Cherrez-Ojeda I, Bousquet J, Giménez-Arnau A, Godse K, Krasowska D, Bartosińska J, Szczepanik-Kułak P, Wawrzycki B, Kolkhir P, Allenova A, Allenova A, Tkachenko S, Teovska Mitrevska N, Mijakoski D, Stoleski S, Kolacinska-Flont M, Kuprys-Lipinska I, Molinska J, Kasperska-Zając A, Zajac M, Zamlynski M, Mihaltan F, Ulmeanu R, Zalewska-Janowska A, Tomaszewska K, Al-Ahmad M, Al-Nesf MA, Ibrahim T, Aqel S, Pesqué D, Rodríguez-González M, Wakida-Kuzunoki GH, Ramon G, Ramon G, Neisinger S, Bonnekoh H, Rukhadze M, Khoshkhui M, Fomina D, Larenas-Linnemann D, Košnik M, Oztas Kara R, Caballero López CG, Liu Q, Ivancevich JC, Ensina LF, Rosario N, Kvedariene V, Ben-Shoshan M, Criado RFJ, Bauer A, Cherrez A, Chong-Neto H, Rojo-Gutierrez MI, Rudenko M, Larco Sousa JI, Lesiak A, Matos E, Muñoz N, Tinoco I, Moreno J, Crespo Shijin C, Hinostroza Logroño R, Sagñay J, Faytong-Haro M, Robles-Velasco K, Zuberbier T, and Maurer M
Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are validated and standardized tools that complement physician evaluations and guide treatment decisions. They are crucial for monitoring atopic dermatitis (AD) and chronic urticaria (CU) in clinical practice, but there are unmet needs and knowledge gaps regarding their use in clinical practice., Objecctive: We investigated the global real-world use of AD and CU PROMs in allergology and dermatology clinics as well as their associated local and regional networks., Methods: Across 72 specialized allergy and dermatology centers and their local and regional networks, 2,534 physicians in 73 countries completed a 53-item questionnaire on the use of PROMs for AD and CU., Results: Of 2,534 physicians, 1,308 were aware of PROMs. Of these, 14% and 15% used PROMs for AD and CU, respectively. Half of physicians who use PROMs do so only rarely or sometimes. Use of AD and CU PROM is associated with being female, younger, and a dermatologist. The Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index and Urticaria Activity Score were the most common PROMs for AD and CU, respectively. Monitoring disease control and activity are the main drivers of the use of PROMs. Time constraints were the primary obstacle to using PROMs, followed by the impression that patients dislike PROMs. Users of AD and CU PROM would like training in selecting the proper PROM., Conclusions: Although PROMs offer several benefits, their use in routine practice is suboptimal, and physicians perceive barriers to their use. It is essential to attain higher levels of PROM implementation in accordance with national and international standards., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)