, and Shire/Takeda. RR Maurer has no conflicts of interest. VL Mata has no conflicts of interest. A Kasperska-Zajac has no conflicts of interest. A Sikora has no conflicts of interest. D Fomina is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from: AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Glaxo SmithKline, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, and Shire/Takeda. E Kovalkova has no conflicts of interest. K Godse has no conflicts of interest. N Dheeraj Rao has no conflicts of interest. M Khoshkhui has no conflicts of interest. S Rastgoo has no conflicts of interest. RFJ Criado has no conflicts of interest. M Abuzakouk has no conflicts of interest. D Grandon has no conflicts of interest. MBA van Doorn is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Genzyme. S Valle has no conflicts of interest. E Magalhães de Souza Lima has no conflicts of interest. SF Thomsen is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. GD Ramón has no conflicts of interest. EE Matos Benavides has no conflicts of interest. A Bauer is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from Novartis, Sanofi, Genentech, Leo Pharma and Shire/Takeda. Ana M Giménez-Arnau has held roles as a Medical Advisor for Sanofi, Uriach, Genentech, Novartis, Amgen , ThemoFisher, Roche, Almirall, and has research grants supported by Instituto Carlos III- FEDER, Novartis, and Uriach; she also participates in educational activities for Almirall, Genentech, Glaxo SmithKline, LEO Pharma, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Avene and Uriach. E Kocatürk is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for Bayer, Novartis, and Sanofi. C Guillet has no conflicts of interest. JI Larco is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for: FAES, Novartis, and Sanofi. Z-T Zhao has no conflicts of interest. M Makris is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Glaxo SmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi. C Ritchie has no conflicts of interest. P Xepapadak reports personal fees from Galenica Greece, Glaxo SmithKline, Nestle, Novartis, Nutricia, and Uriach, outside the submitted work. LF Ensina is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from Novartis, Sanofi, and Takeda. S Cherrez has no conflicts of interest. M Maurer is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from: Allakos, Alnylam, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Biocryst, Blueprint, CSL Behring, FAES, Genentech, Kalvista Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, Menarini, Moxie, MSD, Novartis, Pharming, Pharvaris, Roche, Sanofi, Shire/Takeda, UCB, and Uriach., (© 2021 The Author(s).)