Search

Background: Although asthma is typically characterized by bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR), fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) occurs in ∼50% of patients with severe asthma., Objective: Do FAO/BDR associate with efficacy of omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets IgE?, Methods: In EXTRA, patients aged 12-75 years with inadequately controlled severe allergic asthma despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β 2 -agonists were randomized to omalizumab (n = 427) or placebo (n = 423) for 48 weeks of treatment. In this post hoc analysis, high/low BDR were defined as ≥12%/<12% increases in baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) after bronchodilator administration, respectively. FAO presence (+)/absence (-) were defined as baseline postbronchodilator FEV 1 /forced vital capacity <70%/≥70%, respectively. Poisson regression/analysis of covariance models were used to estimate exacerbation relative rate reductions (RRRs)/least-squares mean changes in FEV 1 , respectively., Results: In patients with high BDR, omalizumab reduced exacerbations more than placebo over the 48-week treatment period regardless of FAO status (RRR [95% confidence interval (CI)]: FAO+, 59.8% [17.7-80.4%]; FAO-, 44.3% [16.6-62.8%]). Omalizumab improved FEV 1 compared with placebo in the FAO-, high BDR subgroup (FEV 1 change from baseline [95% CI] for omalizumab vs placebo, 0.065 L [-0.071 to 0.201 L] to 0.236 L [0.112-0.359 L]) across 48 weeks. This was not observed in patients with low BDR, irrespective of FAO., Conclusion: Omalizumab was more efficacious than placebo at reducing exacerbations in patients with high, but not low, BDR, regardless of the presence of FAO. Lung function improvement primarily occurred in FAO-, high BDR patients, suggesting that asthma with low BDR may represent a difficult-to-treat phenotype., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peanut allergy is the most common food allergy among children. Studies assessing the burden of peanut allergy in a real-world setting are limited., Objective: To estimate annual incidence and prevalence of peanut allergy cases among children aged 4 to 17 years and assess severe reaction and associated health care utilization rates., Methods: Patient longitudinal data between January 2011 and December 2017 from a geographically and payer-type representative US health care claims database were used. Peanut allergy cases were identified using diagnostic codes and/or services indicating peanut-allergy-associated severe reactions/anaphylaxis. Estimated annual incidence was defined as peanut-allergic births as a proportion of all 1-year-olds and adjusted for less than 100% data set capture, undercoding, patient underpresenting rates, and spontaneous outgrowth. Prevalence was calculated on the basis of incidence. To assess rates of severe reactions to peanut and associated health care utilization, the cohort of 720,490 peanut allergy cases identified in 2011 was evaluated over a 6-year period from 2011 to 2017., Results: Annual incidence increased from 1.7% to 5.2% between 2001 and 2017. Estimated prevalence in 4- to 17-year-olds was 1.25 million (2.2%) in 2017. Atopic comorbidities (asthma, 60.8%; atopic dermatitis, 61.7%) and other food allergies (35.3%) were common. Severe reactions (≥1) were observed in more than half (n = 399,806) the patients, and 37.9% were triggered by an accidental exposure. One in 5 patients (n = 144,883) visited the emergency department due to peanut exposure., Conclusions: Claims data suggest that the incidence and prevalence of peanut allergy in the United States may be increasing. Estimated severe reaction rates and health care utilization were high, suggesting that the burden of peanut allergy may be considerable., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Frequent exacerbations are associated with greater FEV 1 decline in patients with asthma. The effect of omalizumab versus placebo on lung function in patients experiencing asthma exacerbations has not been previously examined., Objective: To evaluate the relationship between postbaseline (treatment phase) exacerbation status and lung function decline in children, adolescents, and adults treated with omalizumab versus placebo using data from 3 pediatric and adolescent/adult studies., Methods: Changes in percent predicted FEV 1 (ppFEV 1 ) and FEV 1 by treatment (omalizumab/placebo) and postbaseline exacerbation status (exacerbators/nonexacerbators) were assessed in patients aged 6 to 11 years (IA05, n = 576) and 12 to 75 years (EXTRA/INNOVATE pooled, n = 1202). Pediatric patients were examined at treatment weeks 12, 24, 28, 40, and 52, and adolescent/adult data at weeks 4, 12, 20, and 28., Results: Omalizumab-treated patients experienced larger increases in ppFEV 1 and FEV 1 compared with placebo-treated patients in the pediatric and pooled adolescent/adult populations. The response was observed in pediatric exacerbators, with significantly larger increases in ppFEV 1 and FEV 1 at week 12 (mean difference [95% CI], 4.11% [0.93%-7.30%], P = .011 for ppFEV 1 ; 80 [10-140] mL, P = .017 for FEV 1 ) and week 28 (mean difference [95% CI], 3.65% [0.11%-7.19%], P = .043 for ppFEV 1 ; 100 [30-170] mL, P = .007 for FEV 1 ). In the adolescent/adult population, both exacerbators and nonexacerbators derived similar benefit with omalizumab compared with placebo., Conclusions: Findings from this post hoc analysis suggest that omalizumab may confer some protection against lung function decline among patients who experienced exacerbations during treatment., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Greater severity in childhood asthma negatively impacts functioning and quality of life. Omalizumab is effective in children aged 6 years or older with moderate to severe persistent asthma, but predicting responsiveness in severe disease requires further study., Objective: To assess response to omalizumab treatment among children using indicators of asthma severity., Methods: Post hoc analyses of randomized placebo-controlled studies of omalizumab (Inner-City Anti-IgE Therapy for Asthma [ICATA], IA05, and Preventative Omalizumab or Step-up Therapy for Fall Exacerbations [PROSE]) stratified by body mass index, eosinophil count, fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, and baseline severity indicators (baseline percent predicted FEV 1 , previous hospitalizations, asthma exacerbations). Poisson regression analysis examined exacerbation rate reductions for body mass index, biomarkers, and severity indicators., Results: Children aged 6 to 11 years in IA05 (N = 576; 56% white, 17% black, 26% other/missing), ICATA (N = 237; 55% black, 43% Hispanic), and PROSE (N = 342; 59% black, 35% Hispanic) were included. Trends indicative of greater exacerbation rate change ([omalizumab - placebo]/placebo) were observed for low baseline lung function (IA05 percent predicted FEV 1 : <90%, 36% reduction, 95% CI, -53.3 to -13.5; ≥90%, 22% reduction, 95% CI, -52.1 to 27.5), previous hospitalizations (ICATA: 46% reduction with, 95% CI, -69.7 to -3.9; 24% reduction without, 95% CI, -48.1 to 10.3), frequent baseline exacerbations (IA05: ≥3, 42% reduction, 95% CI, -60.4 to -14.1; <3, 20% reduction, 95% CI, -45.2 to -15.9), and high baseline eosinophil count (IA05: ≥300 cells/μL, 39% reduction, 95% CI, -56.4 to -14.7; <300 cells/μL, 5% reduction, 95% CI, -40.6 to 52.1)., Conclusions: Omalizumab reduces exacerbations in children with moderate to severe persistent allergic asthma, and may provide greater benefit in children with more severe asthma subtypes., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Severe/difficult-to-treat disease occurs in 5% to 10% of patients with asthma, but accounts for more than 50% of related economic costs. Understanding factors associated with persistent very poorly controlled (VPC) asthma may improve outcomes., Objective: To characterize persistent VPC asthma after more than 10 years of standard of care., Methods: The Epidemiology and Natural history of asthma: Outcomes and treatment Regimens (TENOR) II (N = 341) was a multicenter, observational study of patients with severe/difficult-to-treat asthma with a single, cross-sectional visit more than 10 years after TENOR I. Persistent VPC asthma was defined as VPC asthma at TENOR I and TENOR II enrollment; without VPC asthma was defined as well- or not well-controlled asthma at either or both visits. Multivariable logistic regression assessed long-term predictors of persistent VPC asthma using TENOR I baseline variables., Results: Of 327 patients, nearly half (48.0%, n = 157) had persistent VPC asthma. Comorbidities and asthma triggers were more frequent in patients with persistent VPC asthma than in patients without VPC asthma. Total geometric mean IgE was higher in patients with persistent VPC asthma (89.3 IU/mL vs 55.7 IU/mL); there was no difference in eosinophil levels. Lung function was lower in patients with persistent VPC asthma (mean % predicted pre- and postbronchodilator FEV 1 , 63.0% vs 82.8% and 69.6% vs 87.2%, respectively). Exacerbations in the previous year were more likely in patients with persistent VPC asthma (29.7% vs 9.0%, respectively). Predictors of persistent VPC asthma were black versus white race/ethnicity, allergic trigger count (4 vs 0), systemic corticosteroid use, and postbronchodilator FEV 1 (per 10% decrease)., Conclusions: The burden of persistent VPC asthma is high in severe/difficult-to-treat disease; management of modifiable risk factors, maximization of lung function, and trigger avoidance may improve outcomes., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Currently, there is no Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for food allergy. Several new potential treatments are under investigation, including food allergen immunotherapy via various routes of administration, such as oral immunotherapy, epicutaneous immunotherapy, subcutaneous immunotherapy, and sublingual immunotherapy. The double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) has traditionally been used for diagnostic purposes, but extrapolation of the specific terminology used in food allergy diagnosis to interpretation of efficacy in clinical trials is incongruent and difficult to apply. There is a need for standardization of the terminology used in food allergy clinical trials, because inconsistencies can lead to potential misinterpretation of end points. The reactive dose, previously referred to as the eliciting dose, is defined as the dose given that induces the onset of unequivocal allergic symptoms, or the dose that stops the challenge based on physician discretion. Conversely, the single highest tolerated dose is defined as the highest dose given during a food challenge that elicits either no symptoms or symptoms that do not meet stopping criteria per the study protocol. The evolving field of food allergy provides a novel opportunity to define those end points that are most meaningful for patients, which is fundamental for successful implementation, education, and safety., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are limited data that examine differences in asthma etiology between black and white children with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma., Objective: To describe demographic, clinical, and asthma-related outcomes in black and white children and examine whether differences in outcomes are explained by confounding factors in sequential multivariable models., Methods: Black (n = 86) and white (n = 262) children aged 6-11 years from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens 3-year observational study were analyzed. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were described for both cohorts, and outcomes at month 12 were analyzed using statistical models, sequentially adjusting for potential confounders., Results: Black children were more likely to be male (79.1% vs 66.4%; P < .05), obese (12.8% vs 1.5%; P < .001), and from a lower income stratum (USD43,400 vs 55,770; P < .001) than white children. Black children had higher geometric mean IgE levels (434.8 vs 136.8 IU/mL; P < .001), were more likely to have very poorly controlled asthma (72.1% vs 53.4%), use long-term systemic corticosteroids (30.2% vs 9.2%; P < .001), have poorer quality of life (5.5 vs 6.1; P < .001), and have an emergency department visit (27.4% vs 7.7%, P < .001) in the 3 months before month 12. Differences in asthma control and the severity of exacerbations persisted even after accounting for all confounding factors., Conclusions: Among children with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma, asthma burden is greater in black than white children particularly related to several clinical and patient-reported outcome measures that are not explained by differences in background or clinical characteristics., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Data examining associations between asthma exacerbations, triggers, and asthma-related quality of life (QOL) in children with severe/difficult-to-treat asthma are unavailable., Objective: To evaluate real-world data on relationships between asthma exacerbations, triggers, and QOL in children using data from TENOR (The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma Outcomes and Treatment Regimens), a 3-year observational study of patients with severe/difficult-to-treat asthma, including those aged 6 to 12 years., Methods: QOL was examined using the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) and defined exacerbations hierarchically (descending order of severity): hospitalization, emergency department visit, steroid burst, no exacerbation, using the highest value from months 6 and 12. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences in PAQLQ domain scores at month 12 across exacerbation severity, total number of asthma exacerbations, and number of baseline asthma triggers. Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was used to test the association between the number of triggers and exacerbation hierarchy., Results: Greater severity of asthma exacerbations was associated with significantly (P < .001) lower mean PAQLQ domain scores, indicating poorer QOL. A higher number of asthma exacerbations was associated with significantly (P < .001) lower mean PAQLQ domain scores. PAQLQ scores were significantly lower with higher numbers of baseline triggers. Higher baseline number of asthma triggers was associated with greater severity (P = .05) and number of asthma exacerbations (P < .001)., Conclusions: A higher number of asthma triggers at baseline was associated with greater asthma severity and number of asthma exacerbations and lower QOL in children with severe/difficult-to-treat asthma., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Few data are available that evaluate the relationship among asthma exacerbations, asthma triggers, and asthma-related quality of life (QoL)., Objective: To evaluate the impact of asthma exacerbations and asthma triggers on QoL., Methods: Patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma, ages ≥ 13 years (n = 2679) from the TENOR (The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens) 3-year observational study were included. Exacerbations were defined hierarchically in descending order of severity (hospitalization, emergency department [ED] visit, steroid burst, no exacerbation) by using data from months 6 and 12. The total number (frequency) of exacerbations was assessed. Asthma-related QoL was measured at month 12 by using the Mini-Asthma QoL Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ); self-reported asthma triggers were collected at baseline and annually. We used 1-way ANOVA to test for differences in Mini-AQLQ domain scores across asthma exacerbation severity, the total number of asthma exacerbations, and the number of asthma triggers., Results: A significant decrease (P < .001) in Mini-AQLQ domain scores was seen with increasing severity of asthma exacerbation (no exacerbation, steroid burst, ED visit, and hospitalization); symptom (5.5, 4.8, 4.3, and 4.2), activity (5.8, 5.2, 4.6, and 4.4), emotional (5.6, 5.0, 4.4, and 4.2), exposure (5.0, 4.5, 4.0, and 3.9); and overall (5.5, 4.9, 4.3, and 4.1). Increasing exacerbation frequency and the number of baseline asthma triggers also were associated with significant decreases in Mini-AQLQ domain scores. An increasing number of asthma triggers were associated with an increase in severity and frequency of exacerbations., Conclusion: Avoidance of asthma triggers may reduce exacerbation rates and improve asthma-related QoL in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. Interventional studies are warranted to further explore these outcomes., (Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma on guideline-recommended Steps 4/5/6 therapy have not previously been described., Objective: To characterize patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma on Steps 4/5/6 therapy and assess predictors of future asthma exacerbations., Methods: Patients ages ≥12 years with baseline and month 12 medication data were assigned to Steps 4/5/6 care levels from the 2007 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines. Demographic, atopic, and clinical characteristics at baseline and month 12 were assessed by using descriptive statistics. Asthma-related quality of life was assessed by using the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, and work and activity impairment was assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Asthma. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI for asthma exacerbation risk at month 12 were generated by using multivariable logistic regression., Results: A total of 1186 patients were included. More than two-thirds of the patients (67.4%) were on ≥3 long-term controllers, and 55.1% were considered difficult to treat due to frequent exacerbations. Patients reported low asthma-related quality of life scores and considerable impairment in overall work and daily activity (21.4% and 32.1%, respectively). After adjustment for covariates, exacerbation history (hospitalization, OR 6.27 [95% CI, 3.61-10.88]; emergency department visit, OR 3.84 [95% CI, 2.50-5.91]; corticosteroid burst, OR 2.89 [95% CI, 2.18-3.82]) and very poorly controlled asthma (OR 1.95 [95% CI, 1.41-2.71] vs not well controlled) were independently associated with risk of a future exacerbation (all P < .001)., Conclusion: Despite multiple long-term controller medications, patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma on Steps 4/5/6 therapy present with significant clinical burden and risk of future asthma exacerbations., (Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)